Glioma stem cells are more aggressive in recurrent tumors with malignant progression than in the primary tumor, and both can be maintained long-term in vitro
© Huang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 23 April 2008
Accepted: 22 October 2008
Published: 22 October 2008
Despite the advances made during decades of research, the mechanisms by which glioma is initiated and established remain elusive. The discovery of glioma stem cells (GSCs) may help to elucidate the processes of gliomagenesis with respect to their phenotype, differentiation and tumorigenic capacity during initiation and progression. Research on GSCs is still in its infancy, so no definitive conclusions about their role can yet be drawn. To understand the biology of GSCs fully, it is highly desirable to establish permanent and biologically stable GSC lines.
In the current study, GSCs were isolated from surgical specimens of primary and recurrent glioma in a patient whose malignancy had progressed during the previous six months. The GSCs were cryopreserved and resuscitated periodically during long-term maintenance to establish glioma stem/progenitor cell (GSPC) lines, which were characterized by immunofluorescence, flow cytometry and transmission electronic microscopy. The primary and recurrent GSPC lines were also compared in terms of in vivo tumorigenicity and invasiveness. Molecular genetic differences between the two lines were identified by array-based comparative genomic hybridization and further validated by real-time PCR.
Two GSPC lines, SU-1 (primary) and SU-2 (recurrent), were maintained in vitro for more than 44 months and 38 months respectively. Generally, the potentials for proliferation, self-renewal and multi-differentiation remained relatively stable even after a prolonged series of alternating episodes of cryopreservation and resuscitation. Intracranial transplantation of SU-1 cells produced relatively less invasive tumor mass in athymic nude mice, while SU-2 cells led to much more diffuse and aggressive lesions strikingly recapitulated their original tumors. Neither SU-1 nor SU-2 cells reached the terminal differentiation stage under conditions that would induce terminal differentiation in neural stem cells. The differentiation of most of the tumor cells seemed to be blocked at the progenitor cell phase: most of them expressed nestin but only a few co-expressed differentiation markers. Transmission electron microscopy showed that GSCs were at a primitive stage of differentiation with low autophagic activity. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization revealed genetic alterations common to both SU-1 and SU-2, including amplification of the oncogene EGFR and deletion of the tumor suppressor PTEN, while some genetic alterations such as amplification of MTA1 (metastasis associated gene 1) only occurred in SU-2.
The GSPC lines SU-1 and SU-2 faithfully retained the characteristics of their original tumors and provide a reliable resource for investigating the mechanisms of formation and recurrence of human gliomas with progressive malignancy. Such investigations may eventually have major impacts on the understanding and treatment of gliomas.
Recent decades have seen only limited progress in treatment trials and basic research on human glioma, the most common central nervous malignancy. This is partly because previously-established glioma cell lines are composed of morphologically and functionally diverse cells that express a variety of neural lineage markers . It is now generally accepted that these previously-established serum-based cell lines do not replicate the major biological features, particularly the stem cells, of human cancers. Therefore, there is an urgent need for new and clinically relevant in vitro model systems for studying tumor biology and conducting preclinical screening of drugs for malignant brain tumors.
There is overwhelming evidence that glioma tissue contains stem cells that are broadly similar to neural stem cells but differ from them in important ways [2–5]. Although CD133, a 120 kDa cell-surface marker of normal human neural stem cells (NSCs), is not a specific marker or gold standard for identifying glioma stem cells, it has been used in most relevant studies for enriching tumor stem-like cells from brain tumors. Vescovi offered a functional definition of brain tumor stem cells, namely: brain tumor cells should qualify as stem cells if they show cancer-initiating ability upon orthotopic implantation, extensive self-renewal ability demonstrated either ex vivo or in vivo, karyotypic or genetic alterations, aberrant differentiation properties, capacity to generate non-tumorigenic end cells, and multilineage differentiation capacity . Because this subpopulation of glioma cells, generally called glioma stem cells (GSCs), may play an extremely critical role in the initiation and recurrence of gliomas, studies focusing on GSCs have been promoted rapidly. However, conclusions about the biological features of GSCs are not always consistent and sometimes even confusing [1, 7–14]. Most investigators believe that short-term cultured stem cells are superior to those maintained long-term. However, since glioma tissues are in very short supply, it is difficult to find tumor stem cells readily for either biological or preclinical drug studies. Therefore, permanent GSC lines could serve such purposes better than GSCs maintained short-term.
Tumor recurrence is the primary cause of treatment failure and death in glioma patients. Although cancer stem cells are now widely believed to be responsible for tumor recurrence, we do not know whether such cells are exactly the same in recurrent tumors as in the primary tumor in cases of malignancy progression.
We have isolated GSCs from surgical specimens of both primary and recurrent gliomas in recent years. Fortunately, GSCs from primary and recurrent tumors in the same patient were screened out and could be maintained long-term . In the current study, we describe the results of long-term (more than three years) in vitro growth of these GSCs and their detailed characterization. To ensure that GSCs are available for use when required, the cells were periodically cryopreserved and resuscitated during long-term culture and tested for their capacity to form new nonadherent tumor spheres upon retrieval. We also compared the biological characteristics of GSCs derived from the primary and recurrent tumors in a patient with malignancy progression.
Isolation and culture of glioma stem cells
Tumor tissues were washed and minced with fine scissors into small fragments. Single tumor cells and small clumps (3–5 cells per clump) were collected with a 35 μm cell strainer, then resuspended in DMEM-F-12 culture medium (Gibco-Invitrogen) to achieve a final concentration of 1 × 108 live cells per ml as assessed by Trypan blue staining . Tumor spheres were cultured as described previously with some modifications .
Flow cytometry and FACS of CD133-positive cells
A single cell-suspension from the tumor spheres was centrifuged, and magnetic cell separation and fluorescence-activated cell sorting were performed as follows. The cells were dissociated and resuspended in PBS. For magnetic labeling, CD133/1 Micro Beads were used (Miltenyi Biotech). Positive magnetic cell separation (MACS) was carried out using several MACS columns in series according to the manufacturer's instructions (Miltenyi Biotec). Cells were labeled with phycoerythin (PE)-conjugated monoclonal antibodies against human CD133 (CD133/2-PE, Miltenyi Biotec) or isotype control antibody (IgG2b(mouse)-PE, Caltag Laboratories) and analyzed using a BD FACS Calibur. The isolated CD133+ cells were suspended in defined stem cell growth medium containing DMEM-F-12, N2 supplement (Gibco), penicillin G, streptomycin sulfate, recombinant human FGF-2 (20 ng/ml; R&D System) and recombinant human EGF (20 ng/ml; R&D Systems), and were plated at a density of 2 × 106 live cells per 75 cm2 on an uncoated plastic flask.
Aliquots of CD133+ tumor cells obtained from MACS were further flow-sorted by FACS. The cells were labeled with CD133/2-PE at 4°C for 10 min following the manufacturer's instructions, then washed and resuspended in stem cell growth medium; negative controls were performed with IgG2b(mouse)-PE antibody as recommended by the manufacturer. The cells were then flow-sorted and dead cells were excluded by propidium iodide (PI) staining.
Tumor spheres of different passages were dissociated into single cells and plated at a density of one cell per well. Half the volume of each culture medium (50 μl) was changed every three days. The formation of tumor spheres was observed under a phase-contrast microscope.
For proliferation assays, cells were plated on 96-well plates and cultured in 200 μl stem cell growth medium/well at a density of 2000 cells/ml. From day 0 to day 10 after plating, viable cells were quantified using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide-based Colorimetric Assay Cell Proliferation kit (Roche) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Tumor spheres cultured alternately in serum-based medium and serum-free stem cell growth medium
Nonadherent tumor spheres were seeded into DMEM-F12 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Hyclone). After the spheres had attached to the bottom of the flask and grown into cell monolayers for two weeks, the cells were washed with PBS to remove fetal bovine serum and transferred to defined stem cell growth medium. These procedures were repeated and morphological changes in the tumor cells were observed under a phase-contrast microscope.
Immunofluoresence staining to detect the expression of differentiation markers
Isolated CD133+ cells were cultured in the aforementioned stem cell growth medium to allow tumor spheres to form. To determine the capacity of CD133+ cells for multi-lineage differentiation, the tumor spheres were transferred to poly-D-lysine coated chamber slides and cultured in DMEM-F12 supplemented with 10% FBS. For immunofluorescence staining at different times during differentiation, namely days 0 (cultured for 4 h in serum-based medium), 3, 7 and 10, cells grown on the slides were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100. The slides were then probed with mouse antibodies against human CD133, nestin (BD Bioscience), GFAP (Santa Cruz) and β-Tubulin-III (BD Bioscience). The secondary antibodies were either FITC- or Texas Red-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Vector Laboratories). The cells were counterstained with 4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Vector Labs). Expression and/or coexpression of the aforementioned cell surface markers during differentiation was detected with a laser scanning confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss), and images were captured on a color CCD at specific magnifications.
Tumorigenicity of GSCs
Tumor cells from both SU-1 and SU-2 spheres were collected and suspended in 2 μl PBS, then injected intracranially into the right caudate nucleus of athymic (NCR nu/nu) mice. All procedures were conducted in accordance with Chinese laws governing animal care. Briefly, under the guidance of a stereotactic system, 2 μl cell suspension (1 × 108 cells/ml) in PBS were delivered into the right caudate nucleus (0.2 μl/min) by injection through a glass electrode connected to a Hamilton syringe. Mice were sacrificed when they became moribund or showed signs of obvious neurological deficit. Tumor samples were snap-frozen and frozen sections (10 μm) were stained with HE following standard protocols.
Transmission electron microscopy
A single cell suspension from the tumor spheres was centrifuged, and magnetic cell separation and fluorescence-activated cell sorting were performed to collect CD133+ GSCs. Positive cells were resuspended in PBS and the suspension was fixed in 4% buffered glutaraldehyde, dehydrated through a graded ethanol series, embedded in Epon and cut into thin sections. The samples were imaged by a transmission electron microscope.
Array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH)
Genome-wide array comparative genomic hybridization was performed to determine changes in the copy number of genomic DNA from SU-1 and SU-2 GSCs. The array used in this study consisted of 2632 human BACs (Spectral Genomics, Houston, TX) spaced at approximately 1 megabase (Mb) intervals across the whole genome. The experiments were performed according to the manufacturer's protocol, as described previously . Briefly, the arrays were pre-hybridized with human Cot-I DNA (Gibco Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and salmon testis DNA to block the repetitive sequences on BACs. One microgram of normal DNA (reference) or tumor DNA (test) was labeled with cy5-dUTP and cy3-dUTP by random priming. To avoid dye bias, we performed dye swap experiments for each sample. The probe mixture was dissolved in hybridization mixture, denatured, cooled and mounted with a 22 × 60 mm coverslip. Hybridizations were performed in sealed chambers for 16–20 h at 60°C. After post-hybridization washes, the arrays were scanned into two 16-bit TIFF image files using a GenePix 4000A two-color fluorescent scanner and quantified using GenePix software (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA). Data were analyzed using SpectralWare 2.2.23 (Spectral Genomics, Houston, TX).
Quantitative real-time PCR
Real-time PCR was performed using SYBR green reagent and the ABI PRISM 7000 Sequence Detection System (PE Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer's instructions. β-actin transcripts were quantified in all samples as an internal control for the amount and quality of cDNA. Detailed information about primer sequence and product size is available upon request. The primer sets were all optimized to generate a single specific band only from cDNA on argarose gels. Melting-curve analysis was performed for all the reactions to control for the specificity of amplifications. The results of real-time PCR were analyzed by the ΔΔCt method and presented as the ratio between the selected genes and β-actin transcripts. The selected gene/β-actin ratio was then normalized to the mean ratio of the selected genes in normal peripheral blood (for DNA) or in cultured normal human astrocytes (Cambrex, East Rutherford, NJ) (for mRNA) to calculate the Tumor/Normal ratio. All experiments were performed in triplicate.
Growth and differentiation of GSCs maintained long-term in vitro
Intracranial xenografts derived from SU-2 are more aggressive than those from SU-1
Transmission electron microscopy showed that GSCs from both SU-1 and SU-2 lacked autophagosomes
Clones with altered DNA copy number identified by array-based CGH
Real-time PCR validated the results of the array-based CGH
To validate the array-based CGH findings, quantitative real-time PCR was performed to examine the expression of genes encoding EGFR, PTEN, CDC2 and DNMT3B. Consistent with the array-based CGH results, real-time PCR showed increased expression of EGFR and DNMT3B and down-regulation of PTEN and CDC2 in GSCs compared to normal human NSCs (Figure 6C).
In the past few years, stem cell-like tumor precursors have been identified in gliomas. They have been consecutively termed glioma stem cells, brain tumor stem cells or brain tumor initiating cells. They are characterized by self-renewal, limitless proliferation, tumor initiation, multi-differentiation and expression of stem cell surface markers such as CD133 and nestin. However, long-term stable maintenance of GSCs, which will offer much more convenient opportunities for attaining full and accurate understanding of the biological features of this special tumor cell type, has been achieved by only a few groups and does not suffice to meet research requirements [18, 19]. No pure CD133+ glioma stem cell line has so far been available; proliferation and differentiation of these tumor stem cells in vitro cannot be stopped completely even in a culture medium favoring stem cell growth. The percentage of CD133+ cells in such lines has varied widely. Accordingly, there are no unanimously agreed criteria for establishing a GSC line. Successful cell lines from other tumors suggest that establishment of a GSC line should meet the following criteria. First, GSCs can be cultured long-term in vitro while maintaining relatively stable stem cell properties. Secondly, even after long-term maintenance, the GSCs should recapitulate their parent or original tumor. In the current study, SU-1 and SU-2, respectively originating from primary and recurrent gliomas with malignancy progression in the same patient, have been maintained in vitro for more than three years while retaining their tumor stem cell properties. Though the percentage of CD133+ cells was not high (less than 10%), nestin+ cells were the dominant subgroup (> 90%). Thus, the two newly established cell lines SU-1 and SU-2 could be regarded as glioma stem/progenitor lines. Cryopreservation and resuscitation were successful during long-term serial passages in vitro. We also noticed differences in configuration between the tumor spheres derived from SU-1 and SU-2. When cultured in defined stem cell growth medium (FBS free), the SU-1 spheres were more compact than those of SU-2, and the percentage of CD133+ cells was lower. When cultured in serum-based medium, SU-2 seemed more resistant to FBS-induced differentiation and remained more morphologically primitive than SU-1. In vivo, direct orthotopic transplantation of SU-1 and SU-2 cells developed into xenografts in immune-deficient mouse cerebrum, but the tumors derived from SU-2 cells were more aggressive than those from SU-1. These data imply that malignancy progression could also occur in tumor stem cells. Taken together, these results suggest that SU-1 and SU-2 could provisionally be regarded as permanent glioma stem/progrnitor cell lines and further utilized as reliable resources for basic research and clinical trials concerning GSCs.
The study of GSCs is actually an extension of that of NSCs, since not only the concepts but also the methods employed are derived from those used for NSCs. The finding that 102 CD133+ tumor cells could produce tumor mass in NOD-SCID mice, while up to 105 CD133- tumor cells could not, proved that the former were brain tumor initiating cells and the latter were not . So it seemed reasonable to suppose that CD133+ tumor stem cells could proliferate and differentiate into CD133- cells, which could further differentiate into common tumor cells approaching terminal differentiation, as NSCs do. However, Beier's studies revealed that four of 15 cell lines derived from primary glioblastomas grew adherently in vitro and were driven by CD133- tumor cells that fulfilled stem cell criteria. Both CD133+ and CD133- subtypes of GSCs were similarly tumorigenic in nude mice in vivo , indicating that CD133 expression is not sufficient to identify GSCs; more effort is needed to identify a specific GSC marker. At present, though this functional criterion for GSCs is sophisticated and inconvenient to apply, it is reliable and should not be neglected unless and until a specific marker for GSCs is found.
