Quality indicators for colorectal cancer surgery and care according to patient-, tumor-, and hospital-related factors
© Mathoulin-Pelissier et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 13 December 2011
Accepted: 19 July 2012
Published: 19 July 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|13 Dec 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|27 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael McGee|
|4 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karen Sherman|
|5 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ryan Merkow|
|8 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Simone Mathoulin-Pelissier|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|28 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael McGee|
|28 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karen Sherman|
|30 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ryan Merkow|
|29 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Simone Mathoulin-Pelissier|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|29 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|19 Jul 2012||Editorially accepted|
|19 Jul 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2407-12-297|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.