Rapid eradication of colon carcinoma by Clostridium perfringens Enterotoxin suicidal gene therapy
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 23 September 2015
Accepted: 8 February 2017
Published: 13 February 2017
Bacterial toxins have evolved to an effective therapeutic option for cancer therapy. The Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin (CPE) is a pore-forming toxin with selective cytotoxicity. The transmembrane tight junction proteins claudin-3 and -4 are known high affinity CPE receptors. Their expression is highly upregulated in human cancers, including breast, ovarian and colon carcinoma. CPE binding to claudins triggers membrane pore complex formation, which leads to rapid cell death. Previous studies demonstrated the anti-tumoral effect of treatment with recombinant CPE-protein. Our approach aimed at evaluation of a selective and targeted cancer gene therapy of claudin-3- and/or claudin-4- expressing colon carcinoma in vitro and in vivo by using translation optimized CPE expressing vector.
In this study the recombinant CPE and a translation optimized CPE expressing vector (optCPE) was used for targeted gene therapy of claudin-3 and/or -4 overexpressing colon cancer cell lines. All experiments were performed in the human SW480, SW620, HCT116, CaCo-2 and HT-29 colon cancer and the isogenic Sk-Mel5 and Sk-Mel5 Cldn-3-YFP melanoma cell lines. Claudin expression analysis was done at protein and mRNA level, which was confirmed by immunohistochemistry. The CPE induced cytotoxicity was analyzed by the MTT cytotoxicity assay. In addition patient derived colon carcinoma xenografts (PDX) were characterized and used for the intratumoral in vivo gene transfer of the optCPE expressing vector in PDX bearing nude mice.
Claudin-3 and -4 overexpressing colon carcinoma lines showed high sensitivity towards both recCPE application and optCPE gene transfer. The positive correlation between CPE cytotoxicity and level of claudin expression was demonstrated. Transfection of optCPE led to targeted, rapid cytotoxic effects such as membrane disruption and necrosis in claudin overexpressing cells. The intratumoral optCPE in vivo gene transfer led to tumor growth inhibition in colon carcinoma PDX bearing mice in association with massive necrosis due to the intratumoral optCPE expression.
This novel approach demonstrates that optCPE gene transfer represents a promising and efficient therapeutic option for a targeted suicide gene therapy of claudin-3 and/or claudin-4 overexpressing colon carcinomas, leading to rapid and effective tumor cell killing in vitro and in vivo.
KeywordsClostridium perfringens enterotoxin (CPE) Colon cancer Gene therapy Suicide gene
The incidence of colorectal cancer is increasing and is associated with the fourth highest cancer associated mortality rate worldwide [1, 2]. Despite advances in chemotherapy, radiotherapy and the development of new drugs, the prognosis for patients remains poor. Therefore, new targets and therapeutic substances are desperately needed [3, 4].
One promising strategy may be targeted suicidal cancer gene therapy, including an approach by which foreign toxic molecules are specifically delivered to tumor cells [5, 6]. Attractive candidates include bacterial toxins, which have demonstrated efficient cell-killing capacity in several in vitro and in vivo studies [7–10]. Pore-forming bacterial toxins, such as streptolysin O (Streptococcus pyrogenes) and Clostridium perfringes enterotoxin (CPE), are of particular interest [11–14].
Strain A Clostridium perfringens, an anaerobic gram-positive bacterium, produces the CPE protein, associated mainly with food poisoning [15, 16]. The protein binds claudin-4 and claudin-3 on targeted cells [17, 18]. The claudin family consists of at least 27 proteins that are essential for tight-junction formation in epithelial and endothelial cells and are important in controlling paracellular transport and the maintenance of cell polarity [19–23]. The binding of CPE to claudins triggers the formation of a multi-protein membrane pore complex, leading to a loss of cellular osmotic equilibrium and rapid cell lysis [24, 25]. Cells that lack claudin-3 or -4 expression are unaffected by the toxin [11, 17]. Numerous studies have shown that colon carcinoma and other epithelial tumors exhibit increased claudin-3 and/or -4 expression, suggesting that CPE might selectively target such tumors [26–37]. In our previous study we reported the successful tumor targeted in vitro and in vivo suicide gene therapy . Based on this, the present approach is employing CPE gene therapy to selectively eradicate claudin-3 and -4 expressing colon carcinomas as a new strategy for this tumor entity.
Here, we use in vitro and in vivo approaches to demonstrate that claudin-3 and -4 expressing human colon cancers can be successfully treated by CPE gene transfer. CPE expression in these cells permits a rapid and selective eradication of colon cancer, further enhanced by a toxin-mediated bystander effect. We show that CPE specifically binds to the claudins in these cells and provide data on the kinetics of cytotoxicity as well as intracellular distribution of CPE after gene transfer. Our study reveals that CPE gene therapy can be used for the successful treatment of colon cancer.
Human SW480, SW620, HCT116 colon carcinoma and isogenic Sk-Mel5 and Sk-Mel5 Cldn-3-YFP melanoma cell lines were grown in RPMI medium (Gibco, Life technologies, Darmstadt, Germany), 10% FCS (Biochrom, Berlin,Germany). The colon carcinoma lines CaCo-2 and HT-29 were grown in DMEM (Gibco), 10% FCS (Biochrom). All lines were kept at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Claudin-3-YFP stably transfected cells were selected with 0.5–1.5 mgml-1 G418 (Gibco). The expression vector for Cldn-3-YFP is based on pEYFP-N1 . The identity of all cell lines was confirmed by STR-genotyping (DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany).
Quantitative real-time RT-PCR
Cell lysis and isolation of total RNA was done using GeneMatrix Universal RNA Purification Kit EURx (Roboklon, Berlin, Germany). 50 ng of RNA was reverse transcribed and real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed with SYBR GREEN. Each real-time PCR (qPCR) was done using the LightCycler 480 (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Following primers were used for claudin-3: forward 5’-CTGCTCTGCTGCTCGTGTCC-3’; reverse 5’-TTAGACGTAGTCCTTGCGGTCGTAG-3’; for claudin-4: forward 5’-CCTCTGCCAGACCCATATAA-3’; reverse 5’-CACCGTGAGTCAGGAGATAA-3’. The cycle conditions were as follows: 90 °C for 30 s, 95 °C for 5 s, 57 °C for 5 s and 72 °C for 10 s for 45 cycles. Normalization was done with the human housekeeping gene glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (hG6PDH) using the hG6PDH Roche Kit (Roche Diagnostics).
For protein analysis, cells or tissue cryosections were lysed in RIPA buffer (50 mM TRIS, 150 mM, NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, protease inhibitor, ddH2O) and 25 μg of protein was electrophorezed in 10% precast NuPAGE gels (Invitrogen), 1 h at 180 V. The proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Hybond-C Extra, Amersham, Freiburg, Germany) by semidry blotting (Turbo Blot BioRad, Munich, Germany) at 20 V, 25 min. Membranes were blocked for 1 h at room temperature (RT) in TBS (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5, 5% fat-free dry milk and 2.5% casein) and washed in TBST (0.05% Tween 20 in PBS), 2 x 5 min at RT. As primary antibody rabbit anti-claudin-3 antibody (1:3000, Acris, Herford, Germany), rabbit anti-claudin-4 antibody (1:3000, Acris), rabbit anti-CPE (1:4000, Acris), mouse monoclonal anti-β-tubulin (1:1000, BD Bioscience, MD, USA) or mouse monoclonal anti-β-actin antibody (1:10000, Sigma-Aldrich, MI, USA) was added respectively over night at 4 °C and washed in TBST. As secondary HRP-labeled goat anti-rabbit-IgG antibody (1:10000, Promega, Madison, WI, USA) or goat anti-mouse IgM/IgG (1:10000, Sigma-Aldrich) was added for 1 h, RT. Membranes were washed in TBST. Detection was done using ECL solution (Amersham) and exposure to Kodak X-Omat AR film (Kodak, Stuttgart, Germany).
Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin (CPE) expressing plasmids
For transfection experiments the pCpG-optCPE (optCPE) plasmid was used . For construction of plasmid encoding optCPE-GFP fusion protein, cDNA of CPE was amplified by PCR from optCPE and cloned into the Pst I site of pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP (GFP Fusion TOPO TA Expression Kit, Invitrogen Life Technology) resulting in pcDNA3-optCPE-GFP (optCPE-GFP). Preparation of plasmid-DNA was done using the Jetstar Plasmid Purification Maxi Kit (Genomed, Löhre, Germany).
Transfection of human tumor cell lines
Cells were seeded into 6-well plates and transfected with 1.75–3.5 μg DNA (pCpG-optCPE, pCpG-mcsG2/pcDNA3.1 as empty vector or pcDNA3-optCPE-GFP fusion protein vector) using the transfection reagents Fugene X-treme (Roche), Fugene HD (Roche) or Metafectene (Biontex) as recommended by the manufacturer. To ensure comparable transfection rates, transfection efficiency for each cell line was determined by transfection of green fluorescent protein expressing plasmid pEGFP-N1 (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA) and analyzed using FACS Calibur (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA). The number of green fluorescence protein expressing cells was quantified 48 h after transfection and given as a percentage of green fluorescent protein positive cells.
For knock-down experiments cells were seeded in 6-well plates and transfected with 50 nM siRNA control, siRNA Claudin-3 (iBONi siRNA box Cldn3 gene ID1363, Riboxx, Germany) or siRNA Claudin-4 (iBONi siRNA box Cldn4 gene ID1364, Riboxx, Germany) using Lipofectamine RNAiMax Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were seeded for recCPE treatment or optCPE gene transfer 48 h after siRNA transfection.
