This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
A novel panel of biomarkers in distinction of small well-differentiated HCC from dysplastic nodules and outcome values
- Guang-Zhi Jin†1,
- Hui Dong†1,
- Wen-Long Yu†2,
- Yan Li3,
- Xin-Yuan Lu1,
- Hua Yu1,
- Zhi-Hong Xian1,
- Wei Dong1,
- Yin-Kun Liu3Email author,
- Wen-Ming Cong1Email author and
- Meng-Chao Wu4
© Jin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 3 May 2012
Accepted: 20 March 2013
Published: 27 March 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|3 May 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|16 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Luca Di Tommaso|
|17 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jorge Filmus|
|4 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tetsuya Nakatsura|
|18 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Guang-Zhi Jin|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|18 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jorge Filmus|
|10 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Luca Di Tommaso|
|7 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Guang-Zhi Jin|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Mar 2013||Editorially accepted|
|27 Mar 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2407-13-161|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.