Table 4 Concordance of subtype calls and risk categories between the three sites
Comparison type | Pairwise Concordance [95% CI] | Average concordance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Site 1 vs. Site 2 | Site 1 vs. Site 3 | Site 2 vs. Site 3 | ||
(n = 40) | (n = 41) | (n = 40) | ||
Subtype | 96.3% | 98.8% | 95% | 97% |
[86.4%–99.5%] | [91.0%–100%] | [83.1%–99.3%] | ||
Risk Category | 87.5% | 92.7% | 90% | 90% |
(Node Negative) | [73.2%–95.8%] | [80.1%–98.4%] | [76.4%–97.2%] | |
Risk Category | 90.0% | 95.1% | 95.0% | 93% |
(Node Positive) | [76.9%–96.0%] | [83.9%–98.7%] | [83.5%–98.6%] | |