This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Paradoxes in carcinogenesis: New opportunities for research directions
© Baker and Kramer; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 01 May 2007
Accepted: 06 August 2007
Published: 06 August 2007
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|1 May 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 May 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Daniel Satge|
|30 May 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Darryl Shibata|
|1 Jun 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ana Soto|
|3 Jul 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Stuart Baker|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 Jul 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Jul 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Darryl Shibata|
|6 Aug 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Stuart Baker|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 Aug 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Aug 2007||Editorially accepted|
|6 Aug 2007||Article published||10.1186/1471-2407-7-151|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.