Open Peer Review Reports for: Three new chondrosarcoma cell lines: one grade III conventional central chondrosarcoma and two dedifferentiated chondrosarcomas of bone
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23 May 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 4 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Li-Ye Yang |
| 12 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Karl-Ludwig Schaefer |
| 15 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michiyuki Hakozaki |
| 3 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Jolieke van Oosterwijk |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 3 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| Publishing | ||
| 20 Aug 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 28 Aug 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-12-375 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
