Development of a scale to assess cancer stigma in the non-patient population
© Marlow and Wardle; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 9 December 2013
Accepted: 9 April 2014
Published: 23 April 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Dec 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|11 Dec 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Laura Marlow|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|11 Dec 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Suzanne Chambers|
|21 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sophie Lebel|
|30 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Simon J. Craddock Lee|
|6 Mar 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Laura Marlow|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 Mar 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Apr 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Laura Marlow|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|1 Apr 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|9 Apr 2014||Editorially accepted|
|23 Apr 2014||Article published||10.1186/1471-2407-14-285|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.