Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of mouse mammary gland imaging techniques and applications: Reflectance confocal microscopy, GFP Imaging, and ultrasound

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
5 Sep 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Sep 2007 Author responded Author comments - Maddalena Tilli
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Sep 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Oct 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Lacefield
22 Oct 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rebecca Richards-Kortum
23 Oct 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Hoffman
15 Nov 2007 Author responded Author comments - Maddalena Tilli
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Nov 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Lacefield
18 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Hoffman
15 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - Maddalena Tilli
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
23 Jan 2008 Editorially accepted
23 Jan 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2407-8-21

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement