Skip to main content

Table 2 Diagnostic performance of 18 F-FDG PET/CT and ultrasonography in axillary staging

From: Utility of 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose emission tomography/computed tomography fusion imaging (18F-FDG PET/CT) in combination with ultrasonography for axillary staging in primary breast cancer

18F-FDG uptake

TP

TN

FP

FN

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

PPV (%)

NPV (%)

Accuracy (%)

Visual assessment

34

118

6

25

57.6

95.2

85

82.5

83.1

SUV cutoff point

         

0.8

30

118

6

29

50.8

95.2

83.3

80.3

80.9

1.3

24

122

2

35

40.7

98.4

92.3

77.7

79.8

1.5

21

123

1

38

35.6

99.2

95.5

76.4

78.7

1.8

21

124

0

38

35.6

100

100

76.5

79.2

2

20

124

0

39

33.9

100

100

76.1

78.7

3

16

124

0

43

27.1

100

100

74.3

76.5

AUS

32

123

1

27

54.2

99.2

97

82

84.7

Visual assessment of 18F-FDG uptake Combined with AUS

38

117

7

21

64.4

94.4

84.4

84.8

84.7

  1. AUS, Axillary ultrasonography; TP, True positive; TN, True negative; FP, False positive; FN, False negative; PPV, Positive predictive value; NPV, Negative Predictive value;