From: A systematic review of the impact of stigma and nihilism on lung cancer outcomes
Study | Design (Level of evidence) | Participants | Aim of interview | Study factor | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chapple 2004a & b, UK | Home interview (Level III) | Lung cancer patients | Lung cancer patients’ experience of lung cancer including their perceptions, how others reacted to the diagnosis and financial issues | Stigma | Some participants perceived lung cancer as being viewed in the broader society as a self-inflicted disease resulting from smoking and leading to a horrible death. One participant noted that the stigma applied to all lung cancer patients; smokers and non-smokers. As a result of the smoking related stigma it was thought that lung cancer research and screening was neglected. |
N = 45 | The press was criticised for blaming lung cancer patients in particular for their disease. | ||||
NSCLC, SCLC and mesothelioma; All stages. | Medical and treatment outcomes | ||||
Recruited through general practices, nurses, oncologists, chest physicians and support groups and through study website. | Smoking related stigma was thought to be a reason for lung cancer symptoms not being taken as seriously as those for other cancers leading to delays in diagnosis. | ||||
Psychosocial outcomes | |||||
Stigma was perceived to result in social isolation, and deterred support group participation (1 participant) and seeking financial relief (1 participant). | |||||
Conlon 2010, USA | Interview, (Level III) | Oncology social workers | Social workers’ perceptions of the lung cancer experience | Stigma | Smoking stigma |
N = 18 | Lung cancer was always associated with smoking and patients often reported stigma, guilt, blame and shame. Smoking stigma was seen as a reason why support, funding and advocacy for lung cancer were lower. | ||||
Recruited from 17 cancer hospitals in 13 states with experience with approximately 25,000 lung cancer patients. | Division between lung cancer patient smokers and non-smokers. | ||||
Poor prognosis stigma | |||||
Patient reported lung cancer stigmatised as being mostly fatal. | |||||
Psychosocial outcomes | |||||
Patients reported smoking stigma sometimes resulted in reluctance to tell others that they have lung cancer. | |||||
Psychosocial outcomes | |||||
Poor prognosis stigma potentially led to difficulties attending support groups. | |||||
Corner 2005 & 2006, UK | Semi-structured interviews with a time-line prompt mostly in home and often with a relative present (Level III) | Patients recently (<3 months) diagnosed with lung cancer | To explore delays in lung cancer diagnosis | Stigma | Medical and treatment outcomes |
All experienced symptoms for 4 months or more prior to visiting doctor | Factors potentially leading to delay in seeking medical treatment included expectation and fear that smokers would be denied treatment (reported by 1 participant who was a smoker) | ||||
N = 22; 12 men, 10 women | |||||
Median age = 68 years | |||||
15/22 inoperable disease | |||||
1/22 never smoker | |||||
Recruited from 2 hospital outpatient clinics. | |||||
Leydon 2003, UK | Telephone and face-to-face semi-structured interviews (Level IV) | Cancer patients diagnosed < 2 years ago with a focus on those of lower SES | Perceptions of cancer diagnostic process | Lung cancer specific fear | Medical and treatment outcomes |
N = 17; 5 men, 12 women | Lung cancer viewed as fatal (by 1 participant). This theme was reported as arising in the context of potential barriers to seeing a doctor | ||||
Included 2 lung cancer patients; a 67 year old male and a 59 year old female. | |||||
Recruited through cancer support community organisations. | |||||
Sharf 2005 USA, Texas | Interview with guiding questions (Level III) | Patients with NSCLC or a suspicious pulmonary mass who refused or did not follow-up for physician-recommended treatment (N = 7) or invasive investigation (N = 2). | Reasons for declining physician-recommended treatment or follow–up options | Nihilism | Medical and treatment outcomes |
100% male, 89% white | Reasons reported included the view that lung cancer treatments were futile (5 participants). | ||||
Identified at multidisciplinary pulmonary conferences and review of pathology reports at a university affiliated Veterans Affairs hospital. | |||||
9/31 eligible patients interviewed | |||||
2 with history of depression | |||||
Tod 2008, UK | Semi-structured home interviews with partner or a friend participating at the request of 12 participants (Level III) | Lung cancer patients | Factors influencing delay in reporting symptoms (patient delay) | Stigma | Medical and treatment outcomes |
N = 20; 12 men, 8 women. | Nihilism | Factors identified that might result in patient delay in consulting a doctor about their symptoms included the stigma that it was caused by smoking and fear. | |||
18 diagnosed in past 6 months | |||||
3 non smokers; 9 previous smokers. | |||||
Recruited from deprived health district by a respiratory physician and lung cancer nurse specialists. | |||||
Tod 2010 UK | 3 focus groups, (Level III) | Focus group 1; 6 community pharmacists (50% female) | Factors influencing delay in reporting symptoms (patient delay) | Stigma | Medical and treatment outcomes |
Focus group 2: 6 clinical nurse specialists (100% female) | Factors identified that might result in lung cancer patient delay in consulting a doctor about their symptoms included fear of negative evaluation and expectation of denial of treatment especially for smokers. | ||||
Focus group 3: 2 practice nurses (100% female) | |||||
Recruited an area with high levels of lung cancer and smoking and a history of heavy industry |