Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison among identified subgroups by classification tree analysis

From: Classification tree analysis to enhance targeting for follow-up exam of colorectal cancer screening

 

Group 1

Group 2

Group 3

Group 4

 

Variable

Range or category

% or mean (SD)

% or mean (SD)

% or mean (SD)

% or mean (SD)

p

Follow-up exam

Yes

100

82.4

66.7

66.7

0.008

Socio-demographic characteristics

     
 

Age

50–59

20.8

23.5

33.3

24.4

0.767

  

60–69

79.2

76.5

66.7

75.6

 
 

Gender

Male

29.2

35.3

41.7

51.3

0.222

 

Marital status

Married

83.3

82.4

79.2

84.6

0.940

 

Education

Less than high school

8.3

0.0

8.3

5.1

0.001

  

High school

58.3

58.8

37.5

50.0

 
  

Junior college/technical school

25.0

29.4

37.5

5.1

 
  

College degree or higher

8.3

11.8

16.7

39.7

 
 

Employment status

Employed

0.0

0.0

100.0

38.5

<0.001

 

Self-rated economic status

Poor/Somewhat affluent

16.7

29.4

8.3

19.2

0.309

  

Average

66.7

70.6

83.3

64.1

 
  

Affluent/Somewhat affluent

16.7

0.0

8.3

16.7

 

Family history of CRC

Yes

8.3

17.7

16.7

16.7

0.774

History of bowel disease

Yes

100.0

0.0

58.3

42.3

<0.001

Past FOBT screening

Yes

87.5

94.1

83.3

87.2

0.786

Past follow-up recommendation

Yes

20.8

29.4

29.2

21.8

0.809

Past follow-up exam

Yes

20.8

29.4

29.2

20.5

0.743

Psychographic characteristics

     
 

Intention

Yes

70.8

70.6

75.0

60.3

0.492

 

Perceived benefits

6–30

25.5 (3.3)

25.4 (4.0)

26.3 (3.3)

25.5 (3.8)

0.805

 

Perceived susceptibility

3–15

9.3 (2.7)

9.9 (3.0)

9.8 (3.2)

8.5 (2.4)

0.071

 

Perceived severity

6–30

24.3 (2.3)

24.8 (3.7)

25.2 (3.6)

18.5 (4.1)

<0.001

 

Perceived barriers

13–65

39.8 (10.3)

42.3 (8.2)

39.1 (8.2)

37.4 (8.3)

0.175