CA 15-3 is predictive of response and disease recurrence following treatment in locally advanced breast cancer
- Dhafir Al-azawi†1, 3Email author,
- Gabrielle Kelly†2,
- Eddie Myers†3,
- Enda W McDermott†1,
- Arnold DK Hill†1, 3,
- Michael J Duffy†4 and
- Niall O Higgins†1
© Al-azawi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 12 June 2006
Accepted: 05 September 2006
Published: 05 September 2006
Primary chemotherapy (PC) is used for down-staging locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). CA 15-3 measures the protein product of the MUC1 gene and is the most widely used serum marker in breast cancer.
We retrospectively investigated the role of CA 15-3 in conjunction with other clinico-pathological variables as a predictor of response and time to disease recurrence following treatment in LABC. Pre and post primary chemotherapy serum concentrations of CA 15-3 together with other variables were reviewed and related to four outcomes following primary chemotherapy (clinical response, pathological response, time to recurrence and time to progression). Persistently elevated CA 15-3 after PC was considered as consecutively high levels above the cut off point during and after PC.
73 patients were included in this study. Patients received PC (AC or AC-T regimen) for locally advanced breast cancer. 54 patients underwent surgery. The median follow up was 790 days. Patients with high concentrations of CA 15-3 before PC treatment had a poor clinical (p = 0.013) and pathological (p = 0.044) response. Together with Her-2/neu expression (p = 0.009) and tumour lympho-vascular space invasion (LVI) (p = 0.001), a persistently elevated CA 15-3 post PC (p = 0.007) was an independent predictive factor of recurrence following treatment in LABC.
Elevated CA 15-3 level is predictive of a poor response to chemotherapy. In addition, persistently elevated CA 15-3 levels post chemotherapy in conjunction with lympho-vascular invasion and HER2 status predict a reduced disease free survival following treatment in locally advanced breast cancer.
A significant number of women present with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) despite efforts to promote public awareness. The use of Primary chemotherapy (PC) was initially introduced in patients with LABC, and was first reported in 1978 as part of a multidisciplinary approach . Many studies have subsequently demonstrated the benefits of PC in this setting [2, 3]. Much interest has focused on the role of molecular and biological markers in predicting response to PC [4–7], however the precise role of these markers remains controversial. CA 15-3 is a serum-based product of the MUC1 gene and is the most widely used serum marker for breast cancer . Its preoperative levels predict adverse outcome in node negative and node positive breast cancer . Kurebayashi et al have demonstrated that CA 15-3 may have a role in monitoring response to chemotherapy in LABC . This was reinforced by Duffy et al, who suggested that the most important role for CA 15-3 is in monitoring therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer [9, 11]. However the precise role of CA15.3 in predicting response to PC and time to disease recurrence in patients with LABC following both PC and surgery is ill defined. Here we provide evidence to support a role for CA15.3 in both conditions.
73 patients who presented with LABC between January 1999 and May 2005 were included. All patients received primary chemotherapy in the oncology day clinic at St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. All patients were free from metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis as determined by bone scanning, liver ultrasonography and chest x-ray. The histological diagnosis was established either by core biopsy or excisional biopsy. Data was obtained by reviewing the medical records of these patients. The hospital local ethics committee approval was obtained for the study.
Earlier patients 48 (65.7%) were treated with 6 cycles of AC (Doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 at day one and repeated every 21 days). Later patients 25 (34.2%) were treated with 4 cycles of AC followed by 4 cycles of Docetaxol 75 mg/m2 every 21 days).
Clinical response (CR)
Patients' response to PC was assessed by regular clinical examinations during which the clinical progress was documented at each visit. The UICC criteria were used to assess the clinical response . Patients were divided into complete or partial responders or as having static or progressive disease.
Prior to surgery all patients were regularly assessed for response both clinically and radiologically. All suitable patients underwent surgery within 6–8 weeks after completion of PC. Fifty two patients underwent a modified radical mastectomy and two patients underwent breast conserving surgery. Postoperatively all patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (CMF regimen) and post operative radiotherapy.
Variables analysed include tumour size, histological subtypes, tumour grade, tumour stage, ER and Her-2/neu status. ER status was determined by immunohistochemistry using rabbit antihuman ERα antibody. Her2/neu status was evaluated using the Dako Hercep Test immunocytochemical assay. In tumor samples scoring +2 with the Hercep test, Her-2 status was confirmed by fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) test.
Pathological response (PR)
Chevallier's classification was used to evaluate pathological response to PC . Tumour size, lymph node involvement, evidence of lymphovascular space invasion (LVI), DCIS and tumour response to PC were documented.
Serum CA 15-3 was measured by ELISA (ES300/Elecsys 2010; Roche Diagnostics). Variation was <6% for commercial control sera (Preci Controls; Roche Diagnostics). CA 15-3 concentrations were stratified using a cut off value of 30 kilo units/L [9, 13]. Serum CA 15-3 levels were estimated at the time of diagnosis, following each cycle of PC and every three months following surgery. A persistently elevated CA 15-3 after chemotherapy is defined as consecutive high levels of CA15-3 serum samples (steadily rising or fluctuating levels) above the cut off point at the time of completion of PC during the mentioned follow up period prior to surgery.
SAS version 8.2 statistical program (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA) was used in the statistical analysis. The clinical response was re-evaluated as follow: the complete and partial clinical response was considered as a good response while the static and progressive response was considered as a poor response . The pathological response grading was also re-evaluated: Grade I and II were considered as a good PR and grades III and IV as a poor PR . Univariate analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and Wilcoxon's test for continuous variables. Multivariate analysis was carried out using Cox's proportional hazard model. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered to be significant.
Pathological parameters of the tumours in the investigated group.
Stage of the tumour
The relation of high CA 15-3 concentration with the clinico-pathological variables analyzed.
High CA 15-3 before PC
High CA 15-3 after PC
The relation of poor clinical and pathological response to the clinico-pathological variables.
Poor clinical Response
Poor pathological Response
CA 15-3 before PC
CA 15-3 after PC
Fifty four patients underwent surgery. At the end point of the study, 19 patients were either awaiting surgery or were deemed unsuitable for surgery. Using Chevallier's classification there was a complete pathological response grade I, in 4 (7.5%) patients. Five patients (9.4%) had a grade II response, 21 (39.6%) patients had a grade III response and 24 (45.2%) patients had a grade IV response. Groups I and II were compared with groups III and IV. Multivariate analysis failed to show significant relation between pathological response and other variables. Tumour size, the presence of lympho-vascular space invasion and high levels of serum CA 15-3 before PC (p = 0.001, p = 0.034 and p = 0.044 respectively) were significantly associated with an adverse pathological response to PC by univariate analysis. Table (3) demonstrates the relationship of poor pathological response to the clinico-pathological variables studied.
Time to recurrence
Time to progression (TTP)
TTP was defined as the time from the initiation of treatment till the disease progressed or death. Eighteen patients had their disease progressed (15 patients had disease recurrence after surgery and three patients developed disease progression after PC). Using Wilcoxon test high levels of CA 15-3 before PC showed a borderline association with TTP (P = 0.0575). However there was a significant relation between high levels of CA 15-3 after PC and TTP (p = 0.0001). No association was found between the pathological response and TTP (P = 0.3408). However a strong relation was found between the clinical response and TTP (p = 0.0001).
CA 15-3 is a serum based product for the MUC1 gene. While CA 15-3 levels have previously been demonstrated to predict outcome in LABC . Its precise role defined by clinical response, pathological response and disease recurrence following PC treatment requires definition. In a recent review Duffy et al concluded that the most important application of CA 15-3 is in monitoring therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer . Expert panels such as NACB and EGTM recommend the routine use of CA 15-3 in monitoring therapy in patients with LABC [16, 17]. In contrast the routine use of CA 15-3 in LABC is not recommended by the ASCO panel . Here we provide evidence to support a role for CA 15-3 in LABC.
Much interest has focused on predictors of response to treatment in LABC. Chang et al and Mauriac et al [19, 20] showed a favourable outcome in ER negative patients following treatment for LABC. We found no relation between ER and clinical response however a borderline relation was found between ER positive patients and poor pathological response p = 0.052 (table 3), a larger sample of patients may be needed to show a significant relation. However these markers all require tumour tissue. CA 15-3 has the advantage of being a serum based marker and therefore its measurement is less invasive. Kurebayashi et al demonstrated that in pre-treatment CA15-3 positive patients changes in CA 15-3 levels after systemic therapy correlated with response to treatment . Here we show that a high CA 15-3 level before PC along with advanced tumour stage predict a poor clinical response to chemotherapy. A poor pathological response to chemotherapy is predicted by elevated pre chemotherapy CA 15-3 levels, large tumour size and the presence of lympho-vascular invasion. Kurebayashi et al also demonstrated that a greater than 20% reduction in CA 15-3 levels following treatment was a favourable predictive factor for time to disease progression during systemic therapy. In this study we found that post chemotherapy high CA 15-3 levels were associated with reduced time to disease progression. We used a Cox proportional hazards model to identify predictors of recurrence following both chemotherapy and surgery in LABC. Detection of conventional markers such as tumour size, lympho-vascular invasion and hormone receptor status in addition to more recent parameters such as HER2, KI-67 and p53 have all been associated with outcome in LABC [19, 20, 4]. We found that lympho-vascular invasion, HER2 status and elevated CA15-3 levels post chemotherapy were independent predictors of a poor outcome. De La Lande et al reported a relation between CA 15-3 lead time and prognosis . In this study we report a predictive value of high CA 15-3 levels in LABC following PC in relation to TTP and recurrence after surgery. These findings may have important implications as they suggest that surgery may be of minimal benefit in patients who have persistently elevated CA15-3 levels following chemotherapy in LABC. It is not surprising that HER2 status is an independent predictor of poor outcome and this subgroup of patients would undoubtedly benefit from Herceptin.
Elevated CA 15-3 levels predict a poor response to primary chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer. In addition persistent elevation of CA 15-3, post chemotherapy, in conjunction with the presence of lympho-vascular invasion and HER2 positivity predict a reduced disease free survival following treatment in locally advanced breast cancer.
We would like to thank Dr. Leonie Young and Dr. Marie Mc Ilroy who are funded by the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland for their contribution in the revision of the manuscript.
- De Lena M, Zucali R, Viganotti G, Valagussa P, Bonadonna G: Combined chemotherapy-radiotherapy approach in locally advanced (T3b-T4) breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1978, 1: 53-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wolff AC, Davidson NE: Preoperative Therapy in Breast Cancer: Lessons from the Treatment of Locally Advanced Disease. The Oncologist. 2002, 7: 239-245. 10.1634/theoncologist.7-3-239.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schwartz G: Neoadjuvant induction chemotherapy. Minerva Ginecol. 2005, 57 (3): 327-48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kandioler-Eckersberger D, Ludwig C, Rudas M, Kappel S, Janschek E, Wenzel C, Schlagbauer-Wadl H, Mittlbock M, Gnant M, Steger G, Jakesz R: TP53 mutation and p53 over expression for prediction of response to neoadjuvant treatment in breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2000, 6: 50-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ogston KN, Miller ID, Schofield AC, Spyrantis A, Pavlidou E, Sarkar TK, Hutcheon AW, Payne S, Heys SD: Can patients' likelihood of benefiting from primary chemotherapy for breast cancer be predicted before commencement of treatment?. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004, 86: 181-189. 10.1023/B:BREA.0000032986.00879.d7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Makris A, Powles TJ, Dowsett M, Osborne CK, Trott PA, Fernando IN, Ashley SE, Ormerod MG, Titley JC, Gregory RK, Allred DC: Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy in primary breast carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 1997, 3: 593-600.