CT based three dimensional dose-volume evaluations for high-dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer
© Murakami et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 29 September 2013
Accepted: 11 June 2014
Published: 17 June 2014
In this study, high risk clinical target volumes (HR-CTVs) according to GEC-ESTRO guideline were contoured retrospectively based on CT images taken at the time of high-dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR-ICBT) and correlation between clinical outcome and dose of HR-CTV were analyzed.
Our study population consists of 51 patients with cervical cancer (Stages IB-IVA) treated with 50 Gy external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) using central shield combined with 2–5 times of 6 Gy HDR-ICBT with or without weekly cisplatin. Dose calculation was based on Manchester system and prescribed dose of 6 Gy were delivered for point A. CT images taken at the time of each HDR-ICBT were reviewed and HR-CTVs were contoured. Doses were converted to the equivalent dose in 2 Gy (EQD2) by applying the linear quadratic model (α/β = 10 Gy).
Three-year overall survival, Progression-free survival, and local control rate was 82.4%, 85.3% and 91.7%, respectively. Median cumulative dose of HR-CTV D90 was 65.0 Gy (52.7-101.7 Gy). Median length from tandem to the most lateral edge of HR-CTV at the first ICBT was 29.2 mm (range, 18.0-51.9 mm). On univariate analysis, both LCR and PFS was significantly favorable in those patients D90 for HR-CTV was 60 Gy or greater (p = 0.001 and 0.03, respectively). PFS was significantly favorable in those patients maximum length from tandem to edge of HR-CTV at first ICBT was shorter than 3.5 cm (p = 0.042).
Volume-dose showed a relationship to the clinical outcome in CT based brachytherapy for cervical carcinoma.
KeywordsBrachytherapy Image-based gynecological brachytherapy Cervical cancer IGBT CT-based gynecological brachytherapy
Standard therapy for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer is combination of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy with concurrent chemotherapy [1–5]. Intracavitary brachytherapy employing intrauterine (tandem) and vaginal (ovoid) sources based on Manchester principles, has been the standard for many decades [6, 7]. Manchester system is point-based (i.e. two-dimensional) and uses orthogonal x-ray images for calculation and prescription of treatment doses. This concept neglects each tumor size or shape because prescribed dose is delivered to a fixed reference points. Therefore while excellent long-term tumor control rates can be obtained for patients with small tumors, for larger tumors relapse rate are high [8, 9]. Over the decades, GEC-ESTRO [10, 11] and ABS  proposed the concept of 3D image-based brachytherapy (IGBT) for the cervical cancer. Recently improved clinical outcomes are reported using IGBT for the advanced cervical carcinomas [13–19]. GEC-ESTRO working group recommend using MRI for determining high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) and intermediate-risk CTV (IR-CTV) because MRI is superior to CT for delineating the normal anatomy of the female pelvis and for identifying cervical carcinoma extension [19–22]. However, practically majority of institutions do not have access to an MRI unit every time of brachytherapy treatment. In many circumstances CT scanners are often more widely available than MRI, therefore Viswanathan et al. developed guidelines for standard contouring of HR-CTV based on CT images . From 2008 we introduced CT imaging in gynecological brachytherapy but continued to use Manchester system for dose calculation. In this study, we analyzed correlations between clinical outcome and dose of HR-CTV contoured based on CT images.
Patients included in current study are females with cervical carcinoma treated by primary radiation therapy including brachytherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy from April 2008 to December 2010. As mentioned above, our department introduced CT imaging in the process of high-dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR-ICBT) for cervical cancer from 2008. Sixty two patients were identified who had CT image after insertion of brachytherapy applicator and 9 patients were excluded because of having distant disease beyond pelvis and another 2 patients were excluded because they were treated by combination of ICBT and interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT). Therefore current study consisted of 51 patients. All patients underwent pelvic examination, cystoscopy, pyeloureterography, chest X-ray/CT, pelvic CT/magnetic resonance image (MRI), and blood test. Maximum tumor diameters were measured based on the CT/MRI findings. All biopsy specimens were diagnosed in Department of Pathology of our hospital.
Principles of management of the cervical cancer in this institute were described elsewhere . The treatment policy for locally advanced cervical cancer is concurrent chemoradiation therapy (cCRT) with chemotherapy regimen of weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m2/week) or cisplatin (50 mg/m2/3 weeks) plus oral S-1 (80–120 mg/body/day). Concurrent chemoradiotherapy was not performed in the patients with insufficient renal function (serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dl) and aged over 75 years. Supportive treatments such as blood transfusions were encouraged during radiotherapy.
EBRT was delivered by 3D conformal technique with linear accelerator (Clinac iX, Varian Medical System, Palo Alto, CA) using 15 MV photon beam. Treatment planning was based on CT images of 3 mm slice thickness taken by Aquilion LB CT scanner (Toshiba Medical Systems, Japan). The common EBRT portals included whole uterus, as well as parametrium, upper part of vagina down to the level of lower border of obturator foramens, and the draining pelvic lymph nodes up to the level of the common iliac (L4/5 junction). The nodal CTV included internal (obturator and hypogastric), external, and common iliac lymph nodes as well as presacral lymph nodes down to the level of S3. If the primary lesion involved lower third of vagina or there were clinically palpable metastatic inguinal nodes, inguinal regions were also included in EBRT fields. The initial 20–40 Gy was delivered to the whole pelvis with a 4-field box and then pelvic irradiation with a 4 cm-width of central shield (CS) being ensued reducing organ at risk (OAR) exposure. The initiation of CS was depend upon tumor shrinkage. Every week tumor response was accessed by attending radiation oncologist by physical examination. For early responding tumor width of which was smaller than 4 cm after having received 20 Gy of EBRT, CS was initiated. For late responding tumor width of which was larger than 4 cm at 20 Gy, EBRT was continued until tumor width became smaller than 4 cm. For tumors in which response of radiation was unfavorable, CS did not introduced. Total pelvic side wall dose was 50 Gy in 25 fractions. After the CS was inserted, HDR-ICBT was performed in 1–2 sessions/week, but EBRT and HDR-ICBT were not carried out on the same day. All brachytherapy was carried out by 192Ir remote after loading system (RALS, MicroSelectron HDR™, Nucletron, Veennendaal, The Netherlands). ICBT with tandem + ovoid applicators without shielding was performed with a prescribed dose of 6 Gy in point A using Manchester method. A tandem-cylinder was used in the cases with a vaginal involvement exceeding more than one-third of total vaginal length. At each brachytherapy session, CT image of 3 mm slice thickness was taken by a large bore CT simulator (Aquilion™, Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan) situated in operating room with the patient lying in lithotomy position with the applicators in place. Before the acquisition of CT, bladder was filled with 100 ml of saline. Emptiness of rectum was checked at the time of gynecological examination before insertion of the applicators. For dose calculation of ICBT, Oncentra® (Nucletron, Veennendaal, The Netherlands) was used. HR-CTV was determined based on CT images according to Viswanathan’s contouring guidelines . Rectum and bladder were contoured as OARs. Dose constraints for OARs were determined as followed; D2cc bladder < 90 Gy EQD2, D2cc rectum < 75 Gy EQD2. In order to fulfill these dose constraints for OARs, tumors with insufficient response after EBRT and required 50 Gy of EBRT without CS generally could only afford two times of brachytherapy sessions while tumors with sufficient response and started CS only after 20 Gy of EBRT could undergo four or even five times of brachytherapy sessions. The workload with using CT-based IGBT required only additional several minutes for contouring targets and OARs compared with conventional X-ray based 2D planning.
All patients were evaluated weekly for toxicity during radiotherapy through physical examination and blood tests. CT and/or MRI scans and cytology were performed 1–3 months after radiotherapy, and physical examination and blood tests were performed regularly every 1–6 months.
Overall survival rate was estimated from the start of radiation therapy to the date of death or of the last follow-up. Progression-free survival rate was estimated to the date of any disease relapse considered as an event. Patients without relapse who died of another disease or still alive were censored at the time of death or last follow-up. Local control rate which includes central and parametrium relapses was considered as an event, and censored at the time of death, non-local relapse, or last follow-up. Overall survival, Progression-free survival, and local control rate were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
The parameter N indicates the number of fractions and d the dose per fraction. For calculating tumor doses, α/β was assumed as 10 Gy. Because after insertion of CS most of the primary disease did not receive EBRT, EQD2 of EBRT before the initiation of CS was added to the EQD2 of HDR-ICBT. As calculation of HDR-ICBT was based on CT taken by each brachytherapy session, EQD2 at every fraction was calculated and added together.
The survival curves were compared by the log-rank test. For univariate analysis, all of the variables were dichotomized at the median. Statistical significance was set to less than 0.05 as usual. All of the statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics version 18.0 (SAS Institute, Tokyo, Japan).
This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board of the National Cancer Center.
Patients characteristics (n = 51)
No. of patients
Pelvic LN metastasis
Initial tumor size (cm)
Pre treatment Scc (mg/dl)
EBRT* central pelvic dose (Gy)
HDR-ICBT† dose for point A
Tandem + ovoid
Tandem + cylinder
Volume of HR-CTV at first ICBT (ml)
Maximum diameter of HR-CTV at first ICBT (mm)
Maximum length from tandem to edge of HR-CTV at first ICBT (mm)
EQD2 ll of point A
EQD2 ll of HR-CTV D90 **
Treatment related toxicities
One patient experienced sigmoid colon perforation 1 month after completion of radiotherapy which required colostomy. Because cumulative dose for sigmoid colon D2cc was only 43.8 Gy (EQD2, α/β = 3 Gy) and development of the perforation was rather too early, it was implausible that radiation played a major role developing this severe morbidity. Two patients developed grade 2 proctitis and none experienced greater than grade 2 cystitis or vaginitis.
In the current study, definitive radiotherapy using traditional Manchester method with or without concurrent chemotherapy for cervical carcinoma resulted in favorable local control with only 4 local recurrences (7.8%).
Since the introduction of the concept of IGBT [10–12], several improved clinical results have been reported [13–18]. It is recommended in GEC-ESTRO working group that MRI should be used to determine IR-CTV and HR-CTV because of its superiority of tissue discrimination over CT image [20–22, 25]. However, it is even now hard for most of brachytherapy suits to prepare MRI instruments for the use of every brachytherapy procedure for cervical cancer. As an alternative and practical solution, Viswanathan et al. proposed a guideline to contour HR-CTV based on CT images . Current study was to the best of our knowledge first report which validated this CT based HR-CTV contouring guideline in clinical practice. Schmid et al. reported interesting study concerning the feasibility of transrectal ultrasonography for identifying HR-CTV in comparison with MRI . However authors still believe utilizing CT for brachytherapy is the most realistic solution for the future evolution of image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer because of its prevalence and reproducibility.
Dimopoulos et al. analyzed the relationships between dose-volume histogram (DVH) and local control using MRI-based IGBT for cervical cancer and found out that the D90 for HR-CTV greater than 87 Gy resulted in excellent local control . In current study, the cut-off value of D90 was 60 Gy and it was much lower than what Dimopoulos et al. pointed out. It has been known that Japanese centers use lower cumulative dose schedules with shorter overall treatment time (OTT) than those of US and Europe [27, 28]. Recently Toita et al. showed the efficacy of Japanese schedule in a series of multicenter prospective trials in which Stage I and II with small (<4 cm) tumor diameter can be effectively treated by BED 62 Gy10 (JAROG0401/JROSG04-2)  and Stage III/IVA by BED 62–65 Gy10 at point A (JCOG1066) . Therefore it is reasonable that in current study the cut-off value is much lower than Vienna group. In addition 60 Gy could be used as a target dose for HR-CTV D90 in institutions which perform IGBT with Japanese schedule. However further evidence must be accumulated in order to validate the value of HR-CTV D90 ≥ 60 Gy in Japanese schedule.
In current study it was revealed that PFS was significantly favorable if the maximum length from tandem to the margin of HR-CTV at the first ICBT was shorter than 3.5 cm. Therefore if the maximum distance between uterine cavity and margin of HR-CTV is longer than 3.5 cm at the first session of brachytherapy, application of image-guided brachytherapy or combined intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy [16, 31–33] would improve clinical results.
From current study, it was demonstrated that favorable local control could be achieved for tumors with HR-CTV D90 ≥ 60 Gy using conventional Manchester method. However for tumors with delayed response after EBRT and HR-CTV D90 could only be under 60 Gy by Manchester method, further treatment improvement is warranted. In this context, maximum length from tandem to the rim of HR-CTV ≥ 3.5 cm could be used as a cut-off point where ISBT would play an important role. Currently in our institution tumors of which maximum length from tandem to the rim of HR-CTV is longer than 3.5 cm at the time of brachytherapy are treated by the combination of ICBT and ISBT or ISBT alone. Improvement of clinical results after the introduction of the combination of ICBT and ISBT compared with conventional technique will be reported elsewhere.
This study has several limitations. This is a result from single retrospective study with a limited follow-up period and HR-CTV was determined based on CT images rather than MR images. Viswanathan et al. compared CT based and MRI based CTV and concluded that the width of CT based CTV was larger than that of MRI . Therefore HR-CTV contoured based on CT in this study may overestimate the tumor volume in lateral direction. This may be part of the reason of lower cut-off value of HR-CTV D90 in this study. However it will take long before MRI will be available in majority of brachytherapy suit. At present as current standard for IGBT is based on MRI, IGBT is not so popular after its introduction in the treatment of cervical cancer brachytherapy because MRI itself is not prevalent yet. Therefore it is worth accumulating evidence that IGBT based on CT image could also achieve favorable clinical results if used properly.
Dose-volume relationship was found in CT-based intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical carcinoma in Japanese schedule. Further improvement could be expected for cervical cancers with insufficient response after EBRT. For such tumor, ISBT would play an important role and should be investigated.
External beam radiotherapy
High-risk clinical target volume
Intermediate-risk clinical target volume
High-dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy
Concurrent chemoradiation therapy
Organ at risk
- EQD2 :
The equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions.
Part of this study was financially supported by Cancer Research and Development Fund 23-A-13 of our institution.
- Morris M, Eifel PJ, Lu J, Grigsby PW, Levenback C, Stevens RE, Rotman M, Gershenson DM, Mutch DG: Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999, 340: 1137-1143.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB, Thigpen JT, Deppe G, Maiman MA, Clark-Pearson DL, Insalaco S: Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999, 340: 1144-1153.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Viswanathan AN, Beriwal S, De Los Santos JF, Demanes DJ, Gaffney D, Hansen J, Jones E, Kirisits C, Thomadsen B, Erickson B, American Brachytherapy Society: American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix. Part II: high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy. 2012, 11: 47-52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Viswanathan AN Thomadsen B, American Brachytherapy Society Cervical Cancer Recommendations Committee; American Brachytherapy Society: American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix. Part I: general principles. Brachytherapy. 2012, 11: 33-46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Whitney CW, Sause W, Bundy BN, Malfetano JH, Hannigan EV, Fowler WC, Clarke-Pearson DL, Liao SY: Randomized comparison of fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus hydroxyurea as an adjunct to radiation therapy in stage IIB-IVA carcinoma of the cervix with negative para-aortic lymph nodes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group and Southwest Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 1999, 17: 1339-1348.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bethesda M: ICRU report 38. Dose and volume specification for reporting intracavitary therapy in gynecology. ICRU. 1985, 38: 1-20.Google Scholar
- Tod M, Meredith WJ: Treatment of cancer of the cervix uteri, a revised Manchester method. Br J Radiol. 1953, 26: 252-257.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perez CA, Grigsby PW, Nene SM, Camel HM, Galakatos A, Kao MS, Lockett MA: Effect of tumor size on the prognosis of carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with irradiation alone. Cancer. 1992, 69: 2796-2806.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stehman FB, Bundy BN, DiSaia PJ, Keys HM, Larson JE, Fowler WC: Carcinoma of the cervix treated with radiation therapy. I. A multi-variate analysis of prognostic variables in the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Cancer. 1991, 67: 2776-2785.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haie-Meder C, Potter R, Van Limbergen E, Briot E, De Brabandere M, Dimopoulos J, Dumas I, Hellebust TP, Kirisits C, Lang S, Muschitz S, Nevinson J, Nulens A, Petrow P, Wachter-Gerstner N, GEC-ESTRO Working Group: Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (I): concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV. Radiother Oncol. 2005, 74: 235-245.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Potter R, Haie-Meder C, Van Limbergen E, Barillot I, De Brabandere M, Dimopoulos J, Dumas I, Erickson B, Lang S, Nulens A, Petrow P, Rownd J, Kirisits C, GEC-ESTRO Working Group: Recommendations from gynaecological (GYN) GEC ESTRO working group (II): concepts and terms in 3D image-based treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy-3D dose volume parameters and aspects of 3D image-based anatomy, radiation physics, radiobiology. Radiother Oncol. 2006, 78: 67-77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nag S, Cardenes H, Chang S, Das IJ, Erickson B, Ibbott GS, Lowenstein J, Roll J, Thomadsen B, Varia M, Image-Guided Brachytherapy Working Group: Proposed guidelines for image-based intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical carcinoma: report from Image-Guided Brachytherapy Working Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004, 60: 1160-1172.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dimopoulos JC, Lang S, Kirisits C, Fidarova EF, Berger D, Georg P, Dörr W, Pötter R: Dose-volume histogram parameters and local tumor control in magnetic resonance image-guided cervical cancer brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009, 75: 56-63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dimopoulos JC, Pötter R, Lang S, Fidarova E, Georg P, Dörr W, Kirisits C: Dose-effect relationship for local control of cervical cancer by magnetic resonance image-guided brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2009, 93: 311-315.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haie-Meder C, Chargari C, Rey A, Dumas I, Morice P, Magnè N: MRI-based low dose-rate brachytherapy experience in locally advanced cervical cancer patients initially treated by concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2010, 96: 161-165.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nomden CN, de Leeuw AA, Moerland MA, Roesink JM, Tersteeg RJ, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM: Clinical use of the Utrecht applicator for combined intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy treatment in locally advanced cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012, 82: 1424-1430.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pötter R, Dimopoulos J, Georg P, Lang S, Waldhäusl C, Wachter-Gerstner N, Weitmann H, Reinthaller A, Knocke TH, Wachter S, Kirisits C: Clinical impact of MRI assisted dose volume adaptation and dose escalation in brachytherapy of locally advanced cervix cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2007, 83: 148-155.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Potter R, Georg P, Dimopoulos JC, Grimm M, Berger D, Nesvacil N, Georg D, Schmid MP, Reinthaller A, Sturdza A, Kirisits C: Clinical outcome of protocol based image (MRI) guided adaptive brachytherapy combined with 3D conformal radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2011, 100: 116-123.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Brodman M, Friedman F, Dottino P, Janus C, Plaxe S, Cohen C: A comparative study of computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and clinical staging for the detection of early cervix cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1990, 36: 409-412.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim SH, Choi BI, Lee HP, Kang SB, Choi YM, Han MC, Kim CW: Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MR findings. Radiology. 1990, 175: 45-51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mayr NA, Tali ET, Yuh WT, Brown BP, Wen BC, Buller RE, Anderson B, Hussey DH: Cervical cancer: application of MR imaging in radiation therapy. Radiology. 1993, 189: 601-608.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schmid MP, Mansmann B, Federico M, Dimopoulos JC, Georg P, Fidarova E, Dörr W, Pötter R: Residual tumor volumes and grey zones after external beam radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy) in cervical cancer patients. A low-filed MRI study. Strahlenther Onkol. 2013, 189: 238-244.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Viswanathan AN, Dimopoulos J, Kirisits C, Berger D, Potter R: Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-based contouring in cervical cancer brachytherapy: results of a prospective trial and preliminary guidelines for standardized contours. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007, 68: 491-498.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kuroda Y, Murakami N, Morota M, Sekii S, Takahashi K, Inaba K, Mayahara H, Ito Y, Yoshimura R, Sumi M, Kagami Y, Katsumata N, Kasamatsu T, Itami J: Impact of concurrent chemotherapy on definitive radiotherapy for women with FIGO IIIb cervical cancer. J Radiat Res. 2012, 53: 588-593.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Dale RG: The application of the linear-quadratic dose-effect equation to fractionated and protracted radiotherapy. Br J Radiol. 1985, 58: 515-528.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schmid MP, Pötter R, Brader P, Kratochwil A, Goldner G, Kichheiner K, Sturdza A, Kirisits C: Feasibility of transrectal ultrasonography for assessment of cervical cancer. Strahlenther Onkol. 2013, 189: 123-128.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Toita T, Kodaira T, Shinoda A, Uno T, Akino Y, Mitsumori M, Teshima T: Patterns of radiotherapy practice for patients with cervical cancer (1999–2001): patterns of care study in Japan. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008, 70: 788-794.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Viswanathan AN, Creutzberg CL, Craighead P, McCormack M, Toita T, Narayan K, Reed N, Long H, Kim HJ, Marth C, Lindegaard JC, Cerrota A, Small W, Trimble E: International brachytherapy practice patterns: a survey of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012, 82: 250-255.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Toita T, Kato S, Niibe Y, Ohno T, Kazumoto T, Kodaira T, Kataoka M, Shikama N, Kenjo M, Tokumaru S, Yamauchi C, Suzuki O, Sakurai H, Numasaki H, Teshima T, Oguchi M, Kagami Y, Nakano T, Hiraoka M, Mitsuhashi N: Prospective multi-institutional study of definitive radiotherapy with high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy in patients with nonbulky (<4-cm) stage I and II uterine cervical cancer (JAROG0401/JROSG04-2). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012, 82: e49-e56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Toita T, Kitagawa R, Hamano T, Umayahara K, Hirashima Y, Aoki Y, Oguchi M, Mikami M, Takizawa K, Cervical Cancer (Vulva Cancer) Committee of Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG): Phase II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy in patients with locally advanced uterine cervical cancer: efficacy and toxicity of a low cumulative radiation dose schedule. Gynecol Oncol. 2012, 126: 211-216.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dimopoulos JC, Kirisits C, Petric P, Georg P, Lang S, Berger D, Pötter R: The Vienna applicator for combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy of cervical cancer: clinical feasibility and preliminary results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006, 66: 83-90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Tersteeg RJ, Roesink JM, Bijmolt S, Nomden CN, Moerland MA, de Leeuw AA: MRI-guided treatment-planning optimisation in intracavitary or combined intracavitary/interstitial PDR brachytherapy using tandem ovoid applicators in locally advanced cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2009, 93: 322-330.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kirisits C, Lang S, Dimopoulos J, Berger D, Georg D, Pötter R: The Vienna applicator for combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy of cervical cancer: design, application, treatment planning, and dosimetric results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006, 65: 624-630.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/14/447/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.