Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Quality indicators for colorectal cancer surgery and care according to patient-, tumor-, and hospital-related factors

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Dec 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Dec 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael McGee
4 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karen Sherman
5 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ryan Merkow
8 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Simone Mathoulin-Pelissier
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
28 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael McGee
28 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karen Sherman
30 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ryan Merkow
29 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Simone Mathoulin-Pelissier
Resubmission - Version 5
29 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
19 Jul 2012 Editorially accepted
19 Jul 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2407-12-297

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement