Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Beyond KRAS mutation status: influence of KRAS copy number status and microRNAs on clinical outcome to cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer patients

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Sep 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Oct 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gillian Smith
31 Oct 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Wilson
31 Oct 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrea Sartore Bianchi
7 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Leonie Mekenkamp
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gillian Smith
26 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Wilson
27 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrea Sartore Bianchi
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
26 Jun 2012 Editorially accepted
17 Jul 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2407-12-292

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement