Skip to main content

Table 7 Bone mineral density and breast cancer risk

From: Bone mineral density and the subsequent risk of cancer in the NHANES I follow-up cohort

Cohort; Size

BMD Measure

Cases

Significant Association Breast

Uterus Also Assessed?

Significant Association Uterus

SOF 9704

DEXA; Radius, Hip, Calcaneus

97

Yes; Positive

No

 

Framingham 1373

RG Metacarpal

91

Yes* Positive

No

 

FIT 8203

DEXA Femur

102

Yes; Positive

No

 

NHANES-1 6046

RA Metacarpal

100

Yes: post meno pausal only

Yes; 29 cases

Yes; Positive

Sweden 18,000 Hip Fractures

Hip Fracture prior to cancer diagnosis

253

Yes; Inverse@

Yes; 55 cases

No

Sweden 9673 Breast Cancers

Hip Fracture after breast cancer diagnosis

387 Hip Fractures

No

Yes; 2111 cases

Yes; Inverse@

Sweden 677 Forearm Fractures

Forearm fracture

11 cases Breast Cancer

Yes; Inverse@

Yes; 5 cases

Yes; Inverse@

Rochester, MN Case/Control 235 Breast Cancers

Osteoporotic Fracture before & after cancer diagnosis

 

No

No

 

US Multistate Tumor Registry; Case/Control 5559 Breast Cancers & 739 Uterine Cancers

Past Fracture before cancer diagnosis

352 Fractures < or = 5 years prior to Breast Cancer Diagnosis

Yes; Inverse@

Yes; 35 Fractures

Yes; Inverse@

  1. SOF; Study of Osteoporotic Fractures FIT; Fracture Intervention Trial DEXA; Dual Energy X-ray Absorbimetry RA; Radioabsorbimitry RG; Radiogramimetry *; The strongest association was in those women with positive family histories for breast cancer. @; A significant inverse association in the fracture trials is equivalent to a positive association in BMD trials.