|
First author, year
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4a
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
score
|
%
|
|---|
|
Banasik, 2011 [56]
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
SR
|
Y C
|
N
|
N
|
N
|
5
|
63%
|
|
Banerjee, 2007 [51]
|
Y
|
Y C
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y C
|
Y C
|
N
|
N
|
7
|
78%
|
|
Blank, 2003 [31]
|
Y
|
?
|
?
|
Y
|
N
|
?
|
N
|
N
|
N
|
2
|
22%
|
|
Bower, 2012 [58]
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
?
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
8
|
89%
|
|
Carson, 2009 [32]
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
N C
|
N
|
N
|
Y
|
6
|
67%
|
|
Chandwani, 2010 [55]
|
Y
|
Y C
|
Y
|
Y
|
SR
|
Y C
|
N
|
N, ES no CI
|
Y
|
6
|
75%
|
|
Cohen, 2004 [44]
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
NC (SR)
|
N C
|
N
|
N, only 95% CI
|
N
|
4
|
50%
|
|
Culos-Reed, 2006 [52]
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y C
|
Y C
|
N
|
N
|
Y
|
7
|
78%
|
|
Danhauer, 2009 [53]
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
NC
|
N C
|
N
|
N
|
Y
|
5
|
56%
|
|
Littman, 2011 [57]
|
Y
|
Y C
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y C
|
Y d
|
N
|
Y
|
N
|
7
|
78%
|
|
Moadel, 2007 [54]
|
Y
|
Y C
|
Y b
|
Y
|
NC
|
N C
|
N
|
Y
|
Y
|
6
|
67%
|
|
Raghavendra, 2007 [49]
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
SR
|
N
|
N
|
N
|
N
|
4
|
50%
|
|
Rao, 2009 [50]
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
SR
|
N
|
N
|
Y
|
Y
|
6
|
67%
|
|
Vadiraja, 2009a [46]
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
?
|
?
|
N
|
N, ES no CI
|
N
|
4
|
50%
|
|
Vadiraja, 2009b [47]
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
SR
|
?
|
N
|
Y
|
Y
|
6
|
75%
|
|
Vadiraja, 2009c [48]
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
SR
|
?
|
N
|
N, ES no CI
|
Y
|
5
|
56%
|
-
NA not applicable, Y yes, N no, ? unclear, a If only exclusion criteria were reported, this was rated as ‘unclear’; b In the analyses, the baseline differences were included as covariates. C after contacting authors; d Yoga instructors were aware that the study aim was to determine the feasibility of conducting a yoga intervention in overweight and obese breast cancer survivors (not efficacy). SR self report, CI Confidence interval, ES effect size.
