Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Quality-of-life evaluation for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a comparison between vinorelbine plus gemcitabine followed by docetaxel versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin regimens in a randomized trial: Japan Multinational Trial Organization LC00-03 (BRI LC03-01)

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 Jul 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Prunella Blinman
28 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Masaaki Kawahara
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Prunella Blinman
23 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Grutsch
11 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Masaaki Kawahara
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
28 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Masaaki Kawahara
Resubmission - Version 4
28 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Masaaki Kawahara
Resubmission - Version 5
30 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
17 Aug 2011 Editorially accepted
17 Aug 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2407-11-356

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement