Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Study protocol
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A prospective study to assess the value of MMP-9 in improving the appropriateness of urgent referrals for colorectal cancer

  • 1,
  • 1Email author,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 3,
  • 1,
  • 2 and
  • 4
BMC Cancer20066:251

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-6-251

  • Received: 15 August 2006
  • Accepted: 23 October 2006
  • Published:

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Aug 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Sep 2006 Author responded Author comments - Sue Wilson
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Sep 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Oct 2006 Author responded Author comments - Sue Wilson
Resubmission - Version 4
21 Oct 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
23 Oct 2006 Editorially accepted
23 Oct 2006 Article published 10.1186/1471-2407-6-251

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Primary Care and General Practice, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
(2)
Cancer Research UK Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
(3)
Health Sciences Research Institute, University of Warwick, Gibbett Hill Campus, Coventry, UK
(4)
University Hospital Birmingham Foundation NHS Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK

Advertisement