Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Clinicopathological features and EGFR gene mutation status in elderly patients with resected non–small-cell lung cancer

  • Teppei Nishii1, 2Email author,
  • Tomoyuki Yokose2,
  • Yohei Miyagi3,
  • Yataro Daigo4,
  • Hiroyuki Ito1,
  • Tetsuya Isaka1,
  • Kentaro Imai1,
  • Shuji Murakami1,
  • Tetsuro Kondo1,
  • Haruhiro Saito1,
  • Fumihiro Oshita1,
  • Kouzo Yamada1,
  • Shoichi Matsukuma3,
  • Masahiro Tsuboi5,
  • Haruhiko Nakayama1 and
  • Munetaka Masuda6
BMC Cancer201414:610

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-610

Received: 6 April 2014

Accepted: 21 August 2014

Published: 25 August 2014

Abstract

Background

The rapid aging of the population in Japan has been accompanied by an increased rate of surgery for lung cancer among elderly patients. It is thus an urgent priority to map out a treatment strategy for elderly patients with primary lung cancer. Although surgical resection remains standard treatment for early stage non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), it is now essential to confirm the status of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations when planning treatment strategies. Furthermore, several studies have reported that EGFR mutations are an independent prognostic marker in NSCLC. However, the relations between age group and the molecular and pathological characteristics of NSCLC remain unclear. We studied the status of EGFR mutations in elderly patients with NSCLC and examined the relations of EGFR mutations to clinicopathological factors and outcomes according to age group.

Methods

A total of 388 consecutive patients with NSCLC who underwent complete tumor resection in our hospital from 2006 through 2008 were studied retrospectively. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections were used to isolate DNA from carcinoma lesions. Mutational analyses of EGFR gene exons 19, 20, and 21 and KRAS gene exons 12 and 13 were performed by loop-hybrid mobility shift assay, a highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction-based method.

Results

EGFR mutations were detected in 185 (47.7%) and KRAS mutations were detected in 33 (8.5%) of the 388 patients. EGFR mutations were found in a significantly higher proportion of patients younger than 80 years (younger group; 178/359, 49.6%) than in patients 80 years or older (older group; 7/29, 24.1%) (P = 0.008). In contrast, KRAS mutations were more common in the older group (6/29, 20.7%) than in the younger group (27/359, 7.5%) (P = 0.014). The older group showed a trend toward a higher rate of 5-year overall survival among elderly patients with EGFR mutations (100%) than among those with wild-type EGFR (66.2%), but the difference was not significant.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that the EGFR status of patients with NSCLC differs between patients 80 years or older and those younger than 80 years. EGFR mutation status might be a prognostic marker in elderly patients with completely resected NSCLC.

Background

Primary lung cancer remains the leading cause of the death from malignant tumors worldwide [1]. Non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 80% of all cases of lung cancer [2]. Although surgical resection remains the standard treatment for early NSCLC, several molecular pathways have been shown to have prognostic significance in NSCLC. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway is considered particularly important. EGFR is a membrane glycoprotein with an extracellular ligand-binding domain, a transmembrane lipophilic segment, and an intracellular domain that has tyrosine kinase activity. When a growth factor binds to EGFR, EGFR is self-phosphorylated by tyrosine kinase, and phosphorylated EGFR activates cell-signaling pathway involved in the regulation of cell cycle, apoptosis, angiogenesis, and cellular proliferation. Specific mutations of EGFR induce constant phosphorylation of EGFR, and increased levels of phosphorylated EGFR activate downstream signals that induce carcinogenesis [3, 4]. EGFR mutations predict the effect of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) [5, 6]. It is now essential to confirm EGFR mutation status when planning treatment strategies for advanced or recurrent NSCLC.

The population of Japan is aging rapidly. In 2011 the average life-span in Japan was 83 years (males 79 years, females 86 years) [7]. Aging of the population is accompanied by a rapid increase in the incidence of primary lung cancer as well as the number of operations for lung cancer among elderly patients. Since 2009 persons 80 years or older have accounted for more than 10% of all patients in Japan. In 2011, patients 80 years old or older accounted for 11.5% of all patients [812]. Aging will become a global problem in the future, and knowledge acquired in Japan may contribute to solving related problems. Previous studies have suggested a relation between EGFR mutations and several clinicopathological factors, but whether EGFR status differs according to age group remains unclear. The present study assessed the status of EGFR mutations in elderly patients with NSCLC and examined the relations of EGFR mutations and clinicopathological factors to outcomes.

