Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Serum tryptase, mast cells positive to tryptase and microvascular density evaluation in early breast cancer patients: possible translational significance

  • Ilaria Marech1,
  • Michele Ammendola2,
  • Rosario Sacco2,
  • Gennaro Stefano Capriuolo3,
  • Rosa Patruno3,
  • Rosangela Rubini3,
  • Maria Luposella4,
  • Valeria Zuccalà5,
  • Eufemia Savino6,
  • Cosmo Damiano Gadaleta1,
  • Domenico Ribatti7, 8Email author and
  • Girolamo Ranieri1
BMC Cancer201414:534

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-534

Received: 29 January 2014

Accepted: 14 July 2014

Published: 24 July 2014

Abstract

Background

Tryptase is a serine protease released from mast cells that plays a role in tumor angiogenesis. In this study we aimed to evaluate serum tryptase levels in 105 female early breast cancer patients before (STLBS) and after (STLAS) radical surgical resection, mast cell density positive to tryptase (MCDPT) and microvascular density (MVD).

Methods

STLBS and STLAS were assessed using the UniCAP Tryptase Fluoroenzyme immunoassay. Tumor sections were immunostained with a primary anti-tryptase antibody and an anti-CD-34 antibody by means of immunohistochemistry.

Results

The mean ± 1 standard deviation STLBS and STLAS was 7.18 ± 2.63 μg/L, and 5.13 ± 2.21 respectively and a significant difference between mean levels was found (p = 0.0001) by student t-test. A strong correlation between STLBS and MVD (r = 0.81, p = 0.0001); STLBS and MCDPT (r = 0.69, p = 0.003); and MCDPT and MVD (r = 0.77; p = 0.0001) was found.

Conclusions

Results demonstrated higher STLBS in breast cancer patients, indicating an involvement of MC tryptase in breast cancer angiogenesis. Therefore, serum tryptase levels may play a role as a novel surrogate angiogenic marker predictive of response to radical surgery in breast cancer patients. In this patients setting, it’s intriguing to hypothesize that tryptase inhibitors might be evaluated in clinical trials.

Keywords

Angiogenesis Breast cancer Surrogate marker Mast cells Serum tryptase Tissue tryptase

Background

Published data suggest that mast cells (MCs) have a dual role in the regulatory function between inflammatory and tumor cells. Interestingly, MCs induce tumor development and progression angiogenesis-mediated by means of the release of various angiogenic molecules such as Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 (FGF-2), tryptase, chymase. On the other hand, MCs may induce apoptosis of malignant cells by means of the release of several cytokines such as interleukin-4 and Tumour Necrosis Factor [15].

Several experimental studies have already demonstrated that MCs are involved in tumor macroscopic expansion and development [69]. Interestingly, it has been also shown that MCs density (MCD) is strongly related to angiogenesis in animal and human malignancies [3, 922]. Among pro-angiogenic factors released from MCs tryptase is one of the most powerful. It has been demonstrated that tryptase induces in vitro microvascular endothelial cells proliferation in the matrigel assay and displayed in vivo the capillary growth in the chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane [2325].

Tryptase is an agonist of the proteinase-activated receptor-2 (PAR-2) in vascular endothelial cells and breast cancer cells that in turn stimulates their proliferation [24]. Tryptase also induces angiogenesis by release of stored angiogenic factors bound to the extracellular matrix [2629]. Very little data have been published regarding the role of tissue MCs density positive to tryptase (MCDPT) in breast cancer (BC) angiogenesis and development [7, 8, 30]. Moreover, no reports are available about the role of serum tryptase in BC angiogenesis and as a circulating predictive surrogate marker.

Therefore, in the present study we aimed to evaluate serum tryptase levels in BC patients before (STLBS) and after (STLAS) radical surgical resection and MCDPT and microvascular density (MVD) in a series of tumor tissue from early BC patients to correlate each to other. The possible role of serum tryptase as predictive surrogate marker of radical surgery has been also evaluated. In this context tryptase inhibitors (gabexate and nafamostat mesylate) might be evaluated in adjuvant clinical trials as a new anti-angiogenic strategy.

Methods

Study populations

The clinicopathological features of the patients are summarized in the Table 1. A series of 105 BC patients observed at the Clinical Surgery Unit of the “Magna Graecia” University of Catanzaro were selected. Biopsy specimens were collected from 105 female BC patients who had undergone BC surgery. Patients were selected accordingly the presence of a primary, invasive breast tumor (stage T1-T3), the presence or not of metastases in axillary lymph nodes (stage N0-N2), the absence of distant metastases (M0), the presence of unilateral breast cancer and the absence of previous or concomitant primary cancer. Patients were staged according to the International Union Against Cancer Tumor Node Metastasis (UICC-TNM) classification [31]. They not received neo-adjuvant therapies nor other medications that could interfere with serum tryptase levels. Surgical treatment performed was either a modified radical mastectomy (39 patients in which the tumor had a diameter >3 cm) or a quadrantectomy with axillary lymphadenectomy. No patient was subjected to the investigation of sentinel lymph node. Following surgery, a course of 5–6 weeks of radiation therapy (66 patients) was performed. On the basis of clinicopathological features patients were evaluated to receive adjuvant hormonal therapy or chemotherapy or both. Full ethical approval and signed consent from individual patients were obtained to conduct the study. The full name of ethics institutional committee review board that approved our study is: University Hospital Ethics Committee “Mater Domini”, Germaneto, Catanzaro, Italy.
Table 1

MCDPT and MVD expression, STLBS and STLAS levels as a function of clinicopathological characteristics in a series of 105 breast cancer patients

Variable

No. of patients

No. of tumours with high MCDPT * (%)

No. of tumours with high MVD ** (%)

No. of tumours with high STLBS *** (%)

No. of tumours with high STLAS **** (%)

Age, years

     

Range 26-86

105

    

Median 58

105

    

< 58 years

48

25 (53)

29 (58)

26 (55)

27 (56)

≥ 58 years

57

33 (58)

29 (51)

31 (54)

27 (48)

Menopausal status

     

Premenopausal

43

24 (55)

21 (49)

23 (53)

25 (59)

Postmenopausal

62

36 (58)

31 (50)

32 (52)

34 (55)

Hystological type

     

Ductal

78

41 (52)

37 (47)

38 (49)

40 (51)

Lobular

27

14 (51)

16 (58)

13 (48)

15 (55)

Tumour size

     

pT1

49

26 (54)

25 (55)

27 (55)

24 (49)

pT2

36

16 (44)

19 (52)

18 (51)

17 (47)

pT3

20

12 (59)

11 (54)

10 (50)

9 (47)

Nodal status

     

pN0

44

19 (43)

21 (48)

20 (46)

23 (52)

pN1–2

61

29 (48)

32 (53)

33 (54)

35 (58)

Cytohistological grade

     

G1

37

19 (52)

22 (60)

21 (58)

18 (48)

G2

45

20 (44)

23 (51)

21 (47)

22 (49)

G3

23

12 (54)

10 (45)

11 (50)

13 (56)

Estrogen receptor status

     

Negative

29

16 (55)

17 (58)

13 (46)

14 (55)

Positive

76

37 (49)

42 (55)

36 (48)

41 (54)

Progesteron receptor status

     

Negative

34

19 (55)

16 (47)

18 (53)

17 (50)

Positive

71

36 (51)

35 (49)

39 (55)

37 (52)

c-erbB-2 status

     

Negative

69

37 (54)

33 (48)

35 (51)

37 (53)

Positive

36

22 (61)

20 (55)

19 (52)

17 (48)

*Median cut-off value: 8 cells per 400 field.

**Median cut-off value: 23 microvessels per 400 field.

***Median cut-off value: 6.4.

****Median cut-off value: 4.8.

Sample preparation

Blood samples were collected one day before and one day after surgery. Than samples were dispensed into test tubes with serum separator tubes (Becton Dickinson Vacutainer Systems Hemogard, Plymouth, UK) and left for at least 30 min at room temperature. The samples were subsequently centrifuged at 1,500 × g for 15 min at room temperature and the supernatant was recovered. Patient sera were frozen at -80°C. Starting the analytical phase, sera were thawed to room temperature and mixed thoroughly by vortexing at low speed in order to eliminate any particulate matter affecting reproducible results. Serum tryptase levels were measured by fluoro-enzyme-immunoassay (FEIA) using Uni-CAP100 (Pharmacia Diagnostics AB, Uppsala, Sweden).

Immunohistochemistry

The histological diagnosis was made on haematoxylin-eosin-stained slides and histopathological grading was performed according to the criteria described by Bloom and Richardson, as well, moderately and poorly differentiated state [32]. For the evaluation of MCDPT and MVD a three-layer biotin-avidin-peroxidase system was utilized [33]. Briefly, six-μm-thick serial sections of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded biopsy tumour were cut. Then, sections were microwaved at 500 W for 10 min, after which endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 3% hydrogen peroxide solution. Adjacent sections were stained with human-specific monoclonal antibodies anti-tryptase (clone AA1; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) diluted 1:100 for 1 h at room temperature and anti-CD34 (QB-END 10; Bio-Optica Milan, Italy) diluted 1:50 for 1 h at room temperature, respectively. The bound antibody was visualized using a biotinylated secondary antibody, avidin-biotin peroxidase complex and fast red. Nuclear counterstaining was performed with Gill's haematoxylin no. 2 (Polysciences, Warrington, PA, USA). The primary antibody was omitted in negative controls.

Morphometrical assay

An image analysis system (Quantimet500 Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) was utilized [33]. The five areas with higher immunostaining (‘hot spots’) were selected at low magnification and individual MCDPT (Figure 1A) and MVD (Figure 1B) were counted at x400 magnification (0.19 mm2 area). The details of MCDPT and MVD were evaluated at x1000 magnification in oil (Figure 1C and D, respectively).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2407-14-534/MediaObjects/12885_2014_Article_4710_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Immunostaining of breast cancer sections with anti-tryptase and anti-CD34 antibodies. (A) Small arrows indicate a single red mast cell positive to tryptase. Big arrows indicate a single blood vessel with many red blood cells in their lumen. High MCDPT at x400 magnification (0.19 mm2 area). (B) Arrows indicate a single red positive microvessel immunostained with a primary anti CD-34 antibody. High MVD at x400 magnification (0.19 mm2 area). (C) Details of breast cancer section immunostained with a primary anti-tryptase antibody. Small arrows indicate a single red mast cell positive to tryptase, note the blue nucleus of mast cell. Big arrows indicate a single microvessel with a red blood cell in their lumen. X1000 magnification in oil. (D) Details of breast cancer section immunostained with a primary anti-CD-34 antibody. Small arrow indicates two red positive microvessels. Big arrow indicates a cluster of microvessels. X1000 magnification in oil.

Statistical analysis

MCDPT and MVD mean values ±1 standard deviations (s.d.) were evaluated by two independent observers (V.Z. and G.R.) for each tumor sample and in all series of sections. Correlations between STLBS, MCDPT, and MVD were calculated using Pearson's (r) analysis. The correlations between the above indexes and the clinicopathological features listed in Table 1 were analyzed by the Chi-square test. All statistical analyses were performed with the SPSS statistical software package (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL).

Results

The mean ± 1 s.d. STLBS and STLAS were 7.18 ± 2.63 μg/L and 5.13 ± 2.21 μg/L respectively, and a significant difference between mean levels was found (p = 0.0001) by t-test (Table 2, Figure 2). The mean ± 1 s.d. of MCDPT and MVD was 8.35 ± 2.99 and 30.11 ± 8.24 respectively (Table 2). A significant correlation between STLBS and MVD (r = 0.81, p = 0.0001), MCDPT and MVD (r = 0.73; p = 0.001), STLBS and MCDPT (r = 0.60, p = 0.003) was found (Figure 3).
Table 2

MCDPT, MVD, STLBS and STLAS means ±1 standard deviations in a series of 105 breast cancer patients

MCDPT 400x magnification (0.19 mm 2 area)

MVD 400x magnification (0.19 mm 2 area)

STLBS μg/L

STLAS μg/L

*8.35 ± 2.99

*30.11 ± 8.24

*7.18 ± 2.63

5.13 ± 2.21

*Mean ± 1 standard deviation.

t-test: p = 0.0001.

Pearson correlation between MVD and STLBS: r = 0.81; p = 0.0001.

Pearson correlation between MVD and MCDPT: r = 0.77; p = 0.0001.

Pearson correlation between STLBS and MCDPT: r = 0.69; p = 0.0003.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2407-14-534/MediaObjects/12885_2014_Article_4710_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Tryptase levels before (STLBS) and after (STLAS) surgery in a series of 105 breast cancer patients.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2407-14-534/MediaObjects/12885_2014_Article_4710_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Correlation analysis between: STLBS and MVD (r = 0.81, p = 0.0001), MCDPT and MVD (r = 0.73; p = 0.001), MCDPT and STLBS (r = 0.60, p = 0.003).

Discussion

It has been well established that MCs are involved in tumor development [69] angiogenesis-mediated both in animal and human malignancies [922]. However, few data have been published about the role of tissue MCDPT in BC angiogenesis and development [7, 8, 30]. Interestingly, no reports have been published regarding the role of serum tryptase in BC angiogenesis and as a circulating surrogate predictive marker.