GSCs do not differentiate terminally under conditions that would induce terminal differentiation in NSCs. Not only was differentiation retarded, but retro-differentiation was also observed in vitro. Our data showed that soon after treatment with differentiation-inducing agents such as FBS and valproate (VPA), nonadherent tumor spheres dissociated and scattered into adherent spindle-shaped monolayer cells. Most of these were still highly positive for nestin (a marker for neural stem/progenitor cells), while a few cells appeared that were doubly positive for nestin and either GFAP (marker for astrocytes) or β-tubulin III (marker for neurons). Markers of both mature and stem/progenitor cells are very rarely co-expressed during NSC differentiation, but it is common in GSCs . We also observed a "down-up" trend in the percentages of CD133+ cells in SU-1 and SU-2 during a relatively long differentiation-inducing process in vitro; that is, the percentage of CD133+ cells decreased at first, then remained low for a time and finally increased a little, suggesting that partially differentiated CD133+ cells (loss of CD133 expression) retro-differentiated into CD133+ GSCs under certain circumstances, which made the GSCs involved in tumor remodeling more sophisticated. There was a concomitant "up-down" trend in the levels of the neural differentiation markers GFAP and β-tubulin-III. These phenomena were more obvious in SU-2 . Thus, it is easy to infer that GSCs were generally similar to NSCs but showed important differences. Under conditions in which differentiation would be induced in NSCs, GSCs showed an intrinsic potential to maintain their undifferentiated state or to resist differentiation and even tended to retro-differentiate under certain circumstances. Once differentiation was initiated in NSCs, they were transformed step by step into various kinds of mature neural cells.
Amplification of the oncogene EGFR and deletion of the tumor suppressor PTEN have been identified as the critical genetic changes in the tumorigenesis of human GBMs or other types of glioma. However, few existing glioma cell lines harbor these genetic abnormalities [21–32]. The fact that GSCs of both the SU-1 and SU-2 lines faithfully preserved the EGFR amplification and PTEN loss greatly enhances their utility in biological and preclinical studies of human gliomas. Recent studies have shown a close correlation between PTEN loss and low autophagic activiy . We also found that PTEN loss and absence of autophagy were concurrent in both SU-1 and SU-2, and this may suggest potential targets for future molecular intervention. More intriguingly, we discovered amplification of MTA1 in SU-2 but not in SU-1. MTA1 is closely associated with various malignancies and its up-regulation always indicates tumor recurrence and metastasis [34–39]. However, the significance of MTA1 in the malignancy progression of gliomas has rarely been considered. In the current study, the particular amplification of MTA1 in GSCs derived from the recurrent tumor makes it reasonable to conjecture that MTA1 activation may contribute to both the aggression of GSCs and the malignancy progression of gliomas.
In summary, we successfully established two glioma stem/progenitor cell lines from primary and recurrent tumors with malignancy progression obtained from the same patient. We discovered that GSCs in the recurrent tumor with malignancy progression were more aggressive than in the primary tumor, which suggests that tumor progression may be initiated early in tumor stem cells. We also demonstrated that direct isolation and long term maintenance of GSCs from freshly resected glioma tissues is a feasible approach for future biological studies of cancer stem cells and pre-clinical testing of novel therapeutic agents.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this article and accompanying radiographic images.
The authors thank Dr. Ping Feng for her technical support with flow cytometry and our neuropathologist professor Zhen-Yan Liu for his excellent work. This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.30672164; 30772241) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (No. BK2007507).
- Singh SK, Clarke ID, Terasaki M, Bonn VE, Hawkins C, Squire J, Dirks PB: Identification of a cancer stem cell in human brain tumors. Cancer Res. 2003, 63 (18): 5821-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reya T, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF, Weissman IL: Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells. Nature. 2001, 414 (6859): 105-11. 10.1038/35102167.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gilbertson RJ: Brain tumors provide new clues to the source of cancer stem cells: does oncology recapitulate ontogeny?. Cell Cycle. 2006, 5 (2): 135-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Galderisi U, Cipollaro M, Giordano A: Stem cells and brain cancer. Cell Death Differ. 2006, 13 (1): 5-11. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401757.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sanai N, Alvarez-Buylla A, Berger MS: Neural stem cells and the origin of gliomas. N Engl J Med. 2005, 353 (8): 811-22. 10.1056/NEJMra043666.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vescovi AL, Galli R, Reynolds BA: Brain tumor stem cells. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006, 6 (6): 425-36. 10.1038/nrc1889.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ignatova TN, Kukekov VG, Laywell ED, Suslov ON, Vrionis FD, Steindler DA: Human cortical glial tumors contain neural stem-like cells expressing astroglial and neuronal markers in vitro. Glia. 2002, 39 (3): 193-206. 10.1002/glia.10094.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Singh SK, Hawkins C, Clarke ID, Squire JA, Bayani J, Hide T, Henkelman RM, Cusimano MD, Dirks PB: Identification of human brain tumor initiating cells. Nature. 2004, 432 (7015): 396-401. 10.1038/nature03128.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Galli R, Binda E, Orfanelli U, Cipelletti B, Gritti A, De Vitis S, Fiocco R, Foroni C, Dimeco F, Vescovi A: Isolation and characterization of tumorigenic stem-like neural precursors from human glioblastoma. Cancer Res. 2004, 64 (19): 7011-21. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1364.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kondo T, Setoguchi T, Taga T: Persistence of a small subpopulation of cancer stem-like cells in the C6 glioma cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101 (3): 781-6. 10.1073/pnas.0307618100.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fomchenko EI, Holland EC: Stem cell and brain cancer. Exp Cell Res. 2005, 306 (2): 323-9. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2005.03.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zheng X, Shen G, Yang X, Liu W: Most C6 cells are cancer stem cells: evidence from clonal and population analyses. Cancer Res. 2007, 67 (8): 3691-7. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3912.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yuan X, Curtin J, Xiong Y, Liu G, Waschsmann-Hogiu S, Farkas DL, Black KL, Yu JS: Isolation of cancer stem cells from adult glioblastoma multiforme. Oncogene. 2004, 23 (58): 9392-400. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208311.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hemmati HD, Nakano I, Lazareff JA, Masterman-Smith M, Geschwind DH, Bronner-Fraser M, Kornblum HI: Cancerous stem cells can arise from pediatric brain tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100 (25): 15178-83. 10.1073/pnas.2036535100.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zhang QB, Ji XY, Huang Q, Dong J, Zhu YD, Lan Q: Differentiation profile of brain tumor stem cells: a comparative study with neural stem cells. Cell Res. 2006, 16 (12): 909-15. 10.1038/sj.cr.7310104.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reynolds BA, Weiss S: Generation of neurons and astrocytes from isolated cells of the adult mammalian central nervous system. Science. 1992, 255 (5052): 1707-10. 10.1126/science.1553558.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Man TK, Lu XY, Jaeweon K, Perlaky L, Harris CP, Shah S, Ladanyi M, Gorlick R, Lau CC, Rao PH: Genome-wide array comparative genomic hybridization analysis reveals distinct amplifications in osteosarcoma. BMC Cancer. 2004, 4: 45-54. 10.1186/1471-2407-4-45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Inagaki A, Soeda A, Oka N, Kitajima H, Nakagawa J, Motohashi T, Kunisada T, Iwama T: Long-term maintenance of brain tumor stem cell properties under at non-adherent and adherent culture conditions. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007, 361 (3): 586-92. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.07.037.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Günther HS, Schmidt NO, Phillips HS, Kemming D, Kharbanda S, Soriano R, Modrusan Z, Meissner H, Westphal M, Lamszus K: Glioblastoma-derived stem cell-enriched cultures form distinct subgroups according to molecular and phenotypic criteria. Oncogene. 2008, 27 (20): 2897-909. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210949.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beier D, Hau P, Proescholdt M, Lohmeier A, Wischhusen J, Oefner PJ, Aigner L, Brawanski A, Bogdahn U, Beier CP: CD133 (+) and CD133 (-) glioblastoma-derived cancer stem cells show differential growth characteristics and molecular profiles. Cancer Res. 2007, 67 (9): 4010-5. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4180.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Giannini C, Sarkaria JN, Saito A, Uhm JH, Galanis E, Carlson BL, Schroeder MA, James CD: Patient tumor EGFR and PDGFRA gene amplifications retained in an invasive intracranial xenograft model of glioblastoma multiforme. Neuro Oncol. 2005, 7 (2): 164-76. 10.1215/S1152851704000821.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Pandita A, Aldape KD, Zadeh G, Guha A, James CD: Contrasting in vivo and in vitro fates of glioblastoma cell subpopulations with amplified EGFR. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2004, 39 (1): 29-36. 10.1002/gcc.10300.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ekstrand AJ, James CD, Cavenee WK, Seliger B, Pettersson RF, Collins VP: Genes for epidermal growth factor receptor, transforming growth factor alpha, and epidermal growth factor and their expression in human gliomas in vivo. Cancer Res. 1991, 51 (8): 2164-72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wong AJ, Bigner SH, Bigner DD, Kinzler KW, Hamilton SR, Vogelstein B: Increased expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene in malignant gliomas is invariably associated with gene amplification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987, 84 (19): 6899-903. 10.1073/pnas.84.19.6899.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nathoo N, Goldlust S, Vogelbaum MA: Epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists: novel therapy for the treatment of high-grade gliomas. Neurosurgery. 2004, 54 (6): 1480-8. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000125006.88478.F6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cappuzzo F: Erlotinib in gliomas: should selection be based on EGFR and Akt analyses?. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005, 97 (12): 868-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Groszer M, Erickson R, Scripture-Adams DD, Dougherty JD, Le Belle J, Zack JA, Geschwind DH, Liu X, Kornblum HI, Wu H: PTEN negatively regulates neural stem cell self-renewal by modulating G0-G1 cell cycle entry. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103 (1): 111-6. 10.1073/pnas.0509939103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Knobbe CB, Merlo A, Reifenberger G: PTEN signaling in gliomas. Neuro Oncol. 2002, 4 (3): 196-211. 10.1215/15228517-4-3-196.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sansal I, Sellers WR: The biology and clinical relevance of the PTEN tumor suppressor pathway. J Clin Oncol. 2004, 22 (14): 2954-63. 10.1200/JCO.2004.02.141.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li J, Yen C, Liaw D, Podsypanina K, Bose S, Wang SI, Puc J, Miliaresis C, Rodgers L, McCombie R, Bigner SH, Giovanella BC, Ittmann M, Tycko B, Hibshoosh H, Wigler MH, Parsons R: PTEN, a putative protein tyrosine phosphatase gene mutated in human brain, breast, and prostate cancer. Science. 1997, 275 (5308): 1943-7. 10.1126/science.275.5308.1943.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Teng DH, Hu R, Lin H, Davis T, Iliev D, Frye C, Swedlund B, Hansen KL, Vinson VL, Gumpper KL, Ellis L, El-Naggar A, Frazier M, Jasser S, Langford LA, Lee J, Mills GB, Pershouse MA, Pollack RE, Tornos C, Troncoso P, Yung WK, Fujii G, Berson A, Steck PA: MMAC1/PTEN mutations in primary tumor specimens and tumor cell lines. Cancer Res. 1997, 57 (23): 5221-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ishii N, Maier D, Merlo A, Tada M, Sawamura Y, Diserens AC, van Meir EG: Frequent co-alterations of TP53, p16/CDKN2A, p14ARF, PTEN tumor suppressor genes in human glioma cell lines. Brain Pathol. 1999, 9 (3): 469-79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gozuacik D, Kimchi A: Autophagy as a cell death and tumor suppressor mechanism. Oncogene. 2004, 23 (16): 2891-906. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207521.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Balasenthil S, Broaddus RR, Kumar R: Expression of metastasis-associated protein 1 (MTA1) in benign endometrium and endometrial adenocarcinomas. Hum Pathol. 2006, 37 (6): 656-61. 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.01.024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gururaj AE, Singh RR, Rayala SK, Holm C, den Hollander P, Zhang H, Balasenthil S, Talukder AH, Landberg G, Kumar R: MTA1, a transcriptional activator of breast cancer amplified sequence 3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103 (17): 6670-5. 10.1073/pnas.0601989103.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Jang KS, Paik SS, Chung H, Oh YH, Kong G: MTA1 overexpression correlates significantly with tumor grade and angiogenesis in human breast cancers. Cancer Sci. 2006, 97 (5): 374-9. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2006.00186.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yi C, Li X, Xu W, Chen A: Relationship between the expression of MTA-1 gene and the metastasis and invasion in human osteosarcoma. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2005, 25 (4): 445-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hofer MD, Menke A, Genze F, Gierschik P, Giehl K: Expression of MTA1 promotes motility and invasiveness of PANC-1 pancreatic carcinoma cells. Br J Cancer. 2004, 26;90 (2): 455-62. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601535.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Toh Y, Ohga T, Endo K, Adachi E, Kusumoto H, Haraguchi M, Okamura T, Nicolson GL: Expression of the metastasis-associated MTA1 protein and its relationship to deacetylation of the histone H4 in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. Int J Cancer. 2004, 110 (3): 362-7. 10.1002/ijc.20154.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/304/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.