This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
A prospective study to assess the value of MMP-9 in improving the appropriateness of urgent referrals for colorectal cancer
© Ryan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 15 August 2006
Accepted: 23 October 2006
Published: 23 October 2006
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 Aug 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|15 Sep 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Sue Wilson|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|15 Sep 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 Oct 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Sue Wilson|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|21 Oct 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|23 Oct 2006||Editorially accepted|
|23 Oct 2006||Article published||10.1186/1471-2407-6-251|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.