Does knowledge of cancer diagnosis affect quality of life? A methodological challenge
© Montazeri et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
Received: 21 September 2003
Accepted: 19 May 2004
Published: 19 May 2004
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|21 Sep 2003||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Sep 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nazim Turhal|
|3 Nov 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Monika Janda|
|8 Dec 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dirk Vordermark|
|28 Dec 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Ali Montazeri|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|28 Dec 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Mar 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Monika Janda|
|18 May 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Ali Montazeri|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|18 May 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|19 May 2004||Editorially accepted|
|19 May 2004||Article published||10.1186/1471-2407-4-21|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.