Reversal of oncogene transformation and suppression of tumor growth by the novel IGF1R kinase inhibitor A-928605
© Pappano et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 13 March 2009
Accepted: 4 September 2009
Published: 4 September 2009
The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) axis is an important signaling pathway in the growth and survival of many cell and tissue types. This pathway has also been implicated in many aspects of cancer progression from tumorigenesis to metastasis. The multiple roles of IGF signaling in cancer suggest that inhibition of the pathway might yield clinically effective therapeutics.
We describe A-928605, a novel pyrazolo [3,4-d]pyrimidine small molecule inhibitor of the receptor tyrosine kinases (IGF1R and IR) responsible for IGF signal transduction. This compound was first tested for its activity and selectivity via conventional in vitro kinome profiling and cellular IGF1R autophosphorylation. Additionally, cellular selectivity and efficacy of A-928605 were analyzed in an IGF1R oncogene-addicted cell line by proliferation, signaling and microarray studies. Finally, in vivo efficacy of A-928605 was assessed in the oncogene-addicted cell line and in a neuroblastoma model as a single agent as well as in combination with clinically approved therapeutics targeting EGFR in models of pancreatic and non-small cell lung cancers.
A-928605 is a selective IGF1R inhibitor that is able to abrogate activation of the pathway both in vitro and in vivo. This novel compound dosed as a single agent is able to produce significant growth inhibition of neuroblastoma xenografts in vivo. A-928605 is also able to provide additive effects when used in combination with clinically approved agents directed against EGFR in non-small cell lung and human pancreatic tumor models.
These results suggest that a selective IGF1R inhibitor such as A-928605 may provide a useful clinical therapeutic for IGF pathway affected tumors and warrants further investigation.
Insulin-like growth factor signaling plays an important role in development and adult homeostasis by supporting growth and survival of multiple cell and tissue types . These important functions are a direct result of the ability of IGF signaling to activate both the anti-apoptotic AKT pathway and the mitogenic extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK) pathway . However, when this elegantly balanced multi-component signaling system is perturbed, the dual roles of IGF signaling in both survival and proliferation make this pathway a likely contributor to cancer biology. Aberrant IGF signaling has been implicated in multiple aspects of tumor progression including oncogenic transformation, cell proliferation, evasion of apoptosis, tumor cell invasion and metastases [1, 2]. Additionally, IGF signaling has been implicated in resistance to multiple current clinical therapeutics [3–8]. These central roles in tumor initiation, growth and progression make the IGF pathway an ideal candidate pathway to target therapeutically.
IGF pathway signal transduction is thought to occur exclusively through extracellular ligand activation of the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R) and the insulin receptor (IR) . These plasma membrane proteins are members of the receptor tyrosine kinase family and are composed of two extracellular α-subunits disulfide bonded to two single pass membrane spanning β-subunits that contain the cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase activity. The receptors are present either as homodimers or hybrid receptors composed of IGF1R and IR heterodimers, and are activated by binding of the ligands IGF1 and IGF2, as well as insulin when the hybrid receptor is present . The insulin receptor has two alternatively spliced variants known as IRA and IRB. IRA is missing exon 11 which encodes an extra 12 amino acids for the alpha subunit of the IRB form of the receptor. IRB binds to only insulin while IRA is known to associate with both insulin and IGF2 . IGF1 acts both as a circulating hormone and as a tissue growth factor and is expressed in most normal tissues, while IGF2 is predominantly a pre-natal growth hormone in humans [1, 12]. Binding of these ligands to the receptors initiates various signaling cascades that ultimately lead to the anti-apoptotic and proliferative signals through the AKT and ERK pathways, respectively. After ligand binding the receptors become autophosphorylated and activate downstream signaling pathways that ultimately lead to proliferation through effects on cell cycle proteins like Cyclin D1 and p27 . In addition, survival is increased, for instance, by phosphorylation of the pro-apoptotic protein Bad by AKT and ERK, which results in its sequestration and inactivation by 14-3-3 .
The ligand-dependent activation of IGF signal transduction and numerous pathway players increases the complexity of the role of this pathway in cancer. Multiple studies indicate the presence of increased circulating levels of IGF1 in the plasma of patients with prostate, breast and colon cancers . Several studies also implicate over-expression of IGF2 in colon cancer and in ovarian cancer . This increase in IGF2 expression in colon and ovarian cancer is likely the result of a loss of imprinting as both the maternal and paternal forms of this gene are seen in a significant number of these patients [16, 17]. In addition, several studies also suggest that there are a number of tumors that show a higher expression level of IGF1R as well as an increased ratio of IRA to IRB [15, 18, 19].
In this study, we report on the in vitro and in vivo activity of a novel pyrazolo [3,4-d]pyrimidine small molecule inhibitor of IGF1R, A-928605. This compound was found to be selective when analyzed in a panel of in vitro kinase assays, followed by profiling in vivo with a novel IGF1R driven tumor model. Since there are no known activating mutations for IGF1R, we generated a constitutively activated chimeric receptor that is capable of transforming NIH-3T3 cells into a rapidly growing xenograft flank tumor model that is shown to be exquisitely dependent upon IGF signal transduction. The effects of A-928605 in this transformed cell line were directly compared to its effects in the non-transformed control cell line, and resulting data demonstrated that its biological activities are predominantly mechanism-based. The overall positive effects led to analysis of this compound in a patient derived cell line models of neuroblastoma as well as combination studies in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and pancreatic carcinoma in which the small molecule inhibitor A-928605 was shown to be efficacious.
Lapatinib, gefitinib, dastinib, sorafinib, imatinib and erlotinib were prepared using published synthetic procedures. A-928605 was prepared as previously described .
Molecular biology and cell lines
NIH-3T3, SK-N-FI, MiaPaCa-2 and HCC827 cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA). Cell lines were cultured and expanded in media according to ATCC guidelines. CD8-IGF1R was generated by an in-frame fusion of the extracellular and transmembrane domains of the human CD8α coding sequence (amino acids 1-207) followed by a BamHI restriction site to the cytoplasmic domain of human IGF1R (amino acids 959-1368). This product was cloned into the pIRESpuro3 vector (Clontech, Mountain View, CA) via AflII/NotI adaptors. NIH-3T3 CD8-IGF1R and vector control lines were generated by transfection of these constructs with FuGENE 6 (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) followed by selection with 2 μg/ml puromycin. Cells were dilution cloned and surviving colonies were screened for expression of the transgene. Cell clones positive for CD8-IGF1R expression and vector alone transfectants were pooled and remained under puromycin selection for the duration of the study.
Proliferation and soft agar assays
Cells grown in soft agar were plated at 5,000 cells/well in 12-well tissue culture plates in a top layer of 0.3% noble agar on a 0.7% bottom layer. Media containing the final desired concentration of small molecule inhibitor was used as the agar overlay. For proliferation assays, 5,000 cells per well were plated in 96-well tissue culture treated plates and allowed to attach overnight. The following day small molecule inhibitors or DMSO control were added in duplicate at the indicated concentrations and cells were placed in tissue culture incubators for 72 hours. Cell viability was determined by an MTS assay (CellTiter Aqueous One, Promega, Madison, WI).
Western blot analyses
Antibodies used included rabbit anti-ERK1/2 pTpY185/187 (Biosource, Camarillo, CA), rabbit anti-IGF-1Rβ and rabbit anti-Cyclin D1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA), rabbit anti-phospho-IGF-1Rβ (Tyr1135/1136)/IR (Tyr1150/1151), rabbit antiphospho-AKT (S473), rabbit anti-AKT, rabbit anti-ERK1/2, (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Beverly, MA) and mouse anti-ACTIN (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). All cell lysate samples were lysed directly in 2× LDS NuPAGE sample buffer with reducing reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and were analyzed for levels of phosphorylated and total signaling proteins by Western blotting using the NuPAGE electrophoresis and transfer systems (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and near infrared detection.
DNA microarray analysis
Cells were treated with 1 μM of compound or DMSO control (0.000002% final concentration) and grown under normal conditions for 24 hours. Cells were then directly lysed in QIAzol RNA lysis reagent (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Samples were homogenized using an Ultra Turrax T 25 homogenizer (IKA, Wilmington, SC) and then processed with the RNeasy 96 Universal Tissue 8000 kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) using a BioRobot 3000 liquid handler (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and a Sigma 4K15C centrifuge (Sigma, Osterode am Harz, Germany) according to the Qiagen-prescribed protocol. Approximately 2 μg of total RNA for each sample were converted into 20 μg of fragmented, biotin-labeled cRNA with a TargetPrep BioRobot 3000 (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) using a SuperScript Double-Stranded cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), T7-Oligo(dT) primer (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA), MessageAmpTM II-Biotin Enhanced In Vitro Transcription Reagents (Ambion, Austin, TX), and 5× Fragmentation Buffer (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Ten micrograms of fragmented, labeled cRNAs for each sample were hybridized with an Affymetrix Mouse Genome 430A 2.0 array (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) using standard Affymetrix protocols. After hybridization, the chips were washed and stained using Affymetrix GeneChip Fluidics_450 Stations and visualized with the Affymetrix GeneChip Scanner. GeneChip Operating Software (v1.4.036) was used to quantify perfect match and mismatch features on the scanned microarray images. After quantification, quality control was assured using the Affymetrix Power Tools Quality Reporter (v1.0.04) quality control metrics.
Data normalization and analysis were performed using Resolver 7.0 software (Rosetta Inpharmatics, Seattle, WA). Ratios were built for the average of each treatment versus the group average and a p-value was calculated for every-fold change using the Resolver Affymetrix error model . Transcripts and experimental treatments were grouped for visualization by agglomerative hierarchical clustering using the Pearson correlation and the average link in as described in each figure. Probes with a difference of +/- 1.5-fold with a False Discovery Rate (FDR) < 0.05 were considered statistically significant . Transcripts that had statistically significant differences vs. the vehicle control group were investigated through the use of Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) version 6.5 software (Ingenuity Systems, Redwood City, CA) to identify the most significantly over-represented biological pathways and categories of gene ontology with coordinated gene regulation. Array data has been deposited in the public Gene Expression Omnibus database, accession GSE14024.
Tumor implantation and anti-tumor efficacy studies
All animal studies were conducted in accordance with the guidelines established by the internal Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees. For CD8 IGF1R flank tumors, 5.0 × 105 cells/mouse were mixed with an equal volume of Matrigel (BD Biosciences) and injected subcutaneously into the flank of 6- to 8-week-old female nu/nu mice (22 g; Charles River Laboratories). The tumors were allowed to grow approximately 225 mm3, and mice were reassigned into treatment groups (N = 10) based on tumor volume. At the initiation of treatment, the mean tumor volume ± SEM of the groups was approximately 231 ± 10 mm3. For MiaPaCa-2 flank tumors, 1.0 × 106 cells/mouse were mixed with an equal volume of Matrigel and injected subcutaneously into the flank of 6- to 8-week-old female SCID mice (20 g; Charles River Laboratories). The tumors were allowed to grow approximately 225 mm3, and mice were reassigned into treatment groups (N = 10) based on tumor volume. At the initiation of treatment, the mean tumor volume ± SEM of the groups was approximately 210 ± 30 mm3. For HCC-827 flank tumors, a brei was made from HCC-827 tumors maintained by serial passage in mice and injected subcutaneously into the flank of 6- to 8-week-old female SCID mice (20 g; Charles River Laboratories). The tumors were allowed to grow approximately 225 mm3, and mice were reassigned into treatment groups (N = 10) based on tumor volume. At the initiation of treatment, the mean tumor volume ± SEM of the groups was approximately 300 ± 20 mm3. In all flank models, tumor growth was periodically analyzed by measurement with digital calipers and tumor volume was estimated from the formula (L × W 2)/2. For all flank models, the effect of treatment on tumor growth rate was assessed by determining %T/C [(mean tumor volume of treated group on day X ÷ mean tumor volume of control group on day X) × 100].
For all animal studies, administration of therapeutic compounds are described in the figure legends.
Differences between specified groups were analyzed using the Student's t test (two-tailed) for comparing two groups, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
A-928605 is a potent and selective kinase inhibitor of IGF1R
A-928605 reverses IGF1R-dependent transformation
Expression signature of IGF1R transformation is selectively abrogated by A-928605
The dramatic transcriptional changes induced by the constitutive activation of IGF signaling in the CD8-IGF1R line were largely reversed by treatment with A-928605 (Figure 4A). Of the 4,585 transcripts significantly changed in the A-928605-treated CD8-IGF1R cells relative to vehicle-treated CD8-IGF1R cells, 61% were down-regulated and 1860 transcripts overall were in common with those 5,968 transcripts regulated by CD8-IGF1R expression (Figure 4A). By hierarchical clustering, these genes separated into four major clusters. Classes I and II genes exhibited decreased expression in CD8-IGF1R cells relative to NIH-3T3 vector control cells. Class III and IV genes exhibited increased expression in CD8-IGF1R relative to vector control cells. Expression in class I and III genes were normalized by A-928605 treatment. The transcripts in class III include genes related to the cell cycle and to cell growth and proliferation, which was consistent with the status of IGF signaling as potently mitogenic. Data analysis using IPA software revealed regulation of the G1/S and G2/M canonical pathways in both the CD8-IGF1R resting and treated cells. Indeed, mRNA levels of numerous Cyclins such as Ccne1, cell-division cycle proteins including Cdc25c, and other genes related to cell proliferation like Plk1, were up-regulated by CD8-IGF1R expression and down-regulated upon treatment of the CD8-IGF1R positive cells by A-928605 (Figure 4B). Many of these genes have previously been shown to be up-regulated by IGF1 treatment of MCF-7 cells or down-regulated by IGF1R-antibody treatment of SK-N-AS xenograft tumors [27–29]. Other key genes regulated in those studies, such as Aurka, Birc5, Dusp4, and Dusp6 were similarly regulated here (Supplementary Table 1 and Figure 4B). Numerous other growth factor signaling pathways besides the IGF axis were also affected. For example, a variety of cytokines, epidermal growth factors, neurotrophic growth factors, and growth factor receptors were significantly up-regulated by CD8-IGF1R expression and down-regulated upon A-928605 treatment (Supplementary Table 1). In contrast, several important growth factors, including Igf2 and Ogn, the chemokines Cxcl5 and 12, and other growth factor receptors had the opposite expression profile and were in class I. The genes in class IV were up-regulated in CD8-IGF1R cells relative to vector control cells and further up-regulated by A-928605 treatment. Intriguingly, little overall effect on transcription was seen in the vector control line when treated for 24 hours with A-928605, with no statistically significant changes greater than 6-fold and only ten transcripts significantly regulated at all. (Figure 4A, Supplementary Table 1). This almost negligible effect on gene expression in the vector control line combined with the in vitro kinase panel and the weak anti-proliferative effect shown in the vector control line in Figure 3C further demonstrate the biological specificity of A-928605 in blocking the IGF axis.
Translational effects of A-928605 treatment on transformed versus control cells
A-928605 inhibits the growth of IGF1R driven tumors in vivo
A-928605 is effective as a single agent therapy in a human neuroblastoma renal subcapsule model and in combination with other agents in pancreatic and NSCLC models
Tumor growth inhibition studies were also done utilizing the human neuroblastoma cell line SK-N-FI, the human pancreatic carcinoma line MiaPaCa-2 and the human NSCLC line HCC827 to assess the activity of A-928605 in non-engineered models. The SK-N-FI tumor analysis was performed as autocrine IGF signaling has been associated with the proliferation of neuroblastoma as well as other childhood tumors [30, 31]. Accordingly, A-928605 was found to effectively inhibit proliferation of the SK-N-FI cell line in vitro (Figure 1A). The in vivo experiment was performed by surgical renal subcapsule injection of SK-N-FI cells onto the right kidney capsule of experimental animals (Figure 1B). To assess the anti-tumor efficacy of A-928605, mice were randomized on day 14 post SK-N-FI cell injection, when tumor weights were approximately 0.07 g, as determined from cohort mice culled from the study at that time. Treatment for 14 days with A-928605 (b.i.d., i.p.) resulted in a %T/C of 58 (p < 0.001) (Figure 1C &1D).
The ability of A-928605 to significantly inhibit growth in the SK-N-FI model as a single agent led to the analysis of this agent in other human tumor models in combination with clinically approved therapeutics targeting EGFR. The in vivo activity of A-928605 was first assessed in combination with cetuximab, a clinically approved EGFR monoclonal antibody, in the human pancreatic line MiaPaCa-2. First, treatment mice bearing MiaPaCa-2 tumors with A-928605 and cetuximab, alone and in combination, resulted in significant monotherapy activity for each compound, with %T/Cs of approximately 80 (P < 0.05) compared to appropriate controls (Figure 6A). For combination therapy with A-928605 and cetuximab, an additive effect was seen, with the %T/Cs of approximately 72 (P < 0.05) when comparing the combination to each monotherapy and %T/Cs of approximately 60 (P < 0.00001) when comparing the combination to the appropriate negative controls (Figure 6A). The in vivo activity of A-928605 was also assessed in combination with erlotinib, a clinically approved small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of EGFR, in the human NSCLC line HCC827. The HCC827 cell line has greatly increased copy number of the EGFR gene (> 20) and harbors an activating mutation caused by a deletion within exon 19 of the EGFR coding sequence . Treatment of size-matched HCC827 xenografts with A-928605 (data not shown) or erlotinib results in partial responses within these study groups, but the combination of these two therapies leads to a synergistic response and regression of the tumors (Figure 6B). These in vivo results suggest that A-928605 can be an effective therapeutic as a single agent in IGF-dependent tumors, and it can also be quite effective in combination therapy in tumors known to be sensitive to other targeting agents.
The approach of inhibiting IGF1R with a small molecule is validated by the numerous receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) that have been effectively targeted in the treatment of cancer, including Bcr-Abl (imatinib), EGFR (erlotinib, gefitinib) and EGFR/ErbB2 (lapatinib). The success of these small molecule inhibitors in the clinic suggests that numerous other RTKs can be exploited for both their roles in oncogenesis and their relative druggability. The IGF signaling pathway is a multi-component system that plays important roles in both mitogenesis and apoptosis that can ultimately lead to tumorigenesis. The main transducers of the IGF pathway are the RTKs IGF1R and IR. One necessary consideration for targeting the IGF pathway are potential effects on glucose homeostasis in generation of an ATP-competitive inhibitor to IGF1R because of the homology that exists between IGF1R and IR kinase domains (84% similar) and their identical ATP binding sites [33, 34]. Indeed, we find that all IGF1R inhibitors that we have generated, including A-928605, have roughly equipotent IC50s against IGF1R and IR for both in vitro enzyme activity and cellular phosphorylation data (data not shown). This activity is potentially related to increases in resting glucose levels in animal models and patients that is seen after dosing of an IGF1R therapeutic . Despite these complications, the promising efficacy thus far of these treatments in the clinic and the importance of the IGF pathway to human cancer biology warrant additional therapies to go forward into cancer patients where aberrant IGF signaling may be implicated.
In this study we have shown the in vitro and in vivo anti-proliferative effects of a novel pyrazolo [3,4-d]pyrimidine IGF1R small molecule inhibitor. We have characterized A-928605 in an in vitro kinase panel and an oncogene-dependent model cell line that enables rapid analysis of the efficacy of IGF1R small molecule inhibitors both in vitro and in vivo. Using the CD8-IGF1R cell line as a screening tool, A-928605 was shown to be a potent inhibitor of IGF-dependent proliferation. Because of the rapid growth rate and oncogene dependence of the CD8-IGF1R tumor model, the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of A-928605 were ascertained in a tumor setting in less than a week of compound dosing. Additionally, the existence of the isogenic parental vector control cell line served a function in assessing the general non-specific effects of the compound by comparing outcomes in these two cell lines. For instance, A-928605 produced significant changes both by inhibiting early activation of molecules within the IGF signaling pathway and translationally that can be directly attributed to inhibition of IGF1R because none of these effects occurred in the vector control line. A-928605 appears to have few off-target activities in both biochemical and biological contexts when using a kinase panel and microarray analysis of NIH-3T3 cells as rough determinants, respectively. We believe that this cellular analysis is a step beyond and corroborates with the traditional kinome profiling data because it provides an unbiased read-out of the biological consequences of treatment with a small molecule inhibitor in live cells. For example, genes from the microarray analysis include Cdkn1a (p21), which when up-regulated by 1.5-fold in A-928605-treated CD8-IGF1R cells could serve to halt the cell cycle in G1 phase. This may lead to the inhibition of proliferation seen upon treatment with A-928605 both in vitro and in vivo, especially when coupled with the concurrent down-regulation of Cyclin D1 observed at both the transcriptional and protein levels.
It is also interesting to note that activation of the IGF signaling pathway leads to a down-regulation of endogenous IGF pathway components when comparing the untreated vector control line to the CD8-IGF1R line in the microarray experiment. We are not aware of a precedent for this observation and presume this is due to a regulatory feedback loop by the cells in an attempt to quell the high levels of IGF pathway activation observed. This data corroborates well with data currently seen in the clinic for antibodies directed against IGF1R in which the body attempts to compensate for a loss in IGF signaling by increasing levels of circulating IGF1 and Growth Hormone  in a potentially related regulatory feedback loop.
The IGF1R inhibitor A-928605 was also able to significantly retard the growth in a model of neuroblastoma. Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid tumor in children, comprising between 8 and 10% of all childhood cancers. Unfortunately, this disease accounts for 15% of all childhood cancer deaths, indicating the poor prognosis of many of the patients . Autocrine IGF signaling has long been recognized as a mitogenic signal for the proliferation of neuroblastoma as well as other childhood tumors [30, 31]. Therefore, we analyzed the effects of A-928605 in a surgical model of neuroblastoma using SK-N-FI cells injected into the renal subcapsule. SK-N-FI cells are commonly grown as flank model xenografts, but we believe that the implantation used in this study more accurately reflects the true biology of neuroblastoma by placing the tumor near the adrenal glands of the mouse sympathetic nervous system. This combination of the implantation and waiting two weeks after surgery before treatment with the inhibitor provides a much higher hurdle to assess drug efficacy. Treatment of this preclinical tumor model with A-928605 results in significant growth inhibition suggesting that this compound may be clinically effective at treating childhood tumors like neuroblastoma as well as other adult IGF-dependent tumors.
