This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Follow-up of patients with curatively resected colorectal cancer: a practice guideline
© Figueredo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2003
Received: 27 February 2003
Accepted: 06 October 2003
Published: 06 October 2003
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|27 Feb 2003||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Mar 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rick Nelson|
|27 Mar 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Renehan|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Jun 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Bryan Rumble|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|9 Jun 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|7 Jul 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Renehan|
|6 Aug 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Bryan Rumble|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|6 Aug 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|28 Aug 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Renehan|
|30 Sep 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Bryan Rumble|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|30 Sep 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|6 Oct 2003||Editorially accepted|
|6 Oct 2003||Article published||10.1186/1471-2407-3-26|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.