This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Cost-effectiveness of a 21-gene recurrence score assay versus Canadian clinical practice in women with early-stage estrogen- or progesterone-receptor-positive, axillary lymph-node negative breast cancer
© Hannouf et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 6 December 2011
Accepted: 23 September 2012
Published: 2 October 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|6 Dec 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Doug Coyle|
|8 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sonal Gandhi|
|7 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Malek Hannouf|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Doug Coyle|
|31 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sonal Gandhi|
|30 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chris Skedgel|
|21 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Malek Hannouf|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Sep 2012||Editorially accepted|
|2 Oct 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2407-12-447|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.