In this pilot study we have shown for the first time that STLBS strongly correlates with MCDPT and MVD in primary tumor tissue. Our data also demonstrates that STLAS significantly decrease in BC patients. Due to the release of tryptase from MCs, we suggest that MCDPT in primary BC tumor tissue represents the main source of serum tryptase. In our hypothesis, if primary tumor tissue is completely removed STLAS should decrease in one day due to their approximately 4-h long life-cycle. For these reasons, we detected STLAS 24 h before surgery to evaluate their possible role as a circulating surrogate marker suggesting the presence of tumor tissue, and again 24 h after treatment to confirm its decrease and, as a consequence, its possible expression of the absence of tumor tissue. We elaborate the background of our hypothesis based on previously published pilot data, which suggested an increase of MCDPT in primary tumor tissue. In these studies MCDPT was correlated with MVD, suggesting its role in BC angiogenesis [7, 30]. Our data suggested an involvement of MCs and tryptase in BC angiogenesis. Interestingly, published studies already demonstrated an involvement of tissue MCDPT in other malignancies such as squamous carcinoma, gastrointestinal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, and endometrial carcinoma [9, 11, 12, 18, 19]. However, the above studies did not focus on the changes inSTLs before and after surgery, and no correlation between STLs, MCDPT and MVD was evaluated. It is remarkable that tryptase released from MCs is involved in tumor angiogenesis by several mechanisms. Firstly, tryptase stimulates the formation of vascular tubes in in vitro and in vivo experimental models; secondly, tryptase is an agonist of the PAR-2 in vascular endothelial cells that, in turn, induces angiogenesis [34]; thirdly, tryptase may stimulate the release of latent angiogenic factors bound to the extracellular matrix [21, 35]. Overall, the above data suggest that tryptase may be a potential surrogate bio-marker of tumor angiogenesis which is able to predict response to surgical treatment.

Conclusions

If the primary source of tryptase production is no longer existing, after 24 h a significant reduction in STLs should be expected. If elevated STLs persist after surgery, this would suggest that residual tumor tissue remains after surgical resection or, alternatively, that unknown metastases are present. In this context, several tryptase inhibitors, such as gabexate or nafamostat mesilate, may be evaluated in future clinical trials as a new anti-tumor and anti-angiogenic approach.

Abbreviations

STLBS: 

Serum tryptase levels before surgery

STLAS: 

Serum tryptase levels after surgery

MCDPT: 

Mast cell density positive to tryptase

MVD: 

Microvascular density

BC: 

Breast cancer

MCs: 

Mast cells

VEGF: 

Vascular endothelial growth factor

FGF-2: 

Fibroblast growth factor-2

MCD: 

Mast cells density

PAR-2: 

Proteinase-activated receptor-2

UICC-TNM: 

International union against cancer tumor node metastasis

s.d.: 

Standard deviations.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was in part supported by a grant from the “Alleanza Contro il Cancro” project, the Italian National Health Institute and the Italian Ministry of Health and "Associazione Italiana Mastocitosi".

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Interventional Radiology Unit with Integrated Section of Translational Medical Oncology, National Cancer Research Centre IstitutoTumori “Giovanni Paolo II”
(2)
Department of Medical and Surgery Science, Clinical Surgery Unit, University of Catanzaro “Magna Graecia” Medical School
(3)
Section of Animal Health, Department of Prevention, ASL BAT
(4)
Department of Medical and Surgery Science, Cardiovascular Disease Unit, University of Catanzaro “Magna Graecia” Medical School
(5)
Department of Medical and Surgery Science, Pathology Unit, University of Catanzaro “Magna Graecia” Medical School
(6)
Department of Experimental Oncology, Clinical Pathology Laboratory National Cancer Research Centre IstitutoTumori “Giovanni Paolo II”
(7)
Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sensory Organs, University of Bari Medical School
(8)
National Cancer Institute “Giovanni Paolo II”

References

  1. Galli SJ, Kalesnikoff J, Grimbaldeston MA, Piliponsky AM, Williams CM, Tsai M: Mast cells as "tunable" effector and immunoregulatory cells: recent advances. Annu Rev Immunol. 2005, 23: 749-786. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.141025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ribatti D, Crivellato E: Mast cells, angiogenesis and cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2011, 716: 270-288. 10.1007/978-1-4419-9533-9_14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ribatti D, Guidolin D, Marzullo A, Nico B, Annese T, Benagiano V, Crivellato E: Mast cells and angiogenesis in gastric carcinoma. Int J Exp Pathol. 2010, 91: 350-356. 10.1111/j.1365-2613.2010.00714.x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Ranieri G: Hot topic: targeting tumor angiogenesis: an update. Curr Med Chem. 2012, 19: 937-10.2174/092986712799320718.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Theoharides TC, Conti P: Mast cells: the Jekyll and Hyde of tumor growth. Trends Immunol. 2004, 25: 235-241. 10.1016/j.it.2004.02.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ranieri G, Coviello M, Chiriatti A, Stea B, Montemurro S, Quaranta M, Dittadi R, Paradiso A: Vascular endothelial growth factor assessment in different blood fractions of gastrointestinal cancer patients and healthy controls. Oncol Rep. 2004, 11: 435-439.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Mangia A, Malfettone A, Rossi R, Paradiso A, Ranieri G, Simone G, Resta L: Tissue remodelling in breast cancer: human mast cell tryptase as an initiator of myofibroblast differentiation. Histopathology. 2011, 58: 1096-1106. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.03842.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ranieri G, Ammendola M, Patruno R, Celano G, Zito FA, Montemurro S, Rella A, Di Lecce V, Gadaleta CD, Battista De Sarro G, Ribatti D: Tryptase-positive mast cells correlate with angiogenesis in early breast cancer patients. Int J Oncol. 2009, 35: 115-120.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ranieri G, Labriola A, Achille G, Florio G, Zito AF, Grammatica L, Paradiso A: Microvessel density, mast cell density and thymidine phosphorylase expression in oral squamous carcinoma. Int J Oncol. 2002, 21: 1317-1323.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Tomita M, Matsuzaki Y, Edagawa M, Shimizu T, Hara M, Sekiya R, Onitsuka T: Association of mast cells with tumor angiogenesis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Dis Esophagus. 2001, 14: 135-138. 10.1046/j.1442-2050.2001.00171.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ribatti D, Finato N, Crivellato E, Marzullo A, Mangieri D, Nico B, Vacca A, Beltrami CA: Neovascularization and mast cells with tryptase activity increase simultaneously with pathologic progression in human endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005, 193: 1961-1965. 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.04.055.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ammendola M, Sacco R, Donato G, Zuccalà V, Russo E, Luposella M, Vescio G, Rizzuto A, Patruno R, De Sarro G, Montemurro S, Sammarco G, Ranieri G: Mast cell positivity to tryptase correlates with metastatic lymph nodes in gastrointestinal cancer patients treated surgically. Oncology. 2013, 85: 111-116. 10.1159/000351145. doi:10.1159/000351145View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Acikalin MF, Oner U, Topçu I, Yaşar B, Kiper H, Colak E: Tumour angiogenesis and mast cell density in the prognostic assessment of colorectal carcinomas. Dig Liver Dis. 2005, 37: 162-169. 10.1016/j.dld.2004.09.028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gulubova M, Vlaykova T: Prognostic significance of mast cell number and microvascular density for the survival of patients with primary colorectal cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009, 24: 1265-1275. 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.05009.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Esposito I, Menicagli M, Funel N, Bergmann F, Boggi U, Mosca F, Bevilacqua G, Campani D: Inflammatory cells contribute to the generation of an angiogenic phenotype in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J ClinPathol. 2004, 57: 630-636.Google Scholar
  16. Tuna B, Yorukoglu K, Unlu M, Mungan MU, Kirkali Z: Association of mast cells with microvessel density in renal cell carcinomas. Eur Urol. 2006, 50: 530-534. 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.040.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Carlini MJ, Dalurzo MC, Lastiri JM, Smith DE, Vasallo BC, Puricelli LI, de Cidre Lauría LS: Mast cell phenotypes and microvessels in non-small cell lung cancer and its prognostic significance. Hum Pathol. 2010, 41: 697-705. 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.04.029.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ribatti D, Ennas MG, Vacca A, Ferreli F, Nico B, Orru S, Sirigu P: Tumor vascularity and tryptase-positive mast cells correlate with a poor prognosis in melanoma. Eur J Clin Invest. 2003, 33: 420-425. 10.1046/j.1365-2362.2003.01152.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Benítez-Bribiesca L, Wong A, Utrera D, Castellanos E: The role of mast cell tryptase in neoangiogenesis of premalignant and malignant lesions of the uterine cervix. J Histochem Cytochem. 2001, 49: 1061-1062. 10.1177/002215540104900816.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ranieri G, Patruno R, Lionetti A, Di Summa A, Mattioli E, Bufo P, Pellecchia A, Ribatti D, Zizzo N: Endothelial area and microvascular density in a canine non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: an interspecies model of tumor angiogenesis. Leuk Lymphoma. 2005, 46: 1639-1643. 10.1080/10428190500205150.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Nico B, Mangieri D, Crivellato E, Vacca A, Ribatti D: Mast cells contribute to vasculogenic mimicry in multiple myeloma. Stem Cells Dev. 2008, 17: 19-22. 10.1089/scd.2007.0132.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ribatti D, Molica S, Vacca A, Nico B, Crivellato E, Roccaro AM, Dammacco F: Tryptase-positive mast cells correlate positively with bone marrow angiogenesis in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia. 2003, 17: 1428-1430. 10.1038/sj.leu.2402970.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Blair RJ, Meng H, Marchese MJ, Ren S, Schwartz LB, Tonnesen MG, Gruber BL: Human mast cells stimulate vascular tube formation. Tryptase is a novel, potent angiogenic factor. J Clin Invest. 1997, 99: 2691-2700. 10.1172/JCI119458.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Stack MS, Johnson DA: Human mast cell tryptase activates single-chain urinary-type plasminogen activator (pro-urokinase). J Biol Chem. 1994, 269: 9416-9419.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ribatti D, Ranieri G, Nico B, Benagiano V, Crivellato E: Tryptase and chymase are angiogenic in vivo in the chorioallantoic membrane assay. Int J DevBiol. 2011, 55: 99-102.Google Scholar
  26. Itoh Y, Sendo T, Oishi R: Physiology and pathophysiologyof proteinase-activated receptors (P ARs): role of tryptase/P AR-2 in vascular endothelial barrier function. J Pharmacol Sci. 2005, 97: 14-19. 10.1254/jphs.FMJ04005X3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Shpacovitch VM, Brzoska T, Buddenkotte J, Stroh C, Sommerhoff CP, Ansel JC, Schulze-Osthoff K, Bunnett NW, Luger TA, Steinhoff M: Agonists of proteinase-activated receptor-2 induce cytokine release and activation of nuclear transcription factor kappa B in human dermal microvascular endothelial cells. J Invest Dermatol. 2002, 118: 380-385. 10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01658.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Matej R, Mandàkovà P, Netikovà I, Pouckovà P, Olejàr T: Proteinase-activated receptor-2 expression in breast cancer and the role of trypsin on growth and metabolism of breast cancer cell line MDA MB-231. Physiol Res. 2007, 56: 475-484.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Morris DR, Ding Y, Ricks TK, Gullapalli A, Wolfe BL, Trejo J: Protease-activated receptor-2 is essential for factor VIIa and Xa-induced signaling, migration, and invasion of breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2006, 66: 307-314. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1735.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ribatti D, Finato N, Crivellato E, Guidolin D, Longo V, Mangieri D, Nico B, Vacca A, Beltrami CA: Angiogenesis and mast cells in human breast cancer sentinel lymphnodes with and without micrometastases. Histopathology. 2007, 51: 837-842. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2007.02869.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Singletary SE, Connolly JL: Breast cancer staging: working with the sixth edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006, 56: 37-47. 10.3322/canjclin.56.1.37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Bloom HJ, Richardson WW: Histological grading and prognosis in breast cancer; a study of 1409 cases of which 359 have been followed for 15 years. Br J Cancer. 1957, 11: 359-377. 10.1038/bjc.1957.43.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Ranieri G, Grammatica L, Patruno R, Zito AF, Valerio P, Iacobellis S, Gadaleta C, Gasparini G, Ribatti D: A possible role of thymidine phosphorylase expression and 5-fluorouracil increased sensitivity in oropharyngeal cancer patients. J Cell Mol Med. 2007, 11: 362-368. 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00007.x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Liu Y, Mueller BM: Protease-activated receptor-2 regulates vascular endothelial growth factor expression in MDAMB 231 cells via MAPK pathways. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006, 344: 1263-1270. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.04.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hallegren J, Estrada S, Karlson U, Karlson U, Alving K, Pejler G: Heparin antagonists are potent inhibitors of mast cell tryptase. Biochemistry. 2001, 40: 7342-7439. 10.1021/bi001988c.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/14/534/prepub

Copyright

© Marech et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement