Are we missing the Institute of Medicine’s mark? A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures assessing quality of patient-centred cancer care
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Aug 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|12 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jennifer Kryworuchko|
|4 Dec 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jo Armes|
|8 Jan 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Flora Tzelepis|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Jan 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Jan 2014||Editorially accepted|
|25 Jan 2014||Article published||10.1186/1471-2407-14-41|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.