M6P/IGF2Rloss of heterozygosity in head and neck cancer associated with poor patient prognosis
© Jamieson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2003
Received: 14 October 2002
Accepted: 13 February 2003
Published: 13 February 2003
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Oct 2002||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Nov 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bass Hassan|
|20 Nov 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthew Ellis|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|28 Dec 2002||Author responded||Author comments - Randy Jirtle|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|28 Dec 2002||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|7 Jan 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Randy Jirtle|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|7 Jan 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|13 Jan 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bass Hassan|
|30 Jan 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthew Ellis|
|Resubmission - Version 7|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 7|
|13 Feb 2003||Editorially accepted|
|13 Feb 2003||Article published||10.1186/1471-2407-3-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.