Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

The selective Cox-2 inhibitor Celecoxib suppresses angiogenesis and growth of secondary bone tumors: An intravital microscopy study in mice

BMC Cancer volume 6, Article number: 9 (2006) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The inhibition of angiogenesis is a promising strategy for the treatment of malignant primary and secondary tumors in addition to established therapies such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. There is strong experimental evidence in primary tumors that Cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox-2) inhibition is a potent mechanism to reduce angiogenesis. For bone metastases which occur in up to 85% of the most frequent malignant primary tumors, the effects of Cox-2 inhibition on angiogenesis and tumor growth remain still unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of Celecoxib, a selective Cox-2 inhibitor, on angiogenesis, microcirculation and growth of secondary bone tumors.

Methods

In 10 male severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice, pieces of A549 lung carcinomas were implanted into a newly developed cranial window preparation where the calvaria serves as the site for orthotopic implantation of the tumors. From day 8 after tumor implantation, five animals (Celecoxib) were treated daily with Celecoxib (30 mg/kg body weight, s.c.), and five animals (Control) with the equivalent amount of the CMC-based vehicle. Angiogenesis, microcirculation, and growth of A549 tumors were analyzed by means of intravital microscopy. Apoptosis was quantified using the TUNEL assay.

Results

Treatment with Celecoxib reduced both microvessel density and tumor growth. TUNEL reaction showed an increase in apoptotic cell death of tumor cells after treatment with Celecoxib as compared to Controls.

Conclusion

Celecoxib is a potent inhibitor of tumor growth of secondary bone tumors in vivo which can be explained by its anti-angiogenic and pro-apoptotic effects. The results indicate that a combination of established therapy regimes with Cox-2 inhibition represents a possible application for the treatment of bone metastases.

Peer Review reports

Background

Angiogenesis – the formation of new blood vessels from an already established microvasculature – is a key contributor to the pathogenesis of several diseases such as benign and malignant tumors, rheumatoid arthritis, and diabetic retinopathy. A solid tumor cannot grow beyond a critical size of 1–2 mm3 or metastasize without an adequate blood supply [1, 2]. The development of a new vascular network consists of several steps which are controlled by various endogenous stimulators and inhibitors [3]. The best investigated endothelial cell specific growth factors are the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family and its receptors VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, and VEGFR-3 [4, 5]. Besides hypoxia which is the main inducer of VEGF, prostaglandins mediated by Cox-2 have been reported to regulate VEGF expression [6–8] which demonstrates an important link between Cox-2 activity and VEGF expression [9]. Cox-2 is induced by cytokines, growth factors and tumor promoters and is over expressed in inflamed and malignant tissues [10]. The enzyme is localized in neoplastic cells, endothelial cells, and stromal tissues [9, 11–13] and contributes to tumor angiogenesis and tumor growth by (1) an increased expression of the angiogenic growth factor VEGF [14], (2) the production of eicosanoid products which can directly stimulate endothelial cell growth factor induced angiogenesis [15], and (3) the inhibition of tumor and endothelial cell apoptosis by up regulating the antiapoptotic protein bcl-2 [16, 17]. Due to the multiple links between tumor angiogenesis, tumor growth and Cox-2 expression, selective pharmacological inhibition of Cox-2 represents a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of malignant solid tumors.

Celecoxib, a selective Cox-2 inhibitor has been shown to effectively decrease tumor angiogenesis and reduce tumor growth of a variety of experimental primary tumors including colorectal, prostate, and breast tumors [18–24]. However, the effects of Cox-2 inhibition on bone metastases which are found in up to 40% of autopsies of patients with a primary lung tumor [25] have not been described so far.

Here we report our in vivo findings that Celecoxib has anti tumor effects on secondary bone tumors of a non-small cell lung carcinoma by inhibiting angiogenesis and promoting tumor cell apoptosis.

Methods

Animal model and cell lines

Experiments were performed in 10 male adult severe combined immunodeficient mice (SCID, C.B-17/IcrCrl-scid-BR, Charles River Laboratories Inc., Sulzfeld, Germany, 7 to 8 weeks old, 20 to 25 g body weight), following institutional guidelines, approved by the local animal review board.

The human lung carcinoma cell line A 549 was obtained from the German Cancer Research Institute (Heidelberg, Germany). Tumor cells [1 × 107/ml] were injected subcutaneously into the left flank of a donor mouse each and grown to a volume of 0.5 to 1.0 cm3. After sacrificing the donor mouse, the tumor was excised, cut into small pieces (volume 0.5–1.0 mm3) in Dulbecos Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM,) at 4°C and implanted into the recipient mouse as follows.

All surgical procedures were performed in strictly aseptic conditions within a laminar flow unit (Merck Eurolab, Bruchsal, Germany) under deep anesthesia by an intra peritoneal injection of a mixture of ketamine (Ketanest®, 65 mg/kg body weight, Pfizer, Karlsruhe, Germany), xylazine (Rompun®, 13 mg/kg body weight, Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) and acepromazine (Sedastress®, 2 mg/kg body weight, Medistar, Holzwickede, Germany). The surgical preparation was performed as described previously [26]. In brief, the scalp of the mouse was shaved and was surgically excised in an oval area to expose the frontal and parietal bone. The periosteum was removed and an oval cavity of approximately 2 by 1 by 0.5 mm was milled into the calvaria by eliminating parts of the external tabula of the calvaria including the spongious bone underneath. Then one piece (approx. 0.5–1.0 mm3) of the human lung carcinoma A 549 was implanted into the cavity. To prevent the tumors from dehydrating or from mechanical damage, the preparation was sealed with a glass cover slip and bone cement.

The animals were housed individually in special filter cages to maintain aseptic conditions and to prevent mutual damaging of the cranial window. The animals were provided with sterile standard pellet food and water ad libitum.

Cox-2 inhibitor treatment

The selective Cox-2 inhibitor Celecoxib was a generous gift of Pharmacia Inc. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Celecoxib was dissolved in a carboxymethylcellulose (CMC)-based vehicle at 5 mg Celecoxib/ml vehicle. Five animals each were treated once daily by s.c. injection of 30 mg/kg body weight Celecoxib (Celecoxib, n = 5) or the equivalent amount of the (CMC)-based vehicle alone (Control, n = 5). Treatment started on day 8 after tumor implantation and was continued until termination of experiments on day 28 after tumor implantation.

Intravital microscopy

For intravital microscopy, mice were anesthetized and positioned on a custom made stereotactic device.

Within the first week after tumor implantation, mice were observed daily under epi-illumination with a stereotactic microscope (Leica MZ75, Leica, Germany) employing a 5 to 40 fold magnification. At 24 hour intervals, the first appearance of (i) hemorrhage, (ii) the first appearance of newly formed blood vessels entering the implanted tumor tissue, and (iii) the onset of perfusion in these newly formed vessels were determined. Two-dimensional tumor growth was determined off line by measuring the tumors surface area on days 7, 14, 21, and 28 after implantation.

Intravital fluorescence video microscopy was performed using an epi-illumination fluorescence microscope unit (Leica, Germany) equipped with a 4× (EF 4/0.12, Leitz, Wetzlar, Germany) and 40× (Zeiss Achroplan 40×/0.75 w, Carl Zeiss, Germany) objective on days 7, 14, 21 and 28 after tumor implantation. For off line analysis, regions of interest were recorded on video tapes using a S-VHS videocassette recorder (AG-7350, Panasonic, Japan) at a rate of 50 frames/s and a digital camera (Kappa CF 8/1, Kappa Opto-electronics, Germany).

Using an adequate fluorescence filter set for green light (bandpass 515–560 nm), the intravenous injection of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled dextran (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, FITC-Dextran, FD 2000S, molecular weight 2.000.000; 0.1 ml of a 5% solution in 0.9% NaCl as a plasma marker) enabled the observation of the tumor microcirculation.

Off-Line analysis of tumor growth and microhemodynamics

Tumor growth was determined off-line by measuring its two-dimensional surface area in mm2 from standardized digital photographs of the cranial window preparation at 10–fold magnification on days 7, 14, 21, and 28 after implantation using a computer based analysis program (AnalySIS® V3.0, Soft Imaging System, Münster, Germany).

The functional microvessel density (FVD) was determined as the length of all perfused microvessels within a tumor in relation to the two-dimensional surface area of the tumor in mm/mm2 indicated by the fluorescence of FITC labeled dextran in all perfused vessels. Recordings on video tape for off line analysis of the functional vessel density were made for 15 s each. The off line analysis was performed using a computer based image analysis program (CapImage®, Engineering Office Dr. Zeintl, Heidelberg, Germany).

Histopathologic assessment

At the end of the experiment, tumors were immediately excised with the surrounding tissue of the calvaria and the brain for further histopathologic investigation. Tissue samples were fixed for 24–48 hours by immersion in 4% formalin solution. After decalcification of the bone in ethylene-diaminetetraacetic acid for 2 weeks, samples were embedded in paraffin and sliced in three-μm serial sections for Hematoxylin-Eosin staining and five-μm serial sections for immunohistochemistry.

For the TUNEL reaction, the in situ Cell Death Detection Kit (Cat. No 1684809, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions: Briefly, deparaffinized sections were pretreated with proteinase K in 10 mM Tris/HCl and washed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Sections were then incubated with Triton 0.1% (Triton® x-100, Lot. No. 93424, Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland), washed in PBS, and incubated with 5% BSA (Albumin from bovine serum, A-9647, Sigma, St. Louis, MO) to block endogenous peroxidase. For TUNEL reaction, the sections were incubated with the TUNEL reaction mix. Sections were then rinsed with tris buffered saline (TBS) and incubated in converter alkaline phosphatase, followed by TBS washings. Sections were then stained with Fast Red (Sigma FastTM, F-4648, St. Louis, MO) for 10–15 minutes depending on staining intensity. Sections were counterstained with Mayer's hematoxylin (Hämalaun Mayer, Art.-Nr. 1A-528, Chroma, Münster, Germany) and mounted with AquaTex (AquaTex®, Cat.No. 1.08562, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Treatment procedures for Control specimen were the same except for omitting the primary antibody.

For quantitative analysis of apoptotic cells, standardized digital images were acquired with a color digital microscopic camera system (Leitz Diavert microscope, Leica, Bensheim; AxioCam®, Carl Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany) with a resolution of 1300 × 1030 pixel at 200 fold magnification in three randomly distinguished regions of interest (ROI) of each slide and processed with AxioVision Rel. 3.1 software package (Carl Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany). The total number of tumor cells and the number of apoptotic tumor cells were counted. The percentage of positive cells with TUNEL staining served as rate of apoptosis.

Statistics

All numerical data are presented as median with 25% and 75% quartile. Using the software program SigmaStat® for Windows (Version 2.03, SPSS, Chicago, IL), data were analyzed statistically with ANOVA on ranks. Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test was applied for pair wise comparison procedures. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05.

Results

The first newly formed vessels were observed 6 days after implantation in all tumors. Vessel formation was followed by a rapid onset of perfusion within the next 24 hours. Intravital microscopy showed that the origin of the angiogenic sprouting was from the vessels located within the surrounding bone.

Within the first week after tumor implantation, tumor growth was identical in all animals. After the initiation of treatment on day 8 after tumor implantation, animals treated with Celecoxib showed a reduced tumor growth compared to Controls without significant differences between both groups until day 21. On day 28 after tumor implantation, the two-dimensional tumor surface was found statistically smaller with 4.8 mm2 (3.7/5.7) in Celecoxib compared to 10.3 mm2 (7.5/11.4) in Controls (Fig. 1).

Figure 1
figure 1

Graph: Tumor surface, time course. Y-axis: tumor surface (ATUM in mm2), x-axis: time in days after implantation. ANOVA on ranks (p = 0,016); *p < 0.05 versus day 7, #p < 0.05 versus Control, Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test. Significant increase in two-dimensional tumor surface in both groups between days 7 and 28 after tumor implantation. Two-dimensional tumor surface is significantly reduced in animals treated with Celecoxib compared to Controls on day 28. A, B, C, D: Photographs of the cranial window with A 549 lung carcinoma, top-view, scale bar 1000 μm. Tumor borders marked by arrows. Day 7: Celecoxib (A), Control (C). Day 28: Celecoxib (B), Control (D).

Full size image

Functional vessel density (FVD) in the Control animals increased between day 7 and day 14 after tumor implantation, reaching a constant plateau between days 14 and 28. Between days 7 and 14 FVD was similar in animals treated with Celecoxib. However, from day 21 after tumor implantation, FVD decreased in animals treated with Celecoxib. On day 28, FVD was significantly lower in Celecoxib treated animals compared to Controls (10.3 mm/mm2 (9.8/10.6) vs. 7.8 mm/mm2 (6.6/8.1), p = 0.008, Fig. 2). In both groups, FVD was significantly higher at day 28 after tumor implantation compared to the first measurements on day 7 after tumor implantation.

Figure 2
figure 2

Graph: Functional vessel density, time course. Y-axis: functional vessel density (FVD in mm/mm2), x-axis: time in days after implantation. ANOVA on ranks (p = 0.008); *p < 0.05 versus day 7, #p < 0.05 versus Control, Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test. Significant increase in functional vessel density in both groups between days 7 and 28 after tumor implantation. Functional vessel density is significantly reduced in animals treated with Celecoxib compared to Controls on day 28. A, B: Photographs from intravital fluorescence microscopy, top-view, scale bar 200 μm. Tumor borders marked by arrows. Day 28: Celecoxib (A), Control (B).

Full size image

The growth of the implanted tumors was observed histologically in all of the cranial window preparations (Fig. 3 a,b). The tumor dimensions determined from the H&E stained tissue slices showed a close correlation to the tumor sizes quantified from intravital microscopy investigations. TUNEL staining showed an increased rate of apoptosis in tumors treated with Celecoxib (p < 0.001). The percentage of apoptotic cells per total tumor cell number was 54.4% (44.0/65.8) after Celecoxib treatment versus 21.8% (4.4/43.5) in Controls. Cell counting also revealed a reduced overall density of tumor cells with 3394 cells/mm2 (3129/3936) in animals treated with Celecoxib compared to 4996 cells/mm2 (4466/5732) in Controls (p < 0,001). (Fig. 3 c,d)

Figure 3
figure 3

A, B: A 549 lung carcinoma at day 28, hematoxylin-eosin stained cross section, scale bar 500 μm. Tumor borders marked by arrows. Control (A), Celecoxib (B). C, D: A 549 lung carcinoma at day 28, TUNEL reaction, scale bar 50 μm, apoptotic cells stained red. Control (C), Celecoxib (D).

Full size image

The injection of Celecoxib or CMC-vehicle alone was well tolerated, no difference in animal behavior or loss of weight was observed.

Discussion

Today's therapy of bone metastases with surgical procedures, chemotherapy, and radiation is limited to palliative treatment in many cases. Since angiogenesis is essential for tumor growth, selective targeting of tumor vasculature is a promising strategy that might help to overcome limited therapy options in bone metastases. Although bone metastases occur in up to 40% of lung cancer patients [25], research on antiangiogenic therapy has mostly been focused on primary tumors. Compounds inhibiting Cox-2 are of special interest for antiangiogenic therapy because prostaglandins mediated by Cox-2 have been shown to be important contributors to VEGF dependent tumor angiogenesis [27]. Cox-2 inhibitors have already shown promising antitumor effects in several solid tumors [18, 19, 22–24], however, the effects of Cox-2 inhibition on bone metastases have not been described so far. The main goal of the current study was to determine the effects of the selective Cox-2 inhibitor Celecoxib on tumor growth and angiogenesis of secondary bone tumors of a human non small cell lung carcinoma in vivo.

Previous studies have suggested that the antitumor activity of Celecoxib can be attributed, at least in part, to the inhibition of tumor angiogenesis [9, 16, 28, 29]. Liu et al. [16] showed that the selective Cox-2 inhibitor NS 398 did not directly effect tumor cell proliferation of PC-3 prostate carcinomas but suppressed tumor growth through a down regulation of VEGF mediated tumor angiogenesis.

In the present study, Celecoxib significantly reduced functional vessel density in tumors and tumor size by 25% and 53%, respectively, compared to Controls. It has been shown previously that the antiangiogenic potential of selective Cox-2 inhibitors is mainly mediated by Cox-2 dependent mechanisms. Cox-2 regulates angiogenesis primarily through the eicosanoid products prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), Thromboxane A2 (TXA2) and Prostacyclin (PGI2) [6, 15, 30–36]. PGE2 stimulates the expression of VEGF, the key regulator of angiogenesis [6, 30, 31]. Downstream angiogenic actions of PGE2 also include the induction of the matrix metalloprotinases MMP-2 and MMP-9 and the integrin αvβ3 which is selectively expressed on endothelial cells [32–35]. TXA2 and PGI2 mediate angiogenic actions such as endothelial cell migration and VEGF up regulation [15, 36]. Antiangiogenesis, induced by endothelial cell apoptosis may be mediated by Cox-2 dependent and Cox-2 independent mechanisms [17, 21, 37–39].

The mechanisms and the causal relation between Cox-2 inhibition, angiogenesis and tumor growth were not investigated within the scope of the present study. However, our data demonstrate an effective anti tumor action of Celecoxib. The results of the functional vessel density time course indicate that one mechanism underlying the anti tumor effect of Celecoxib is the antiangiogenic potential resulting in a reduction of feeding and draining tumor blood vessels. Interestingly, the time course showed that the functional vessel density decreased in animals treated with Celecoxib from day 14 after tumor implantation while the tumor surface increased overall. However, tumor growth was decelerated by Celecoxib, resulting in a relatively reduced tumor size of 53% compared to Controls, suggesting that the decrease of functional vessel density precedes a reduction of tumor size.

Liu et al. [16] further stated that tumor growth suppression by Cox-2 inhibition is achieved by a combination of direct induction of tumor cell apoptosis and decreased angiogenesis because NS 398 also enhanced tumor cell apoptosis, detected with the TUNEL reaction. Since then, the proapoptotic effect of Cox-2 inhibitors on tumor cells and endothelial cells, being mediated via various pathways has been proved in several in vitro and in vivo studies [17, 21, 37, 38, 40–46]. Cox-2 dependent mechanisms are based on a decreased production of PGE2 which is associated with the modulation of pro- and antiapoptotic factors such as Bcl-2 and the prostate apoptosis-response gene (PAR-4) [17, 38]. Cox-2 independent mechanisms of apoptosis induction by Celecoxib include (i) bcl-2 independent blockade of Akt signaling by inhibition of 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 (PDK-1) and (ii) a caspase-9 and apoptosis protease-activating factor-1 (Apaf-1) dependent but bcl-2 independent mitochondrial pathway [21, 37, 41–45]. The significance of the Cox-2 independent apoptosis pathways was substantiated by the creation of Celecoxib derivates lacking Cox-2 inhibitory activity being able to effectively induce apoptosis via the same mechanisms as the parental Celecoxib, such as the blockade of Akt activation [42–44]. In the present study, apoptosis of tumor cells was investigated using the TUNEL assay. Consistent with previous findings, a significantly higher percentage of apoptotic tumor cells were found in tumors treated with Celecoxib compared to Controls. The exact mechanism by which apoptosis is augmented is not established in this study. However, it may be suggested that it is similar to that reported previously, which may include Cox-2 dependent as well as Cox-2 independent pathways [17, 21, 37, 38, 40–45].

Conclusion

The data presented demonstrate that Celecoxib is a potent inhibitor of tumor growth of secondary bone tumors in vivo. This can be explained by its antiangiogenic and proapoptotic effects. We believe that a combination of established treatment procedures of bone metastases such as surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy with cyclooxygenase 2 inhibition is promising to improve the success of therapy.

References

  1. Folkman J: Anti-angiogenesis: new concept for therapy of solid tumors. Ann Surg. 1972, 175: 409-416.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Carmeliet P: Mechanisms of angiogenesis and arteriogenesis. Nat Med. 2000, 6: 389-395. 10.1038/74651.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Folkman J: How is blood vessel growth regulated in normal and neoplastic tissue? G.H.A. Clowes memorial Award lecture. Cancer Res. 1986, 46: 467-473.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Matsumoto T, Claesson-Welsh L: VEGF receptor signal transduction. Sci STKE. 2001, 2001: RE21-

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Breier G, Blum S, Peli J, Groot M, Wild C, Risau W, Reichmann E: Transforming growth factor-beta and Ras regulate the VEGF/VEGF-receptor system during tumor angiogenesis. Int J Cancer. 2002, 97: 142-148. 10.1002/ijc.1599.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng T, Cao W, Wen R, Steinberg RH, LaVail MM: Prostaglandin E2 induces vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor mRNA expression in cultured rat Muller cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998, 39: 581-591.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoper MM, Voelkel NF, Bates TO, Allard JD, Horan M, Shepherd D, Tuder RM: Prostaglandins induce vascular endothelial growth factor in a human monocytic cell line and rat lungs via cAMP. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1997, 17: 748-756.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shweiki D, Itin A, Soffer D, Keshet E: Vascular endothelial growth factor induced by hypoxia may mediate hypoxia-initiated angiogenesis. Nature. 1992, 359: 843-845. 10.1038/359843a0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Williams CS, Tsujii M, Reese J, Dey SK, DuBois RN: Host cyclooxygenase-2 modulates carcinoma growth. J Clin Invest. 2000, 105: 1589-1594.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Fosslien E: Biochemistry of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors and molecular pathology of COX-2 in neoplasia. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2000, 37: 431-502. 10.1080/10408360091174286.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jones MK, Wang H, Peskar BM, Levin E, Itani RM, Sarfeh IJ, Tarnawski AS: Inhibition of angiogenesis by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: insight into mechanisms and implications for cancer growth and ulcer healing. Nat Med. 1999, 5: 1418-1423. 10.1038/70995.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Masferrer JL, Leahy KM, Koki AT, Zweifel BS, Settle SL, Woerner BM, Edwards DA, Flickinger AG, Moore RJ, Seibert K: Antiangiogenic and antitumor activities of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors. Cancer Res. 2000, 60: 1306-1311.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsujii M, Kawano S, Tsuji S, Sawaoka H, Hori M, DuBois RN: Cyclooxygenase regulates angiogenesis induced by colon cancer cells. Cell. 1998, 93: 705-716. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81433-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gallo O, Franchi A, Magnelli L, Sardi I, Vannacci A, Boddi V, Chiarugi V, Masini E: Cyclooxygenase-2 pathway correlates with VEGF expression in head and neck cancer. Implications for tumor angiogenesis and metastasis. Neoplasia. 2001, 3: 53-61. 10.1038/sj.neo.7900127.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Daniel TO, Liu H, Morrow JD, Crews BC, Marnett LJ: Thromboxane A2 is a mediator of cyclooxygenase-2-dependent endothelial migration and angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 1999, 59: 4574-4577.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu XH, Kirschenbaum A, Yao S, Lee R, Holland JF, Levine AC: Inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 suppresses angiogenesis and the growth of prostate cancer in vivo. J Urol. 2000, 164: 820-825. 10.1097/00005392-200009010-00056.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sheng H, Shao J, Morrow JD, Beauchamp RD, DuBois RN: Modulation of apoptosis and Bcl-2 expression by prostaglandin E2 in human colon cancer cells. Cancer Res. 1998, 58: 362-366.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Abou-Issa HM, Alshafie GA, Seibert K, Koki AT, Masferrer JL, Harris RE: Dose-response effects of the COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib, on the chemoprevention of mammary carcinogenesis. Anticancer Res. 2001, 21: 3425-3432.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fife RS, Stott B, Carr RE: Effects of a Selective Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitor on Cancer Cells In Vitro. Cancer Biol Ther. 2004, 3:

    Google Scholar 

  20. Howe LR, Subbaramaiah K, Patel J, Masferrer JL, Deora A, Hudis C, Thaler HT, Muller WJ, Du B, Brown AM, Dannenberg AJ: Celecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitor, protects against human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)/neu-induced breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2002, 62: 5405-5407.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hsu AL, Ching TT, Wang DS, Song X, Rangnekar VM, Chen CS: The cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor celecoxib induces apoptosis by blocking Akt activation in human prostate cancer cells independently of Bcl-2. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 11397-11403. 10.1074/jbc.275.15.11397.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kundu N, Fulton AM: Selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 or COX-2 inhibitors control metastatic disease in a murine model of breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2002, 62: 2343-2346.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sinicrope FA, Gill S: Role of cyclooxygenase-2 in colorectal cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2004, 23: 63-75. 10.1023/A:1025863029529.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Srinath P, Rao PN, Knaus EE, Suresh MR: Effect of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors on prostate cancer cell proliferation. Anticancer Res. 2003, 23: 3923-3928.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. A.P. F, J.A. E, M.A. G, L.R. K, R.M. S: Fishman's Pulmonary Diseases and Disorders. 1998, New York, NY, McGraw-Hill, 1769-1771. 3rd

    Google Scholar 

  26. Klenke FM, Merkle T, Fellenberg J, Abdollahi A, Huber PE, Gebhard MM, Ewerbeck V, Sckell A: A novel model for the investigation of orthotopically growing primary and secondary bone tumours using intravital microscopy. Lab Anim. 2005, 39: 377-383. 10.1258/002367705774286411.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cianchi F, Cortesini C, Bechi P, Fantappie O, Messerini L, Vannacci A, Sardi I, Baroni G, Boddi V, Mazzanti R, Masini E: Up-regulation of cyclooxygenase 2 gene expression correlates with tumor angiogenesis in human colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2001, 121: 1339-1347. 10.1053/gast.2001.29691.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kirschenbaum A, Liu X, Yao S, Levine AC: The role of cyclooxygenase-2 in prostate cancer. Urology. 2001, 58: 127-131. 10.1016/S0090-4295(01)01255-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Reddy BS, Hirose Y, Lubet R, Steele V, Kelloff G, Paulson S, Seibert K, Rao CV: Chemoprevention of colon cancer by specific cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, celecoxib, administered during different stages of carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2000, 60: 293-297.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Seno H, Oshima M, Ishikawa TO, Oshima H, Takaku K, Chiba T, Narumiya S, Taketo MM: Cyclooxygenase 2- and prostaglandin E(2) receptor EP(2)-dependent angiogenesis in Apc(Delta716) mouse intestinal polyps. Cancer Res. 2002, 62: 506-511.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu XH, Kirschenbaum A, Lu M, Yao S, Dosoretz A, Holland JF, Levine AC: Prostaglandin E2 induces hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha stabilization and nuclear localization in a human prostate cancer cell line. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 50081-50086. 10.1074/jbc.M201095200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dohadwala M, Batra RK, Luo J, Lin Y, Krysan K, Pold M, Sharma S, Dubinett SM: Autocrine/paracrine prostaglandin E2 production by non-small cell lung cancer cells regulates matrix metalloproteinase-2 and CD44 in cyclooxygenase-2-dependent invasion. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 50828-50833. 10.1074/jbc.M210707200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Callejas NA, Casado M, Diaz-Guerra MJ, Bosca L, Martin-Sanz P: Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 promotes the release of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 in fetal rat hepatocytes. Hepatology. 2001, 33: 860-867. 10.1053/jhep.2001.23002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dormond O, Foletti A, Paroz C, Ruegg C: NSAIDs inhibit alpha V beta 3 integrin-mediated and Cdc42/Rac-dependent endothelial-cell spreading, migration and angiogenesis. Nat Med. 2001, 7: 1041-1047. 10.1038/nm0901-1041.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Dormond O, Bezzi M, Mariotti A, Ruegg C: Prostaglandin E2 promotes integrin alpha Vbeta 3-dependent endothelial cell adhesion, rac-activation, and spreading through cAMP/PKA-dependent signaling. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 45838-45846. 10.1074/jbc.M209213200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Buchanan FG, Chang W, Sheng H, Shao J, Morrow JD, DuBois RN: Up-regulation of the enzymes involved in prostacyclin synthesis via Ras induces vascular endothelial growth factor. Gastroenterology. 2004, 127: 1391-1400. 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.07.025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kulp SK, Yang YT, Hung CC, Chen KF, Lai JP, Tseng PH, Fowble JW, Ward PJ, Chen CS: 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1/Akt signaling represents a major cyclooxygenase-2-independent target for celecoxib in prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2004, 64: 1444-1451. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-2396.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang Z, DuBois RN: Par-4, a proapoptotic gene, is regulated by NSAIDs in human colon carcinoma cells. Gastroenterology. 2000, 118: 1012-1017. 10.1016/S0016-5085(00)70352-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Raut CP, Nawrocki S, Lashinger LM, Davis DW, Khanbolooki S, Xiong H, Ellis LM, McConkey DJ: Celecoxib inhibits angiogenesis by inducing endothelial cell apoptosis in human pancreatic tumor xenografts. Cancer Biol Ther. 2004, 3: 1217-1224.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Basu GD, Pathangey LB, Tinder TL, Lagioia M, Gendler SJ, Mukherjee P: Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor induces apoptosis in breast cancer cells in an in vivo model of spontaneous metastatic breast cancer. Mol Cancer Res. 2004, 2: 632-642.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Jendrossek V, Handrick R, Belka C: Celecoxib activates a novel mitochondrial apoptosis signaling pathway. FASEB J. 2003, 17: 1547-1549.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhu J, Huang JW, Tseng PH, Yang YT, Fowble J, Shiau CW, Shaw YJ, Kulp SK, Chen CS: From the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor celecoxib to a novel class of 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 inhibitors. Cancer Res. 2004, 64: 4309-4318. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-4063.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhu J, Song X, Lin HP, Young DC, Yan S, Marquez VE, Chen CS: Using cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors as molecular platforms to develop a new class of apoptosis-inducing agents. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002, 94: 1745-1757.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Song X, Lin HP, Johnson AJ, Tseng PH, Yang YT, Kulp SK, Chen CS: Cyclooxygenase-2, player or spectator in cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor-induced apoptosis in prostate cancer cells. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002, 94: 585-591.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ding H, Han C, Zhu J, Chen CS, D'Ambrosio SM: Celecoxib derivatives induce apoptosis via the disruption of mitochondrial membrane potential and activation of caspase 9. Int J Cancer. 2005, 113: 803-810. 10.1002/ijc.20639.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Liu XH, Yao S, Kirschenbaum A, Levine AC: NS398, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, induces apoptosis and down-regulates bcl-2 expression in LNCaP cells. Cancer Res. 1998, 58: 4245-4249.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank K. Goetzke and R. Föhr for their technical support with the histological stainings and the TUNEL assay. We very much appreciate the proof-reading by Deborah Stroka. This study was generously supported by a research grant (F.02.0015) of the MWFK Ba-Wue (Ministry for Science, Research, and Art of the State of Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) to AS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inselspital, University of Bern, CH, 3010, Bern, Switzerland

    Frank Michael Klenke

  2. Department of Experimental Surgery, University of Heidelberg, INF 365, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany

    Martha-Maria Gebhard

  3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, D-69118, Heidelberg, Germany

    Volker Ewerbeck

  4. German Cancer Research Center, INF 280, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany

    Amir Abdollahi & Peter E Huber

  5. Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Charité – Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, D-12200, Berlin, Germany

    Axel Sckell

Authors
  1. Frank Michael Klenke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martha-Maria Gebhard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Volker Ewerbeck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Amir Abdollahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Peter E Huber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Axel Sckell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Axel Sckell.

Additional information

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

FMK participated in designing the study, carried out the animal experiments, the histology and the TUNEL assay, interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. MMG and VE participated in designing the study and revising critically the manuscript. AA and PEH established the A549 lung carcinoma cell cultures and tumor cell suspensions and participated in revising critically the manuscript. AS conceived, coordinated, and designed the study, performed the statistical analysis, interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. All of the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klenke, F.M., Gebhard, MM., Ewerbeck, V. et al. The selective Cox-2 inhibitor Celecoxib suppresses angiogenesis and growth of secondary bone tumors: An intravital microscopy study in mice. BMC Cancer 6, 9 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-6-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-6-9

Keywords

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us