This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Comparison of mouse mammary gland imaging techniques and applications: Reflectance confocal microscopy, GFP Imaging, and ultrasound
© Tilli et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 05 September 2007
Accepted: 23 January 2008
Published: 23 January 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|5 Sep 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|27 Sep 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Maddalena Tilli|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|27 Sep 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Oct 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Lacefield|
|22 Oct 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rebecca Richards-Kortum|
|23 Oct 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert Hoffman|
|15 Nov 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Maddalena Tilli|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|15 Nov 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Dec 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Lacefield|
|18 Dec 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert Hoffman|
|15 Jan 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Maddalena Tilli|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|15 Jan 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|23 Jan 2008||Editorially accepted|
|23 Jan 2008||Article published||10.1186/1471-2407-8-21|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.