Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of two methods based on cross-sectional data for correcting corpus uterine cancer incidence and probabilities

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Apr 2001 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Aug 2001 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Murphy
8 Aug 2001 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Riitta Luoto
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Aug 2001 Author responded Author comments - Ray Merrill
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Aug 2001 Submitted Manuscript version 4
21 Aug 2001 Author responded Author comments - Ray Merrill
Resubmission - Version 5
21 Aug 2001 Submitted Manuscript version 5
21 Aug 2001 Author responded Author comments - Ray Merrill
Resubmission - Version 6
21 Aug 2001 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
6 Sep 2001 Editorially accepted
6 Sep 2001 Article published 10.1186/1471-2407-1-13

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement