Skip to main content

Table 3 Pooled ORs and 95% CIs for ERCC2 rs13181 polymorphism of stratified meta-analysis

From: Association between polymorphisms in ERCC2 gene and oral cancer risk: evidence from a meta-analysis

Subgroup

Genotype

No of studies

Test of association

Test of heterogeneity

   

OR(95% CI)

Z

P-value

Model

χ 2

P-value

I2(%)

Asian

AC vs. AA

4

1.16[0.88,1.36]

0.83

0.405

F

5.81

0.121

48.3

 

CC vs. AA

4

1.33[0.59,3.01]

0.69

0.489

R

1.41

0.098

52.3

AC + CC vs. AA

4

1.13[0.75,1.71]

0.59

0.555

R

8.79

0.032

65.9

CC vs. AC + AA

4

1.08[0.74,1.56]

0.39

0.694

F

4.36

0.225

61.2

 

C vs. A

4

1.12[0.76,1.65]

0.56

0.576

R

10.90

0.012

72.5

Oral leukoplakia

AC vs. AA

4

1.28[1.01,1.62]

2.01

0.045

F

2.13

0.546

0.0

 

CC vs. AA

4

1.94[0.99,3.79]

1.95

0.052

R

7.52

0.057

60.1

AC + CC vs. AA

4

1.35[1.08,1.69]

2.60

0.009

F

3.64

0.303

17.6

CC vs. AC + AA

4

1.67[0.90,3.13]

1.63

0.102

R

7.20

0.066

58.3

 

C vs. A

4

1.38[1.04,1.82]

2.26

0.024

R

6.88

0.043

56.4

Oral cancer

AC vs. AA

4

1.10[0.73,1.65]

0.45

0.656

R

7.02

0.071

57.3

 

CC vs. AA

4

1.07[0.69,1.69]

0.31

0.758

F

5.26

0.154

43.0

AC + CC vs. AA

4

1.11[0.71,1.75]

0.46

0.643

R

9.29

0.026

67.7

CC vs. AC + AA

4

1.01[0.66,1.55]

0.06

0.951

F

3.13

0.371

4.3

 

C vs. A

4

1.09[0.73,1.64]

0.44

0.661

R

10.22

0.064

55.0

  1. OR, odds ratio; vs, versus; R, random effect model; F, fixed effect model.