Skip to main content

Table 1 Relationships between p-Smad2 and clinicopathological features in 135 gastric cancer cases.

From: Phosphorylated Smad2 in Advanced Stage Gastric Carcinoma

Parameter

P-Smad2

p-Value

  

High (n = 63)

Low (n = 72)

 

Gender

    
 

Male

39 (41.9%)

54 (58.1%)

N.S.

 

Female

24 (57.1%)

18 (42.9%)

 

Morphologic feature+

    
 

Type 1

6 (37.5%)

10 (62.5%)

0.025

 

Type 2

14 (35.0%)

26 (65.0%)

 
 

Type 3

17 (45.9%)

20 (54.1%)

 
 

Type 4

26 (61.9%)

16 (38.1%)

 

T stage

    
 

2

7 (25.9%)

20 (74.1%)

0.031

 

3

52 (50.0%)

52 (50.0%)

 
 

4

4 (100.0%)

0 (0.00%)

 

Differentiation

    
 

Intestinal-type

15 (31.2%)

33 (68.8%)

0.011

 

Diffuse-type

48 (55.2%)

39 (44.8%)

 

Lymph node metastasis+

(Japanese classification)

N0 and N1

34 (40.5%)

50 (59.5%)

0.047

 

N2 and N3

29 (56.9%)

22 (43.1%)

 

Lymph node metastasis++

(UICC classification)

N0 and N1

31 (36.9%)

53 (63.1%)

0.004

 

N2 and N3

32 (62.7%)

19 (37.3%)

 

Hepatic metastasis

    
 

Negative

62 (47.0%)

70 (53.0%)

N.S.

 

Positive

1 (33.3%)

2 (66.7%)

 

Peritoneal metastasis

    
 

Negative

48 (42.1%)

66 (57.9%)

0.017

 

Positive

15 (71.4%)

6 (28.6%)

 

Peritoneal cytology+++

    
 

Negative

36 (40.4%)

53 (59.6%)

0.026

 

Positive

22 (64.7%)

12 (35.3%)

 

Lymphatic invasion

    
 

Ly0 and ly1

26 (40.6%)

38 (59.4%)

N.S.

 

Ly2 and ly3

37 (52.1%)

34 (47.9%)

 

Venous invasion

    
 

Negative

50 (45.5%)

60 (54.5%)

N.S.

 

Positive

13 (52.0%)

12 (48.0%)

 

Clinical stage

    
 

I

2 (22.2%)

7 (77.8%)

0.022

 

II

15 (39.5%)

23 (60.5%)

 
 

III

18 (40.0%)

27 (60.0%)

 
 

IV

28 (68.7%)

15 (31.3%)

 
  1. +, Classification according to the General Rules for Gastric Cancer Study of the Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer [13]. Type 1 is defined as a polypoid tumor; type 2 as polypoid tumor with ulceration and with sharply demarcated margins; type 3 as ulcerated carcinoma with cancer infiltration into the surrounding wall; type 4 as diffusely infiltrating flat carcinoma in which ulceration is usually not a marked feature.
  2. ++, Nodal stage was assessed by the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) tumor node metastasis (TNM) classification [16] and by classification according to the general rules for gastric cancer study of the Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer. In the TNM classification, nodal stage was classified according to the number of involved regional LNs as follows: pN0, no LN spread; pN1, 1 to 6 diseased LNs; pN2, 7 to 15; and pN3, more than 15. In the Japanese classification, nodal stage was classified according to the extent of positive LN into n0, n1, n2, and n3 and is considered to reflect the anatomic pathway of lymphatic spread. n1 is defined as proximate regional LN disease, and n2 or n3 are defined as distant.
  3. +++, In 12 cases, peritoneal cytology was not performed (Total 123 cases).