A-928605 is also efficacious in tumor models when used in combination with clinically approved therapeutics designed against EGFR. For instance, human pancreatic xenografts treated with a combination of the EGFR monoclonal antibody cetuximab and A-928605 results in an additive effect on tumor growth inhibition when compared to either of these agents dosed as monotherapies. Combination studies were also performed in the human NSCLC line HCC827. Interestingly, synergy is seen when the combination of the EGFR small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib is used with A-928605. The effect of dual IGF1R/EGFR inhibition leads to a noticeable regression in these tumors. This is of particular interest because clinical data suggests that both the EGFR pathway and the IGF1R pathway are implicated in NSCLC as discussed below.
There are additional small molecule clinical candidates directed against IGF1R that are being investigated, but monoclonal antibodies targeting IGF1R are currently the most clinically advanced reagents. These IGF1R specific antibodies show clear inhibition of tumor growth in numerous pre-clinical tumor models [37–40]. In the clinic, these IGF1R antibodies have produced compelling proof-of-principle data that implicate an important role for IGF signaling in numerous tumor types including, but not limited to, NSCLC and Ewing's Sarcoma . Based on these preliminary clinical results and the preponderance of evidence that IGF plays an essential role in cancer, it is important that development of small molecule inhibitors of IGF1R continue and that they are able to have their clinical efficacy assessed in a patient population in need of more molecularly targeted therapies such as A-928605.
In this study, we demonstrated the in vitro and in vivo activities of A-928605, a novel pyrazolo [3,4-d]pyrimidine small molecule inhibitor of IGF1R. IGF signaling is believed to have multiple roles in cancer from oncogenesis to metastasis making it compelling for a targeted therapy approach. A-982605 is selective at inhibiting IGF1R and effective as a single agent or in combination with clinically approved agents targeting EGFR in several cancer models in vivo. Our results suggest that A-928605 or similar molecules it could provide useful clinical therapeutics in the treatment of cancer.
epidermal growth factor receptor
extracellular signal regulated kinase
false discovery rate
insulin-like growth factor
insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor
Ingenuity Pathways Analysis
non-small cell lung cancer
receptor tyrosine kinase
treated versus control
The authors would like to thank Julie Wilsbacher for her help in preparing this manuscript. We would also like to thank Peter Kovar for his invaluable technical assistance.
- Yakar S, Leroith D, Brodt P: The role of the growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor axis in tumor growth and progression: Lessons from animal models. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2005, 16 (4-5): 407-420. 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2005.01.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baserga R: The insulin-like growth factor-I receptor as a target for cancer therapy. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2005, 9 (4): 753-768. 10.1517/14728126.96.36.1993.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Albanell J, Baselga J: Unraveling resistance to trastuzumab (Herceptin): insulin-like growth factor-I receptor, a new suspect. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001, 93 (24): 1830-1832. 10.1093/jnci/93.24.1830.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jones HE, Goddard L, Gee JM, Hiscox S, Rubini M, Barrow D, Knowlden JM, Williams S, Wakeling AE, Nicholson RI: Insulin-like growth factor-I receptor signalling and acquired resistance to gefitinib (ZD1839; Iressa) in human breast and prostate cancer cells. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2004, 11 (4): 793-814. 10.1677/erc.1.00799.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lu Y, Zi X, Pollak M: Molecular mechanisms underlying IGF-I-induced attenuation of the growth-inhibitory activity of trastuzumab (Herceptin) on SKBR3 breast cancer cells. Int J Cancer. 2004, 108 (3): 334-341. 10.1002/ijc.11445.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lu Y, Zi X, Zhao Y, Mascarenhas D, Pollak M: Insulin-like growth factor-I receptor signaling and resistance to trastuzumab (Herceptin). J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001, 93 (24): 1852-1857. 10.1093/jnci/93.24.1852.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nahta R, Yuan LX, Du Y, Esteva FJ: Lapatinib induces apoptosis in trastuzumab-resistant breast cancer cells: effects on insulin-like growth factor I signaling. Molecular cancer therapeutics. 2007, 6 (2): 667-674. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0423.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilsbacher JL, Zhang Q, Tucker LA, Hubbard RD, Sheppard GS, Bamaung NY, Fidanze SD, Wang GT, Hu X, Davidsen SK, et al: Insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor and ErbB kinase inhibitor combinations block proliferation and induce apoptosis through cyclin D1 reduction and Bax activation. J Biol Chem. 2008, 283 (35): 23721-23730. 10.1074/jbc.M708360200.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Denley A, Cosgrove LJ, Booker GW, Wallace JC, Forbes BE: Molecular interactions of the IGF system. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2005, 16 (4-5): 421-439. 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2005.04.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pandini G, Frasca F, Mineo R, Sciacca L, Vigneri R, Belfiore A: Insulin/insulin-like growth factor I hybrid receptors have different biological characteristics depending on the insulin receptor isoform involved. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277 (42): 39684-39695. 10.1074/jbc.M202766200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frasca F, Pandini G, Scalia P, Sciacca L, Mineo R, Costantino A, Goldfine ID, Belfiore A, Vigneri R: Insulin receptor isoform A, a newly recognized, high-affinity insulin-like growth factor II receptor in fetal and cancer cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1999, 19 (5): 3278-3288.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- LeRoith D, Roberts CT: The insulin-like growth factor system and cancer. Cancer Lett. 2003, 195 (2): 127-137.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liang J, Slingerland JM: Multiple roles of the PI3K/PKB (Akt) pathway in cell cycle progression. Cell Cycle. 2003, 2 (4): 339-345.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- She QB, Solit DB, Ye Q, O'Reilly KE, Lobo J, Rosen N: The BAD protein integrates survival signaling by EGFR/MAPK and PI3K/Akt kinase pathways in PTEN-deficient tumor cells. Cancer Cell. 2005, 8 (4): 287-297. 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.09.006.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Pollak MN, Schernhammer ES, Hankinson SE: Insulin-like growth factors and neoplasia. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004, 4 (7): 505-518. 10.1038/nrc1387.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen CL, Ip SM, Cheng D, Wong LC, Ngan HY: Loss of imprinting of the IGF-II and H19 genes in epithelial ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2000, 6 (2): 474-479.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cui H, Cruz-Correa M, Giardiello FM, Hutcheon DF, Kafonek DR, Brandenburg S, Wu Y, He X, Powe NR, Feinberg AP: Loss of IGF2 imprinting: a potential marker of colorectal cancer risk. Science. 2003, 299 (5613): 1753-1755. 10.1126/science.1080902.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Khandwala HM, McCutcheon IE, Flyvbjerg A, Friend KE: The effects of insulin-like growth factors on tumorigenesis and neoplastic growth. Endocr Rev. 2000, 21 (3): 215-244. 10.1210/er.21.3.215.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tarn C, Rink L, Merkel E, Flieder D, Pathak H, Koumbi D, Testa JR, Eisenberg B, von Mehren M, Godwin AK: Insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor is a potential therapeutic target for gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105 (24): 8387-8392. 10.1073/pnas.0803383105.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hubbard RD, Bamaung NY, Palazzo F, Zhang Q, Kovar P, Osterling DJ, Hu X, Wilsbacher JL, Johnson EF, Bouska J, et al: Pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidines as potent inhibitors of the insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF-IR). Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2007, 17 (19): 5406-5409. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.07.037.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weng L, Dai H, Zhan Y, He Y, Stepaniants SB, Bassett DE: Rosetta error model for gene expression analysis. Bioinformatics. 2006, 22 (9): 1111-1121. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl045.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y: Controlling the false discovery rate--a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B. 1995, 57: 289-300.Google Scholar
- Kellar KA, Lorenzi MV, Ho CP, You D, Wen ML, Ryseck RP, Oppenheimer S, Fink BE, Vite GD, Rowley BR, et al: Constitutively active receptor tyrosine kinases as oncogenes in preclinical models for cancer therapeutics. Molecular cancer therapeutics. 2006, 5 (6): 1571-1576. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0078.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zong C, Yan R, August A, Darnell JE, Hanafusa H: Unique signal transduction of Eyk: constitutive stimulation of the JAK-STAT pathway by an oncogenic receptor-type tyrosine kinase. Embo J. 1996, 15 (17): 4515-4525.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kim HJ, Litzenburger BC, Cui X, Delgado DA, Grabiner BC, Lin X, Lewis MT, Gottardis MM, Wong TW, Attar RM, et al: Constitutively active type I insulin-like growth factor receptor causes transformation and xenograft growth of immortalized mammary epithelial cells and is accompanied by an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition mediated by NF-kappaB and snail. Mol Cell Biol. 2007, 27 (8): 3165-3175. 10.1128/MCB.01315-06.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ledbetter JA, Tsu TT, Clark EA: Covalent association between human thymus leukemia-like antigens and CD8(Tp32) molecules. J Immunol. 1985, 134 (6): 4250-4254.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Creighton CJ, Casa A, Lazard Z, Huang S, Tsimelzon A, Hilsenbeck SG, Osborne CK, Lee AV: Insulin-like growth factor-I activates gene transcription programs strongly associated with poor breast cancer prognosis. J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26 (25): 4078-4085. 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.4429.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Shang Y, Mao Y, Batson J, Scales SJ, Phillips G, Lackner MR, Totpal K, Williams S, Yang J, Tang Z, et al: Antixenograft tumor activity of a humanized anti-insulin-like growth factor-I receptor monoclonal antibody is associated with decreased AKT activation and glucose uptake. Molecular cancer therapeutics. 2008, 7 (9): 2599-2608. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-2401.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang Q, Greene MI: Mechanisms of resistance to ErbB-targeted cancer therapeutics. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2008, 118 (7): 2389-2392. 10.1172/JCI34916.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kiess W, Koepf G, Christiansen H, Blum WF: Human neuroblastoma cells use either insulin-like growth factor-I or insulin-like growth factor-II in an autocrine pathway via the IGF-I receptor: variability of IGF, IGF binding protein (IGFBP) and IGF receptor gene expression and IGF and IGFBP secretion in human neuroblastoma cells in relation to cellular proliferation. Regul Pept. 1997, 72 (1): 19-29. 10.1016/S0167-0115(97)01026-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kurmasheva RT, Houghton PJ: Pediatric oncology. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2007, 11 (4): 424-432. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.05.037.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Amann J, Kalyankrishna S, Massion PP, Ohm JE, Girard L, Shigematsu H, Peyton M, Juroske D, Huang Y, Stuart Salmon J, et al: Aberrant epidermal growth factor receptor signaling and enhanced sensitivity to EGFR inhibitors in lung cancer. Cancer research. 2005, 65 (1): 226-235.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Favelyukis S, Till JH, Hubbard SR, Miller WT: Structure and autoregulation of the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor kinase. Nat Struct Biol. 2001, 8 (12): 1058-1063. 10.1038/nsb721.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ullrich A, Gray A, Tam AW, Yang-Feng T, Tsubokawa M, Collins C, Henzel W, Le Bon T, Kathuria S, Chen E, et al: Insulin-like growth factor I receptor primary structure: comparison with insulin receptor suggests structural determinants that define functional specificity. Embo J. 1986, 5 (10): 2503-2512.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rodon J, DeSantos V, Ferry RJ, Kurzrock R: Early drug development of inhibitors of the insulin-like growth factor-I receptor pathway: lessons from the first clinical trials. Molecular cancer therapeutics. 2008, 7 (9): 2575-2588. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0265.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Riley RD, Heney D, Jones DR, Sutton AJ, Lambert PC, Abrams KR, Young B, Wailoo AJ, Burchill SA: A systematic review of molecular and biological tumor markers in neuroblastoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2004, 10 (1 Pt 1): 4-12. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-1051-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burtrum D, Zhu Z, Lu D, Anderson DM, Prewett M, Pereira DS, Bassi R, Abdullah R, Hooper AT, Koo H, et al: A fully human monoclonal antibody to the insulin-like growth factor I receptor blocks ligand-dependent signaling and inhibits human tumor growth in vivo. Cancer research. 2003, 63 (24): 8912-8921.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cohen BD, Baker DA, Soderstrom C, Tkalcevic G, Rossi AM, Miller PE, Tengowski MW, Wang F, Gualberto A, Beebe JS, et al: Combination therapy enhances the inhibition of tumor growth with the fully human anti-type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody CP-751,871. Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 11 (5): 2063-2073. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1070.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kolb EA, Gorlick R, Houghton PJ, Morton CL, Lock R, Carol H, Reynolds CP, Maris JM, Keir ST, Billups CA, et al: Initial testing (stage 1) of a monoclonal antibody (SCH 717454) against the IGF-1 receptor by the pediatric preclinical testing program. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008, 50 (6): 1190-1197. 10.1002/pbc.21450.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maloney EK, McLaughlin JL, Dagdigian NE, Garrett LM, Connors KM, Zhou XM, Blattler WA, Chittenden T, Singh R: An anti-insulin-like growth factor I receptor antibody that is a potent inhibitor of cancer cell proliferation. Cancer research. 2003, 63 (16): 5073-5083.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/9/314/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.