Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A novel mutation in the tyrosine kinase domain of ERBB2 in hepatocellular carcinoma

  • Tanios Bekaii-Saab1, 2Email author,
  • Nita Williams4,
  • Christoph Plass4,
  • Miguel Villalona Calero1, 2 and
  • Charis Eng3, 4, 5
BMC Cancer20066:278

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-6-278

Received: 24 August 2006

Accepted: 06 December 2006

Published: 06 December 2006

Abstract

Background

Several studies showed that gain-of-function somatic mutations affecting the catalytic domain of EGFR in non-small cell lung carcinomas were associated with response to gefitinib and erlotinib, both EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In addition, 4% of non-small cell lung carcinomas were shown to have ERBB2 mutations in the kinase domain. In our study, we sought to determine if similar respective gain-of-function EGFR and ERBB2 mutations were present in hepatoma and/or biliary cancers.

Methods

We extracted genomic DNA from 40 hepatoma (18) and biliary cancers (22) samples, and 44 adenocarcinomas of the lung, this latter as a positive control for mutation detection. We subjected those samples to PCR-based semi-automated double stranded nucleotide sequencing targeting exons 18–21 of EGFR and ERBB2. All samples were tested against matched normal DNA.

Results

We found 11% of hepatoma, but no biliary cancers, harbored a novel ERBB2 H878Y mutation in the activating domain.

Conclusion

These newly described mutations may play a role in predicting response to EGFR-targeted therapy in hepatoma and their role should be explored in prospective studies.

Background

Mutations in the protein-kinase enzyme family, such as the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR, ERBB2), found in human cancers are being investigated as promising targets for the development of novel antitumor therapies.EGFR is the first described member of a family of related transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinases. It is comprised of the following four related receptors: EGFR itself (ERBB1 or HER1), ERBB2 (HER2/neu), ERBB3 (HER3) and ERBB4 (HER4). ERBB receptors are composed of an extracellular ligand-binding domain, a transmembrane segment, and an intracellular protein tyrosine kinase domain. These receptors trigger downstream signaling pathways that are complex and multilayered. Deregulation of those ERBB receptors can lead to malignant transformation. These receptors form either homo- or heterodimeric complexes which provides amplification and diversification [1]. Heterodimerization of the ERBB2 and EGFR is associated with a more robust signaling than homodimerization [2]. Several studies showed that gain-of-function somatic mutations affecting the catalytic domain (specifically the ATP binding site, exons 18–21) of EGFR in non-small cell lung carcinomas were strongly associated with response to gefitinib and erlotinib, both related EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) [35]. More recently, a number of studies reported the presence of ERBB2 mutations located in the kinase domain (exons 19 and 20) in non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC) that could potentially result in the activation of the tyrosine kinase activity of the receptor protein [69]. In addition to NSCLC, mutations in the ERBB2 kinase domain were described in gastric, colorectal, and breast cancers [10, 11]. In our study, we sought to determine if similar respective gain-of-function EGFR and ERBB2 mutations were present in hepatoma and biliary cancers to determine the potential for ERBB -targeted therapy.

Hepatoma is the most common malignant tumor of the liver with a clear rising incidence in the number of cases in the United States, and is largely attributed to the increase in hepatitis C related liver disease [12]. Cancers of the biliary tract are the second most common primary hepatobiliary cancer [13]. There is no satisfactory treatment available for patients with hepatobiliary cancers and chemotherapy has been extremely disappointing.

The poor prognosis of patients with hepatoma and biliary cancers in addition to the lack of satisfactory therapy for advanced cases indicates a need for more effective therapeutic options. EGFR signaling is implicated in both hepatic and biliary carcinogenesis. Studies indicate that EGFR is expressed in up to 85% and 80% of hepatoma and biliary cancers, respectively [14], and EGF might be required for the growth of those cells [15, 16]. ERBB2 is also expressed in a significant number of hepatoma and biliary cancers acting as an independent prognostic factor and a major contributor to carcinogenesis [1721]. Recently, a multi-center phase 2 study looked at the efficacy and tolerability of erlotinib in advanced hepatoma and biliary cancers with encouraging results [22, 23]. In hepatoma, the reported PFS at 6 months of 32% with disease control (PR + SD) of 59% for a median duration of 4 months. The median overall survival (OS) was 13 months. In biliary cancers, the reported PFS at 6 months was 25% with disease control (PR + SD) of 55% for a median duration of 5.4 months. The median OS was 9 months.

Methods

In our study, we extracted genomic DNA from 40 hepatoma (18) and biliary cancers (22) samples, and 44 adenocarcinoma of the lung, the latter as a positive control for mutation detection. All hepatobiliary samples were paraffin-embedded while all lung samples were frozen. Hepatoma and biliary cancers were subjected to laser capture microdissection as previously described (Kurose K et al. Hum Mol Genet 2001) to enrich the neoplastic component. We subjected those samples to PCR-based semi-automated double stranded nucleotide sequencing, per routine of the Eng lab [24, 25]. Exons 18–21 (exon-intron junctions and flanking intronic regions) of EGFR were amplified using the primers and conditions described by Lynch et al [3] and those of ERBB2 were amplified using the primers and conditions described by Stephens et al [6]. Double stranded sequencing was performed with the ABI-3700. Mutations or variants were confirmed in both directions as well as confirmed by a second independent PCR reaction. All samples were tested against matched germline DNA derived from the related normal organ. Our samples were acquired on anonymised archived materials without personal identifiers, on an exempt protocol approved by the Ohio State University Institutional Review Board.

Results

All hepatoma and biliary cancers samples were negative for gain-of-function somatic mutations affecting the catalytic domain of the EGFR gene. Power calculations suggest that our negative results predict that no more than 3% of hepatoma or biliary cancers would eventually be found to carry such mutations. As a positive control for mutation detection, we sequenced EGFR exons 18–21 in 44 adenocarcinoma of the lung and found 2 (5%) with somatic delE746-A750 mutations, previously reported to be associated with gefitinib responsiveness. In contrast, 2 (11%) of the 18 hepatoma had a single novel somatic H878Y (CAT to TAT; c.2632C > T) mutation in exon 21 of ERBB2 (figure 1), while none of the biliary cancers were found to have somatic mutations. None of the matched normal tissue was found to have somatic mutations for EGFR or ERBB2 found in the tumors. These are different from the reported mutations in non-small cell lung carcinomas. The H878Y missense mutation occurring in the activation domain of ERBB2 alters a basic hydrophilic residue to an acidic hydrophilic residue, and so is predicted to affect function.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2407-6-278/MediaObjects/12885_2006_Article_630_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Somatic missense mutation, H878Y, found in genomic DNA from hepatoma (top chromatogram) but not in corresponding normal tissue (bottom panel).

Discussions and Conclusion

The lack of effective treatment for hepatobiliary tumors indicates a need for more effective therapeutic options. Emerging targeted therapies including EGFR inhibitors are offering promise in a variety of malignancies including hepatobiliary tumors. From this study, we conclude that gain-of-function somatic mutations affecting the catalytic domain of EGFR as described in non-small cell lung carcinomas have a predicted low yield in hepatoma and biliary cancers. A recently published study showed the lack of somatic mutations in EGFR tyrosine kinase domain in 100 hepatocellular carcinomas confirming our findings [26]. In contrast, we showed that 11% of hepatocellular carcinomas tested have an ERBB2 mutation occurring in the activation domain. None were found in biliary cancer specimens. Given the availability of agents interfering with ERBB2 signaling and the established role of ERBB2 in the EGFR signaling pathway, we speculate that these newly described mutations may play a role in predicting response to EGFR-targeted therapy in hepatoma in predicting response to agents that target ERBB2 and/or EGFR in hepatoma. Interestingly, one such agent, lapatinib (a dual EGFR/ERBB2 TKI), was recently reported to have activity in hepatomas (TGCR = 40%) but not in biliary cancers (TGCR = 26%) [27]. Cohen et al showed that in head and neck cancers although responses to gefitinib or erlotinib were not linked to kinase mutations of EGFR, one single response case was actually linked to a mutation in exon 20 of ERBB2 establishing the potential predictive value of such mutations on responses to agents that target ERBB2 and/or EGFR [28]. In conclusion, our findings suggest that mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of ERBB2 in hepatoma may underlie responsiveness to agents that target ERBB2 and/or EGFR. This should trigger similar analysis as part of correlative studies in prospective studies.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

CE is a recipient of the Doris Duke Distinguished Clinical Scientist Award and is a National Scholar of the Dorothy M. Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute of The Ohio State University.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University
(2)
Department of Pharmacology, The Ohio State University
(3)
Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University
(4)
Department of Molecular Virology, Immunology and Medical Genetics; Human Cancer Genetics Program, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University
(5)
Genomic Medicine Institute and Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation

References

  1. Mendelsohn J, Baselga J: Status of epidermal growth factor antagonists in the biology and treatment of cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003, 27: 2787-2799. 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.504.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Lillemoe KD: Cancers of the Biliary Tree: Clinical Management. Gastrointestinal Oncology, Principles and Practice. Edited by: Kelsen KP, Daly JM, Kern SE, Levin B, Tepper JE. 2002, Philadelphia. Lippincott Willaims and Wilkins, 645-662. 1Google Scholar
  3. Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, Gurubhagavatula S, Okimoto RA, Brannigan BW, Harris PL, Haserlat SM, Supko JG, Haluska FG, Louis DN, Christiani DC, Settleman J, Haber DA: Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med. 350 (21): 2129-39. 10.1056/NEJMoa040938. 2004 May 20
  4. Paez JG, Janne PA, Lee JC, Tracy S, Greulich H, Gabriel S, Herman P, Kaye FJ, Lindeman N, Boggon TJ, Naoki K, Sasaki H, Fujii Y, Eck MJ, Sellers WR, Johnson BE, Meyerson M: EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science. 304 (5676): 1497-500. 10.1126/science.1099314. 2004 Jun 4
  5. Pao W, Miller V, Zakowski M, Doherty J, Politi K, Sarkaria I, Singh B, Heelan R, Rusch V, Fulton L, Mardis E, Kupfer D, Wilson R, Kris M, Varmus H: EGF receptor gene mutations are common in lung cancers from "never smokers" and are associated with sensitivity of tumors to gefitinib and erlotinib. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101 (36): 13306-11. 10.1073/pnas.0405220101. 2004 Sep 7
  6. Stephens P, Hunter C, Bignell G, Edkins S, Davies H, Teague J, Stevens C, O'Meara S, Smith R, Parker A, Barthorpe A, Blow M, Brackenbury L, Butler A, Clarke O, Cole J, Dicks E, Dike A, Drozd A, Edwards K, Forbes S, Foster R, Gray K, Greenman C, Halliday K, Hills K, Kosmidou V, Lugg R, Menzies A, Perry J, Petty R, Raine K, Ratford L, Shepherd R, Small A, Stephens Y, Tofts C, Varian J, West S, Widaa S, Yates A, Brasseur F, Cooper CS, Flanagan AM, Knowles M, Leung SY, Louis DN, Looijenga LH, Malkowicz B, Pierotti MA, Teh B, Chenevix-Trench G, Weber BL, Yuen ST, Harris G, Goldstraw P, Nicholson AG, Futreal PA, Wooster R, Stratton MR: Lung cancer: intragenic ERBB2 kinase mutations in tumours. Nature. 431 (7008): 525-6. 10.1038/431525b. 2004 Sep 30
  7. El-Serag HB, Mason AC: Rising incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States. N Eng J Med. 1999, 340 (10): 745-750. 10.1056/NEJM199903113401001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Roskoski R: The ErbB/HER receptor protein-tyrosine kinases and cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 319 (1): 1-11. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.04.150. 2004 Jun 18
  9. Altimari A, Fiorentino M, Gabusi E, Gruppioni E, Corti B, D'Errico A, Grigioni WF: Investigation of ErbB1 and ErbB2 expression for therapeutic targeting in primary liver tumours. Dig Liver Dis. 2003, 35 (5): 332-8. 10.1016/S1590-8658(03)00077-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ito Y, Takeda T, Sakon M, Tsujimoto M, Higashiyama S, Noda K, Miyoshi E, Monden M, Matsuura N: Expression and clinical significance of erb-B receptor family in hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 84 (10): 1377-83. 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1580. 2001 May 18
  11. Ito Y, Takeda T, Sasaki Y, Sakon M, Yamada T, Ishiguro S, Imaoka S, Tsujimoto M, Higashiyama S, Monden M, Matsuura N: Expression and clinical significance of the erbB family in intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma. Pathol Res Pract. 2001, 197 (2): 95-100. 10.1078/0344-0338-00016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang BJ, Huang TJ, Liang QW, Huang CW, Fang Y: Quantitative detection of HER-2 oncogene amplification in primary hepatocellular carcinoma using dual FISH technique and its clinical significance. Yi Chuan Xue Bao. 2001, 28 (9): 793-800.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Su Q, Liu Y: Expression of c-erbB-2 protein and EGF receptor in hepatitis B, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 1995, 24 (2): 93-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chow NH, Huang SM, Chan SH, Mo LR, Hwang MH, Su WC: Significance of c-erbB-2 expression in normal and neoplastic epithelium of biliary tract. Anticancer Res. 1995, 15 (3): 1055-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ito Y, Takeda T, Sasaki Y, Sakon M, Yamada T, Ishiguro S, Imaoka S, Tsujimoto M, Higashiyama S, Monden M, Matsuura N: Expression and clinical significance of the erbB family in intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma. Pathol Res Pract. 2001, 197 (2): 95-100. 10.1078/0344-0338-00016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ukita Y, Kato M, Terada T: Gene amplification and mRNA and protein overexpression of c-erbB-2 (HER-2/neu) in human intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma as detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization, in situ hybridization, and immunohistochemistry. J Hepatol. 2002, 36 (6): 780-5. 10.1016/S0168-8278(02)00057-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Philip PA, Mahoney M, Thomas J, Pitot H, Donehower R, Kim G, Picus J, Fitch T, Geyer S, Erlichman C: Phase II Trial of erlotinib (OSI-774) in patients with hepatocellular or biliary cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2004 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition). 2004, 22 (14S (July 15 Supplement)): 4025-Google Scholar
  18. Philip PA, Mahoney MR, Allmer C, Thomas J, Pitot HC, Kim G, Donehower RC, Fitch T, Picus J, Erlichman C: Phase II study of Erlotinib (OSI-774) in patients with advanced hepatocellular cancer. J Clin Oncol. 23 (27): 6657-63. 10.1200/JCO.2005.14.696. 2005 Sep 20
  19. Mutter GL, Lin MC, Fitzgerald JT, Kum JB, Baak JP, Lees JA, Weng LP, Eng C: Altered PTEN expression as a diagnostic marker for the earliest endometrial precancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 92 (11): 924-30. 10.1093/jnci/92.11.924. 2000 Jun 7
  20. Kurose K, Gilley K, Matsumoto S, Watson PH, Zhou XP, Eng C: Frequent somatic mutations in PTEN and TP53 are mutually exclusive in the stroma of breast carcinomas. Nat Genet. 2002, 32 (3): 355-7. 10.1038/ng1013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ukita Y, Kato M, Terada T: Gene amplification and mRNA and protein overexpression of c-erbB-2 (HER-2/neu) in human intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma as detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization, in situ hybridization, and immunohistochemistry. J Hepatol. 2002, 36 (6): 780-5. 10.1016/S0168-8278(02)00057-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Philip PA, Mahoney M, Thomas J, Pitot H, Donehower R, Kim G, Picus J, Fitch T, Geyer S, Erlichman C: Phase II Trial of erlotinib (OSI-774) in patients with hepatocellular or biliary cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2004 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition). 2004, 22 (14S (July 15 Supplement)): 4025-Google Scholar
  23. Philip PA, Mahoney MR, Allmer C, Thomas J, Pitot HC, Kim G, Donehower RC, Fitch T, Picus J, Erlichman C: Phase II study of Erlotinib (OSI-774) in patients with advanced hepatocellular cancer. J Clin Oncol. 23 (27): 6657-63. 10.1200/JCO.2005.14.696. 2005 Sep 20
  24. Mutter GL, Lin MC, Fitzgerald JT, Kum JB, Baak JP, Lees JA, Weng LP, Eng C: Altered PTEN expression as a diagnostic marker for the earliest endometrial precancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 92 (11): 924-30. 10.1093/jnci/92.11.924. 2000 Jun 7
  25. Kurose K, Gilley K, Matsumoto S, Watson PH, Zhou XP, Eng C: Frequent somatic mutations in PTEN and TP53 are mutually exclusive in the stroma of breast carcinomas. Nat Genet. 2002, 32 (3): 355-7. 10.1038/ng1013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Cohen EE, Lingen MW, Martin LE, Harris PL, Branningan BW, Haserlat SM, Okimoto RA, Sgroi DC, Dahiya S, Muir B, Clark JR, Rocco JW, Vokes EV, Haber DA, Bell DW: Response of Some Head and Neck Cancers to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors May be Linked to Mutation of ERBB2 rather than EGFR. Clin Cancer Res. 11 (22): 8105-8. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0926. 2005 Nov 15
  27. Ramanathan RK, Belani CP, Singh DA, Tanaka M, Lenz HJ, Yen Y, Kindler HL, Iqbal S, J J, Gandara DR: Phase II study of lapatinib, a dual inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase 1 and 2 (Her2/Neu) in patients (pts) with advanced biliary tree cancer (BTC) or hepatocellular cancer (HCC). A California Consortium (CCC-P) Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I. 2006, 24 (18S (June 20 Supplement)): 4010-Google Scholar
  28. Lee SC, Lim SG, Soo R, Hsieh WS, Guo JY, Putti T, Tao Q, Soong R, Goh BC: Lack of Somatic Mutations in EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Domain in Hepatocellular and Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2006, 16 (1): 73-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/6/278/prepub

Copyright

© Bekaii-Saab et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.