MTT cytotoxicity assay
MTT assay was performed to test cytotoxicity of recombinant CPE or after optCPE transfection and biological activity of released CPE from transfected cells. For sensitivity testing of the cell lines towards recombinant CPE 6 × 103- 4 × 105 cells were seeded into 96-well plates and 24 h later the toxin was added at different concentrations (0, 50, 100, 150 ng ml-1) and incubated for 72 h. For determination of the biological activity of CPE in supernatants of transfected cells, 6 × 103 non-transfected cells were seeded into 96-well plates. After 24 h, 100 μl of supernatants from optCPE transfected cells were added to the respective non-transfected cells and incubated for 72 h. For all cytotoxicity assays MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazyol-2yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (5 mg ml-1, Sigma) was added after 72 h of CPE incubation and absorbance was measured in triplicates at 560 nm in a microplate reader (Tecan, Groedig, Austria). Values are expressed as percentage of untreated controls.
Ridascreen Clostridium perfringens Enterotoxin ELISA (R-Biopharm, Darmstadt, Germany) was performed to quantify CPE in supernatants 24 h or 48 h after transfection. For this, 4 × 105 cells were seeded into 6-well plates and transfected with pCpG-optCPE or pCpG-mscG2 (e.v.) plasmid-DNA. Supernatants were used for the detection as recommended by the manufacturer. For analyzing potential shedding of CPE into the blood of animals, which received gene transfer, blood was collected and CPE was quantified in serum samples. Recombinant CPE was used as standard at serial dilutions of 0.4 ng to 25 ng CPE ml-1. Measurements were done in duplicates at 450 nm in the microplate reader (Tecan). Values are expressed as percentage of untreated controls.
Immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry
For immunofluorescence, 2 × 105 cells were seeded onto cover slips (Steiner GmbH, Siegen Eiserfeld, Germany). After 24 h cells were treated with Hoechst 33342 (5 μM) or recombinant CPE (250 ng ml-1, R-Biopharm) or were transfected with pcDNA3.1 as empty vector, pCpG-optCPE (optCPE) or pcDNA3-optCPE-GFP (optCPE-GFP) as described. Cells were washed with PBS, fixed 15 min in 3.7% (v/v) formaldehyde in PBS, quenched 20 min with 0.1 M glycin in PBS and blocked 1 h with 1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin and 0.05% Tween 20 in PBS at RT. As primary antibody, rabbit anti-human claudin-3 or rabbit anti- human claudin-4 antibody (1:100, Acris) or rabbit anti-CPE (1:1000, Acris) was added for 2 h at RT. Cells were washed with TBST. Alexa 488 labeled goat anti-rabbit-IgG (1:1000, Invitrogen) or Alexa 555 labeled goat anti-rabbit-IgG (1:1000, Invitrogen) was added as secondary antibody for 1 h at RT. For staining of nuclei DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich) and for staining of the cytoplasm Alexa 555 phalloidin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used. Cells were evaluated in a fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany).
For immunohistochemistry of the patient-derived xenotransplant (PDX, EPO GmbH, Berlin, Germany) tumor samples 3–5 μm paraffin embedded tumor sections were deparaffinized, fixed with 0.04% glutaraldehyde for 15 min at RT, quenched 20 min with 0.1 M glycin, incubated 10 min with 3% H2O2, washed with PBS, permeabilized by 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min, RT and blocked 1 h with 1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin and 0.05% Tween 20 in PBS at RT. Primary antibody rabbit anti-human claudin-3/-4 (1:200, Acris) was added for 2 h, RT. Sections were washed with PBS and as secondary antibody HRP-labeled goat anti-rabbit antibody (1:200, Promega) was added for 1 h, RT, then washed in PBS and incubated with diamino-benzidine (DAB, DAKO, Hamburg, Germany) 1 min, at RT, washed in PBS, counterstained for 30 s with hemalum (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), rinsed in water, covered with glycergel (DAKO) and evaluated in a light microscope (Zeiss).
in vivo optCPE gene transfer
For establishment of subcutaneous tumors, pieces of app. 3 × 3 mm in size of patient derived colorectal cancer xenograft tissue (PDX, Co7515*, lung metastasis of colon cancer, see Additional file 1) were inoclulated into the left flank of female NMRI: nu/nu mice (n = 5 animals per group). When tumors reached a mean volume of 0.3 cm3, animals were randomized into treatment groups. Intratumoral non-viral optCPE gene transfer was performed in anesthetized animals by jet-injection. Therefore, 50 μg plasmid DNA of respective vector construct was applied by 5 injections (jet injector, EMS Medical Systems SA, Nyon, Switzerland) of 10 μl injection volume (1 μg DNA μl-1 PBS). The in vivo optCPE gene transfer gene transfer was performed once at day 46 post tumor inoculation.
Tumor volumes (TV) were measured at indicated time points and calculated using the formula: TV = (width2 x length)/2. As toxicity parameters body weight, clinical signs and behavior were recorded for all mice twice a week. Animals were sacrificed and tumors were harvested for further analysis.
For statistical analyses of the in vitro experiments the Student’s t-test, 1way-ANOVA test and 2way-ANOVA test was used. For the analyses of in vivo optCPE gene transfer experiments the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was used. Error values for the in vitro experiments are S.D. and for in vivo optCPE gene transfer experiment S.E.M.
Claudin-3 and -4 expression in human colon carcinoma cell lines
Sensitivity of human colon carcinoma cells towards recombinant CPE
EC50 values of recombinant CPE
EC 50 [ ng ml -1 ]
In vitro CPE expression and selective cytotoxicity after CPE gene transfer
These data further support the correlation between claudin-3 and -4 expression and CPE mediated toxicity.
Bystander effect of CPE gene transfer
Transfection efficiency of the human cancer cell lines, determined by transfer of the pEGFP vector and FACScan
Transfection efficiency (% GFP-positive cells)
Quantification of CPE release into the cell culture medium of empty vector or optCPE-transfected human colon carcinoma cells (error values are S.D.)
CPE ± SD [ng ml -1 ]
46.92 ± 22.06
231.67 ± 46.21
67.30 ± 1.33
80.51 ± 5.97
16.50 ± 3.15
5.40 ± 0.9
Claudin-specificity and analysis of claudin-3/optCPE-GFP co-localization
In addition to the previous described knock-in experiments, we also performed knock-down experiments in the human colon cancer cell lines HCT116 and SW480 by using short interfering RNA, targeting claudin-3 and -4 to proof the important role of the claudins in the CPE mediated effect. The down-regulation of both claudins (siCldn3 + siCldn4) led to a significantly reduced responsiveness of the colon cancer cells towards recCPE treatment and optCPE gene transfer compared to control (siCo) treated cells, demonstrating specific activity of CPE to its receptors claudin-3 and -4 (Additional file 2).
Time lapse of CPE toxicity
Time lapse evaluation after recCPE treatment by live fluorescence microscopy in Sk-Mel5 Cldn-3-YFP cells revealed a rapid process of cell death starting at 20 min after recCPE addition. This process continued with swelling of treated cells, cell blebbing and size reduction of nuclei (Fig. 3f). To quantify the decrease in size nuclei area was measured over a time period of 45 min. These measurements showed significant (***P < 0.001) size reduction of 50%, indicative for rapid nuclear damage and cell death (Additional file 3).
Claudin-3 and -4 expression in patient-derived colon carcinoma xenografts
To extend the approach beyond the established in vitro models to in vivo optCPE gene transfer application, claudin-3 and -4 expression was analyzed in human patient-derived colon carcinoma xenografts (PDX) at protein level (Fig. 4a). We found claudin-3 and/or -4 expression in 26 of 27 analyzed tumors of which 19 showed high expression of both proteins. Only one tumor (Co5735) did not express claudin-3 or -4. The immunohistochemistry confirmed Western blot data and indicates mostly membranous localization as shown for representative PDX tumors (Fig. 4b).
In vivo expression of CPE and antitumoral efficiency after non-viral intratumoral CPE gene transfer
The intratumoral CPE expression was first analyzed after non-viral intratumoral in vivo optCPE gene transfer jet injection of the optCPE-GFP expressing vector (Fig. 4c). Efficient expression of optCPE-GFP fusion protein was determined 24 h and 48 h after gene transfer. The immunofluorescence revealed areas of strong optCPE-GFP expression within tumor tissues (Fig. 4d), indicating a successful in vivo optCPE gene transfer.
After optCPE-GFP jet-injection gene transfer (day 46 after tumor implantation), significant antitumoral activity by optCPE-GFP mediated cytotoxicity was observed in transfected Co7515 PDX-bearing mice. Tumor growth inhibition, as measured by tumor volume, was significant (*P = 0.0451) in optCPE-GFP transfected tumors compared to vector transfected control group (Fig. 4e). Evaluation of HE-stained sections of optCPE transfected tumors revealed massive necrotic areas within the tumors due to optCPE action (Fig. 4f). In all animals no systemic toxicities, such as body weight loss, diarrhea or increase in body temperature were observed, which strongly indicates safety of this gene therapeutic approach (Additional file 4). This is supported by the fact, that analysis for potential appearance of CPE in the blood of the animals by ELISA revealed no shedding of the toxin to the circulation (Additional file 5).
Pore-forming CPE as effective cancer therapeutic
Genes coding for bacterial toxins have shown their therapeutic potential for cancer treatment in cancer gene therapy [10, 37–40]. Especially pore-forming toxins like Streptolysin O from Streptococcus pyogenes and Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin (CPE) from Clostridium perfringens are of increasing interest, of which CPE possesses high specificity in action [12, 13, 41]. The targeted action of CPE is mediated by binding to claudin-3 and -4, which are frequently overexpressed in cancers. This is in line with other studies, which show an upregulation of claudin-3 and -4 in colorectal cancers compared to their expression in normal mucosa [26, 29]. In fact these findings render claudin-3 and -4 an attractive target for selective therapy. In this study we demonstrated, that colon cancer cells also overexpress claudin-3 and-4, which therefore represents the potential target for CPE therapy.
CPE binding to the claudins results in rapid cell lysis [42, 43]. The antitumoral effect of recombinant CPE (recCPE) has been shown in several in vitro and in vivo studies. It was demonstrated however, that the therapeutic use of recCPE is restricted by the need of repeated application to achieve an antitumoral effect [29, 44–47].
Selectivity of CPE-mediated rapid cytotoxicity
In this approach we demonstrated for the first time that CPE was efficiently expressed in colon cancer cells in vitro as well as in colon cancer PDX in vivo optCPE gene transfer, which led to effective tumor cell lyses in claudin-3 and -4 positive cells, whereas claudin-negative cells remained unaffected . Several publications have characterized claudin-3 and -4 as natural and specific receptors for CPE [49–52]. Here, sensitivity of colon cancer cells towards external application of recCPE and more importantly of gene transfected CPE was shown. We demonstrated a direct correlation of claudinexpression, localization and CPE toxicity.
There is only one report about the use of CPE for cancer gene therapy , whereas other bacterial toxins, such as Pseudomonas exotoxin, Diphteria toxin and Streptolysin O, have already been analyzed regarding their gene therapeutic use and antitumoral effects. After transfection of Streptolysin O and Diphteria toxin expressing vectors, both toxins exerted toxic effects in vitro and in vivo, but also led to side effects, as these toxins act on non-tumor targets [8, 9, 12]. By contrast, CPE has the advantage of specific binding to claudin-3 and -4, which is accessible at the cell surface and potentially also in the cytoplasm of cancer cells. Previously we established a translation optimized CPE vector (optCPE), which combines both, target specificity and efficient cytotoxicity . Using the optCPE and optCPE-GFP fusion protein in this approach, rapid tumor destruction in vitro and in vivo was achieved after optCPE gene transfer. In fact, the selectivity of CPE tumor cell eradication was further supported by the use of the isogenic Sk-Mel5 cells, in which only the claudin-3 expressing cells were susceptible towards CPE action and claudin negative cells remained unaffected. More importantly, siRNA-mediated down-regulation of claudin-3 and -4 in colon cancer cells led to decreased responsiveness of these cells towards CPE toxicity. This strengthens the importance of the claudins for targeted action of CPE in colon cancer.
Release of CPE and bystander effect
It is still unknown how intracellularly expressed CPE is released to bind the extracellular domains of the claudins. CPE is naturally produced by the clostridium bacteria and only liberated by lyses during bacterial sporulation [53, 54]. As we have described previously and observed in this study, released CPE is present in the media of all transfected cells, suggesting that it is liberated independently of CPE-mediated cytotoxicity or claudin-3 and -4 expression, as it was also released by the claudin-negative Sk-Mel5 cells . This supports the concept of the bystander effect, as it contributes to the efficiency of gene therapy.
The bystander effect was seen during in vitro optCPE gene transfer, as it eradicated up to 92% of colon carcinoma cells, although transfection efficiencies range only between 35 to 75%. The biological activity was further proven as non-transfected cells treated with released CPE containing media revealed strong cytotoxicity. Such effect can be crucial for improved therapeutic efficiency, particularly for in vivo optCPE gene transfer.
Time lapse of CPE toxicity
Additionally we demonstrated the process of cell death after external application of recCPE by localization analysis and confirmed biological activity of released optCPE, as cell death was initiated as early as 20 min after treatment. Furthermore, this was validated by significant decrease of nuclear size by 50%, which could be caused by aggregation of chromatin during apoptosis, by chromatin dissolution or nuclear fragmentation during necrosis. In previous analyses for external therapeutic application of recCPE both, necrosis and apoptosis were reported, depending on the CPE doses used . We further showed in our previous study that the intracellular accumulation of CPE induced rapid release of cytoplasmic lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), activation of caspases 3/7 in vitro and caused in vivo necrosis in CPE transfected tumors .
CPE sensitivity of claudin-3 and -4 expressing patient derived colon carcinoma xenografts (PDX)
The selective and efficient cytotoxic effect of CPE gene transfer was proven for human colon cancer cell lines in vitro. Our study extended the promising anticancer potential of CPE gene therapy to in vivo optCPE gene transfer scrutinization in a patient derived subcutaneous xenograft model derived from a metastatic colorectal tumor. By screening of 27 colon carcinoma PDX for claudin-3 and/or -4, the clinical relevance of this approach was further supported, as 20 out of 27 PDX models showed both, claudin-3 and claudin-4 expression, whereas 3 revealed the expression of only claudin-3, suggesting, that binding of CPE can occur. We further demonstrated the selective and efficient antitumoral action of CPE gene therapy in the claudin-3 and -4 overexpressing PDX Co7515, where gross tumor necrosis of the treated tumors was observed. This strongly indicates the applicability of this suicidal gene therapy for the treatment of colon carcinomas.
We report for the first time the successful tumor-targeted CPE gene therapy for colon carcinoma in vitro and in vivo optCPE gene transfer. This approach demonstrates that CPE gene transfer could be a promising and efficient option for a targeted suicide gene therapy of claudin-3 and/or -4 expressing colon carcinoma.
The CPE gene therapy is of particular interest if applied locally to treat either unresectable residual cancer tissue or to treat unresectable or refractory liver or lung metastasis of colorectal cancers. In fact, we did use in our in vivo optCPE gene transfer experiment the Co7515 PDX model, which highly expresses claudin-3 and -4 and is derived from lung metastasis of colon cancer. This provides some hint that such approach might be of value for the local control of the disease. Therefore, this strategy could be of particular value for treatment of therapy-refractory tumors or metastases thereof.
Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin
pCpG-mscG2 empty vector/pcDNA3.1 empty vector
pCpG-optCPE expressing vector
pcDNA3.1-optCPE-GFP expressing vector
patient derived xenograft
We gratefully thank Iduna Fichtner, EPO GmbH Berlin, Germany, for supporting the in vivo optCPE gene transfer experiments and Jörg Piontek, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany, for providing the Cldn3-YFP expression vector for in vitro studies. We thank Renate Fischer, R-Biopharm, Darmstadt, Germany for providing the recombinant CPE for the in vitro studies. We thank for the support of Matthias Richter and Anje Sporbert, core facility of the Max-Delbrück-Center in performing all confocal microscopy analyses.
The concept of the study and the experimental work was funded by the Deutsche Krebshilfe (DKH110838), Germany and the Berliner Krebsgesellschaft, Berlin, Germany.
Availability of data and materials
All datasets are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request and IRB approval.
JP carried out experiments, analyzed data and prepared the manuscript. LM and NN carried out experiments and analyzed data. MR established the PDX models, was involved in in vivo optCPE gene transfer study design and data collection. JA supported in vitro experiments and DK generated expression vectors, was involved in study design and data interpretation. WW conceived experiments, designed study and was involved in data interpretation and manuscript writing and editing. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
All animal experimental procedures are performed in accordance with the in-house guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and in accordance with the United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research regulations for the Welfare of Animals (Workman P. et al. Br. J. Cancer 2010; 102: 1555-77) and of the German Animal Protection Law and approved by the local responsible and official authorities, State Office of Health and Social Affairs (LaGeSo Berlin, Germany; Approval No. A0452/08). The animal care, housing and the experiments are performed in accordance to the ethical guidelines.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics: 2011. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:9–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Touil Y, Igoudjil W, Corvaisier M, Dessein A-F, Vandomme J, Monté D, Stechly L, Skrypek N, Langlois C, Grard G, Millet G, Leteurtre E, Dumont P, Truant S, Pruvot F-R, Hebbar M, Fan F, Ellis LM, Formstecher P, Van Seuningen I, Gespach C, Polakowska R, Huet G. Colon cancer cells escape 5FU chemotherapy-induced cell death by entering stemness and quiescence associated with the c-Yes/YAP axis. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:837–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Misale S, Yaeger R, Hobor S, Scala E, Janakiraman M, Liska D, Valtorta E, Schiavo R, Buscarino M, Siravegna G, Bencardino K, Cercek A, Chen C-T, Veronese S, Zanon C, Sartore-Bianchi A, Gambacorta M, Gallicchio M, Vakiani E, Boscaro V, Medico E, Weiser M, Siena S, Di Nicolantonio F, Solit D, Bardelli A. Emergence of KRAS mutations and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer. Nature. 2012;486:532–6. doi:10.1038/nature11156.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Walther W, Stein U. Therapeutic genes for cancer gene therapy. Mol Biotechnol. 1999;13:21–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lu Y. Transcriptionally regulated, prostate-targeted gene therapy for prostate cancer. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2009;61:572–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morin PJ. Claudin proteins in human cancer: promising new targets for diagnosis and therapy. Cancer Res. 2005;65:9603–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Michl P, Gress TM. Bacteria and bacterial toxins as therapeutic agents for solid tumors. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2004;4:689–702.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dang LH, Bettegowda C, Huso DL, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Combination bacteriolytic therapy for the treatment of experimental tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:15155–60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zheng J, Chen D, Chan J, Yu D, Ko E, Pang S. Regression of prostate cancer xenografts by a lentiviral vector specifically expressing diphtheria toxin A. Cancer Gene Ther. 2003;10:764–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walther W, Petkov S, Kuvardina ON, Aumann J, Kobelt D, Fichtner I, Lemm M, Piontek J, Blasig IE, Stein U, Schlag PM. Novel Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin suicide gene therapy for selective treatment of claudin-3- and -4-overexpressing tumors. Gene Ther. 2012;19:494–503.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang WS, Park S-O, Yoon A-R, Yoo JY, Kim MK, Yun C-O, Kim C-W. Suicide cancer gene therapy using pore-forming toxin, streptolysin O. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006;5:1610–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Michl P, Barth C, Buchholz M, Lerch MM, Rolke M, Holzmann K-H, Menke A, Fensterer H, Giehl K, Löhr M, Leder G, Iwamura T, Adler G, Gress TM. Claudin-4 expression decreases invasiveness and metastatic potential of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 2003;63:6265–71. PMID:14559813.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Minton NP. Clostridia in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2003;1:237–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gao Z, McClane B a. Use of clostridium perfringens enterotoxin and the enterotoxin receptor-binding domain (C-CPE) for cancer treatment: opportunities and challenges. J Toxicol. 2012;2012:981626.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnson EA. Clostridial toxins as therapeutic agents: benefits of nature’s most toxic proteins. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1999;53:551–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smedley JG, McClane BA. Fine Mapping of the N-Terminal Cytotoxicity Region of Clostridium perfringens Enterotoxin by Site-Directed Mutagenesis. Infect Immun. 2004;72:6914–23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Katahira J, Sugiyama H, Inoue N, Horiguchi Y, Matsuda M, Sugimoto N. Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin utilizes two structurally related membrane proteins as functional receptors in vivo. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:26652–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gumbiner B. Structure, biochemistry, and assembly of epithelial tight junctions. Am J Physiol. 1987;253:C749–58. PMID:3322036.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anderson JM, Van Itallie CM. Tight junctions and the molecular basis for regulation of paracellular permeability. Am J Physiol. 1995;269:G467–75. PMID:7485497.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tsukita S, Furuse M. Pores in the wall: claudins constitute tight junction strands containing aqueous pores. J Cell Biol. 2000;149:13–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Niessen CM. Tight junctions/adherens junctions: basic structure and function. J Invest Dermatol. 2007;127:2525–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ding L, Lu Z, Lu Q, Chen Y-H. The claudin family of proteins in human malignancy: a clinical perspective. Cancer Manag Res. 2013;5:367–75. doi:10.2147/CMAR.S38294.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Singh U, Van Itallie CM, Mitic LL, Anderson JM, McClane BA. CaCo-2 cells treated with Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin form multiple large complex species, one of which contains the tight junction protein occludin. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:18407–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chakrabarti G, Zhou X, McClane BA. Death pathways activated in CaCo-2 cells by Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin. Infect Immun. 2003;71:4260–70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hewitt KJ, Agarwal R, Morin PJ. The claudin gene family: expression in normal and neoplastic tissues. BMC Cancer. 2006;6:186.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Soini Y. Expression of claudins 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 in various types of tumours. Histopathology. 2005;46:551–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lu Z, Ding L, Lu Q, Chen Y-H. Claudins in intestines: Distribution and functional significance in health and diseases. Tissue Barriers. 2013;1:24978.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mees ST, Mennigen R, Spieker T, Rijcken E, Senninger N, Haier J, Bruewer M. Expression of tight and adherens junction proteins in ulcerative colitis associated colorectal carcinoma: upregulation of claudin-1, claudin-3, claudin-4, and beta-catenin. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009;24:361–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kominsky SL, Tyler B, Sosnowski J, Brady K, Doucet M, Nell D, Smedley JG, McClane B, Brem H, Sukumar S. Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin as a novel-targeted therapeutic for brain metastasis. Cancer Res. 2007;67:7977–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tabariès S, Siegel PM. The role of claudins in cancer metastasis. Oncogene. 2016. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.289.
- Rangel LBA, Agarwal R, D’Souza T, Pizer ES, Alò PL, Lancaster WD, Gregoire L, Schwartz DR, Cho KR, Morin PJ. Tight junction proteins claudin-3 and claudin-4 are frequently overexpressed in ovarian cancer but not in ovarian cystadenomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:2567–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Neesse A, Hahnenkamp A, Griesmann H, Buchholz M, Hahn SA, Maghnouj A, Fendrich V, Ring J, Sipos B, Tuveson DA, Bremer C, Gress TM, Michl P. Claudin-4-targeted optical imaging detects pancreatic cancer and its precursor lesions. Gut. 2013;62:1034–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Santin AD, Bellone S, Marizzoni M, Palmieri M, Siegel ER, McKenney JK, Hennings L, Comper F, Bandiera E, Pecorelli S. Overexpression of claudin-3 and claudin-4 receptors in uterine serous papillary carcinoma: novel targets for a type-specific therapy using Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin (CPE). Cancer. 2007;109:1312–22. doi:10.1002/cncr.22536.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Neesse A, Griesmann H, Gress TM, Michl P. Claudin-4 as therapeutic target in cancer. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2012;524:64–70.
- Saeki R, Kondoh M, Kakutani H, Tsunoda S, Mochizuki Y, Hamakubo T, Tsutsumi Y, Horiguchi Y, Yagi K. A Novel Tumor-Targeted Therapy Using a Claudin-4-Targeting Molecule. Mol Pharmacol. 2009;76:918–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yuan X, Lin X, Manorek G, Kanatani I, Cheung LH, Rosenblum MG, Howell SB. Recombinant CPE fused to tumor necrosis factor targets human ovarian cancer cells expressing the claudin-3 and claudin-4 receptors. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009;8:1906–15. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martín V, Cortés ML, de Felipe P, Farsetti A, Calcaterra NB, Izquierdo M. Cancer gene therapy by thyroid hormone-mediated expression of toxin genes. Cancer Res. 2000;60:3218–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee EJ, Jameson JL. Cell-specific Cre-mediated activation of the diphtheria toxin gene in pituitary tumor cells: potential for cytotoxic gene therapy. Hum Gene Ther. 2002;13:533–42. doi:10.1089/10430340252809829.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li Y, McCadden J, Ferrer F, Kruszewski M, Carducci M, Simons J, Rodriguez R. Prostate-specific expression of the diphtheria toxin A chain (DT-A): studies of inducibility and specificity of expression of prostate-specific antigen promoter-driven DT-A adenoviral-mediated gene transfer. Cancer Res. 2002;62:2576–82. PMID: 11980652.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Castro MG, Candolfi M, Kroeger K, King GD, Curtin JF, Yagiz K, Mineharu Y, Assi H, Wibowo M, Ghulam Muhammad AKM, Foulad D, Puntel M, Lowenstein PR. Gene therapy and targeted toxins for glioma. Curr Gene Ther. 2005;5:155–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bhakdi S, Bayley H, Valeva A, Walev I, Walker B, Weller U, Kehoe M, Palmer M. Staphylococcal alpha-toxin, streptolysin-O, and Escherichia coli hemolysin: prototypes of pore-forming bacterial cytolysins. Arch Microbiol. 1996;165:73–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smedley JG, Uzal F a, McClane B a. Identification of a prepore large-complex stage in the mechanism of action of Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin. Infect Immun. 2007;75:2381–90. doi:10.1128/IAI.01737-06.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kokai-Kun JF, Benton K, Wieckowski EU, McClane BA. Identification of a Clostridium perfringens Enterotoxin Region Required for Large Complex Formation and Cytotoxicity by Random Mutagenesis. Infect Immun. 1999;67:5634–41.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kominsky SL, Vali M, Korz D, Gabig TG, Weitzman SA, Argani P, Sukumar S. Clostridium perfringens Enterotoxin Elicits Rapid and Specific Cytolysis of Breast Carcinoma Cells Mediated through Tight Junction Proteins Claudin 3 and 4. Am J Pathol. 2004;164:1627–33.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Michl P, Buchholz M, Rolke M, Kunsch S, Löhr M, McClane B, Tsukita S, Leder G, Adler G, Gress TM. Claudin-4: A New Target for Pancreatic Cancer Treatment Using Clostridium perfringens Enterotoxin. Gastroenterology. 2001;121:678–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sonoda N, Furuse M, Sasaki H, Yonemura S, Katahira J, Horiguchi Y, Tsukita S. Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin fragment removes specific claudins from tight junction strands: Evidence for direct involvement of claudins in tight junction barrier. J Cell Biol. 1999;147:195–204. PMCID: PMC2164970.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Long H, Crean CD, Lee W, Cummings OW, Gabig TG. Expression of Clostridium Perfringens Enterotoxin Receptors Claudin-3 and Claudin-4 in Prostate Cancer Epithelium. Cancer Res. 2001;1:7878–81.Google Scholar
- Chakrabarti G, McClane BA. The importance of calcium influx, calpain and calmodulin for the activation of CaCo-2 cell death pathways by Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin. Cell Microbiol. 2005;7:129–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McClane BA. The complex interactions between Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin and epithelial tight junctions. Toxicon Off J Int Soc Toxinol. 2001;39:1781–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shrestha A, Uzal FA, McClane BA. The interaction of Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin with receptor claudins. Anaerobe. 2016;41:18–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Veshnyakova A, Piontek J, Protze J, Waziri N, Heise I, Krause G. Mechanism of Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin interaction with claudin-3/-4 protein suggests structural modifications of the toxin to target specific claudins. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:1698–708.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frieben WR, Duncan CL. Homology between enterotoxin protein and spore structural protein in Clostridium perfringens type A. Eur J Biochem. 1973;39:393–401. PMID: 4359628.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Powell DW. Barrier function of epithelia function of epithelia. Am J Physiol. 1981;241:G275–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar