Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of categorical features between the training and validation sets

From: External validation of the Bayesian Estimated Tools for Survival (BETS) models in patients with surgically treated skeletal metastases

Feature

 

Training set (n = 189)

Validation set (n = 815)

P

No. of patients

%

No. of patients

%

% Missing

Sex†‡

male

85

45.0

369

45.3

0

.91

female

104

55.0

446

54.7

Oncologic diagnosis grouping†‡

1.0

52

27.3

173

21.3

0.4

.001*

2.0

34

18.2

74

9.2

3.0

103

54.5

567

69.1

Visceral metastases†‡

yes

114

60.3

325

39.8

6.1

<.0001*

no

75

39.7

441

54.1

Lymph node metastases†‡

yes

36

18.8

169

20.7

61.8

<.0001*

no

153

81.2

143

17.5

Skeletal metastases†‡

solitary

55

29.0

123

15.1

3.2

<.0001*

multiple

134

71.0

666

81.7

Pathologic fracture status†‡

yes

84

44.2

614

75.3

0.7

<.0001*

no

105

55.8

196

24.0

ECOG performance status†‡

0,1,2

93

49.2

558

68.5

0

<.0001*

3,4

96

50.8

257

31.5

Survival > 3 months

yes

129

68.3

557

68.3

0

.78

no

60

31.7

258

31.7

Survival > 12 months

yes

79

41.8

241

29.6

0

.002*

no

110

58.2

574

70.4

  1. ECOG indicates Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; % Missing, the proportion of unknown or missing data within the validation set.
  2. *Distributions are significantly different between the training and validation sets by the chi-square· method.
  3. Denotes feature of 3-month model.
  4. Denotes feature of 12-month model.