Neuropilin-2 expression in breast cancer: correlation with lymph node metastasis, poor prognosis, and regulation of CXCR4 expression
© Yasuoka et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 12 February 2009
Accepted: 07 July 2009
Published: 07 July 2009
Neuropilin-2 (Nrp2) is a receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C), which is a well-known lymphangiogenic factor and plays an important role in lymph node metastasis of various human cancers, including breast cancer. Recently, Nrp2 was shown to play a role in cancer by promoting tumor cell metastasis. CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) also promotes tumor metastasis. In the previous studies, we demonstrated that VEGF-C and cytoplasmic CXCR4 expressions were correlated with poorer patient prognosis (BMC Cancer 2008,8:340; Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005, 91:125–132).
The relationship between Nrp2 expression and lymph node metastasis, VEGF-C expression, CXCR4 expression, and other established clinicopathological variables (these data were cited in our previous papers), including prognosis, was analyzed in human breast cancer. Effects of neutralizing anti-Nrp2 antibody on CXCR4 expression and chemotaxis were assessed in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells.
Nrp2 expression was observed in 53.1% (60 of 113) of the invasive breast carcinomas. Nrp2 expression was significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis, VEGF-C expression, and cytoplasmic CXCR4 expression. Survival curves determined by the Kaplan-Meier method showed that Nrp2 expression was associated with reduced overall survival. In multivariate analysis, Nrp2 expression emerged as a significant independent predictor for overall survival. Neutralizing anti-Nrp2 antibody blocks cytoplasmic CXCR4 expression and CXCR4-induced migration in MDA-MB-231 cells.
Nrp2 expression was correlated with lymph node metastasis, VEGF-C expression, and cytoplasmic CXCR4 expression. Nrp2 expression may serve as a significant prognostic factor for long-term survival in breast cancer. Our data also showed a role for Nrp2 in regulating cytoplasmic CXCR4 expression in vitro.
Neuropilin-2 (Nrp2) is a transmembrane glycoprotein that interacts with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Nrp2 is involved in the regulation of many physiological conditions, including angiogenesis . Previous reports have suggested a possibility that Nrp may function independently of VEGF receptors to modulate endothelial cell migration, which may lead to angiogenesis [2, 3]. Nrp2 is also known to function as a receptor for VEGF-C [4, 5], which is a well-known lymphangiogenic factor and plays an important role in lymph node metastasis of various human cancers , including breast cancer . Recently, Nrp2 was shown to play a role in cancer by promoting migration of breast cancer cells, which correlates with tumor cell metastasis [8, 9]. However, the role of Nrp2 in human breast cancer is largely unknown.
Metastasis is the major cause of death associated with solid tumors . Metastasis of cancer cells is a complex process including invasion, hemangiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis, trafficking of cancer cells through blood or lymph vessels, extravasations, organ-specific homing, and growth. Recent evidence suggests that CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) plays a critical role in the homing of cancer cells to specific metastatic sites . The CXCR4 ligand, CXCL12, was found to be expressed in liver, bone marrow, lung, and lymph nodes, and also shown to promote migration of cancer cells . Previous reports demonstrated that up-regulated CXCR4 expression in human cancers, including breast cancer, was correlated with lymph node metastasis and unfavorable prognosis, and was regulated by nitric oxide [13–15].
In this study, we examined the relationship of Nrp2 to lymph node metastasis, VEGF-C expression, and CXCR4 expression in human breast cancer tissues, and further investigated the potential value or relevance of Nrp2 for predicting disease outcome. We then showed that an antibody against Nrp2 reduces cytoplasmic CXCR4 expression and inhibited CXCL12-induced chemotaxis in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells, which were previously shown to express endogenous Nrp2 .
Patients and tumor samples
The relationship between Neuropilin-2 expression and other parameters.
Lymph node metastasis
I and II
For immunostaining, 4-micrometer thick paraffin sections were de-paraffinized, placed in a solution of 97% methanol and 3% hydrogen peroxide for 5 min, then autoclaved for antigen retrieval. After washing in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), the slides were treated for 20 min with Protein Block Serum-free (DAKO Cytomation, Carpinteria, CA, USA). This was followed by an overnight incubation at 4°C in a humidified chamber with a 1:20 diluted goat anti-human Nrp2 antibody (R & D Systems, Inc, Minneapolis, MN, USA). After the overnight treatment, Histofine SAB-PO (NICHIREI, Tokyo, Japan) was used as the second antibody, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Color was developed using diaminobenzidine with 0.01% hydrogen peroxide, and hematoxylin was used as a counterstain. For the negative control, all reagents except for the primary antibody were used. The immunohistochemical scoring was performed blindedly by 3 pathologists (HY, RK, and YN), who had no clinical knowledge of the patients. The immunostained sections of two representative slides of each case were examined by light-microscopy, and all tumor areas were analyzed for Nrp2 positivity, which was defined as the cases in which at least 10% of tumor cells were immunoreactive.
The MDA-MB-231 breast carcinoma cell line was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA). MDA-MB-231 cells were maintained at 37°C in 95% air and 5% CO2, as monolayers in tissue culture dishes containing DMEM medium (Invitrogen, Tokyo, Japan) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS) (HyClone, South Logan, UT, USA). For the experiments, 6 cm tissue culture plates (Corning Inc, Corning, NY, USA) were seeded with 5 × 105 cells in 3 mL of medium + 10% FCS. Next day, media was changed to FCS-free medium, and then neutralizing anti-Nrp2 antibody (final concentration was 3 microgram/mL) was added. This concentration of Nrp2 antibody had no effect on cell viability as measured by the CellTiter 96 Aqueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) (data not shown).
Determination of CXCR4 protein expression
For the determination of CXCR4 protein expression, MDA-MB-231 cell lines were incubated for 12 hours with or without neutralizing anti-Nrp2 antibody, and then harvested. Cell lysates were prepared using NE-PER™ Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) containing Halt™ Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Pierce). For Western blot analysis of CXCR4, 40 microgram samples of nuclear extracts or cytoplasmic fractions were separated by electrophoresis in 10–20% SDS polyacrylamide gels, and transferred to PVDF membranes by electroblotting as described previously . The membrane was blocked with 5% skim milk in PBS for 1 h at room temperature, incubated overnight with anti-human CXCR4 rabbit antibody (Abcam Ltd., Cambridge, UK), washed with PBS, and labeled with peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Dako Cytomation, Denmark) for 1 h at room temperature. The signals were visualized using the LumiGLO Reserve chemiluminescence substrate kit (KPL, Inc, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and recorded by luminocapture (ATTO, Tokyo, Japan). Anti-beta-2-microglobulin antibody (Dako Cytomation) was used for the internal control of cytoplasmic extract. Anti-transcription factor IID antibody (Upstate, Lake Placid, NY, USA) was used for the internal control of nuclear extract.
Migration assay was performed in 24-well plates using inserts with 8 micrometer pore size membranes (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA, USA). The surface of the membranes was precoated with 50 microliter of fibronectin (BD Biosciences) in PBS (25 microgram per mL) per filter, allowed to dry at room temperature, and washed with PBS. MDA-MB-231 cells were suspended at 1 × 106 cells/mL in FCS-free medium and placed in the upper chambers of the membrane. At the same time, the lower compartment of the chamber was loaded with or without 400 ng/mL of recombinant human CXCL12 (R&D Systems), and the upper compartment of the chamber was placed with or without neutralizing anti-Nrp2 antibody (final concentration was 3 microgram/mL). After incubation for 24 hours, the chamber was removed, and cells that had migrated to the bottom of the membrane were fixed, stained in Cyto Quick Solution (Muto Pure Chemical, Tokyo, Japan), and counted by light microscopy. All assays were done in triplicate.
Fisher's exact test was used to examine the association of various clinicopathological factors including Nrp2, VEGF-C expression, and cytoplasmic or nuclear CXCR4 expression. Overall survival (OS) curves and disease-free survival (DFS) curves were obtained using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. A multivariate model using the Cox stepwise regression analysis was used to evaluate the statistical strength of independent association between covariates and DFS and/or OS. The effects of neutralizing anti-Nrp2 antibody treatment were analyzed by Student's t test. A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant. A software package (JMP IN 5.1.1, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) was used for all statistical testing and management of the database.
Nrp2 expression in breast cancer tissue
Nrp2 expression is correlated with lymph node metastasis, VEGF-C expression, and cytoplasmic CXCR4 expression
As we described previously , the expression of VEGF-C protein was observed as diffuse cytoplasmic staining in breast cancer cells. VEGF-C expression was positive in 82% (93 of 113) of the breast cancer patients. Nrp2 expression tended to be co-localized or adjacent to VEGF-C expression (data not shown). In the previous study on immunostaining of CXCR4, cytoplasmic staining had been prominent than nuclear staining . Cytoplasmic staining with a nuclear component had been observed in 20% (23 of 113) of those tumors, predominantly nuclear staining in 5% (6 of 113), predominantly cytoplasmic staining in 29% (33 of 113), and no staining in 45% (51 of 113). In the cases with both Nrp2 and CXCR4 positivity, co-localized expression of these two proteins was observed on sequential sections of the tumors (Figures 1C–D). As shown in Table 1, Nrp2 expression was correlated with lymph node metastasis (p = 0.0389), VEGF-C expression (p < 0.001), and cytoplasmic CXCR4 expression (p < 0.001).
Nrp2 expression is correlated with patients' survival
Anti-Nrp2 blocks CXCR4 expression and CXCR4-induced migration
The present study, to our knowledge, is the first one to demonstrate the clinicopathological significance of Nrp2 expression in human breast cancer. In normal breast epithelium, Nrp2 expression was not observed. In normal and cancer tissue, Nrp2 expression was identified in blood or lymph vessels. In addition to cytoplasmic VEGF-C and cytoplasmic CXCR4 expression, that had been already reported, Nrp2 expression was correlated with lymph node status and was positive in 53.1% of cases.
Previously, we reported that lymph node metastasis is correlated with cytoplasmic CXCR4 expression . Given that Nrp2 expression was significantly correlated with cytoplasmic CXCR4 expression, we considered the possibility that Nrp2 expression with VEGF-C stimulation is involved in the expression of cytoplasmic CXCR4. In the present study, treatment of the MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell line, which express Nrp2, endogenous VEGF-C, and cytoplasmic or nuclear CXCR4 [8, 14, 16], with anti-Nrp2 antibody significantly inhibited cytoplasmic CXCR4 protein expression. Furthermore, the chemotactic responses of MDA-MB-231 cells were significantly blocked by neutralizing anti-Nrp2 antibody. In these cells, cytoplasmic CXCR4 expression was unchanged after administration of recombinant human VEGF-C protein (wild type or Cys156Ser) (data not shown). Endogenous VEGF-C expression may be sufficient for endogenous CXCR4 expression, and Nrp2 with endogenous VEGF-C stimulation may regulate cytoplasmic CXCR4. Our data support the previous report that downregulation of Nrp2 in cancer cells can lead to fewer metastasis . In addition, it is known that expression of CXCR4 in MDA-MB-231 cells is dependent on VEGF signaling . Since the Nrp2 antibody blocked CXCR4 expression at 12 h after administration, the Nrp2 antibody may be affecting CXCR4 expression through the inhibition of VEGF signaling rather than inhibiting CXCR4 directly.
In this study, survival curves determined by the Kaplan-Meier method and univariate analysis demonstrated that Nrp2 expression was negatively associated with OS. Furthermore, multivariate analysis using the Cox stepwise regression analysis demonstrated that Nrp2 expression was still correlated with poor OS after consideration of other prognostic factors. Therefore, Nrp2 expression appears to be a reliable prognostic biomarker. Although we reported previously that cytoplasmic CXCR4 expression may become a useful prognostic indicator for OS, cytoplasmic CXCR4 expression was not identified as an independent prognostic factor for OS in this study (p = 0.0735). Considering that Nrp2 was correlated with poorer prognosis despite no correlation with distant metastasis, it may be necessary to increase the number of cases in the future study.
Nrp2 expression is significantly correlated with VEGF-C expression, cytoplasmic CXCR4 expression, and lymph node metastasis in breast cancer. Nrp2 expression may serve as a significant prognostic factor for long-term survival in breast cancer. Nrp2 also regulates cytoplasmic expression of functional CXCR4 expression in vitro.
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
CXC chemokine receptor 4
Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium
Fetal Calf Serum
We would like to thank Ms. Ayumi Tsukiyama, Department of Pathology, Osaka Police Hospital, and Ms. Shiho Hayashi, Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, for their expert technical assistance. This study was supported by 2008 Wakayama Medical Award for Young Researchers.
- Staton CA, Kumar I, Reed MW, Brown NJ: Neuropilins in physiological and pathological angiogenesis. J Pathol. 2007, 212 (3): 237-248. 10.1002/path.2182.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pan Q, Chanthery Y, Liang WC, Stawicki S, Mak J, Rathore N, Tong RK, Kowalski J, Yee SF, Pacheco G, et al: Blocking neuropilin-1 function has an additive effect with anti-VEGF to inhibit tumor growth. Cancer Cell. 2007, 11 (1): 53-67. 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.10.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang L, Zeng H, Wang P, Soker S, Mukhopadhyay D: Neuropilin-1-mediated vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor-dependent endothelial cell migration. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278 (49): 48848-48860. 10.1074/jbc.M310047200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Favier B, Alam A, Barron P, Bonnin J, Laboudie P, Fons P, Mandron M, Herault JP, Neufeld G, Savi P, et al: Neuropilin-2 interacts with VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3 and promotes human endothelial cell survival and migration. Blood. 2006, 108 (4): 1243-1250. 10.1182/blood-2005-11-4447.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karpanen T, Heckman CA, Keskitalo S, Jeltsch M, Ollila H, Neufeld G, Tamagnone L, Alitalo K: Functional interaction of VEGF-C and VEGF-D with neuropilin receptors. FASEB J. 2006, 20 (9): 1462-1472. 10.1096/fj.05-5646com.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stacker SA, Achen MG, Jussila L, Baldwin ME, Alitalo K: Lymphangiogenesis and cancer metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002, 2 (8): 573-583. 10.1038/nrc863.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakamura Y, Yasuoka H, Tsujimoto M, Yang Q, Tsukiyama A, Imabun S, Nakahara M, Nakao K, Nakamura M, Mori I, et al: Clinicopathological significance of vascular endothelial growth factor-C in breast carcinoma with long-term follow-up. Mod Pathol. 2003, 16 (4): 309-314. 10.1097/01.MP.0000062858.98295.9F.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Timoshenko AV, Rastogi S, Lala PK: Migration-promoting role of VEGF-C and VEGF-C binding receptors in human breast cancer cells. Br J Cancer. 2007, 97 (8): 1090-1098. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603993.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Caunt M, Mak J, Liang WC, Stawicki S, Pan Q, Tong RK, Kowalski J, Ho C, Reslan HB, Ross J, et al: Blocking neuropilin-2 function inhibits tumor cell metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2008, 13 (4): 331-342. 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.01.029.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gupta GP, Massague J: Cancer metastasis: building a framework. Cell. 2006, 127 (4): 679-695. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muller A, Homey B, Soto H, Ge N, Catron D, Buchanan ME, McClanahan T, Murphy E, Yuan W, Wagner SN, et al: Involvement of chemokine receptors in breast cancer metastasis. Nature. 2001, 410 (6824): 50-56. 10.1038/35065016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fernandis AZ, Prasad A, Band H, Klosel R, Ganju RK: Regulation of CXCR4-mediated chemotaxis and chemoinvasion of breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 2004, 23 (1): 157-167. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206910.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yasuoka H, Kodama R, Hirokawa M, Takamura Y, Miyauchi A, Sanke T, Nakamura Y: CXCR4 expression in papillary thyroid carcinoma: induction by nitric oxide and correlation with lymph node metastasis. BMC Cancer. 2008, 8: 274-10.1186/1471-2407-8-274.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Yasuoka H, Tsujimoto M, Yoshidome K, Nakahara M, Kodama R, Sanke T, Nakamura Y: Cytoplasmic CXCR4 expression in breast cancer: induction by nitric oxide and correlation with lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis. BMC Cancer. 2008, 8 (1): 340-10.1186/1471-2407-8-340.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Cabioglu N, Yazici MS, Arun B, Broglio KR, Hortobagyi GN, Price JE, Sahin A: CCR7 and CXCR4 as novel biomarkers predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in T1 breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 11 (16): 5686-5693. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakamura Y, Yasuoka H, Tsujimoto M, Yoshidome K, Nakahara M, Nakao K, Nakamura M, Kakudo K: Nitric oxide in breast cancer: induction of vascular endothelial growth factor-C and correlation with metastasis and poor prognosis. Clin Cancer Res. 2006, 12 (4): 1201-1207. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1269.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakamura Y, Yasuoka H, Tsujimoto M, Imabun S, Nakahara M, Nakao K, Nakamura M, Mori I, Kakudo K: Lymph vessel density correlates with nodal status, VEGF-C expression, and prognosis in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005, 91 (2): 125-132. 10.1007/s10549-004-5783-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tavassoli FA, Devilee P: World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Breast and Female Genital Organs. 2003, Lyon: IARC PressGoogle Scholar
- Bloom HJ, Richardson WW: Histological grading and prognosis in breast cancer; a study of 1409 cases of which 359 have been followed for 15 years. Br J Cancer. 1957, 11 (3): 359-377.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gray MJ, Van Buren G, Dallas NA, Xia L, Wang X, Yang AD, Somcio RJ, Lin YG, Lim S, Fan F, et al: Therapeutic targeting of neuropilin-2 on colorectal carcinoma cells implanted in the murine liver. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008, 100 (2): 109-120. 10.1093/jnci/djm279.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bachelder RE, Wendt MA, Mercurio AM: Vascular endothelial growth factor promotes breast carcinoma invasion in an autocrine manner by regulating the chemokine receptor CXCR4. Cancer Res. 2002, 62 (24): 7203-7206.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/9/220/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.