Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Paradoxes in carcinogenesis: New opportunities for research directions

BMC Cancer20077:151

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-7-151

Received: 01 May 2007

Accepted: 06 August 2007

Published: 06 August 2007

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 May 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniel Satge
30 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Darryl Shibata
1 Jun 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ana Soto
3 Jul 2007 Author responded Author comments - Stuart Baker
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Jul 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Jul 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Darryl Shibata
6 Aug 2007 Author responded Author comments - Stuart Baker
Resubmission - Version 4
6 Aug 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
6 Aug 2007 Editorially accepted
6 Aug 2007 Article published 10.1186/1471-2407-7-151

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute
(2)
Office of Disease Prevention, National Institutes of Health

Advertisement