Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Cross-sectional study of self-reported physical activity, eating habits and use of complementary medicine in breast cancer survivors

  • Arnoud J Templeton1Email author,
  • Beat Thürlimann1,
  • Michael Baumann1,
  • Michael Mark1,
  • Sarah Stoll1,
  • Madeleine Schwizer1,
  • Daniel Dietrich2 and
  • Thomas Ruhstaller1
BMC Cancer201313:153

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-153

Received: 14 June 2012

Accepted: 19 March 2013

Published: 25 March 2013

Abstract

Background

Besides conventional adjuvant therapies, many breast cancer survivors engage in various activities like exercise, diet and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in order to improve their prognosis. Little is known about specific interests and willingness to participate in institutional programs (e.g. exercise classes).

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study in patients with early breast cancer assessing current physical activity (PA, e.g. 30 minutes brisk walking), attention to eating habits (“diet”), use of CAM, and interest in learning more about these fields. Patients indicating interest in PA counselling received a voucher for a free instruction by a certified physiotherapist. Data were analysed for factors predictive for engagement in the three fields using a stepwise multivariate logistic approach.

Results

Of 342 consecutive patients, 232 (69%) reported to be physically active more than once per week, 299 (87%) paying special attention to nutrition (in most cases fruits, “balanced diet”, low fat), and 159 (46%) use of CAM (vitamins, special teas, homeopathy, herbal medicine, mistletoe). Factors predictive for PA were use of CAM, higher age, and fewer worries about the future. Swiss nationality at birth, physical activity and higher education were predictive for diet; whereas physical activity, higher education and lower age were predictive for use of CAM. No associations between any of the above variables and breast cancer characteristics were found. Around half of the patients reported interest in receiving more information and willingness to attend special counselling. Of 166 vouchers, only 7 (4%) were eventually utilized.

Conclusions

A high proportion of breast cancer survivors report PA, following a specific diet and use of CAM. There were no disease related factors associated with such pursuits, but an association between patient related factors and these fields was observed suggesting general health awareness in some patients. Around half of the patients were interested in more information and indicated willingness to participate in institutional programs. Impact on disease specific and general health including health economic aspects warrants further research.

Keywords

Breast cancer CAM Eating habit Interest Physical activity Survivor

Background

Women with early breast cancer may suffer from toxicities of adjuvant therapies or radiation treatment, may feel fatigued, anxious, or in a low mood state and some become fearful of overexertion and are uncertain of what they can do [1, 2]. In daily practice, many patients raise questions about what lifestyle measures they can modify to improve their health status and disease specific prognosis [3].

Physical exercise has been shown to improve self-esteem, fitness and coping with therapy and there is evidence that physical activity is associated with reduced all-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality [4].

Several studies have suggested that dietary interventions may improve relapse-free survival in breast cancer patients with differential effects on hormone-receptor positive and negative disease [57] whereas other trials did not show a reduction in breast cancer events or mortality during a 7-year follow-up period [8].

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is a growing field in health care and particularly among breast cancer patients [912]. To date, there is no convincing evidence that use of CAM has a major impact on breast cancer outcome [13, 14]. Several CAM interventions have reported an association with improved quality of life (QoL), increased coping effectiveness and alleviation of hot flushes [1518].

Though many patients ask for supportive options there are sparse data on interest of and factors associated with willingness to participate in institutional programs (e.g. exercise classes). The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate what activities Swiss patients with early breast cancer are carrying out and what fields they are interested to receive further information about and/or are willing to actively engage in. The characteristics of these patients were also explored.

Methods

Study population

Consecutive patients from the Breast Centre St. Gallen (a tertiary referring centre in Eastern Switzerland) were offered study participation. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of early breast cancer with no sign of recurrence. All patients provided written informed consent for study participation. Ethical committee approval was received on 11-NOV-2008 (EKSG 08/082/2B) by the Ethikkommission des Kantons St. Gallen and the study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments and according to Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines.