Methods

Patients

We retrospectively studied 388 consecutive patients with NSCLC who underwent complete tumor resection at Kanagawa Cancer Center Hospital (Yokohama, Japan) from 2006 through 2008. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Kanagawa Cancer Center, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. The pathological diagnoses were independently made by 2 pathologists (T.N., T.Y.). Discrepancies in diagnoses were resolved by mutual agreement. The median follow-up time was 1981 days.

Assessments

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections of the resected tumors were used for DNA extraction. Mutational analyses of EGFR gene exons 19, 20, and 21 and KRAS gene exons 12 and 13 were performed by loop-hybrid mobility shift assay (LH-MSA), a highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction–based method, as described previously (Additional file 1: Table S1) [13].

Statistical analysis

Relations between EGFR status and categorical data were evaluated with the chi-square test. Continuous variables were compared by Student’s t-test. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences in survival rates were assessed using the log-rank test. P < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Statistical manipulations were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 20 for Windows software system (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Relations between EGFR, KRASstatus and clinicopathological features

The patients’ characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Of the 388 patients, 228 (58.8%) were men, and 160 (41.2%) were women. The mean age was 66.6 years (range, 35–90). EGFR mutations were detected in 185 patients (185/388, 47.7%) and KRAS mutations were detected in 33 (33/388, 8.5%). EGFR mutations were found more frequently in women (110/185, 59.5%), adenocarcinoma (183/185, 98.9%), and non-smokers (106/185, 57.3%) (P < 0.001). Patients with EGFR mutation had fewer pre-existing cardiopulmonary comorbidities than patients with wild-type (P = 0.028). The mean tumor diameter was smaller in patients with EGFR mutations (2.68 ± 0.92 cm) than in those with wild-type EGFR (3.35 ± 1.71 cm; P < 0.001). The rate of pathological T1 disease was significantly higher among patients with EGFR mutations (114/185, 61.6%) than among those with wild-type EGFR (83/203, 40.9%; P < 0.001). In contrast, KRAS mutations were not significantly related to gender, histopathological type, or smoking status. Although KRAS status did not correlate with pathological T factors, mean tumor diameter was larger in patients with KRAS mutations (3.46 ± 1.99 cm) than in those with wild-type KRAS (2.99 ± 1.36 cm; P = 0.001).
Table 1

Correlations between EGFR mutations and clinicopathological features

Characteristics

Total

No. of patients

  

EGFRstatus

p a

KRASstatus

p a

  

Mutation

Wild-type

 

Mutation

Wild-type

 
 

(n = 388)

(n = 185, 47.7%)

(n = 203, 52.3%)

 

(n = 33, 8.5%)

(n = 355, 91.5%)

 

Mean age, yr ± SD b

66.6 ± 10.0

65.1 ± 10.3

67.9 ± 9.57

0.462

68.6 ± 9.11

66.4 ± 10.1

0.553

Gender

   

<0.001

  

0.552

Male

228

75

153

 

21

207

 

Female

160

110

50

 

12

148

 

Histological type

   

<0.001

  

0.059

Adenocarcinoma

302

183

119

 

30

272

 

Others

86

2

84

 

3

83

 

Vascular invasion

       

Ly -

314

155

159

0.172

25

289

0.429

Ly +

74

30

44

 

8

66

 

V -

261

151

110

<0.001

23

238

0.756

V +

127

34

93

 

10

117

 

p-stage

   

<0.001

   

I

293

155

138

 

22

271

0.217

II / III

95

30

65

 

11

84

 

T-factor

   

<0.001

   

T1

197

114

83

 

14

183

0.316

T2 / 3

191

71

120

 

19

191

 

Tumor diameter (cm)

3.03 ± 1.43

2.68 ± 0.92

3.35 ± 1.71

<0.001

3.46 ± 1.99

2.99 ± 1.36

0.001

N-factor

   

0.348

   

N0

322

157

165

 

29

293

0.435

N1 / 2

66

28

38

 

4

62

 

Smoking status

   

<0.001

  

0.107

Non-smoker

157

106

51

 

9

148

 

Smoker

231

79

152

 

24

207

 

Pre-existing cardiopulmonary comorbidity

203

86

117

0.028

20

183

0.319

ap < 0.05 statistically significant.

b SD, standard deviation.

EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; KRAS, v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog; ND, lymph node dissection.

Relations between age group and clinicopathological features

We divided the patients into two groups according to whether they were 80 years or older (older group) or younger than 80 years (younger group) and compared EGFR status and clinicopathological features between these age groups (Table 2). The younger group comprised 359 patients (92.5%), and the older group comprised 29 (7.5%). The proportion of patients with EGFR mutations was significantly higher in the younger group (178/359, 49.6%) than in the older group (7/29, 24.1%; P = 0.008). In contrast, KRAS mutations were more common in the older group (6/29, 20.7%) than in the younger group (27/359, 7.5%; P = 0.014). The proportion of smokers was significantly lower in the younger group (208/359, 57.9%) than in the older group (23/29, 79.3%; P = 0.024). Elderly patients had more pre-existing cardiopulmonary comorbidities than younger patients (P = 0.024). Gender, histopathological type, vascular invasion, pathological stage, and tumor diameter did not differ significantly between the groups. We omitted lymph-node resection in the older group (P < 0.001). Table 3 shows the region of EGFR mutation according to age group. Although the study group was small, there were no exon 20 mutations in the older group.
Table 2

Correlations between age group and clinicopathological features, including EGFR status

 

No. of patients

Characteristics

Total

≥80 years

<80 years

p a

 

(n = 388)

(n = 29, 7.5%)

(n = 359, 92.5%)

 

Mean age, yr ± SD b

66.6 ± 10.0

82.6 ± 2.41

65.3 ± 9.29

<0.001

Gender

   

0.246

Male

228

20

208

 

Female

160

9

151

 

Histology

   

0.034

Adenocarcinoma

302

18

284

 

others

86

11

75

 

Biomarker

    

EGFR wild type

203

22

181

0.008

EGFR mutation

185

7

178

 

KRAS wild type

355

23

332

0.014

KRAS mutation

33

6

27

 

Vascular invasion

    

Ly -

314

26

288

0.214

Ly +

74

3

71

 

V -

261

18

243

0.535

V +

127

11

116

 

p-stage

   

0.080

I

293

18

275

 

II / III

95

11

84

 

T-factor

   

0.506

T1

197

13

184

 

T2/3

191

16

175

 

Tumor diameter (cm)

3.03 ± 1.43

3.00 ± 1.44

3.40 ± 1.24

0.629

N-factor

   

0.584

N0

322

23

299

 

N1/2

66

6

60

 

Operation

   

0.155

Limited resection (wedge/segmentectomy)

80

3

77

 

Standard surgery (lobectomy, pneumonectomy)

308

26

282

 

Lymph node resection

   

<0.001

ND0/1/sampling

109

25

156

 

ND2

278

4

203

 

Smoking

   

0.024

Non-smoker

157

6

151

 

Smoker

231

23

208

 

Pre-existing cardiopulmonary comorbidity

203

21

182

0.024

ap < 0.05 statistically significant.

b SD, standard deviation.

EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; KRAS, v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog; ND, lymph node dissection.

Table 3

Region of EGFR mutation according to age group

 

No. of patients

EGFRmutations

Total

≥80 years

<80 years

Exon 19

73

3

70

Exon 20

13

0

13

Exon 21

97

4

93

Combined

2

0

2

Relations between EGFRstatus and outcomes

Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed that EGFR mutation status was significantly associated with survival (Figure 1). The 5-year overall survival rate was significantly higher in patients with EGFR mutations (90.2%) than in those with wild-type EGFR (75.2%) in the younger group (P < 0.001; Figure 1A). The 5-year overall survival rate was slightly, but not significantly higher in patients with EGFR mutations (100%) than in those with wild-type EGFR (66.2%) in the older group (P = 0.226; Figure 1B).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2407-14-610/MediaObjects/12885_2014_Article_4820_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Relations between EGFR mutations and outcomes. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed that EGFR mutation status was significantly associated with survival. (A) The 5-year overall survival rate was higher in patients with EGFR mutations (90.2%) than in those with wild-type EGFR (75.2%) in the younger group (P < 0.001). (B) In the older group, the 5-year disease free survival rate was 100% among patients with EGFR mutations; however, the difference between the two groups was not significant.

Discussion

In the present study, we first evaluated EGFR mutations in resected NSCLC tissue by LH-MSA. LH-MSA is a highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction-based method. Sakuma et al. previously evaluated EGFR mutations by LH-MSA in our hospital. EGFR mutations were detected in 53.2% of NSCLCs and were significantly associated with adenocarcinoma, female sex, and no smoking history [14]. In the present study, we detected EGFR mutations in 47.7% of NSCLCs (Table 1). The presence of an EGFR mutation is closely linked to several clinicopathological factors, such as gender, smoking history, and pathological findings. Our results are consistent with those of recent studies reporting that the rate of EGFR mutations is higher among Asians (including Japanese), females, nonsmokers, and adenocarcinomas [14, 15]. Although LH-MSA yet has not been generally performed, it is known to be a sensitive and low cost method in scanning the known gene mutation. Furthermore, we can treat many samples in a short time by LH-MSA. Nakajima et al. analyzed EGFR mutations using LH-MSA, and confirmed the results by direct sequencing. They concluded that LH-MSA has a high detection capability compared with direct sequencing [16]. Guideline from the College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology indicate that LH-MSA compares favourably with the other method [17].

We then studied the relations between EGFR status and clinicopathological factors according to age group (Table 2). Past report suggested the impact of age on EGFR mutation, and concluded that age was associated with EGFR mutation in lung cancer [18]. In this study, if we analyze the EGFR status using the median age of 66 years old as a cutoff, there is no difference between younger and elderly group. Next, we divided the cohort in every ten years old, and we found that the rate of EGFR mutation suddenly decreased in a group 80 years or older. Because aging of the population is a global problem, the average life-span older than 80 years old in Japan was worthy of mention to the world. Due to the above reasons, we thought that the age of 80 years old is turning point in consideration of gene profile change, and divided the patients into two groups at 80 years of age. The older group (≥80 years) of patients with NSCLC included significantly higher rates of non-adenocarcinoma, wild-type EGFR, KRAS mutations, and smokers. There was no difference between the older group and younger group in tumor size, T-factor, or pathological stage. Moreover, in Japan, females outlive males (males 79 years, females 86 years). Of the 29 elderly patients, 9 are females include 7 adenocarcinomas and 4 smokers. EGFR mutations were detected in 3 females. The 5-year overall survival rate was 100% regardless of EGFR mutation or wild type. When we examined the region of EGFR mutation according to age group (Table 3), no exon 20 mutations were found in the older group. Although our study group was small, our results suggest that EGFR mutation status might differ between elderly and younger patients with NSCLCs. Given that smoking is one of the causes of the low rate of EGFR mutations in the older group, the rate of EGFR mutations may increase in the future owing to enlightenment movements such as the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control [19]. Recently, smoking prevalence in Japan is decreasing generally. In particular, the drop of the smoking prevalence in young generation is remarkable. On the other hands, lung cancer mortality in Japan rises, probably it depends on the increase of the lung cancer in an elderly person who had been a smoker [20]. If the low rate of EGFR mutations is unrelated to smoking, it is very interesting that EGFR status might be affected by aging. Furthermore, it is reported that the response rate of gefitinib in elderly (aged 70 years or older) patients with advanced EGFR mutated NSCLC was 45.5%. EGFR-TKI is more effective than conventional chemotherapy in elderly patients, if we could pay attention to drug discontinuation and dose reduction due to age-related organ dysfunction [21]. On the other hand, NSCLC with exon 20 mutation is resistant for EGFR-TKI. Although our result has no statistical significance due to a small population of elderly patients, the lack of exon 20 mutations might be a characteristic of elderly patients. Large clinical trials are needed to investigate the relation between age group and the response to EGFR-TKI.

Finally, we assessed the relations between the EGFR status and outcomes. EGFR mutations were associated with significantly better survival than wild-type EGFR in the younger group (Figure 1). In the older group, however, the 5-year overall survival rate did not differ significantly according to EGFR mutations, and wild-type EGFR status and was 100% in patients with EGFR mutations. EGFR-TKIs are obviously beneficial in patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC, but several studies have suggested that EGFR mutations might be an independent positive prognostic factor [22]. Our results suggest that elderly patients with NSCLC who have EGFR mutations are especially likely to have good outcomes after complete lung resection.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that the EGFR status of patients with NSCLC differs according to age group (>80 years vs. ≤80 years). EGFR mutation status might be a prognostic marker in elderly patients with completely resected NSCLC.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Ms Sachie Osanai for technical assistance.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Thoracic Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center Hospital
(2)
Department of Pathology, Kanagawa Cancer Center Hospital
(3)
Molecular Pathology and Genetics Division, Kanagawa Cancer Center Research Institute
(4)
Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Center, Shiga University of Medical Science Hospital
(5)
Respiratory Disease Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center
(6)
Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E: Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010, 60: 277-300. 10.3322/caac.20073.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hoffman PC, Mauer AM, Vokes EE: Lung cancer. Lancet. 2000, 355: 479-485. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)82038-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hynes NE, Lane HA: ERBB receptors and cancer: the complexity of targeted inhibitors. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005, 5: 341-354. 10.1038/nrc1609.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Yarden Y, Sliwkowski MX: Untangling the ErbB signalling network. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001, 2: 127-137. 10.1038/35052073.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, Gurubhagavatula S, Okimoto RA, Brannigan BW, Harris PL, Haserlat SM, Supko JG, Haluska FG, Louis DN, Christiani DC, Settleman J, Haber DA: Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med. 2004, 350: 2129-2139. 10.1056/NEJMoa040938.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Paez JG, Jänne PA, Lee JC, Tracy S, Greulich H, Gabriel S, Herman P, Kaye FJ, Lindeman N, Boggon TJ, Naoki K, Sasaki H, Fujii Y, Eck MJ, Sellers WR, Johnson BE, Meyerson M: EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science. 2004, 304: 1497-1500. 10.1126/science.1099314.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. World Health Statistics. 2013, http://www.who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/2013/en/,
  8. Ueda Y, Fujii Y, Kuwano H: Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2007. Annual report by the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007, 2009 (57): 488-513.Google Scholar
  9. Sakata R, Fujii Y, Kuwano H: Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2008: annual report by The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010, 58: 356-383.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Sakata R, Fujii Y, Kuwano H: Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2009: annual report by the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011, 59: 636-667. 10.1007/s11748-011-0838-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kuwano H, Amano J, Yokomise H: Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2010: annual report by The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012, 60: 680-708. 10.1007/s11748-012-0119-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Amano J, Kuwano H, Yokomise H: Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2011: Annual report by The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011, 2013 (61): 578-607.Google Scholar
  13. Matsukuma S, Yoshihara M, Kasai F, Kato A, Yoshida A, Akaike M, Kobayashi O, Nakayama H, Sakuma Y, Yoshida T, Kameda Y, Tsuchiya E, Miyagi Y: Rapid and simple detection of hot spot point mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor, BRAF, and NRAS in cancers using the loop-hybrid mobility shift assay. J Mol Diagn. 2006, 8: 504-512. 10.2353/jmoldx.2006.060030.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Sakuma Y, Matsukuma S, Yoshihara M, Nakamura Y, Noda K, Nakayama H, Kameda Y, Tsuchiya E, Miyagi Y: Distinctive evaluation of nonmucinous and mucinous subtypes of bronchioloalveolar carcinomas in EGFR and K-ras gene-mutation analyses for Japanese lung adenocarcinomas: confirmation of the correlations with histologic subtypes and gene mutations. Am J Clin Pathol. 2007, 128: 100-108. 10.1309/WVXFGAFLAUX48DU6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Mitsudomi T, Yatabe Y: Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene and related genes as determinants of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors sensitivity in lung cancer. Cancer Sci. 2007, 98: 1817-1824. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00607.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Nakajima T, Yasufuku K, Suzuki M, Hiroshima K, Kubo R, Mohammed S, Miyagi Y, Matsukuma S, Sekine Y, Fujisawa T: Assessment of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration. Chest. 2007, 132: 597-602. 10.1378/chest.07-0095.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lindeman NI, Cagle PT, Beasley MB, Chitale DA, Dacic S, Giaccone G, Jenkins RB, Kwiatkowski DJ, Saldivar JS, Squire J, Thunnissen E, Ladanyi M: Molecular testing guideline for selection of lung cancer patients for EGFR and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors: guideline from the College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology. J Thorac Oncol. 2013, 8: 823-859. 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318290868f.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Ueno T, Toyooka S, Suda K, Soh J, Yatabe Y, Miyoshi S, Matsuo K, Mitsudomi T: Impact of age on epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2012, 78: 207-211. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.09.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. http://www.who.int/fctc/en/,
  20. Funatogawa I, Funatogawa T, Yano E: Trends in smoking and lung cancer mortality in Japan, by birth cohort, 1949–2010. Bull World Health Organ. 2013, 91: 332-340. 10.2471/BLT.12.108092.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Fujita S, Katakami N, Masago K, Yoshioka H, Tomii K, Kaneda T, Hirabayashi M, Kunimasa K, Morizane T, Mio T: Customized chemotherapy based on epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II trial. BMC Cancer. 2012, 12: 185-10.1186/1471-2407-12-185. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/12/185,View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Izar B, Sequist L, Lee M, Muzikansky A, Heist R, Iafrate J, Dias-Santagata D, Mathisen D, Lanuti M: The impact of EGFR mutation status on outcomes in patients with resected stage I non-small cell lung cancers. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013, 96: 962-968. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.05.091.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/14/610/prepub

Copyright

© Nishii et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement