Skip to main content

Table 3 Predicted effect of screening strategies on cancer rates and cost-effectiveness

From: Evaluation of primary HPV-DNA testing in relation to visual inspection methods for cervical cancer screening in rural China: an epidemiologic and cost-effectiveness modelling study

Screening strategy and test

Average lifetime reduction cancer incidence

Average lifetime reduction cancer mortality

Average reduction cumulative incidence 0-64 years

Cost-effectiveness ratio compared to no intervention (US$ / LYS) †

Once-lifetime (35 years)

    

VIA only

7%

8%

8%

557

VIA/VILI

8%

10%

10%

629

careHPV@1.0 pg/ml

10%

12%

12%

959

careHPV@0.5 pg/ml

10%

12%

13%

909

Twice-lifetime (35+45 years)

    

VIA only

13%

16%

17%

611

VIA/VILI

16%

18%

20%

689

careHPV@1.0 pg/ml

19%

22%

24%

1,032

careHPV@0.5 pg/ml

21%

24%

25%

985

10 yearly (30-59 years)

    

VIA only

17%

19%

20%

665

VIA/VILI

19%

22%

23%

744

careHPV@1.0 pg/ml

24%

28%

29%

1,074

careHPV@0.5 pg/ml

24%

28%

29%

1,071

5 yearly (30-59 years)

    

VIA only

27%

32%

33%

796

VIA/VILI

31%

36%

37%

916

careHPV@1.0 pg/ml

37%

43%

44%

1,395

careHPV@0.5 pg/ml

37%

43%

44%

1,391

IARC recommended

    

VIA only

37%

43%

41%

1,213

VIA/VILI

41%

47%

45%

1,427

careHPV@1.0 pg/ml

47%

54%

52%

2,269

careHPV@0.5 pg/ml

48%

54%

52%

2,263

  1. † Comparison GDP per capita Shanxi Province 2008: US$ 2,975 [25].