Open Peer Review Reports for: Hopefulness predicts resilience after hereditary colorectal cancer genetic testing: a prospective outcome trajectories study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
13 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
5 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lisa Aspinwall |
30 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christine Way |
26 Nov 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Judy Ho |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
26 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
3 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christine Way |
11 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lisa Aspinwall |
10 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Judy Ho |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
10 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
5 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Judy Ho |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
5 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
9 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Judy Ho |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
9 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
11 Jun 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
11 Jun 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-10-279 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.