Impact of maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) evaluated by 18-Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) on survival for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a preliminary report

Table 1 Characteristics of the 26 patients

Patient ID	Sex	Age	Pathology		Nephrectomy	MSKCC classification	NCCN classification	Prior therapy	SUVmax	SUVmax site
			type	grading
2	M	63	sarc/clear	3	Yes	Poor	Poor	IFN	15.2	local recurrence
3	M	73	clear	2	Yes	Favorable	Not Poor	IFN IL	8.2	lung
4	M	61	papillary	3	No	Intermediate	Poor	non	8.8	primary
5	F	72	clear	1	No	Intermediate	Not Poor	non	5.2	primary
6	F	55	clear	2	No	Intermediate	Not Poor	IFN IL	6.8	primary
7	M	57	papillary	2	Yes	Intermediate	Poor	N	4.0	bone
8	M	59	clear	2	Yes	Intermediate	Poor	non	7.4	bone
9	M	68	clear	3	Yes	Intermediate	Not Poor	IFN	5.7	bone
10	F	57	clear	2	Yes	Poor	Poor	IFN N	9.1	lymph node
11	M	75	clear	2	Yes	Intermediate	Not Poor	IFN	5.3	muscle
12	M	58	clear	3	Yes	Favorable	Not Poor	IFN	8.5	local recurrence
13	F	61	clear	2	Yes	Intermediate	Poor	IFN C	4.3	pancreas
14	M	59	clear	2	Yes	Intermediate	Not Poor	non	1.4	lung
15	M	61	clear	2	Yes	Intermediate	Poor	IFN	7.7	lymph node
16	M	73	clear	2	No	Poor	Poor	non	16.6	primary
17	F	32	papillary	3	Yes	Favorable	Not Poor	non	16.1	uterus
18	M	56	papillary	2	Yes	Intermediate	Not Poor	C	7.0	lung
19	M	68	clear	2	Yes	Intermediate	Poor	non	9.0	bone
20	M	61	clear	2	Yes	Intermediate	Not Poor	non	5.6	IVC thrombus
21	F	56	sarc/clear	3	Yes	Intermediate	Poor	IFN	10.0	contralateral kidney
22	M	62	clear	3	No	Poor	Poor	non	12.0	primary
23	M	61	clear	3	No	Poor	Poor	non	14.3	primary
24	M	82	clear	1	Yes	Intermediate	Poor	non	5.1	bone
25	M	69	papillary	3	Yes	Favorable	Not Poor	non	13.4	lymph node
26	M	66	clear	1	Yes	Intermediate	Not Poor	IFN	8.2	lung

ISSN: 1471-2407