Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Trends of risk classification and primary therapy for Japanese patients with prostate cancer in Nara Uro-Oncological Research Group (NUORG)–a comparison between 2004-2006 and 2007-2009

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Apr 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gerald Mickisch
10 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hideyuki Akaza
11 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cesar Camara
17 Oct 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nobumichi Tanaka
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Oct 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Oct 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nobumichi Tanaka
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Oct 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
17 Oct 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nobumichi Tanaka
Resubmission - Version 7
17 Oct 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 7
17 Oct 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nobumichi Tanaka
Resubmission - Version 8
17 Oct 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 8
17 Oct 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nobumichi Tanaka
Resubmission - Version 9
17 Oct 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 9
8 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cesar Camara
Resubmission - Version 10
Submitted Manuscript version 10
Publishing
4 Dec 2013 Editorially accepted
10 Dec 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2407-13-588

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement