Skip to main content

Table 1 P atients and tumor characteristics

From: Normal tissue complication probability model parameter estimation for xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients based on scintigraphy and quality of life assessments

Characteristic

Value-n(%)

Age (y)

Mean

53

Range

28-78

Gender (n)

Female

1 (3.2)

Male

30 (96.8)

Tumor site

NPC

11 (35.5)

Oral cavity

14 (45.2)

Oropharynx

4 (12.9)

Larynx

1 (3.2)

Parotid

1 (3.2)

Stage (TNM staging system)

T1

3 (9.7)

T2

12 (38.7)

T3

6 (19.4)

T4

7 (22.6)

Not applicable/Recurrent

3 (9.6)

N0

16 (51.7)

N1

5 (16.1)

N2

7 (22.6)

N3

0 (0.0)

Not applicable/Recurrent

3 (9.6)

Dose, Gy/# fractions

 

14 (45.2) 69.2/38

 

1 (3.2) 54.8/30

 

9 (29.1) 59.4/33

 

4 (12.9) 57.6/32

 

1 (3.2) 68.4/38

 

1 (3.2) 70.8/35

 

1 (3.2) 52.2/29

Parotid gland mean dose

Ipsilateral, mean (range)

51.7 (26.9-74.8) Gy

Contralateral, mean (range)

36.7 (7.6-57.6) Gy

Surgery before RT

Yes

16 (51.6)

No

15 (48.4)

Chemotherapy

Yes

19 (61.3)

No

12 (38.7)

SEF recovery*

Grade 3+ xerostomia

10 (16.1)

No grade 3+ xerostomia

52 (83.9)

QoL measurement*

Grade 3+ xerostomia

6 (19.4)

No grade 3+ xerostomia

25 (80.6)

  1. *SEF recovery and QoL measurement was at 1-year after RT. Grade 3+: ≧grade 3.
  2. Abbreviation: RT radiotherapy, SEF salivary excretion factorm, QoL quality of life.