Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Total and individual antioxidant intake and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer

  • Dina Gifkins1, 2,
  • Sara H Olson3,
  • Lisa Paddock2, 4,
  • Melony King1, 2,
  • Kitaw Demissie1, 2,
  • Shou-En Lu1, 2,
  • Ah-Ng Tony Kong5,
  • Lorna Rodriguez-Rodriguez1 and
  • Elisa V Bandera1, 2Email author
BMC Cancer201212:211

Received: 14 February 2012

Accepted: 1 June 2012

Published: 1 June 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
14 Feb 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ettore Bidoli
16 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brenda Laky
7 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Elisa Bandera
Resubmission - Version 2
7 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Jun 2012 Editorially accepted
1 Jun 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2407-12-211

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
School of Public Health, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services
Rutgers University, Department of Pharmaceutics, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy