Skip to main content

Table 2 The associations between Ku70 polymorphisms and gastric cancer risk

From: Genetic polymorphisms of DNA double strand break gene Ku70 and gastric cancer in Taiwan

 

Case (%)

Control (%)

Adjusted ORa (95% CI)

P -value

promoter T-991C (rs5751129)

    

TT

106 (77.9)

502 (89.6)

1.00 (ref)

 

TC

26 (19.1)

52 (9.3)

2.41 (1.53-3.88)

0.0020

CC

4 (3.0)

6 (1.1)

3.21 (0.96-9.41)

0.0837

   P for trend

  

2.87 (1.37-5.02)

<0.0001

   (TC+CC) vs TT

  

2.48 (1.74-3.92)

0.0005

   CC vs (TT+TC)

  

2.67 (0.71-9.69)

0.1114

Promoter G-57C (rs2267437)

    

CC

95 (69.9)

383 (68.4)

1.00 (ref)

 

CG

37 (27.2)

167 (29.8)

0.91 (0.48-1.38)

0.6722

GG

4 (2.9)

10 (1.8)

1.56 (0.55-4.97)

0.4954

   P for trend

  

0.93 (0.53-3.34)

0.6164

   (CG+GG) vs CC

  

0.98 (0.63-1.52)

0.8367

   GG vs (CC+CG)

  

1.52 (0.58-5.01)

0.4917

promoter A-31G (rs132770)

    

GG

109 (80.1)

459 (82.0)

1.00 (ref)

 

GA

19 (14.0)

73 (13.0)

1.16 (0.71-1.93)

0.7763

AA

8 (5.9)

28 (5.0)

1.25 (0.51-2.68)

0.6642

   P for trend

  

1.18 (0.68-2.34)

0.9065

   (GA+AA) vs GG

  

1.14 (0.73-1.76)

0.6227

   AA vs (GG+GA)

  

1.03 (0.37-3.01)

0.6673

intron 3 (rs132774)

    

GG

113 (83.1)

459 (82.0)

1.00 (ref)

 

GC

23 (16.9)

101 (18.0)

0.91 (0.60-1.73)

0.8040

CC

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

  
  1. a Adjusted by age and gender; the line with ORs that significantly differ from 1.00 are bolded