Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Health-related quality of life in survivors of stage I-II breast cancer: randomized trial of post-operative conventional radiotherapy and hypofractionated tomotherapy

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Jan 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Grit Welzel
21 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kai Budischewski
28 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Colin Johnson
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
11 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Grit Welzel
12 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kai Budischewski
19 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Harijati Versmessen
Resubmission - Version 5
19 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
20 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Harijati Versmessen
Resubmission - Version 6
20 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 6
11 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Grit Welzel
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
18 Oct 2012 Editorially accepted
25 Oct 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2407-12-495

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement