Soluble Neural-cadherin as a novel biomarker for malignant bone and soft tissue tumors
© Niimi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 29 August 2012
Accepted: 14 June 2013
Published: 26 June 2013
Neural-cadherin (N-cadherin) is one of the most important molecules involved in tissue morphogenesis, wound healing, and the maintenance of tissue integrity. Recently, the cleavage of N-cadherin has become a focus of attention in the field of cancer biology. Cadherin and their ectodomain proteolytic shedding play important roles during cancer progression. The aims of this study are to investigate the serum soluble N-cadherin (sN-CAD) levels in patients with malignant bone and soft tissue tumors, and to evaluate the prognostic significance of the sN-CAD levels.
We examined the level of serum sN-CAD using an ELISA in 80 malignant bone and soft tissue tumors (bone sarcoma, n = 23; soft tissue sarcoma, n = 50; metastatic cancer, n = 7) and 87 normal controls. The mean age of the patients was 51 years (range, 10–85 years) and the mean follow-up period was 43 months (range, 1–115 months).
The median serum sN-CAD level was 1,267 ng/ml (range, 135–2,860 ng/ml) in all patients. The mean serum sN-CAD level was 1,269 ng/ml (range, 360–2,860 ng/ml) in sarcoma patients, otherwise 1,246 ng/ml (range, 135–2,140 ng/ml) in cancer patients. The sN-CAD levels in patient were higher than those found in the controls, who had a median serum level of 108 ng/ml (range, 0–540 ng/ml). The patients with tumors larger than 5 cm had higher serum sN-CAD levels than the patients with tumors smaller than 5 cm. The histological grade in the patients with higher serum sN-CAD levels was higher than that in the patients with lower serum sN-CAD levels. A univariate analysis demonstrated that the patients with higher serum sN-CAD levels showed a worse disease-free survival rate, local recurrence-free survival rate, metastasis-free survival rate, and overall survival rate compared to those with lower serum sN-CAD levels. In the multivariate analysis, sN-CAD was an independent factor predicting disease-free survival.
sN-CAD is a biomarker for malignant bone and soft tissue tumors, and a potentially valuable pre-therapeutic prognostic factor in patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma.
KeywordsSarcoma Cadherin Prognosis Shedding Biomarker
Musculoskeletal sarcoma is a rare malignancy. Despite the recent advances in treatment for these tumors, the prognosis is still poor. To improve the clinical outcomes of sarcoma patients, the discovery of the mechanisms of tumorigenesis and the identification of early biomarkers for determining the diagnosis/prognosis are required. In particular, the identification of a biomarker that can predict patients at high-risk is important, because such a biomarker could be a useful indicator for determining whether adjuvant therapeutic modalities, such as irradiation and chemotherapy, should be utilized.
The etiology of tumors is multifactorial, and is believed to be the result of inappropriate cell growth, faulty cell differentiation and improper cell–cell and cell–extracellular matrix interactions. In particular, cell-cell adhesion is important in maintaining the tissue architecture. Cadherins are one of the most important proteins involved in cell-cell adhesion. The cadherins constitute a large multigene family of transmembrane glycoproteins that mediate calcium-dependent intercellular adhesion. More than 40 members of the cadherin family have been identified so far . Cytoplasmic domain of the cadherin molecule can form a molecular complex with the catenin family, which link the cadherin to the actin cytoskeleton of the cell. The cadherin-dependent signaling affects fundamental cellular processes such as proliferation, survival, differentiation, cell shape and migration, which in turn influence the tissue morphogenesis and structure. The signaling is also involved in pathogenic events such as carcinogenesis and distant metastasis [2, 3]. The loss of cell growth control and architecture disruption is hallmarks of oncogenic transformation. Previous studies have provided evidence that the loss of adhesiveness and increased invasive capacity of tumors cells are associated with a disruption of cell-cell adhesion mediated by malfunction or altered phosphorylation of the cadherin-catenin complex [4–7].
Recent studies showed that N-cadherin can be cleaved by ADAM10 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase 10). The metalloproteinase domain of the enzyme is responsible for the initial step of N-cadherin processing, which releases soluble active fragments into the extracellular space, and subsequently generates an intracellular C-terminal fragment (CTF) [8, 9]. The CTF initiates signaling pathways through the cytoplasmic β-catenin pool. Therefore, the ADAM10-dependent cleavage of N-cadherin modulates cell-cell adhesion, as well as signal transduction.
Recently, many researchers have reported that cadherins and their ectodomain shedding play important roles during cancer progression. A multitude of extracellular proteinases have been identified, and proteolytic shedding of the extracellular domain results in the generation of soluble E-, P- or N-cadherin ectodomains. Elevated levels of circulating soluble E- and P-cadherins have been described in cancer patients compared with healthy controls. For example, Chan et al. showed that the soluble E-cadherin concentration was significantly elevated in 67% of patients with gastric cancer . Soluble N-cadherin (sN-CAD) can be found in the circulation of normal individuals, but is elevated in patients with breast, prostate and bladder carcinoma [11–14]. However, to date, there have been no studies that have investigated the use of the serum sN-CAD levels as a diagnostic or predicting factor.
The aims of this study are to investigate the serum sN-CAD levels in patients with malignant bone and soft tissue tumors, and to evaluate the prognostic significance of the sN-CAD levels.
Patient and tumor characteristics
No. of patients
(N = 73)
At the final follow-up, 26 patients were continuously disease-free, 13 patients had no evidence of disease, 15 patients were alive with disease, and 19 patients died of disease.
The control subjects comprised 28 males and 59 females. The mean age of the control subjects was 46 years (range, 19–89 years). Almost all control subjects younger than 60 years old were healthy volunteers without any medical history of cancer. Those over 60 years of age had conditions such as osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, and so on, and all had C-reactive protein values below 0.5 mg/dl.
This study is in compliance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and written informed consent was obtained from all of the patients included in this study.
Serum sample collection and storage
Fifty-one serum samples were obtained at open biopsy or initial surgical excision before administration of any chemotherapeutic agent. Seventeen serum samples were obtained at the excision of recurrent tumor. Five serum samples were obtained at the excision of the metastatic lesion. Longitudinal change of the sN-CAD was measured by measuring the serum level at the pre- and post-operative day in a metastatic epitheliod sarcoma patient. Venous blood samples were collected and centrifuged at 2,500 g for 10 min. All sera were stored at -80°C until measurement. All samples were collected under the approval of the ethics committee of the Mie University Graduate School of Medicine.
Immunoenzymometric assay for the sN-CAD levels
The immunoenzymometric assay for the sN-CAD levels was performed using a home-made ELISA plate, as described in a previous report . All serum samples were diluted 5 times in PBS containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA). A dilution series of recombinant N-cadherin from 1 to 1,000 ng/ml was prepared (recombinant human N-cadherin/Fc chimera, R&D Systems, Abingdon, UK). A 96 well immunoplate (CN-469949, Nalge Nunc International, Denmark) was coated with 75 μl of the diluted sample overnight at 4°C. The wells were washed with PBS/0.05% Tween-20 and quenched at 37°C with PBS/1% BSA for 1 hr. Next, the plates were washed again (4 times) and incubated with the primary antibody (Mouse GC-4 antibody, Sigma, St. Louis, MO; 1/200 in PBS/0.1% BSA) at 37°C for 2 hr. The plates were then washed again (4 times), and subsequently incubated with a mouse secondary antibody linked to alkaline phosphatase (Goat anti-mouse linked to alkaline phosphatase, Sigma, St. Louis, MO; 1/3,000). The substrate, p-nitrophenylphosphate (N2765, Sigma, St. Louis, MO), was added to the plates, and after 30 min, the optical density of each well was determined with a microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Wokingham, UK) at 405 nm. Measurements were done at least in a triplet for each sample, and the mean value was calculated.
The Mann–Whitney U test was used to analyze the association of the serum sN-CAD levels between healthy subjects and patients. The Mann–Whitney U test was also used to analyze the associations between the serum sN-CAD levels and the clinicopathological variables, such as the type of tumor (bone or soft tissue sarcoma), age, tumor depth, tumor size, histological grade, and the type of malignancy (primary or recurrence/metastasis). We defined the cut-off level of sN-CAD at 1,500 ng/ml to identify the high-risk patient group. The disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as the time from the initial treatment to the date of clinically documented local recurrence/metastasis. The local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was defined as the time from the initial treatment to the date of clinically documented local recurrence. The metastasis-free survival (MFS) was defined as the time from the initial treatment to the date of clinically documented distant metastasis. The overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from the initial treatment to the date of death from any cause. For the multivariate analysis, a Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify the statistically significant differences in the survival and to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals. The prognostic variables by the univariate analysis with a p < 0.2 (age, tumor size, histological grading, and sN-CAD) were entered into a Cox multivariate analysis model. A p value < 0.05 was considered to be significant. The analysis was performed using the StatView statistical software package (version 5.0; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). The statistical analysis was performed by N.R. and M.A., and both of whom have responsibility for the results of statistical analysis.
Serum sN-CAD levels in sarcoma patients, cancer patients, and control subjects
Associations between the serum sN-CAD level and the clinicopathological variables
The results of the univariate analysis of the associations between the serum soluble N-cadherin levels and the clinicopathological variables
No of patients
Soluble N-cadherin (ng/ml)
Soft tissue tumor
Tumor size 1
Recurrent / metastatic tumor
The disease-free survival rate and predictors of events
The univariate analyses of the association between patients prognosis and clinicopathological valiables
5-year disease-free survival rate (%)
p Value 3
5-year local recurrence-free survival rate (%)
p Value 3
5-year metastasis-free survival rate (%)
p Value 3
5-year overall survival rate (%)
p Value 3
Soluble Cadherin 2
The results of the multivariate analysis of the disease-free survival
95% confidence interval
Soluble Cadherin 1
Local recurrence-free survival rate and predictors of events
The metastasis-free survival rate and predictors of events
The overall survival rate and predictors of events
The results of the multivariate analysis of the overall survival
95% confidence interval
Soluble Cadherin 1
In the present study, we found that the serum levels of sN-CAD in patients with malignant bone and soft tissue tumors were higher than those in control subjects. Both the tumor size and the histological grade were positively correlated to the serum sN-CAD levels. The current univariate analyses showed that high serum sN-CAD levels were associated with a decreased OS, DFS, MFS, and LRFS. Multivariate analyses showed an association of a high serum sN-CAD level with a decreased DFS. These results suggest that sN-CAD is a biomarker, and may potentially be valuable as a pre-therapeutic prognosic factor in patients with malignant bone and soft tissue tumors. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report which indicated the significance of sN-CAD as a biomarker for prognosis in malignant bone and soft tissue tumor patients.
Recently, accumulating evidence has suggested epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) to play a critical role in cancer progression . The EMT is defined by the loss of epithelial characteristics and the acquisition of a mesenchymal phenotype. The cell characteristics are highly affected during the EMT, resulting in altered cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions, and increased cell motility and invasiveness. In epithelial cancers, the EMT is characterized by a switch in cell membrane cadherins (from E- to N-cadherin), a change from apical–basal to front–back polarity and the acquisition of motility, enabled in part by the restructuring of the actin cytoskeleton . The EMT is associated with the invasion and metastasis of various cancers [14, 20–23]. Because sarcoma cells have a mesenchymal phenotype, N-cadherin may be one of the key molecules involved in disease progression. However, only a small number of studies about N-cadherin expression in bone and soft tissue sarcoma have been reported. Laskin et al.  described that N-cadherin was observed in chordoma (100%), biphasic synovial sarcoma (86%), diffuse mesothelioma (70%), malignant melanoma (56%), epithelioid sarcoma (38%), epithelioid angiosarcoma (25%), poorly differentiated synovial sarcoma (15%), clear cell sarcoma (10%), and monophasic fibrous synovial sarcoma (4%). Kashima et al.  found a reduced expression of N-cadherin on the osteosarcoma cell surface, and suggested that the reduced expression of N-cadherin might be due to the proteolytic cleavage of the intact form into the secreted form. However, no study has so far assessed the relationship between the sN-CAD levels and their clinical significance in patients with bone and soft tissue tumors.
The present study showed that the serum sN-CAD levels were correlated with the tumor size (p = 0.02). The several possible causes of the increased levels of sN-CAD in patients with larger tumors can be supposed. First possibility is that the sN-CAD levels may depend on the number of malignant cells. Larger tumor might have a higher sN-CAD level because they are composed of a higher number of cells. Second possibility is that the expression and/or shedding of N-cadherin may increase in rapidly growing tumors. In the current study, the univariate analyses showed that high serum sN-CAD levels were associated with a decreased OS, DFS, MFS, and LRFS. The multivariate analyses showed an association of a high serum sN-CAD level with a decreased DFS. Therefore, our results suggest that a higher sN-CAD level is correlated with the local aggressiveness of the tumor.
In the present study, we confirmed that, poor overall survival was associated with high sN-CAD and high histological grade in the univariate analysis. However, sN-CAD was failed to demonstrate any association with OS in multivariate analysis. The first possible reason is that sN-CAD is not a strong predictor for OS compared with histological grading. The second possible reason is that multivariate analysis couldn’t detect the sN-CAD as a strong predictor for OS, because this study consists of relatively small number of patients. Therefore, we think that the larger scale study is necessary.
Recent studies have demonstrated that N-cadherin can be cleaved by ADAM10, which is one of the ADAM family members . ADAM10 is a transmembrane protein involved in proteolysis and cell adhesion, and has been implicated in the pathogenesis or progression of several cancers, including uterine, ovarian, gastric and colorectal cancer . There have so far been no reports describing the ADAM10 expression in sarcoma tissue, but Matsumura et al. demonstrated that ADAM10 was expressed in a fibrosarcoma cell line . The proteolytic activity of ADAM10 is inhibited by TIMP-1 and 3 [6, 8]. Down-regulation of TIMP-1,-3 lead to deregulation of the TIMP-1, -3/ADAM10 pathway, with increased N-cadherin shedding. In fact, Benassi et al.  reported the TIMP-1 expression to be either weak or negative in the majority of 53 high grade soft tissue sarcoma samples, and concluded that low levels of negative regulators of proteolysis may be related to the biological aggressiveness of tumors. There was also a report demonstrating a lack of TIMPs expression in almost all high-grade osteosarcomas . Other authors reported that no or minimal expression of TIMP-1 was detected in musculoskeletal sarcomas, and that there was a significant decrease of serum the TIMP-1 levels in sarcoma patients compared to healthy controls [30, 31]. Therefore, we believe that the high sN-CAD expression level in high grade sarcoma patients might be the result of a disruption of the balance between the activation and suppression of N-cadherin shedding. Further investigations are therefore warranted.
The chief limitation of this study is the small number of samples examined. As is always the case in studies concerning bone and soft tissue sarcoma, a large number of samples could not be collected due to the rarity of the tumor. This makes it difficult to obtain blood samples from a large number of patients with each histopathology. In addition, bone and soft tissue sarcoma has a variety of pathological classifications, and we were only able to investigate a few samples from each pathological classification. As a result, a statistical analysis could not be performed for each pathological classification due to the small number of samples. The second limitation is that our samples were collected under various conditions, such as from the patients with primary sarcoma, sarcoma with multiple metastases, and so on. To improve the efficacy of using sN-CAD as a biomarker, prospective longitudinal blood collection from numerous patients, for example, collection of blood preoperatively, ximmediately after surgery, and at the time when sarcoma recurs, is indispensible to improve the reliability of sN-CAD as a biomarker. The third limitation is concerning the cut-off value. In this study, we determined the cut-off value in consideration of mean sN-CAD and clinical impact. As described above, a large number of samples could not be collected due to the rarity of the tumor and adequate cut-off value is not established. Further investigation is warrant.
Despite these limitations, we believe that this study is of great value for the diagnosis and treatment of these tumors. Clinically, tumor factors such as tumor-node-metastasis staging, differentiation, histological classification, and the tumor size are known to have strong prognostic value. However, a prognostic indicator that could predict the operability, survival rate, and recurrence rate before the pathology of a resected specimen is available (and, hence, before surgery) would be particularly helpful. This would provide important guidance and clues for the selection of an optimal therapeutic approach. In this study, we identified that the pre-therapeutic level of sN-CAD could serve such a purpose, and could be determined by using a simple enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
In conclusion, our results indicate that sN-CAD is present in significantly higher amounts in patients with malignant bone and soft tissue tumors than in healthy subjects. In addition, a high serum sN-CAD level is associated with a poor outcome in musculoskeletal tumor patients. sN-CAD is therefore a potentially valuable pretherapeutic factor for predicting the long-term survival in patients. Further studies involving a larger sample and longer follow-up are necessary to verify these results.
A disintegrin and metalloproteinase 10
Malignant fibrous histiocytomas
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors
Phosphate buffered saline
Bovine serum albumin
Local recurrence-free survival
Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase.
The authors thank the staff members of Mie University Hospital, Shiokawa Hospital, and Toyama Hospital for their corporation with the blood sampling. We thank Mrs. Katsura Chiba and Miss Kayoko Oda for their diligence in preparing the clinical recordings. We gratefully acknowledge Marc Bracke for his technical advice.
- Charalabopoulos K, Gogali A, Dalavaga Y, Daskalopoulos G, Vassiliou M, Bablekos G, Karakosta A, Constantopoulos S: The clinical significance of soluble E-cadherin in nonsmall cell lung cancer. Exp Oncol. 2006, 28: 83-85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cavallaro U, Schaffhauser B, Christofori G: Cadherins and the tumor progression: is it all in a switch?. Cancer Lett. 2002, 176: 123-128. 10.1016/S0304-3835(01)00759-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wheelock MJ, Johnson KR: Cadherins as modulators of cellular phenotype. Ann Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2003, 19: 207-235. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.011102.111135.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baki L, Marambaud P, Efthimiopoulos S, Georgakopoulos A, Wen P, Cui W, Shioi J, Koo E, Ozawa M, Friedrich VL, Robakis NK: Presenilin-1 binds cytoplasmic epithelial cadherin, inhibits cadherin/p120 association, and regulates stability and function of the cadherin/catenin adhesion complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 2381-2386. 10.1073/pnas.041603398.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Jeanes A, Gottardi CJ, Yap AS: Cadherins and cancer: how does cadherin dysfunction promote tumor progression?. Oncogene. 2008, 27: 6920-6929. 10.1038/onc.2008.343.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Maretzky T, Reiss K, Ludwig A, Buchholz J, Scholz F, Proksch E, De Strooper B, Hartmann D, Saftig P: ADAM10 mediates E-cadherin shedding and regulates epithelial cell-cell adhesion, migration, and beta-catenin translocation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 9182-9187. 10.1073/pnas.0500918102.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Van Aken E, De Wever O, Da Rocha AS C, Mareel M: Defective E-cadherin/catenin complexes in human cancer. Virchows Arch. 2001, 439: 725-751.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reiss K, Maretzky T, Ludwig A, Tousseyn T, De Strooper B, Hartmann D, Saftig P: ADAM10 cleavage of N-cadherin and regulation of cell-cell adhesion and beta-catenin nuclear signalling. EMBO J. 2005, 24: 742-752. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600548.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Uemura K, Kuzuya A, Aoyagi N, Ando K, Shimozono Y, Ninomiya H, Shimohama S, Kinoshita A: Amyloid beta inhibits ectodomain shedding of N-cadherin via down-regulation of cell-surface NMDA receptor. Neurosci. 2007, 145: 5-10. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.12.022.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chan AO, Lam SK, Chu KM, Lam CM, Kwok E, Leung SY, Yuen ST, Law SY, Hui WM, Lai KC, Wong CY, Hu HC, Lai CL, Wong J: Soluble E-cadherin is a valid prognostic marker in gastric carcinoma. Gut. 2001, 48: 808-811. 10.1136/gut.48.6.808.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Jaggi M, Nazemi T, Abrahams NA, Baker JJ, Galich A, Smith LM, Balaji KC: N-cadherin switching occurs in high Gleason grade prostate cancer. Prostate. 2006, 66: 193-199. 10.1002/pros.20334.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nagi C, Guttman M, Jaffer S, Qiao R, Keren R, Triana A, Li M, Godbold J, Bleiweiss IJ, Hazan RB: N-cadherin expression in breast cancer: correlation with an aggressive histologic variant—invasive micropapillary carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005, 94: 225-235. 10.1007/s10549-005-7727-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rieger-Christ KM, Cain JW, Braasch JW, Dugan JM, Silverman ML, Bouyounes B, Libertino JA, Summerhayes IC: Expression of classic cadherins type I in urothelial neoplastic progression. Hum Pathol. 2001, 32: 18-23. 10.1053/hupa.2001.21140.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tomita K, Van Bokhoven A, Van Leenders GJLH, Ruijter ETG, Jansen CFJ, Bussemakers MJG, Schalken JA: Cadherin switching in human prostate cancer progression. Cancer Res. 2000, 60: 3650-3654.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Inwards CY, Unni KK: Classification and grading of bone sarcomas. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1995, 9: 545-569.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guillou L, Coindre JM, Bonichon F, Nguyen BB, Terrier P, Collin F, Vilain MO, Mandard AM, Le Doussal V, Leroux A, Jacquemier J, Duplay H, Sastre-Garau X, Costa J: Comparative study of the National Cancer Institute and French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group grading systems in a population of 410 adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 1997, 15: 350-362.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Derycke L, De Wever O, Stove V, Vanhoecke B, Delanghe J, Depypere H, Bracke M: Soluble N-cadherin in human biological fluids. Int J Cancer. 2006, 119: 2895-2900. 10.1002/ijc.22219.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Voulgari A, Pintzas A: Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer metastasis: mechanisms, markers and strategies to overcome drug resistance in the clinic. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009, 1796: 75-90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Foroni C, Broggini M, Generali D, Damia G: Epithelial-mesenchymal transition and breast cancer: Role, molecular mechanisms and clinical impact. Cancer Treat Rev. 2012, 38: 689-697. 10.1016/j.ctrv.2011.11.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bailey T, Biddlestone L, Shepherd N, Barr H, Warner P, Jankowski J: Altered cadherin and catenin complexes in the Barrett’s esophagus-dysplasia-adenocarcinoma sequence: Correlation with disease progression and dedifferentiation. Am J Pathol. 1998, 152: 135-144.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- De Boer CJ, Van Dorst E, Van Krieken H, Jansen-van Rhijn CM, Warnaar SO, Fleuren GJ, Litvinov SV: Changing roles of cadherins and catenins during progression of squamous intraepithelial lesions in the uterine cervix. Am J Pathol. 1999, 155: 505-515. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65146-2.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Cho SB, Lee KH, Lee JH, Park SY, Lee WS, Park CH, Kim HS, Choi SK, Rew JS: Expression of E- and N-cadherin and clinicopathology in hepatocellular carcinoma. Pathol Int. 2008, 58: 635-642. 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2008.02282.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Patel IS, Madan P, Getsios S, Bertrand MA, MacCalman CD: Cadherin switching in ovarian cancer progression. Int J Cancer. 2003, 106: 172-177. 10.1002/ijc.11086.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Laskin WB, Miettinen M: Epithelial-type and neural-type cadherin expression in malignant noncarcinomatous neoplasms with epithelioid features that involve the soft tissues. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002, 126: 425-431.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kashima T, Kawaguchi J, Takeshita S, Kuroda M, Takanashi M, Horiuchi H, Imamura T, Ishikawa Y, Ishida T, Mori S, Machinami R, Kudo A: Anomalous cadherin expression in osteosarcoma. Possible relationships to metastasis and morphogenesis. Am J Pathol. 1999, 155: 1549-1555. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65471-5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Arribas J, Bech-Serra JJ, Santiago-Josefat B: ADAMs, cell migration and cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2006, 25: 57-68. 10.1007/s10555-006-7889-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matsumura S, Demaria S: Up-regulation of the Pro-inflammatory Chemokine CXCL16 is a Common Response of Tumor Cells to Ionizing Radiation. Radiat Res. 2010, 173: 418-425. 10.1667/RR1860.1.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Benassi MS, Magagnoli G, Ponticelli F, Pazzaglia L, Zanella L, Gamberi G, Ragazzini P, Ferrari C, Mercuri M, Picci P: Tissue and serum loss of metalloproteinase inhibitors in high grade soft tissue sarcomas. Histol Histopathol. 2003, 18: 1035-1040.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ferrari C, Benassi S, Ponticelli F, Gamberi G, Ragazzini P, Pazzaglia L, Balladelli A, Bertoni F, Picci P: Role of MMP-9 and its tissue inhibitor TIMP-1 in human osteosarcoma: findings in 42 patients followed for 1–16 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004, 75: 487-491. 10.1080/00016470410001295-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berend KR, Toth AP, Harrelson JM, Layfield LJ, Hey LA, Scully SP: Association between ratio of matrix metalloproteinase-1 to tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 and local recurrence, metastasis, and survival in human chondrosarcoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998, 80: 11-17. 10.1302/0301-620X.80B1.8037.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roebuck MM, Helliwell TR, Chaudhry IH, Kalogrianitis S, Carter S, Kemp GJ, Ritchie DA, Jane MJ, Frostick SP: Matrix metalloproteinase expression is related to angiogenesis and histologic grade in spindle cell soft tissue neoplasms of the extremities. Am J Clin Pathol. 2005, 123: 405-414. 10.1309/LK1V7R99JL41WVKP.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/13/309/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.