Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Recurrent differentiated thyroid cancer: towards personalized treatment based on evaluation of tumor characteristics with PET (THYROPET Study): study protocol of a multicenter observational cohort study

  • Jakob W Kist1Email author,
  • Bart de Keizer2,
  • Marcel PM Stokkel1,
  • Otto S Hoekstra3,
  • Wouter V Vogel1 and
  • THYROPET study group
BMC Cancer201414:405

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-405

Received: 17 December 2013

Accepted: 20 May 2014

Published: 5 June 2014



After initial treatment of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) patients are followed with thyroglobulin (Tg) measurements to detect recurrences. In case of elevated levels of Tg and negative neck ultrasonography, patients are treated 'blindly' with Iodine-131 (131I). However, in up to 50% of patients, the post-therapy scan reveals no 131I-targeting of tumor lesions. Such patients derive no benefit from the blind therapy but are exposed to its toxicity. Alternatively, iodine-124 (124I) Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) has become available to visualize DTC lesions and without toxicity. In addition to this, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT detects the recurrent DTC phenotype, which lost the capacity to accumulate iodine. Taken together, the combination of 124I and 18F-FDG PET/CT has potential to stratify patients for treatment with 131I.


In a multicenter prospective observational cohort study the hypothesis that the combination of 124I and 18F-FDG PET/CT can avoid futile 131I treatments in patients planned for ‘blind’ therapy with 131I, is tested.

One hundred patients planned for 131I undergo both 124I and 18F-FDG PET/CT after rhTSH stimulation. Independent of the outcome of the scans, all patients will subsequently receive, after thyroid hormone withdrawal, the 131I therapy. The post 131I therapeutic scintigraphy is compared with the outcome of the 124I and 18F-FDG PET/CT in order to evaluate the diagnostic value of the combined PET modalities.

This study primary aims to reduce the number of futile 131I therapies. Secondary aims are the nationwide introduction of 124I PET/CT by a quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) program, to correlate imaging outcome with histopathological features, to compare 124I PET/CT after rhTSH and after withdrawal of thyroid hormone, and to compare 124I and 131I dosimetry.


This study aims to evaluate the potential value of the combination of 124I and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the prevention of futile 131I therapies in patients with biochemically suspected recurrence of DTC. To our best knowledge no studies addressed this in a prospective cohort of patients. This is of great clinical importance as a futile 131I is a costly treatment associated with morbidity and therefore should be restricted to those likely to benefit from this treatment.

Trial registration identifier: NCT01641679


Thyroid cancer Recurrence 124I 18F-FDG PET/CT Cross-calibration Thyropet


Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is the most frequent endocrine tumor, with an annual incidence per 100.000 individuals of 1 – 3 in men and 2 – 4 in women [1]. In general, DTC has an excellent prognosis, and only 5 to 10% will die of their disease [2, 3]. Prognosis is less favorable when the disease recurs after primary treatment. Local or regional recurrence occurs in 5 – 20% of patients [4]. Distant metastases develop in up to 10%, usually in the lungs and bones [5]. Recurrences are usually detected during the early years of follow-up, but may occur years later [6]. As in many diseases, early detection of recurrence improves outcome and survival, because limited disease load may allow surgical resection and/or effective treatment with radioactive iodine (131I). Follow-up is therefore necessary throughout the patients’ life. Therefore, even though DTC incidence is low, many patients are currently under surveillance for a possible recurrence (estimated 500.000 in the United States) [7, 8].

The serum marker Thyroglobulin (Tg) plays a pivotal role in the follow-up of differentiated thyroid cancer. Serum Tg should be undetectable in DTC patients following effective thyroid remnant ablation with 131I, so that any detectable level reflects (neoplastic) thyroid tissue [9]. The level of serum Tg is related to the amount of neoplastic thyroid tissue; it has been estimated that 1 g of neoplastic thyroid tissue corresponds with a serum Tg of 1 ng/ml during thyroid hormone replacement therapy, and with 2 – 10 ng/ml following recombinant human thyroid hormone stimulating hormone (rhTSH) stimulation [10, 11]. A serum Tg cut-off level ≥ 2 ng/ml following rhTSH is highly sensitive to identify patients in whom persistent tumor may be found with imaging techniques [12, 13].

When recurrent DTC is suspected because of serum Tg above the cut-off level, several imaging tests may be performed to detect the exact sites of recurrence. The sodium/iodide symporter (NIS) mediates iodide uptake in the thyroid gland and thyroid cancer cells [14]. The ability of the thyroid to accumulate Iodide via NIS is the basis for scintigraphic thyroid imaging with radioiodine (using the gamma-emitting 123I) as well as for therapy using the beta-emitter 131I, which targets and destroys iodide-transporting benign and malignant thyroid cells. In thyroid cancer, the primary therapy is total thyroidectomy, which in practice is near-total to spare adjacent nerves and parathyroids. Postoperatively, 131I is used to ablate these postoperative thyroid remnants, and to detect (using post 131I whole body scintigraphy) and treat potential metastases [1517]. With this approach, highly selective radiation doses can be achieved in tumor tissue, often much higher than with external radiotherapy.

Historically, the follow-up of patients with DTC included scintigraphy after a low activity of 131I if serum Tg was elevated, but this is no longer recommended because of poor sensitivity [1823]. To date, whole body scintigraphy after ‘blind’ administration of high ‘therapeutic’ activity of 131I is performed in these patients, during withdrawal of thyroid hormone replacement to stimulate uptake of iodine in cells of thyroidal origin, both to diagnose and re-stage the potential recurrence and to initiate its treatment [18, 2428]. This strategy can be effective, but an estimated 38% - 50% of patients will have a negative post-therapeutic 131I whole body scan and/or no objective therapy effect [29, 30]. Such patients will have received a total body irradiation of 450 millisievert (mSv) and may have suffered from side effects such as nausea, sialoadenitis, loss of taste, or reduced spermatogenesis. Furthermore, their risk of secondary malignancies has increased [31, 32]. All induced by a treatment from which they derived no benefit. Also, the prolonged thyroid hormone withdrawal and subsequent hypothyroidism necessary for 131I therapy have major impact on quality of life, with a majority of patients suffering from significant changes in physical, psychological, and social well-being [3337]. The high frequency of high activities 131I from which patients do not derive any benefit but are exposed to its toxicity and potential adverse oncological effects, has led to a search for new diagnostic tools to improve the selection of patients for such treatment.

Nowadays, ultrasound of the neck is applied to detect a local recurrence or regional lymph node metastases allowing direct biopsy to confirm the diagnosis. Nonetheless, ultrasound is limited to the neck only, and when negative in the presence of detectable Tg, whole body evaluation is required.

Recently, Iodine-124 (124I) has become available as a novel radionuclide for whole body Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) in the follow-up of DTC [3841], with a promising diagnostic accuracy and a considerably lower radiation exposure than whole body scintigraphy after therapeutic activity of 131I [39]. Furthermore, recent experience has shown that 124I PET/CT images may be representative for the biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of subsequent therapy with 131I [42, 43]. Thus, 124I PET/CT may allow for more accurate restaging of patients in a whole body procedure, perform dosimetry for subsequent 131I therapy and predict the outcome of the treatment. However, some recurrent DTC lesions do not accumulate iodine, which is correlated with tumor dedifferentiation and this implies a poor prognosis [5]. Patients suspected of non-iodine accumulating DTC, so far only evident after futile blind 131I therapy, require restaging before local or systemic therapy may be applied. Metabolic PET imaging with the glucose analogon 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG), especially during (rh)TSH stimulation, has a high sensitivity to detect recurrent DTC in patients with detectable Tg and negative iodine scintigraphy [44]. It may correlate with a more aggressive tumor behavior and poor prognosis [45], and can help to select patients for other treatment modalities (surgery, external beam radiotherapy or multikinase inhibitors [4648]). 18F-FDG PET/CT is currently applied only when prior treatment and imaging with therapeutic activity of 131I has proven to be ineffective [49]. The value of 18F-FDG PET/CT before 131I treatment has not been tested.

At the biological level, 124I and 18F-FDG uptake is related to expression of the sodium iodine symporter (NIS) [16], while 18F-FDG uptake is related to hexokinase-I (HKI) and Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) activity [50, 51]. The evaluation of the relation of 124I and 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging findings and histopathological parameters (such as thyroglobulin, TTF1, Ki-67 and Cytokeratine-19 staining) and response to 131I treatment will give more insight in the fundamental knowledge about DTC.

The present study aims to test the power of combined for detect and characterize DTC lesions in patients with suspected recurrence. Based on the characteristics of 124I and 18F-FDG PET/CT, it is reasonable to assume that a combined strategy of imaging and histopathological evaluation at the time of suspected recurrence will yield adequate information on the disease stage prior to treatment with 131I, regardless of tumor dedifferentiation, with a potential impact on clinical decision making. The combination of both entities has been suggested in proof of concept studies [52], illustrated in Figure 1, but needs proper testing, to increase fundamental knowledge about DTC and further improve treatment.
Figure 1

Images from two different patients scanned with both 124 I and 18 F-FDG PET/CT. The 124I PET/CT of patient 1 (a) shows multiple 124I negative pulmonary nodules, which are evidently 18F-FDG positive (b). The thoracic wall lesion of patient 2 is clearly 124I avid (c) and showing no uptake on the 18F-FDG PET/CT (d).

The multicenter design of this study requires highly standardized procedures for 124I PET/CT. Previously nationwide standardization was done for 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Netherlands, which eventually evolved into the European EARL accreditation system [53, 54]. In order to compare the scans between centers calibration and standardization of the 124I PET/CT scans prior to the start of the study will be done a in quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) program.

In summary, therapy with high activities of 131I for recurrent DTC is effective in many cases, but the current blind approach also leads to overtreatment, delay, and unnecessary decrease in quality of life in a significant number of cases. As we described, a combination of diagnostic tests has a potential to allow earlier and better restaging and selection for treatment. The proposed trial aims to test the value and optimal implementation of these new tests, standalone and in combination, to derive parameters for a new personalized strategy for diagnosis and treatment of patients with (suspected) recurrent DTC.

Methods and design

Study objectives

The primary aim of the study is to evaluate the value of combined imaging with 124I and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the prevention of futile treatment with high therapeutic activity of 131I. Interpretation of both PET-scans will lead to a positive or negative treatment proposal. This will be compared with the actual response on therapy. The definition of a futile treatment will be a negative post blind 131I therapy scintigraphy.

We define four secondary aims. Firstly, our aim is to organize a synchronized introduction and QA/QC of 124I PET/CT in the Netherlands. More specifically, we aimed to create a procedure for the cross-calibration of 124I PET/CT in a multicenter setting, which guarantees reliable and comparable quantification, and is practical to use. The procedure should result in calibration factors per scanner and an indication of a measurement threshold of the scanner, which is defined as the lowest activity that can be reliably quantified. The measurement threshold will be determined per vendor.

Secondly, translational correlation of 124I and 18F-FDG PET/CT with histopathology (where available) and treatment outcome will be done, in an explorative setting. The outcome of the treatment is defined as a positive or negative post-therapy scan. This scan and both 124I and 18F-FDG PET/CT will be correlated with histopathological features. The expression of different markers will be quantified in the samples. In this way we aim to determine which histopathological features of both primary tumor and metastatic lesions can predict outcome of the scans.

Thirdly, the study aims to investigate whether 124I PET/CT has the same diagnostic, dosimetric and prognostic yield during stimulation with rhTSH as with hormone withdrawal combined with low-iodine diet. Because 124I PET/CT will be performed both after stimulation with rhTSH and after withdrawal from levothyroxine it is possible to determine any differences in outcome from the two scan preparation strategies. Both visual assessment as the quantifiable data will be compared. As simultaneous administration of 131I and 124I is required this can only be done in selected.

Fourthly, we aim to compare 124I PET/CT and 131I scintigraphy dosimetry and correlate the results with clinical outcome. As 124I PET cannot be considered as the golden standard for dosimetry of iodine therapy the dosimetry based on 124I PET will be compared with 131I-scintigraphy dosimetry. An additional phantom study will be performed to correlate the results.

Study design

This study is designed as a nationwide multicenter observational cohort study. The study population includes patients with biochemically suspicion (i.e. increase Tg levels) of recurrence of their previously completely removed thyroid carcinoma without evidence of local recurrence, planned for ‘blind’ therapeutic activity of 131I.

The patients to be included in the study should meet the following inclusion criteria:
  1. 1.

    Patients with a history of differentiated thyroid cancer

  2. 2.

    After complete thyroidectomy and ablation of functional remnants with 131I.

  3. 3.

    Planned for ‘blind’ treatment with high activity of 131I based on biochemically suspected recurrence, defined as a Tg-level above 2.0 ng/ml.

  4. 4.

    Ultrasonography of the neck performed < 2 months prior to inclusion.

If one of the following criteria is met patients will be excluded from the study:
  1. 1.

    Age < 18 years

  2. 2.


  3. 3.

    Incapacitated subjects

  4. 4.

    Contrast enhanced CT performed < 4 months prior to inclusion

  5. 5.

    131I therapy performed < 12 months prior to inclusion

  6. 6.

    Indication for other therapy modality (i.e. surgery in case of a positive ultrasonography, radiotherapy, embolization or chemotherapy)


Study endpoints

Primary endpoint is the number of futile high dose 131I treatments that could have been avoided by implementation of pre-therapy imaging based on post-therapy scintigraphy

Four secondary endpoints were defined: (1) Synchronized QA/QC of 124I PET in the Netherlands, (2) correlation of 124I PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT with histopathological parameters, (3) correlation between 124I PET/CT findings during rhTSH and withdrawal combined with low-iodine diet and (4) correlation between 124I PET/CT and 131I-scintigraphy dosimetry.

Study procedures

The study consists of four phases: pre-therapy, between pre-therapy and therapy, therapy and follow-up phase. For each phase the main study procedures are described below. Figure 2 shows an overview of the most important procedures.
Figure 2

Flow chart THYROPET study. †Only in selected centers; if allowed according to local radiation safety regulations; *if available in center; # 124I and 18F-FDG PET/CT only if pre-therapy scan was positive.

Pre-therapy phase

Patients with biochemically confirmed recurrent DTC, will undergo 18F-FDG and 124I PET/CT imaging after pre-treatment with two injections of rhTSH. 18F-FDG will be administered and 18F-FDG PET/CT will be performed 60 minutes post injection. Subsequently, 74 megabecquerel (MBq) of 124I is administered intravenously. 124I PET/CT scans are then performed 24 and 96 hours after administration of 124I.

Between ‘pre-therapy phase’ and ‘therapy phase’

If either the 18F-FDG PET/CT or the 124I PET/CT shows metastatic lesions and it is possible to acquire a biopsy from the lesion, this will be done to correlate histopathological characteristics with both the result of the scans and the resection specimen of the original tumor. If multiple metastatic lesions are present on either of the scans, a biopsy will be pursued to acquire from every lesion, but only if the 124I or FDG uptake differs between the different lesions. This will be done in easily accessible metastatic lesions without large risks of complications and/or discomfort for the subject.

After the pre-therapy phase, subjects will start thyroid hormone withdrawal 4 weeks prior to 131I therapy. A low-iodine diet (LID) will be prescribed one week before the therapy.

Therapy phase

Subjects will undergo 131I therapy with 7400 MBq of 131I orally. In a subgroup of subjects (in selected centers) additional 124I PET/CT scans will be performed for dosimetric evaluation. Furthermore, the influence of the method of preparation for the scan, either withdrawal of thyroid hormone or rhTSH stimulation, will be evaluated. Seven days after administration of 131I a post-therapy scintigraphy is made, combined with SPECT/CT if available.

Follow-up phase

Six months after therapy both Tg and TSH levels will be determined after rhTSH administration. If the previous 18F-FDG PET/CT or the 124I PET/CT showed pathological uptake, that specific PET modality will be repeated. If both PET techniques were positive during the pre-therapy phase, both the 18F-FDG PET/CT and the 124I PET/CT will be repeated.

If another treatment modality, e.g. surgery, external beam radiotherapy or multikinase inhibitors, is indicated after the 131I therapy the data of this additional therapy will be collected as well. If a metastatic lesion is removed surgically the histopathological specimen will be collected for additional staining and reviewing by an expert endocrine pathologist.

Additional protocol information

Histopathology thyroidectomy specimen

From every included subject original resection specimens of the thyroid will be collected and if possible additional staining will be done. All specimens will be reviewed and scored by an expert endocrine pathologist.

Histopathology biopsies

If one or more biopsies are acquired from the subjects between the pre-therapy and therapy phase they will be stored fresh-frozen and analyzed later.

Review panel

The local nuclear physician will assess all scans and, additionally, an expert review panel consisting of experienced nuclear physicians will assess every scan and every lesion individually as either positive or negative. Finally, the expert panel will discuss their disagreements to reach consensus on every scan and of every lesion in each scan.

Sample size calculation

The power calculation is based on the (conservative) assumption that 40% of patients currently undergo a futile treatment. With approximately 50 evaluable patients per year in the Netherlands, we estimate we are able to include a minimum of 100 patients in 3 years. With a sample size of exactly 100 evaluable patients, a two-sided 95.0% confidence interval for a single proportion using the Pearson-Klopper method for constructing the confidence interval (exact binomial CI) will extend 10% from the observed proportion for an expected proportion of 40%.

Recruitment and consent

The patients will be selected for potential participation by the endocrinologist. After consultation with on whether the patient is eligible the local principal investigator of the study the endocrinologist informs the patient. Informed consent is acquired at least a week later by the local principal investigator. See Additional file 1 for a list of participating centers.

Withdrawal of individual subjects

Subjects of the study can leave the study at any time for any reason without any consequences. The investigator can decide to withdraw a subject from the study for urgent medical reasons. For every subject that decides to withdraw from the study a new subject will be included. In this way the number of subjects included will not be changed. If subjects withdraw from the study they will be offered regular follow-up.

Follow-up of patients

Patients will receive standard follow-up according to the Dutch guidelines after the subject has completed the study.

Premature termination of the study

The study relies on 124I PET/CT being predictive for 131I-treatment outcome. When 3 patients have been encountered with negative 124I PET/CT and positive post-therapy scintigraphy, the main clinical hypothesis can no longer be supported and the study will be stopped.

Statistical analysis

Patient demographic data, tumor characteristics and data derived from the scans will be described in frequency tables. χ2-tests and trend tests (for ordered scales) will be used to determine whether a significant reduction in futile treatments could have been achieved by applying the 124I and 18F-FDG PET/CT. More in detail: interpretation of both PET-scans will lead to a positive or negative treatment proposal. This will be compared with the actual response on therapy. The definition of a futile treatment will be a negative post ‘blind’ 131I therapy scintigraphy. Additionally, accuracy measures such as sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value will be calculated from this data. Multivariate analysis will be performed whenever appropriate using logistic regression.


Since 124I has become available for PET scanning, the interest for its use in DTC has been high. More and more studies addressed its potential use in these patients. Furthermore, it is well known that during dedifferentiation of DTC, its tumor cells may become FDG avid and multiple studies have correlated 18F-FDG PET/CT with aggressiveness of DTC and the loss of iodine avidity. To our best knowledge no studies however addressed in a large prospective cohort of patients with recurrent thyroid cancer the additional value of these scan modalities in the prevention of futile 131I therapies. This is of great clinical importance as a futile 131I treatment is costly and not without short- and long-term side effects and should therefore be restricted to those who will likely to benefit from this treatment.

Trial status

The Medical the Ethics Board of the Netherlands Cancer Institute approved the study for all participating centers. Subsequently, this approval has been checked by all participating centers. The study is recruiting patients Since December 2012. The estimated length of the study is four years.

Authors’ information

THYROPET study group. Dr. J.M.H. De Klerk, Department of Nuclear medicine, Meander Medical Center Amersfoort, The Netherlands. Dr. D. Huysmans, Catharina hospital Eindhoven, Department of Nuclear medicine, The Netherlands. Dr. H. van Tinteren, Department of epidemiology and statistics, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, The Netherlands. Dr. J.P. de Boer, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Medical oncology, The Netherlands. Prof. dr. J. Morreau, Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands. Drs. M. van der Vlies, Department of Nuclear medicine and PET research, VU University Medical Center, The Netherlands. Dr. M.C. Huisman, Department of Nuclear medicine and PET research, VU University Medical Center, The Netherlands. Dr. E.G.W.M. Lentjes, Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands. Prof. dr. J.W.A. Smit Department of Internal medicine, Radboudumc, The Netherlands. Dr. J. Lavalaye, Department of Nuclear medicine, St. Antonius hospital Nieuwegein, The Netherlands. Prof. dr. P.L. Jager, Department of Nuclear medicine, Isala clinics, The Netherlands. Dr. F. van der Zant, Department of Nuclear medicine, Medical Center Alkmaar, The Netherlands. Dr. C.J. Hoekstra, Department of Nuclear medicine, Medical Center Jeroen Bosch, The Netherlands. Prof. dr. M. Gotthardt, Department of Nuclear medicine, Radboudumc, The Netherlands. Drs. V.J.R. Schelfhout, Department of Nuclear medicine, Rijnstate hospital, The Netherlands. Dr. A.H. Brouwers, Department of Nuclear medicine, University medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands. Drs. A.B. van Dijk, Department of Nuclear medicine, Dr. Bernard Verbeeten Instituut, The Netherlands. Dr. W.I. de Bruin, Department of Nuclear medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, The Netherlands. Dr. I. Al Younis, Department of Nuclear medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands. Drs. F. Sivro, Department of Nuclear medicine, St. Lucas Andreas hospital, The Netherlands. Drs. J.A. Adam, Department of Nuclear medicine, Amsterdam Medical Center, The Netherlands. Dr. H.T.T. Phan, Department of Nuclear medicine, Medical Center Leeuwarden, The Netherlands. Dr. G.W. Sloof, Department of Nuclear medicine, Groene Hart Hospital, The Netherlands. Dr. N.R.L. Wagenaar, Department of Nuclear medicine, ZGT, The Netherlands. Dr. B.L.R. Kam, Department of Nuclear medicine, Erasmus MC, The Netherlands. Drs. M.R.J. ten Broek, Department of Nuclear medicine, Reinier de Graaf Groep, The Netherlands. Drs. F. Smit, Department of Nuclear medicine, Rijnland Ziekenhuis, The Netherlands.





Differentiated thyroid cancer


Low-iodine diet










Sodium/iodide symporter


Positron emission tomography/Computed tomography


Recombinant human thyroid stimulating hormone






Thyroid stimulating hormone.



The authors of the manuscript would like to acknowledge everyone in the participating centers for their efforts for the Thyropet study. The study is funded by the Dutch Cancer Society (NKI 2011–5024). This study is supported by an unrestricted grant by Cyclotron B.V. by providing the 124I free of charge.

Research support

Dutch Cancer Society (NKI 2011-5024).

BV Cyclotron VU (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) provides I124 as an unrestricted study grant.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute
Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht
Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET research, VU University Medical Center


  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E: Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010, 60: 277-300. 10.3322/caac.20073.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Schvartz C, Bonnetain F, Dabakuyo S, Gauthier M, Cueff A, Fieffé S, Pochart J-M, Cochet I, Crevisy E, Dalac A, Papathanassiou D, Toubeau M: Impact on overall survival of radioactive iodine in low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012, 97: 1526-1535. 10.1210/jc.2011-2512.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Welsh L, Powell C, Pratt B, Harrington K, Nutting C, Harmer C, Newbold K: Long-term outcomes following low-dose radioiodide ablation for differentiated thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013, 98: 1819-1825. 10.1210/jc.2013-1197.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Shaha AR: Recurrent differentiated thyroid cancer. Endocr Pract. 2012, 18: 600-603. 10.4158/EP12047.CO.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Schlumberger M, Challeton C, De Vathaire F, Travagli JP, Gardet P, Lumbroso JD, Francese C, Fontaine F, Ricard M, Parmentier C: Radioactive iodine treatment and external radiotherapy for lung and bone metastases from thyroid carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 1996, 37: 598-605.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mazzaferri EL, Kloos RT: Clinical review 128: current approaches to primary therapy for papillary and follicular thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001, 86: 1447-1463. 10.1210/jcem.86.4.7407.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Husson O, Haak HR, Oranje WA, Mols F, Reemst PHM, van de Poll-Franse LV: Health-related quality of life among thyroid cancer survivors: a systematic review. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2011, 75: 544-554. 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04114.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. The SEER cancer statistics review 1975–2010.,
  9. Francis Z, Schlumberger M: Serum thyroglobulin determination in thyroid cancer patients. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008, 22: 1039-1046. 10.1016/j.beem.2008.09.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bachelot A, Cailleux AF, Klain M, Baudin E, Ricard M, Bellon N, Caillou B, Travagli JP, Schlumberger M: Relationship between tumor burden and serum thyroglobulin level in patients with papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid. 2002, 12: 707-711. 10.1089/105072502760258686.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Demers LM, Spencer CA: Laboratory medicine practice guidelines: laboratory support for the diagnosis and monitoring of thyroid disease. 2002, Washington, DC: National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry, 1-125.,Google Scholar
  12. Haugen BR, Pacini F, Reiners C, Schlumberger M, Ladenson PW, Sherman SI, Cooper DS, Graham KE, Braverman LE, Skarulis MC, Davies TF, DeGroot LJ, Mazzaferri EL, Daniels GH, Ross DS, Luster M, Samuels MH, Becker DV, Maxon HR, Cavalieri RR, Spencer CA, McEllin K, Weintraub BD, Ridgway EC: A comparison of recombinant human thyrotropin and thyroid hormone withdrawal for the detection of thyroid remnant or cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999, 84: 3877-3885.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mazzaferri EL, Robbins RJ, Spencer CA, Braverman LE, Pacini F, Wartofsky L, Haugen BR, Sherman SI, Cooper DS, Braunstein GD, Lee S, Davies TF, Arafah BM, Ladenson PW, Pinchera A: A consensus report of the role of serum thyroglobulin as a monitoring method for low-risk patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003, 88: 1433-1441. 10.1210/jc.2002-021702.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Castro MR, Bergert ER, Goellner JR, Hay ID, Morris JC: Immunohistochemical analysis of sodium iodide symporter expression in metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer: correlation with radioiodine uptake. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001, 86: 5627-5632. 10.1210/jcem.86.11.8048.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dadachova E, Carrasco N: The Na/I symporter (NIS): imaging and therapeutic applications. Semin Nucl Med. 2004, 34: 23-31. 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2003.09.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Filetti S, Bidart JM, Arturi F, Caillou B, Russo D, Schlumberger M: Sodium/iodide symporter: a key transport system in thyroid cancer cell metabolism. Eur J Endocrinol. 1999, 141: 443-457. 10.1530/eje.0.1410443.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. de Meer SG, Vriens MR, Zelissen PM, Borel Rinkes IH, de Keizer B: The role of routine diagnostic radioiodine whole-body scintigraphy in patients with high-risk differentiated thyroid cancer. J Nucl Med. 2011, 52: 56-59. 10.2967/jnumed.110.080697.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Pacini F, Agate L, Elisei R, Capezzone M, Ceccarelli C, Lippi F, Molinaro E, Pinchera A: Outcome of differentiated thyroid cancer with detectable serum Tg and negative diagnostic (131)I whole body scan: comparison of patients treated with high (131)I activities versus untreated patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001, 86: 4092-4097. 10.1210/jcem.86.9.7831.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Cailleux AF, Baudin E, Travagli JP, Ricard M, Schlumberger M: Is diagnostic iodine-131 scanning useful after total thyroid ablation for differentiated thyroid cancer?. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000, 85: 175-178. 10.1210/jcem.85.1.6310.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Pacini F, Capezzone M, Elisei R, Ceccarelli C, Taddei D, Pinchera A: Diagnostic 131-iodine whole-body scan may be avoided in thyroid cancer patients who have undetectable stimulated serum Tg levels after initial treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002, 87: 1499-1501. 10.1210/jcem.87.4.8274.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Pacini F, Molinaro E, Castagna MG, Agate L, Elisei R, Ceccarelli C, Lippi F, Taddei D, Grasso L, Pinchera A: Recombinant human thyrotropin-stimulated serum thyroglobulin combined with neck ultrasonography has the highest sensitivity in monitoring differentiated thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003, 88: 3668-3673. 10.1210/jc.2002-021925.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Frasoldati A, Pesenti M, Gallo M, Caroggio A, Salvo D, Valcavi R: Diagnosis of neck recurrences in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Cancer. 2003, 97: 90-96. 10.1002/cncr.11031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Torlontano M, Crocetti U, D'Aloiso L, Bonfitto N, Di Giorgio A, Modoni S, Valle G, Frusciante V, Bisceglia M, Filetti S, Schlumberger M, Trischitta V: Serum thyroglobulin and 131I whole body scan after recombinant human TSH stimulation in the follow-up of low-risk patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. Eur J Endocrinol. 2003, 148: 19-24. 10.1530/eje.0.1480019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Schlumberger M, Mancusi F, Baudin E, Pacini F: 131I therapy for elevated thyroglobulin levels. Thyroid. 1997, 7: 273-276. 10.1089/thy.1997.7.273.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. de Keizer B, Koppeschaar HP, Zelissen PM, Lips CJ, van Rijk PP, van Dijk A, de Klerk JM: Efficacy of high therapeutic doses of iodine-131 in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer and detectable serum thyroglobulin. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001, 28: 198-202. 10.1007/s002590000443.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Pacini F, Lippi F, Formica N, Elisei R, Anelli S, Ceccarelli C, Pinchera A: Therapeutic doses of iodine-131 reveal undiagnosed metastases in thyroid cancer patients with detectable serum thyroglobulin levels. J Nucl Med. 1987, 28: 1888-1891.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Pineda JD, Lee T, Ain K, Reynolds JC, Robbins J: Iodine-131 therapy for thyroid cancer patients with elevated thyroglobulin and negative diagnostic scan. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995, 80: 1488-1492.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pachucki J, Burmeister LA: Evaluation and treatment of persistent thyroglobulinemia in patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer. Eur J Endocrinol. 1997, 137: 254-261. 10.1530/eje.0.1370254.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ma C, Xie J, Kuang A: Is empiric 131I therapy justified for patients with positive thyroglobulin and negative 131I whole-body scanning results?. J Nucl Med. 2005, 46: 1164-1170.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. van Tol KM, Jager PL, de Vries EGE, Piers DA, Boezen HM, Sluiter WJ, Dullaart RPF, Links TP: Outcome in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer with negative diagnostic whole-body scanning and detectable stimulated thyroglobulin. Eur J Endocrinol. 2003, 148: 589-596. 10.1530/eje.0.1480589.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sawka AM, Thabane L, Parlea L, Ibrahim-Zada I, Tsang RW, Brierley JD, Straus S, Ezzat S, Goldstein DP: Second primary malignancy risk after radioactive iodine treatment for thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thyroid. 2009, 19: 451-457. 10.1089/thy.2008.0392.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Brown AP, Chen J, Hitchcock YJ, Szabo A, Shrieve DC, Tward JD: The Risk of second primary malignancies up to three decades after the treatment of differentiated Thyroid Cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008, 93: 504-515. 10.1210/jc.2007-1154.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Schroeder PR: A comparison of short-term changes in health-related quality of life in thyroid carcinoma patients undergoing diagnostic evaluation with recombinant human thyrotropin compared with thyroid hormone withdrawal. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005, 91: 878-884.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Luster M, Felbinger R, Dietlein M, Reiners C: Thyroid hormone withdrawal in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a one hundred thirty-patient pilot survey on consequences of hypothyroidism and a pharmacoeconomic comparison to recombinant thyrotropin administration. Thyroid. 2005, 15: 1147-1155. 10.1089/thy.2005.15.1147.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Dow KH, Ferrell BR, Anello C: Quality-of-life changes in patients with thyroid cancer after withdrawal of thyroid hormone therapy. Thyroid. 1997, 7: 613-619. 10.1089/thy.1997.7.613.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Bianchi GP, Zaccheroni V, Solaroli E, Vescini F, Cerutti R, Zoli M, Marchesini G: Health-related quality of life in patients with thyroid disorders. Qual Life Res. 2004, 13: 45-54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Botella-Carretero JI, Galán JM, Caballero C, Sancho J, Escobar-Morreale HF: Quality of life and psychometric functionality in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2003, 10: 601-610. 10.1677/erc.0.0100601.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Freudenberg LS, Antoch G, Jentzen W, Pink R, Knust J, Görges R, Müller SP, Bockisch A, Debatin JF, Brandau W: Value of (124)I-PET/CT in staging of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. Eur Radiol. 2004, 14: 2092-2098. 10.1007/s00330-004-2350-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Lubberink M, Abdul Fatah S, Brans B, Hoekstra OS, Teule GJJ: The role of (124)I-PET in diagnosis and treatment of thyroid carcinoma. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008, 52: 30-36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Lee J, Nah KY, Kim RM, Oh Y-J, An Y-S, Yoon J-K, An GI, Choi TH, Cheon GJ, Soh E-Y, Chung WY: Effectiveness of [124I]-PET/CT and [18F]-FDG-PET/CT for Localizing Recurrence in Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma. J Korean Med Sci. 2012, 27: 1019-10.3346/jkms.2012.27.9.1019.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Van Nostrand D, Moreau S, Bandaru VV, Atkins F, Chennupati S, Mete M, Burman K, Wartofsky L: (124)I positron emission tomography versus (131)I planar imaging in the identification of residual thyroid tissue and/or metastasis in patients who have well-differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2010, 20: 879-883. 10.1089/thy.2009.0430.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Lubberink M, van Schie A, de Jong HWAM, van Dongen GAMS, Teule GJJ: Acquisition settings for PET of 124I administered simultaneously with therapeutic amounts of 131I. J Nucl Med. 2006, 47: 1375-1381.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Freudenberg LS, Jentzen W, Görges R, Petrich T, Marlowe RJ, Knust J, Bockisch A: 124I-PET dosimetry in advanced differentiated thyroid cancer: therapeutic impact. Nuklearmedizin. 2007, 46: 121-128.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Rivera M, Ghossein RA, Schoder H, Gomez D, Larson SM, Tuttle RM: Histopathologic characterization of radioactive iodine-refractory fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-positive thyroid carcinoma. Cancer. 2008, 113: 48-56. 10.1002/cncr.23515.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Alzahrani AS, Al-Zahrani AS, Abouzied M-EM, Salam SA, Mohamed G, Rifai A, Sugair Al A, Amin T: The role of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the postoperative evaluation of differentiated thyroid cancer. Eur J Endocrinol. 2008, 158: 683-689. 10.1530/EJE-07-0903.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Mirallié E, Guillan T, Bridji B, Resche I, Rousseau C, Ansquer C, Bodet-Milin C, Curtet C, Carnaille B, Murat A, Charbonnel B, Kraeber-Bodéré F: Therapeutic impact of 18FDG-PET/CT in the management of iodine-negative recurrence of differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Surgery. 2007, 142: 952-958. 10.1016/j.surg.2007.09.015. discussion 952–8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Frilling A, Tecklenborg K, Görges R, Weber F, Clausen M, Broelsch EC: Preoperative diagnostic value of [(18)F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with radioiodine-negative recurrent well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2001, 234: 804-811. 10.1097/00000658-200112000-00012.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Brose MS, Nutting CM, Sherman SI, Shong YK, Smit JWA, Reike G, Chung J, Kalmus J, Kappeler C, Schlumberger M: Rationale and design of decision: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic radioactive iodine (RAI)-refractory, differentiated thyroid cancer. BMC Cancer. 2011, 11: 349-10.1186/1471-2407-11-349.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Jentzen W, Freudenberg L, Eising EG, Sonnenschein W, Knust J, Bockisch A: Optimized 124I PET Dosimetry protocol for radioiodine therapy of differentiated Thyroid Cancer. J Nucl Med. 2008, 49: 1017-1023. 10.2967/jnumed.107.047159.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Kim M-H, Ko SH, Bae JS, Lee SH, Jung CK, Lim D-J, Baek KH, Kim SH, Lee JM, Kang MI, Cha BY: Non-FDG-avid primary papillary thyroid carcinoma may not differ from FDG-avid papillary thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid. 2013, 23: 1452-1460. 10.1089/thy.2013.0051.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Hooft L, van der Veldt AAM, van Diest PJ, Hoekstra OS, Berkhof J, Teule GJJ, Molthoff CFM: [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in recurrent thyroid cancer is related to hexokinase i expression in the primary tumor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005, 90: 328-334. 10.1210/jc.2004-0779.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Freudenberg LS, Antoch G, Frilling A, Jentzen W, Rosenbaum SJ, Kühl H, Bockisch A, Görges R: Combined metabolic and morphologic imaging in thyroid carcinoma patients with elevated serum thyroglobulin and negative cervical ultrasonography: role of 124I-PET/CT and FDG-PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008, 35: 950-957. 10.1007/s00259-007-0634-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Boellaard R, O’Doherty MJ, Weber WA, Mottaghy FM, Lonsdale MN, Stroobants SG, Oyen WJG, Kotzerke J, Hoekstra OS, Pruim J, Marsden PK, Tatsch K, Hoekstra CJ, Visser EP, Arends B, Verzijlbergen FJ, Zijlstra JM, Comans EFI, Lammertsma AA, Paans AM, Willemsen AT, Beyer T, Bockisch A, Schaefer-Prokop C, Delbeke D, Baum RP, Chiti A, Krause BJ: FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009, 37: 181-200.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Boellaard R, Oyen WJG, Hoekstra CJ, Hoekstra OS, Visser EP, Willemsen AT, Arends B, Verzijlbergen FJ, Zijlstra J, Paans AM, Comans EFI, Pruim J: The Netherlands protocol for standardisation and quantification of FDG whole body PET studies in multi-centre trials. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008, 35: 2320-2333. 10.1007/s00259-008-0874-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:


© Kist et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.