Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Perceived benefits and barriers to exercise for recently treated patients with multiple myeloma: a qualitative study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Nov 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Melinda Craike
Resubmission - Version 2
29 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joachim Wiskemann
27 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gill Mein
2 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Melinda Craike
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gill Mein
22 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joachim Wiskemann
3 May 2013 Author responded Author comments - Melinda Craike
Resubmission - Version 4
3 May 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
21 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joachim Wiskemann
23 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gill Mein
3 Jun 2013 Author responded Author comments - Melinda Craike
Resubmission - Version 5
3 Jun 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
24 Jun 2013 Editorially accepted
1 Jul 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2407-13-319

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement