Gain in cellular organization of inflammatory breast cancer: A 3D in vitro model that mimics the in vivo metastasis
© Morales and Alpaugh; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 6 May 2009
Accepted: 23 December 2009
Published: 23 December 2009
The initial step of metastasis in carcinomas, often referred to as the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), occurs via the loss of adherens junctions (e.g. cadherins) by the tumor embolus. This leads to a subsequent loss of cell polarity and cellular differentiation and organization, enabling cells of the embolus to become motile and invasive. However highly malignant inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) over-expresses E-cadherin. The human xenograft model of IBC (MARY-X), like IBC, displays the signature phenotype of an exaggerated degree of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in situ by tumor emboli. An intact E-cadherin/α, β-catenin axis mediates the tight, compact clump of cells found both in vitro and in vivo as spheroids and tumor emboli, respectively.
Using electron microscopy and focused ion beam milling to acquire in situ sections, we performed ultrastructural analysis of both an IBC and non-IBC, E-cadherin positive cell line to determine if retention of this adhesion molecule contributed to cellular organization.
Here we report through ultrastructural analysis that IBC exhibits a high degree of cellular organization with polar elements such as apical/lateral positioning of E-cadherin, apical surface microvilli, and tortuous lumen-like (canalis) structures. In contrast, agarose-induced spheroids of MCF-7, a weakly invasive E-cadherin positive breast carcinoma cell line, do not exhibit ultrastructural polar features.
This study has determined that the highly metastatic IBC with an exaggerated malignant phenotype challenges conventional wisdom in that instead of displaying a loss of cellular organization, IBC acquires a highly structured architecture.
These findings suggest that the metastatic efficiency might be linked to the formation and maintenance of these architectural features. The comparative architectural features of both the spheroid and embolus of MARY-X provide an in vitro model with tractable in vivo applications.
Normal epithelial tissue has a distinct architecture. The organization and maintenance of this tissue architecture is mediated by cell-cell adhesion junctions . The most notable of the adhesion junctions is the adherens junction (AJ). The AJs are critical for the formation of a polarized epithelial sheet composed of two structurally distinguishable surfaces, namely the apical and basal [1–3]. The transmembrane protein E-cadherin forms AJs and binds to the family of catenins (e.g. α-catenin, β-catenin, p120) on the cytoplasmic side of the plasma membrane [4, 5]. This intact E-cadherin α/β-catenin axis regulates cytoskeleton dynamics . Nuclear translocation of β-catenin upon cleavage of a formerly intact axis alters gene transcription . Positioned directly adjacent to the AJ is the tight junction (TJ). In glandular epithelium the TJs are lumenally-located (apical face) in relationship to the AJs. These junctions are predominantly composed of claudin proteins and are responsible for regulating ion permeability [1, 6]. More basally-located are the desmosomes (DMs) and these junctions provide resistance to shear stress of epithelial tissue and are composed of desmosomal cadherins (desmocollins, desmogleins) [1, 7]. The desmosomal cadherins are linked to intermediate filaments of plaque proteins (desmoplakin, plakoglobin and plakophillin) in the cytoplasm . The hallmark structure of a polarized epithelial sheet is the tripartite complex composed of a TJ, AJ and DM. This structural complex is observed in electron micrographs and is located at the apex (apical/lateral) of adjacent cells [2, 8]. In normal epithelial tissue polarity results in an asymmetric distribution of protein receptors/transporters, signaling complexes, ion channels and lipids between two surfaces, the apical and basolateral . It is the maintenance of the architectural integrity and function of the two surfaces which traditionally distinguish normal from aberrant cells.
Most cancers arise from epithelial cells and the initial step in metastatic progression is reduced intercellular adhesion [9, 10]. This is primarily associated with the loss of E-cadherin function with subsequent loss of cell polarity, epithelial differentiation and organization [11–13]. With the loss of positional cues the cancer cells are relieved of contact inhibition of growth and become more motile and invasive . A loss of E-cadherin results in a loss in all epithelial features and is sufficient to accelerate the adenoma-to-carcinoma transition in mouse tumor models, indicating that loss of E-cadherin may be a rate-limiting step in tumor progression .
Reduced expression of E-cadherin with diminution of cell-cell junctions is generally accepted as a malignancy indicator . Paradoxically, human inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), a highly metastatic carcinoma, over-expresses E-cadherin [16–18]. The human xenograft model of IBC (MARY-X), like IBC, displays the signature phenotype of an exaggerated degree of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in situ by tumor emboli . MARY-X also exhibits a 10 - 20 fold over-expression of an intact E-cadherin/α, β- catenin axis . This over-expressed highly functional adhesion molecule mediates the tight, compact clump of cells found both in vitro as spheroids and in vivo as tumor emboli [20, 21]. Compaction due to E-cadherin confers resistance to apoptosis . In MARY-X, disruption of the intact axis by Ca++ depletion, E-cadherin antibody, glycan modification of MUC1 and trypsin proteolysis results in the total dissolution of the in vitro spheroids followed by apoptosis, suggesting that over-expressed E-cadherin/α, β-catenin axis plays an important role in the survival of highly metastatic IBC [20–22].
In this study, using the human xenograft model of IBC (MARY-X) we show that malignant IBC displays architectural features or a gain in cellular organization that is not typically found in aggressive carcinomas. This architecture, found both in vitro and in vivo, exhibits intact tight junctions, adherens junctions and microvilli coating of the apical surface of lumen-like structures (canalis), which are evenly distributed throughout the MARY-X spheroid and tumor cell embolus. This 3D in vitro model that truly mimics the in vivo physiological/pathological conditions provides tractable information concerning structural architecture and metastatic behavior of the in vivo tumor cell embolus.
MARY-X xenograft and in vitrospheroids
MARY-X was established from a patient with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) . In vivo, MARY-X recapitulates the human IBC phenotype of extensive lymphovascular invasion of the tumor cell emboli. The IBC spheroids are a cellular derivative (i.e. primary cell line) of MARY-X primary tumor explants. Upon mincing the tumor cells are released into the media as sheets of cells and single cells. The tumor cells form tight, compact clumps or aggregates of cells termed "MARY-X spheroids". These spheroids can be further purified or partitioned from the cellular debris by employing cell strainers of varying pore sizes (e.g. 40, 70 and 100 μm; BD Biosciences) . The resultant preparation is 100% human IBC cells (termed MARY-X spheroids) which can be maintained in culture for periods up to three months.
The MARY-X spheroids when injected into severe-combined immune deficient (SCID) mice, form complex primary tumors (and distant lung metastases) where the tumor cell emboli are found nestled within the murine lymphatics and blood vessels (i.e. lymphovascular invasion) . The tumor is composed of a 30% murine component (surrounding stroma, lymphatic vessels and blood vessels) and 70% human inflammatory breast cancer cell component (tumor cell emboli) .
MCF-7 (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD) spheroids were established by plating MCF-7 cells on a 1% agarose-coated tissue culture plate.
All cells were maintained in minimal essential medium (MEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics (100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin) at 37°C in an air-5% CO2 atmosphere at constant humidity.
All experiments were performed in compliance with the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Animal Care and Use Program (Protocol Number 06-04-006).
In vitroDissolution Studies
The MARY-X spheroids underwent full dissolution by either calcium depletion or the adhesion-blocking E-cadherin antibody (Invitrogen, clone HECD-1) as previously reported . Cytospin preparations were obtained for dissolute spheroids.
Transmission Electron Microscopy
MARY-X spheroids, tumor emboli and MCF-7 agarose-induced spheroids were fixed for 2-24 hours at 4°C in 3% Glutaraldehyde/0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) and post-fixed for 45 min in buffered 1% osmium tetroxide. The samples were dehydrated in a series of ethanol solutions followed by a propylene oxide rinse and infiltrated with Embed 812 resin. Thin sections (120 nm) were cut with a diamond knife on a LKB microtome and collected on nickel grids (EMS: G300H-Ni). Sections were stained in 4% uranyl acetate for 1-2 hours followed by 0.6% lead citrate for 20 minutes. Sections were viewed on a Zeiss EM902 transmission electron microscope and images were captured digitally using a Mega View III CCD camera with a pixel resolution of 1.3 Megapixels. Analysis of spheroid preparations was performed on spheroid pellets (5,000 - 10,000 spheroids/pellet). TEM viewing was performed on 20 - 30 randomly chosen fields of multiple spheroid pellet and tumor emboli preparations.
Scanning Electron Microscopy
MARY-X spheroids, tumor emboli and MCF-7 agarose-induced spheroids were fixed and post-fixed as described in the TEM protocol above, dehydrated in a series of ethanol solutions and dried using a critical point dryer (Balzer CPD-030). The dried samples were coated with a 2 -3 nanometers of gold using a Denton Desk II sputter coater. Observations were made using a scanning electron microscope (Supra 55 VP or Quanta 200 3D). Spheroid pellet preparations (5,000 - 10,000 spheroids/pellet) are mounted (scattered) onto pins and sputter-coated as described. Observations were performed on 10 - 20 individual spheroids of multiple preparations.
Scanning Electron Microscopy/Focused Ion Beam Milling
Milling of the specimens was performed using a Quanta 200 3D dual beam SEM-FIB. In situ sections (i.e. milling) were achieved with an initial blunt section at a current of 20 nA, followed by decreasing currents (20 - 3nA) for polished sections. Images were captured at a 1 Megapixel resolution.
The antibodies used for immunofluorescence included E-cadherin (BD Transduction labs; catalogue #610181) and β-catenin (Sigma; catalogue #C 2206). The monoclonal antibody for E-cadherin recognized the intracellular domain. Immunofluorescence was observed using an upright Leica TCS SP2 AOBS 1- and 2-photon laser scanning confocal microscope.
Results and Discussion
Polar Architectural Features of MARY-X
The information that malignant IBC retains structural integrity gives exciting insight into the possibility that metastatic efficiency in some carcinomas is independent of "loss of function" i.e. loss of cellular differentiation accompanied by higher mobility and invasiveness resulting from reduced intercellular adhesion [11, 13]. According to traditional definition, architectural integrity is disrupted during pathogenesis of epithelial tumors and pathological assessment is based predominantly on microscopic evaluation of (loss of) epithelial cell features [11, 29]. Histological patterns, such as the loss of E-cadherin expression in carcinomas is the most widely accepted malignant and prognostic indicator in diagnosis of the disease . However, ultrastructural features cannot be seen in these typical evaluations and "gain in function" or structural organization has not been explored with respect to possible clinical outcomes.
The Polar Architectural Features of the MARY-X In Vitro Spheroid Mimic the In VivoMetastasis
A limitation in our understanding of epithelial tissue and tumors that are derived from them is that most insight into the formation, maintenance, function and pathology of epithelial tissue has depended on the analysis of traditional 2D cell tissue culture. This approach has been particularly useful in cancer research to determine drug response and toxicity in carcinomas. However, the results of a number of studies comparing the response of cells to drugs are often different when cells are cultured in 2D due to the failure to recapitulate the native 3D in vivo state [27, 30]. In addition, 2D cultures differ significantly in morphology, signaling and differentiation. In vitro 3D models (e.g. explants and traditional 2D cultures in matrix scaffolds) have been developed as an intermediate between the 2D cultures and animal models to better understand in vivo 3D physiological conditions/environment [29, 31, 32]. These in vitro 3D models offer expeditious assessment of drug response and toxicity and more closely resemble in vivo morphology and intracellular signaling . Studies using 3D models appear to better correlate with drug response found in vivo . However these models show significant variability of in vivo conditions and offer only short term in vitro conditions . The most significant difficulty is the inability of these in vitro 3D models to fully mimic the defined in vivo 3D orientation, of either normal (i.e. polarity; distinct structural architecture) or aberrant (loss of structural integrity) epithelial cells, that dictates intracellular, intercellular and cell extracellular matrix (ECM) signaling .
Therefore, presently, the in vitro study of metastatic progression using 2D cultures has limited bearing on the in vivo situation. Even when the 3D architecture is recreated in the in vitro model or artificial soft agar scaffolds, the multicellular spheroids are dissimilar to micrometastases [30, 33]. However, the MARY-X model is similar in that it grows as spontaneous, tight multicellular spheroids in vitro and as lymphovascular emboli in vivo, both displaying the same highly organized structural architecture. This true recapitulation provides us with a 3D in vitro model with tractable in vivo applications. The MARY-X model will allow us to manipulate these spheroids in culture and identify key gene products that convert IBC architecture to a more indolent carcinoma and determine if this affects metastatic behavior in vivo. Our study offers an alternative perspective as to what constitutes an aggressive carcinoma with a poor clinical outcome. Understanding carcinomas such as IBC that have a "gain in function" i.e. cellular organization could offer new strategies and approaches in treatment.
MLA co-established the IBC xenograft, MARY-X, in 1998 during her postdoctoral fellowship. MARY-X was the first of only two IBC xenografts to be established. MARY-X has the distinction of exhibiting the signature phenotype of IBC that of extensive lymphovascular invasion in situ of the tumor cell emboli.
inflammatory breast cancer
scanning electron microscopy
transmission electron microscopy
We thank Dr. Andrew Koff (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center) for his critical review of the manuscript and guidance and Katia Manova and personnel (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Molecular Cytology Core Facility) for discussions and data collection and interpretation. We would also like to thank Bergen County Academies of the Bergen County Technical School District and especially Daniel Naftalovich for their assistance and use of their nanotechnology facility.
- Giepmans BN, van Ijzendoorn SC: Epithelial cell-cell junctions and plasma membrane domains. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008, 1788 (4): 820-31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Niessen CM, Gottardi CJ: Molecular components of the adherens junction. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008, 1778 (3): 562-571. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.12.015.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nejsum LN, Nelson WJ: A molecular mechanism directly linking E-cadherin adhesion to initiation of epithelial cell surface polarity. J Cell Biol. 2007, 178 (2): 323-335. 10.1083/jcb.200705094.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Halbleib JM, Nelson WJ: Cadherins in development: cell adhesion, sorting, and tissue morphogenesis. Genes Dev. 2006, 20 (23): 3199-3214. 10.1101/gad.1486806.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Behrens J, von Kries JP, Kuhl M, Bruhn L, Wedlich D, Grosschedl R, Birchmeier W: Functional interaction of beta-catenin with the transcription factor LEF-1. Nature. 1996, 382 (6592): 638-642. 10.1038/382638a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shin K, Fogg VC, Margolis B: Tight junctions and cell polarity. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2006, 22: 207-235. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.22.010305.104219.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Garrod D, Chidgey M: Desmosome structure, composition and function. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008, 1778 (3): 572-587. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.07.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scothern A, Garrod D: Visualization of desmosomes in the electron microscope. Methods Cell Biol. 2008, 88: 347-366. full_text.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Woodhouse EC, Chuaqui RF, Liotta LA: General mechanisms of metastasis. Cancer. 1997, 80 (8 Suppl): 1529-1537. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19971015)80:8+<1529::AID-CNCR2>3.0.CO;2-F.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hanahan D, Weinberg RA: The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000, 100 (1): 57-70. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81683-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vincent-Salomon A, Thiery JP: Host microenvironment in breast cancer development: epithelial-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer development. Breast Cancer Res. 2003, 5 (2): 101-106. 10.1186/bcr578.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wodarz A, Nathke I: Cell polarity in development and cancer. Nat Cell Biol. 2007, 9 (9): 1016-1024. 10.1038/ncb433.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thiery JP: Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002, 2 (6): 442-454. 10.1038/nrc822.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perl AK, Wilgenbus P, Dahl U, Semb H, Christofori G: A causal role for E-cadherin in the transition from adenoma to carcinoma. Nature. 1998, 392 (6672): 190-193. 10.1038/32433.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hirohashi S: Inactivation of the E-cadherin-mediated cell adhesion system in human cancers. Am J Pathol. 1998, 153 (2): 333-339.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kleer CG, van Golen KL, Braun T, Merajver SD: Persistent E-cadherin expression in inflammatory breast cancer. Mod Pathol. 2001, 14 (5): 458-464. 10.1038/modpathol.3880334.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Colpaert CG, Vermeulen PB, Benoy I, Soubry A, van Roy F, van Beest P, Goovaerts G, Dirix LY, van Dam P, Fox SB, et al: Inflammatory breast cancer shows angiogenesis with high endothelial proliferation rate and strong E-cadherin expression. Br J Cancer. 2003, 88 (5): 718-725. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600807.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Cristofanilli M, Valero V, Buzdar AU, Kau SW, Broglio KR, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Sneige N, Islam R, Ueno NT, Buchholz TA, et al: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) and patterns of recurrence: understanding the biology of a unique disease. Cancer. 2007, 110 (7): 1436-1444. 10.1002/cncr.22927.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alpaugh ML, Tomlinson JS, Shao ZM, Barsky SH: A novel human xenograft model of inflammatory breast cancer. Cancer Res. 1999, 59 (20): 5079-5084.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tomlinson JS, Alpaugh ML, Barsky SH: An intact overexpressed E-cadherin/alpha, beta-catenin axis characterizes the lymphovascular emboli of inflammatory breast carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2001, 61 (13): 5231-5241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alpaugh ML, Tomlinson JS, Ye Y, Barsky SH: Relationship of sialyl-Lewis(x/a) underexpression and E-cadherin overexpression in the lymphovascular embolus of inflammatory breast carcinoma. Am J Pathol. 2002, 161 (2): 619-628.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Alpaugh ML, Barsky SH: Reversible model of spheroid formation allows for high efficiency of gene delivery ex vivo and accurate gene assessment in vivo. Hum Gene Ther. 2002, 13 (10): 1245-1258. 10.1089/104303402320139023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oktem G, Bilir A, Selvi N, Yurtseven ME, Vatansever S, Ates U, Uysal A, Omay SB: Chemotherapy influences inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activity on 3D breast cancer cell line. Oncol Res. 2006, 16 (4): 195-203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guirado D, Aranda M, Vilches M, Villalobos M, Lallena AM: Dose dependence of the growth rate of multicellular tumour spheroids after irradiation. Br J Radiol. 2003, 76 (902): 109-116. 10.1259/bjr/30772617.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ponce de Leon V, Barrera-Rodriguez R: Changes in P-glycoprotein activity are mediated by the growth of a tumour cell line as multicellular spheroids. Cancer Cell Int. 2005, 5 (1): 20-10.1186/1475-2867-5-20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Feder-Mengus C, Ghosh S, Reschner A, Martin I, Spagnoli GC: New dimensions in tumor immunology: what does 3D culture reveal?. Trends Mol Med. 2008, 14 (8): 333-340. 10.1016/j.molmed.2008.06.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- dit Faute MA, Laurent L, Ploton D, Poupon MF, Jardillier JC, Bobichon H: Distinctive alterations of invasiveness, drug resistance and cell-cell organization in 3D-cultures of MCF-7, a human breast cancer cell line, and its multidrug resistant variant. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2002, 19 (2): 161-168. 10.1023/A:1014594825502.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ferber EC, Kajita M, Wadlow A, Tobiansky L, Niessen C, Ariga H, Daniel J, Fujita Y: A role for the cleaved cytoplasmic domain of E-cadherin in the nucleus. J Biol Chem. 2008, 283 (19): 12691-12700. 10.1074/jbc.M708887200.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Debnath J, Brugge JS: Modelling glandular epithelial cancers in three-dimensional cultures. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005, 5 (9): 675-688. 10.1038/nrc1695.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamada KM, Cukierman E: Modeling tissue morphogenesis and cancer in 3D. Cell. 2007, 130 (4): 601-610. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schmeichel KL, Bissell MJ: Modeling tissue-specific signaling and organ function in three dimensions. J Cell Sci. 2003, 116 (Pt 12): 2377-2388. 10.1242/jcs.00503.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kumar HR, Zhong X, Hoelz DJ, Rescorla FJ, Hickey RJ, Malkas LH, Sandoval JA: Three-dimensional neuroblastoma cell culture: proteomic analysis between monolayer and multicellular tumor spheroids. Pediatr Surg Int. 2008, 24 (11): 1229-1234. 10.1007/s00383-008-2245-2.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Griffith LG, Swartz MA: Capturing complex 3D tissue physiology in vitro. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006, 7 (3): 211-224. 10.1038/nrm1858.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/9/462/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.