Results of concurrent radio-chemotherapy for the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in everyday clinical practice with special reference to early mortality
© Schlumpf et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 21 January 2013
Accepted: 21 November 2013
Published: 27 December 2013
Randomized controlled trials have established concurrent chemo-radiotherapy as the preferred treatment option for inoperable local-regionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs). Because many patients have multiple co-morbidities and would not fulfill the eligibility criteria of clinical trials, the results need to be re-evaluated in daily clinical practice with special reference to early mortality.
167 consecutive patients with HNSCC who received concurrent chemo-radiotherapy at the Basel University Hospital between 1988 and 2006 were analyzed retrospectively with a special focus on early deaths and risk factors for an unfavorable outcome.
In our cohort, the 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 54% and 47%, respectively. The therapy was associated with relevant toxicity and an early mortality rate of 5.4%. Patients dying early were analyzed individually for the cause of death. Patients with elevated white blood cell counts (HR: 2.66 p = 0,016) and vascular co-morbidities (HR: 5.3, p = 0,047) showed significantly worse survival rates. The same factors were associated with a trend toward increased treatment-related mortality. The 3-year survival rate improved from approximately 43% for patients treated before the year 2000 to 65% for patients treated after the year 2000 (Fisher’s exact test p = 0.01).
Although many patients who received concurrent chemo-radiotherapy would not have qualified for clinical trials, the outcome was favorable and has significantly improved in recent years. However the early mortality was slightly worse than what is described in the literature.
KeywordsChemo-radiotherapy Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma Every day practice
Approximately 60% of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) are diagnosed with a locally advanced stage (stages III and IV) . Without treatment, the median survival is less than 4 months . Treatment of advanced-stage HNSCC remains challenging. In the past, radiotherapy alone was the treatment of choice for patients with non-resectable or inoperable local-regional disease. Due to unsatisfactory results, intensified radiotherapy and concurrent radiation and chemotherapy protocols were initiated . In early trials with chemo-radiotherapy, there were no improvements in survival, due to an increase in toxicity and therapeutic abortions; however, radiotherapy in combination with cis-platinum resulted in higher complete remission rates of 65% to 70% [3–5]. In a randomized trial, the 3-year survival rate was significantly higher for patients who obtained concurrent chemo-radiotherapy with cis-platinum  than radiotherapy alone. The advantages of this regimen were confirmed by multiple trials [6–10], and several meta-analyses have consistently demonstrated that concurrent chemo-radiotherapy and, in particular, platinum-based concurrent chemo-radiotherapy could improve patient survival by a magnitude of 8 to 11 percent compared to radiotherapy alone . However, the better long-term results come at the price of a higher toxicity.
Today, in the era of targeted therapies, the combination of radiotherapy with cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody against EGFR that is over-expressed in a majority of HNSCC tumors resulted in significantly improved survival rates compared with radiotherapy alone (55% vs. 45% after 3 years) and a better local-regional control . However, despite promising results, the role of cetuximab in therapeutic regimens remains uncertain; as yet, no direct comparisons of this drug to other chemotherapy drugs (such as cis-platinum) exist.
The improved survival rates from concurrent chemo-radiotherapy come at the price of increased therapy-associated morbidity due to myelosuppression, dermatitis, mucositis, and diarrhea. The patients with numerous co-morbidities and poor general health are particularly vulnerable to these toxicities and might therefore be unsuitable for this treatment option . The restrictive inclusion criteria of most trials would exclude many HNSCC patients with co-morbidities due to chronic alcohol and nicotine consumption. Despite representing the majority of patients, evidence-based guidelines in these subsets of patients with co-morbidities are largely nonexistent. Outside of controlled trials, more frequent discontinuations of treatment, delays in the irradiation protocol and reductions in radiation doses occur, which indicate that certain results obtained in trials can only be partially transferred to the clinical practice. Thus, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy cannot be adopted as the standard treatment for all patients with advanced-stage disease .
A number of unexpected deaths during or shortly after concurrent chemo-radiotherapy in our clinic prompted this analysis. The aim of our study was to analyze retrospectively the results of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy in a setting outside of a prospective clinical trial at the Basel University Hospital. Early mortality within 30 days of therapy was of special interest. Specifically, our questions were as follows: 1. What are the results of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy in the cohort of locally advanced HNSCC patients treated in the Head and Neck Cancer Center of the Basel University Hospital? 2. How many patients died during or within 30 days of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy? 3. How does this patient population compare to the patients treated within a clinical trial? 4. Are there any predictive factors for early mortality?
A total of 167 consecutive patients who were treated at the Interdisciplinary Head and Neck Cancer Center of the University Hospital of Basel were included. All patients had pathologically proven HNSCC. HPV status was not determined. The patients had been evaluated at the interdisciplinary tumor board by experienced specialists of the cancer center prior to treatment with concurrent chemo-radiotherapy. The relevant data were extracted from patient charts. Before treatment, the clinical, laboratory and imaging examinations were performed to determine an accurate TNM stage (TNM 6th edition) . The staging procedure did not include PET scans. During therapy, the patients were assessed at least weekly for signs of toxicity. This retrospective analysis was approved by the ethical committee beider Basel, Switzerland, (EKBB 360/2009).
The following data were assessed: age; sex; performance status (PS); histology; stage; smoking and alcohol consumption history; co-morbidities (e.g. concurrent vascular disease); laboratory values (i.e., hemoglobin levels, leukocyte counts, and serum albumin levels); duration and type of chemotherapy and radiotherapy; radiological response according to WHO criteria and overall survival time.
To determine whether patient outcome has improved over time, patients were divided into two cohorts of either before or after the year 2000.
The variables related to the patients, diseases, and treatments, were compared among cohorts using the chi-square test for discrete variables and the Mann- Whitney U test for continuous variables. The probabilities of survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. The log-rank test was used for comparing groups. The following variables were analyzed for association with survival:
patient characteristics (age, sex, smoking history, and weight loss); disease characteristics (disease stage and histology) and laboratory values (white blood cell count, hemoglobin, and albumin).
The relative risk was calculated with the MedCalc software; RR = a/(a + b)/c/(c + d).
A total of 167 consecutive patients with HNSCC receiving concurrent chemo-radiotherapy between 1988 and 2006 at the Head and Neck Cancer Center of the Basel University Hospital were analyzed retrospectively. The median age was 57 years (25–82 years); 80% of the patients were male. Nicotine and/or alcohol consumption was commonly reported. Most tumors were located in the piriform sinus (n = 32), the base of the tongue (n = 27), the tonsils (n = 24) and in the hypopharynx (n = 20). In 117 patients, lymph node metastases were detected: 76 on the ipsi-lateral side, 39 bilaterally and in 2 patients, the nodal metastasis occurred only contra-laterally. Metastases in the lung were described in one patient; in all other patients, no distant metastases were documented. The staging according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) resulted in 1 patient with stage I cancer, 8 with stage II, 27 with stage III and 129 with stage IV. In the patients with stage I-III carcinomas, primary surgery was not performed due to considerations regarding functional or cosmetic organ preservation. Eight of the 167 patients showed a synchronous secondary carcinoma. Before treatment, 36 patients (44%) had concurrent vascular disease (n = 82; for 85 patients, there were no data available). In addition, 31 patients (35%) had hemoglobin values below the normal range (normal range: 135–175 g/l) (n = 79), 13 patients (16%) showed increased leukocytes counts (normal range: 4.5-11.5 g/l) (n = 79) and 33 patients (45%) had albumin levels below the normal range (normal range: 37–51 g/l) (n = 74).
A total of 88% of patients started concurrent chemo-radiotherapy within the first three months after diagnosis. Cis-platinum was the primary treatment and was frequently used as a single agent in combination with radiotherapy. Among patients treated with radiotherapy and combination chemotherapy regimens, cis-platinum/5-FU and carbo-platinum/5-FU were most frequent. Several patients were treated in a pilot study with irradiation in combination with cis-platinum and gefitinib, a tyrosine-kinase EGFR inhibitor. The doses of radiotherapy were above 70 Gy for most patients; 23% of patients received a total dose of 60–70 Gy, and 14% received less than 60 Gy. The duration of treatment was in the standard range, typically lasting 40 to 60 days.
Results of the concurrent chemo-radiotherapy
Of the 167 patients, 98 (59%) showed a complete response, 23 (14%) had a partial remission, eight (5%) showed no change in disease status, six (3%) showed tumor progression, nine (5%) died during therapy, and for 23 patients (14%), the response data were missing.
Under therapy, approximately half of the patients suffered from severe stomatitis > grade 2. The pretreatment hemoglobin values were below the normal range (men < 140 g/l, women < 120 g/l) in 28 out of 79 patients (36%; for 88 patients, there were no data available), and 76 out of 84 patients (90%) developed anemia during the therapy. Also, 70 out of 72 patients (97%) developed hypoalbuminemia (< 37 g/l) during therapy. Neutropenia occurred in 14 out of 53 patients (28%); 11 of these patients (20%) developed febrile neutropenia. Nausea and vomiting were documented in 21 of 56 patients (37%), and 79 out of 81 patients (97%) presented with stomatitis > grade II.
Early mortality during concurrent therapy
A summary of the causes of death while under therapy
Cause of death:
Unknown (no autopsy)
ischemia of the small bowel
The prognostic impact of hemoglobin, albumin, white blood cell counts, vascular co-morbidities, and alcohol and nicotine consumption
A description of risk factors associated with death while under therapy
The potential risk factors and their association with death under concurrent chemo-radiotherapy
Predictive factors for early death under therapy
Below normal range
Below normal range
A cross-study comparison of long term survival data and early death rates of the patients with HNSCC from Basel and patients with HNSCC who had been treated within published clinical trials with concurrent chemo-radiotherapy
3-OS (in %)
5-OS (in %)
Early mortality (patients)
Bonner et. al.
Huguenin et. al.
Calais et. al.
Merlano et. al.
Adelstein et. al.
Wendt et. al.
Brizel et. al.
Al-Sarraf et. al.
Data from Basel
- Therapy before 2000
- Therapy after 2000
A main cause for the better survival rates in the cohort treated after the year 2000 might be the improved radiotherapy technique with the introduction of 3D-CRT (3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy) with isocentric CT-planning at our institute in the year 2001 with maximum dose levels of up to 74 Gy in the tumor area replacing the 2D-SSD technique. The dose prescription pertains to the appropriate PTV area: 74 Gy to the primary tumor and macroscopically positive lymph nodes (boost area). Per definition the CTV area covers all macroscopic disease (tumor and positive lymphnodes). The CTV is the area at risk of microscopic involvement. The PTV is a safety margin that is added to the CTV to allow for set-up errors and movement. In general the ipsilateral nodal drainage areas were treated with 56 Gy and the contralateral drainage areas with 50 Gy.
None of the patients was treated with IMRT (intensity modulated ratiotherapy). Other potential reasons for improvement in outcome such as chemotherapy schedules and doses could not be evaluated in this retrospective study. Furthermore, the results with respect to overall survival appear to support the selection strategy applied by the interdisciplinary head and neck cancer center team. Of note, outside of a setting with an experienced interdisciplinary team, the results might differ significantly.
Comparison of therapy-associated mortality
Nine out of 167 patients died during or within 30 days after completion of therapy, an observation that led to the initiation of this retrospective analysis. Our hypothesis was that the rate of early mortality might be too high in our institution. Examining the above mentioned trials with respect to early death rates, we obtained the information as shown in Table 3. These results indicate that compared to these trials, our cohort ranged within the 95-99% worst values. This is not surprising in a patient population outside of a clinical trial for which usually less rigid criteria are applied to exclude a patient from the treatment.
Comparison of the eligibility criteria
To identify differences between our HNSCC population and the patients treated within the relevant clinical trials, the eligibility criteria have been analyzed. In the trial by Bernier et al. , patients with anemia (<110 g/l) were excluded from the trial. This restriction indicates that four out of nine patients who died under therapy in our cohort would have been excluded from this treatment approach. However, 25 of 70 patients (35%) who survived the treatment would have also been excluded and would have missed the benefits of chemo-radiotherapy. In the same trial, the age limit was set to 70 years; 17 of our patients would not have qualified due to the age restriction and one of the patients over 70 years died under therapy. In total, five out of our nine patients who died under treatment would not have met the 2 abovementioned inclusion criteria and therefore would not have been eligible for the treatment according to the trial. In the study by Bonner et al. , normal hematological, hepatic and renal function were a prerequisite for the treatment, which would have excluded 50 of our patients. According to this study, 6 out of the 9 patients who died under treatment would not have met the eligibility criteria and thus would have been excluded. These comparisons show that our patients represent a different population from that of the clinical trials and are characterized by increased co-morbidities and risk factors, thereby explaining the larger treatment-associated mortality. Overall, the eligibility criteria within the clinical trial protocols were safer; however, they also excluded many patients who successfully completed the treatment and appear to have benefited from this therapeutic approach. Although patient selection was based on the decisions of an experienced interdisciplinary team, a higher number of early deaths during therapy was observed, supporting the notion that a checklist of inclusion and exclusion criteria, as used in the clinical trial setting, would be a safe way to minimize early deaths. Despite the fact that many patients who were treated at University Hospital in Basel would never have fulfilled the inclusion criteria of a clinical trial, the 3-year survival data were comparable to the results from the published clinical trials in a patient collective that was considerably larger than the highly selected trial population. This finding indicates that the rigid selection of a clinical trial also eliminates many patients who derive a benefit from the therapy. Whether the patients with early deaths died due to treatment complications or due to the disease or co-morbidities cannot be definitely decided in a single-arm study. The question remains of whether a higher early mortality risk is considered acceptable in view of the favorable overall survival results of a cohort with less stringent patient selection.
Unfortunately, among all of the factors analyzed for prognostic value, none was significantly associated with early death, and we could not identify any predictive marker for therapy-associated mortality.
Despite having a rather high early mortality rate, the overall outcome of our cohort of HNSCC patients treated with concurrent chemo-radiotherapy is favorable and has improved in recent years. Because our study did not reveal significant predictive markers for early fatal outcomes, we suggest for the moment not to withhold concurrent chemo-radiotherapy based only on such a marker. However, these risk factors should give rise to greater caution and be discussed with patients before therapy. In conclusion, the analyses of our data confirmed that chemo-radiotherapy performed by an experienced team can reach similar results in a population outside of a clinical trial and that considerable progress has been made with the use of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy to treat HNSCC over the last decade. An experienced team is necessary to perform the treatments and manage the therapy-associated toxicities.
- Seiwert T, Cohen ED-A: State-of-the-art management of locally advanced head and neck cancer. Br J Cancer. 2005, 92: 1341-1348. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602510. ST - State-of-the-art management of locally advanced head and neck cancerView ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kowalski L, Carvalho AD-M: Natural history of untreated head and neck cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2000, 36: 1032-1037. 10.1016/S0959-8049(00)00054-X. ST - Natural history of untreated head and neck cancerView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vokes E, Kies M, Haraf D, Stenson K, List M, Humerickhouse R, Dolan M, Pelzer H, Sulzen L, Witt M, et al: Concomitant chemoradiotherapy as primary therapy for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2000, 18: 1652-1661. ST - Concomitant chemoradiotherapy as primary therapy for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancerPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Argiris AD-M: Update on chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Curr Opin Oncol. 2002, 14: 323-329. 10.1097/00001622-200205000-00012. ST - Update on chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancerView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Manam R, Al-Sarraf M: Head and neck cancer. Cancer Chemother Biol Response Modif. 2002, 20: 419-434. ST - Head and neck cancerPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Adelstein D, Li Y, Adams G, Wagner HJ, Kish J, Ensley J, Schuller D, Forastiere AD-J: An intergroup phase III comparison of standard radiation therapy and two schedules of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003, 21: 92-98. 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.008. ST - An intergroup phase III comparison of standard radiation therapy and two schedules of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell head and neck cancerView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Merlano M, Corvo R, Margarino G, Benasso M, Rosso R, Sertoli M, Cavallari M, Scala M, Guenzi M, Siragusa AD-F: Combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy in advanced inoperable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer. 1991, 67: 915-921. 10.1002/1097-0142(19910215)67:4<915::AID-CNCR2820670410>3.0.CO;2-8. ST - Combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy in advanced inoperable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The final report of a randomized trialView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wendt T, Grabenbauer G, Rödel C, Thiel H, Aydin H, Rohloff R, Wustrow T, Iro H, Popella C, Schalhorn AD-A: Simultaneous radiochemotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in advanced head and neck cancer: a randomized multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 1998, 16: 1318-1324. ST - Simultaneous radiochemotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in advanced head and neck cancer: a randomized multicenter studyPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brizel D, Albers M, Fisher S, Scher R, Richtsmeier W, Hars V, George S, Huang A, Prosnitz LD, Brizel D, Albers M, Fisher S, Scher R, Richtsmeier W, Hars V, George S, Huang A, Prosnitz LD-J: Hyperfractionated irradiation with or without concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 1998, 338: 1798-1804. 10.1056/NEJM199806183382503. ST - Hyperfractionated irradiation with or without concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancerView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Al-Sarraf M, LeBlanc M, Giri P, Fu K, Cooper J, Vuong T, Forastiere A, Adams G, Sakr W, Schuller D, Ensley JD-A: Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: phase III randomized intergroup study 0099. J Clin Oncol. 1998, 16: 1310-1317. ST - Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: phase III randomized Intergroup study 0099PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pignon J, Bourhis J, Domenge C, Designé LD-M: Chemotherapy added to locoregional treatment for head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma: three meta-analyses of updated individual data. MACH-NC collaborative group. Meta-analysis of chemotherapy on head and neck cancer. Lancet. 2000, 355: 949-955. ST - Chemotherapy added to locoregional treatment for head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma: three meta-analyses of updated individual data. MACH-NC Collaborative Group. Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy on Head and Neck CancerView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bonner J, Harari P, Giralt J, Azarnia N, Shin D, Cohen R, Jones C, Sur R, Raben D, Jassem J, et al: Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. 2006, 354: 567-578. 10.1056/NEJMoa053422. ST - Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck,View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Garden A, Asper J, Morrison W, Schechter N, Glisson B, Kies M, Myers J, Ang KD-M: Is concurrent chemoradiation the treatment of choice for all patients with Stage III or IV head and neck carcinoma?. Cancer. 2004, 100: 1171-1178. 10.1002/cncr.20069. ST - Is concurrent chemoradiation the treatment of choice for all patients with Stage III or IV head and neck carcinoma?View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harari P, Ritter M, Petereit D, Mehta M: Chemoradiation for upper aerodigestive tract cancer: balancing evidence from clinical trials with individual patient recommendations. Curr Probl Cancer. 2004, 28: 7-40. 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2003.10.002. ST - Chemoradiation for upper aerodigestive tract cancer: balancing evidence from clinical trials with individual patient recommendationsView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- O’Sullivan B, Shah J: New TNM staging criteria for head and neck tumors. Seminars in surgical oncology. 2003, Malden, Massachusetts, USA: Wiley Online Library, 30-42.Google Scholar
- Huguenin P, Beer K, Allal A, Rufibach K, Friedli C, Davis J, Pestalozzi B, Schmid S, Thöni A, Ozsahin M, et al: Concomitant cisplatin significantly improves locoregional control in advanced head and neck cancers treated with hyperfractionated radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2004, 22: 4665-4673. 10.1200/JCO.2004.12.193. ST - Concomitant cisplatin significantly improves locoregional control in advanced head and neck cancers treated with hyperfractionated radiotherapyView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Calais G, Alfonsi M, Bardet E, Sire C, Germain T, Bergerot P, Rhein B, Tortochaux J, Oudinot P, Bertrand PD-D: Randomized trial of radiation therapy versus concomitant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for advanced-stage oropharynx carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999, 91: 2081-2086. 10.1093/jnci/91.24.2081. ST - Randomized trial of radiation therapy versus concomitant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for advanced-stage oropharynx carcinomaView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bernier J, Domenge C, Ozsahin M, Matuszewska K, Lefèbvre J, Greiner R, Giralt J, Maingon P, Rolland F, Bolla M, et al: Postoperative irradiation with or without concomitant chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004, 350: 1945-1952. 10.1056/NEJMoa032641. ST - Postoperative irradiation with or without concomitant chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancerView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/13/610/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.