Comparison of survival of patients with metastases from known versus unknown primaries: survival in metastatic cancer
© Riihimäki et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 8 November 2012
Accepted: 24 January 2013
Published: 28 January 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Nov 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amy Downing|
|12 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nicholas Pavlidis|
|27 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Kari Hemminki|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amy Downing|
|7 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nicholas Pavlidis|
|11 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Kari Hemminki|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|11 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nicholas Pavlidis|
|18 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Kari Hemminki|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|18 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|24 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|28 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2407-13-36|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.