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Modlich O, Prisack HB, Munnes M, Audretsch W, Bojar H: Predictors of primary breast cancers responsiveness to preoperative epirubicin/cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy: translation of microarray data into clinically useful predictive signatures. J Transl Med. 2005, 9;3: 32-10.1186/1479-5876-3-32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Duffy MJ: Biochemical markers in breast cancer: which ones are clinically useful?. Clin Biochem. 2001, 34: 347-352. 10.1016/S0009-9120(00)00201-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duffy MJ, Duggan C, Keane R, Hill ADK, McDermott E, Crown J, O'Higgins N: High Preoperative CA 15-3 Concentrations Predict Adverse Outcome in Node-Negative and Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Study of 600 Patients with Histologically Confirmed Breast Cancer. Clinical Chemistry. 2004, 50 (3): 559-563. 10.1373/clinchem.2003.025288.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kurebayashi J, Nishimura R, Tanaka K, Kohno N, Kurosumi M, Moriya T, Ogawa Y, Taguchi T: Significance of serum tumour markers in monitoring advanced breast cancer patients treated with systemic therapy: a prospective study. Breast Cancer. 2004, 11 (4): 389-95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duffy MJ: Serum tumour markers in breast cancer: are they of clinical value?. Clinical Chemistry. 2006, 52 (3): 345-351. 10.1373/clinchem.2005.059832.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chevallier B, Roche H, Olivier JP, Chollet P, Hurteloup P: Inflammatory breast cancer. Pilot study of intensive induction chemotherapy (FEC-HD) results in a high histologic response rate. Am J Clin Oncol. 1993, 16: 223-28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kumpulainen EJ, Keskikuru R, Johansson RT: Serum tumor marker CA 15.3 and stage are the two most important predictors of survival in primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002, 76: 95-102. 10.1023/A:1020514925143.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Westenend PJ, Meurs CJ, Damhuis RA: Tumour size and vascular invasion predict distant metastasis in stage I breast cancer. Grade distinguishes early and late metastasis. J Clin Pathol. 2005, 58 (2): 196-20. 10.1136/jcp.2004.018515.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Martinez-Trufero J, de Lobera AR, Lao J, Puertolas T, Artal-Cortes A, Zorrilla M, Alonso V, Pazo R, Valero MI, Rios-Mitchell MJ, Calderero V, Herrero A, Anton A: Serum markers and prognosis in locally advanced breast cancer. Tumori. 2005, 91 (6): 522-30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Diamindis Fleisher M, Dnistrian AM, Sturgeon CM, Lamerz R, Wittliff J: Practice guidelines and recommendations for use of tumor markers in the clinic. Tumor markers, physiology, pathobiology, technology and clinical applications. Edited by: Diamindis EP, Fritsche H, Scharwtz MK, Chan DW. 2002, Chicago: AACC Press, 33-63.Google Scholar
- Hayward JL, Carbone PP, Heuson J-C, Kumaoka S, Segaloff A, Rubens RD: Assessment of response to therapy in advanced breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1997, 13: 89-94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Anonymous: Clinical practice guidelines for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer. Adopted on May 17, 1996 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 1996, 14: 2843-77.Google Scholar
- Chang J, Powles TJ, Allred DC, Ashley SE, Clark GM, Makris A, Assersohn L, Gregory RK, Osborn CK, Dowsett M: Biologic markers as predictors of clinical outcome from systemic therapy for primary operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999, 17: 3058-63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mauriac L, MacGrogan G, Avril A, Durand M, Floquet A, Debled M, Dilhuydy JM, Campo ML: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast carcinoma larger than 3 cm: a unicentre randomized trial with a 124-month median follow-up. Institut Bergonie Bordeaux Groupe Sein (IBBGS). Ann Oncol. 1999, 10: 47-52. 10.1023/A:1008337009350.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- De La Lande B, Hacene K, Floiras J-L, Alatrakchi N, Pichon M-F: Prognostic value of CA 15-3 kinetics for metastatic breast cancer. Int J Biol Markers. 2002, 17: 231-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/6/220/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.