Data collection

All consenting patients were asked to complete a questionnaire (help of the attending nurse was available, if requested) about habits in the fields of physical activity (defined as > 30 minutes brisk walking or equivalent once or more per week), attention to eating habits (“diet”), and use of CAM. Specifically, the questions for eating habits and CAM were “Do you pay special attending to your nutrition?” and “Do you use something from the field of complementary medicine?”, respectively. Both questions could be answered with “yes” or “no” and, in case of “yes” a selection of various modalities was offered including “other” (to be specified) and allowing multiple answers. Patients were also asked if they wished to receive further information and about their willingness to present at a separate occasion for special counselling in their respective fields of interest. Patients indicating interest in more information or willingness to participate in institutional programs (e.g. exercise classes), were offered a free voucher for personal counselling and guided physical training by a certified physiotherapist. Further questions referred to smoking habits, mood, type of health insurance, education, nationality, living situation (alone or with partner, rural or urban), employment situation, and if breast cancer diagnosis had lead to a general change in life. After completion of the questionnaire weight, height and vital signs were recorded and body composition (using Bio Impedance Analyse, BIA 4plus, 83125 Eggstätt, Germany) and peak flow capacity measured. Patient and tumour characteristics including age at diagnosis, tumour stage, pathological grade, hormone-receptor and Her2-status, adjuvant treatment, and concurrent disease were extracted from hospital records. For patients refusing to participate in the study, a non-compliance form was completed documenting the reasons for decline (if given).

Statistical analyses

Objectives of this study were to evaluate what patients with early breast cancer do and are possibly willing to do beside classical adjuvant treatment and to identify predictors for PA, attention to eating habits and use of CAM. We prospectively hypothesized that patients engaging in any of these fields would have a higher socioeconomic status (i.e. private insurance, higher education), be younger, non-smokers, have a lower body mass index (BMI), and no comorbidities.

In a logistic regression model with a binary response variable (no PA or once per week vs. more than once per week and yes vs. no for attention to eating habits and CAM, respectively), and a binary independent variable (two groups) and assuming that at least 25% of the patients would be in either group, a sample size of n = 333 was necessary to detect a difference of 20% in response rates with a power of 80% at a significance level alpha of 0.05 and allowing correlation between the binary predictor of interest and several covariates (R-squared = 0.25). Each independent variable was first analysed in the univariate setting and then all variables with a p-value < 0.1 analysed together in a multivariate model using a stepwise model search to find the relevant predictors. Sample size estimation was conducted with PASS 2008 (NCSS, LLC, Kaysville, Utah, USA) and analyses were performed with S + 8.2 (TIBCO Software Inc., Somerville, MA, USA).

Results

Between December 2008 and September 2010 375 patients were asked to participate in the study while attending the Breast Centre of St. Gallen. 28 (8%) patients declined participation and 5 (1%) patients were excluded from the analysis because they did not fulfil the selection criteria (e.g. no history of breast cancer, metastatic disease) or withdrawal of consent. All remaining 342 (91%) patients completed the questionnaire. Patients’ characteristics, concurrent and prior therapies are presented in Table 1. Median age was 61 years, most patients were Swiss citizens (78%), and median time since diagnosis of breast cancer was 3.1 years. Patients had stage I, IIA, IIB, and IIIA/B in 29%, 35%, 20%, and 16%, respectively, with around 75% endocrine sensitive and 16% Her2 positive disease. Concurrent and prior treatment was typical for patients with early breast cancer.
Table 1

Patients’ characteristics and treatment (n = 342)

 

n

 

%

Age; median (range), years

 

61 (29–94)

 

Time since first diagnosis; median (range), years

 

3.1 (0.1 - 35)

 

Postmenopausal

298

 

87

Mood; median (range), VAS (0 = unhappy, 10 = happy)

 

7.2 (0.8 - 10)

 

Future; median (range), VAS (0 = fear, 10 = confidence)

 

7.9 (0.5 - 10)

 

Body mass index; median (range), kg/m2

 

24.5 (17–48)

 

Living together with partner

258

 

75

Living in rural area

245

 

72

Private health insurance

139

 

41

Education

   

         none or basic

107

 

31

         professional degree

163

 

48

         academic/university degree

67

 

20

Working situation

   

         at home

77

 

23

         working

126

 

37

         retired

112

 

33

         other

27

 

8

Nationality at birth

   

         Swiss

265

 

77

         EU

50

 

15

         other

27

 

8

Current treatment

   

no

116

 

34

yes

226

 

66

         endocrine

197

 

87

         chemotherapy

26

 

12

         anti-Her2

13

 

6

Prior treatment

   

         surgery

338

 

99

         endocrine

124

 

36

         chemotherapy

189

 

55

         anti-Her2

30

 

9

         radiotherapy

244

 

71

Concomitant medication for

   

         diabetes

16

 

5

         hypertension

97

 

28

         depression

24

 

7

         other

54

 

16

Physical activity

More than two thirds (69%) of all patients reported to be physically active more than once per week (i.e. at least twice for ≥ 30 minutes brisk walking or equivalent per week), whereas 20% indicated physical activity once per week (≥ 30 minutes brisk walking or equivalent per week) and only 11% reported not to be physically active (Figure 1A). The rate of interest in further information and willingness to participate in institutional programs (e.g. exercise classes) was highest in the group of patients reporting once weekly physical activity (around 57%). Based on indicated interest in more information or willingness to attend programs, a total of 306 patients were offered a free voucher for a personal instruction by a certified physiotherapist. 140 (46%) of these patients declined the voucher. Of the 166 vouchers which were distributed and after a median follow-up of 31 months (range 16 – 37), only 7 (4%) were utilized for guided training.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2407-13-153/MediaObjects/12885_2012_Article_3785_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Current activity, interest in more information and willingness to present for special counselling, total and with respect to current activity in the respective field: A. physical activity; B. attention to eating habits; C. use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). How to read the figure: E.g. in A. Physical activity, 20% of 338 patients (n = 69, in yellow) reported to be physically active once per week. Of these 69 patients, 58% (n = 40, in green) indicated the wish to receive more information about the impact of physical activity, whereas 41%, n = 28 (in red), did not wish any specific information about this. The blue segment indicates those patients who did not answer the question (missing data). Of the 69 patients being physically active once per week, 55% (n = 38, in green) indicated to be willing to come for special counselling about physical activity and breast cancer, whereas 44%, n = 30 (in red) did not do so. Figure 1A illustrates that the rate of patients willing to come for counselling is lower than the rate of those wishing more information and that the highest interest in further information and/or activity is indicated by those engaging in some physical activity (i.e. once per week).

In order account for the fact that once weekly PA may not be of great importance, predictive factors for PA were analysed comparing those patients engaging in PA more than once per week with those who were inactive or indicated once weekly PA. Predictive factors for PA were higher age, use of CAM, and less anxiety about the future (Table 2).
Table 2

Predictive factors for physical activity, attention to eating habits (diet), CAM, lifestyle change

 

Univariate

 

Multivariate

 

OR

95% CI

P

OR

95% CI

P

Physical Activity (more than once per week [n = 232] vs. less [n = 106])

Use of CAM

1.8

1.1 - 2.9

0.01

1.8

1.1 - 2.9

0.03

Age (per 10 increase)

1.2

1.0 - 1.5

0.05

1.3

1.0 - 1.6

0.04

Positive about future

1.2

1.0 - 1.3

0.02

1.1

1.0 - 1.3

0.03

Attention to eating

2.6

1.4 - 5.1

< 0.01

   

Current treatment

1.5

1.0 - 2.5

0.07

   

Private insurance

1.5

1.1 - 2.2

0.02

   

Mood (happier on VAS)

1.1

1.0 - 1.3

0.03

   

Muscle mass (per 1% increase)

1.1

1.0 - 1.1

< 0.01

   

BMI (per 1 kg/m2 increase)

0.9

0.9 - 1.0

< 0.01

   

Current smoker

0.8

0.6 - 1.0

0.06

   

Co-morbidities present

0.7

0.5 - 0.9

< 0.01

   

Special Attention to Diet (yes [n = 299] vs. no [n = 43])

Swiss nationality at birth

3.9

1.6 - 9.3

< 0.01

3.7

1.5 - 9.3

< 0.01

Physical activity

2.0

1.3 - 3.0

< 0.01

2.3

1.1 - 4.5

0.02

Higher education

1.5

1.1 - 1.8

< 0.01

1.7

1.0 - 2.7

0.05

Age (per 10 years)

1.4

1.0 - 1.8

0.04

   

Use of CAM

2.1

1.1 - 4.1

0.03

   

Living with partner

0.4

0.1 - 1.0

0.05

   

Her2 positive tumour

0.4

0.2 - 0.9

0.03

   

Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) (yes [n = 159] vs. no [n = 175])

Physical activity

1.6

1.2 - 2.3

< 0.01

2.0

1.2 - 3.3

< 0.01

Higher education

1.4

1.1 - 1.6

< 0.01

1.6

1.1 - 2.2

< 0.01

Age (per 10 years)

0.7

0.6 - 0.9

< 0.01

0.7

0.6 - 0.9

< 0.01

Diet

2.1

1.1 - 4.1

0.03

   

Comorbidities

0.7

0.5 - 0.9

< 0.01

   

Postmenopausal

0.5

0.3 - 0.8

< 0.01

   

Lifestyle Changed after Diagnosis of Breast Cancer (yes [n = 154] vs. no [n = 187])

Use of CAM

2.8

1.8 - 4.3

< 0.01

2.2

1.3 - 3.7

< 0.01

Diet

2.0

1.0 - 4.0

0.05

2.2

1.0 - 5.0

0.06

Physical activity

1.4

1.0 - 2.0

0.04

1.6

0.9 - 2.9

0.08

Higher education

1.4

1.2 - 1.7

< 0.01

1.5

1.0 - 2.1

0.03

Mood (happy)

0.9

0.8 - 1.0

0.04

0.9

0.8 - 1.0

0.02

Age (per 10 years increase)

0.5

0.4 - 0.6

< 0.01

0.5

0.4 - 0.7

< 0.01

Postmenopausal

0.5

0.3 - 0.8

< 0.01

   

Comorbidities

0.7

0.6 - 0.9

0.01

   

Eating habits (“diet”)

In total, 299 (87%) patients reported paying attention to eating habits. More vegetables/fruit (80%) consumption, “balanced” and (61%), low-fat diet (60%), and organic products (46%) were the most popular (multiple answers were allowed). The rate of patients reporting interest in more information and willingness to come for an addition consultation focussing in such information was similar in these patients paying attention to eating habits compared to those not doing so (Figure 1B).

Predictive factors for paying special attention to eating habits were Swiss nationality at birth, higher education (university degree or university of applied sciences degree), and physical activity (Table 2).

CAM

Around half of all patients (46%) reported using CAM. Vitamins (38%), teas (29%), homeopathy (19%), herbal medicine (19%), and mistletoe (16%) were the most commonly reported additions to conventional therapies. In most cases (40%), patients had initiated the respective method themselves. A medical doctor or an alternative practitioner was involved in 23% and 14% respectively. Most patients already using CAM were interested in more information on CAM (Figure 1C).

Predictive factors for use of CAM were higher education, physical activity and younger age (Table 2).

Change of life style with breast cancer diagnosis

154 (45%) of patients indicated having changed their lifestyle in general after breast cancer diagnosis. Of these patients, many reported to live more deliberately (23%) or with less stress/calmer (22%), others to look more after themselves (13%), pay more attention to eating habits (10%), physical activity or to have quit smoking. Overall, several patients reported a positive change of their life, whereas only 4% reported a negative impact (e.g. anxiety).

Predictive factors for a change of lifestyle were use of CAM, paying attention to eating habits, physical activity and these patients tended to have a higher education, be happier and younger (Table 2).

Discussion

This cross-sectional study of self-reported activities in the fields of physical activity, eating habits, and use of CAM was conducted in a population of patients with early breast cancer (survivors) that may be considered representative for patients with early breast cancer in Eastern Switzerland. Compliance with completion of the questionnaire was high and understanding of the questions was supported by attending specialist breast nurses. Around half of all patients indicated activities, interest in getting more information about the fields and declared willingness to present on an extra occasion. For physical activity, we explored whether patients expressing interest in more activity are really ready to engage actively. All interested patients were offered a free voucher for training with personal instruction by a certified physiotherapist. Interestingly, nearly half of these patients declined this offer despite declaring interest in the questionnaire. Furthermore, only 4% of the vouchers were eventually used. This pattern is not unusual with psychological research reporting that less than half of lifestyle intentions are successfully realised leaving a considerable ‘intention-behaviour gap’ [19]. Besides this, we think that the surprisingly low rate questions the nature of the training offered or the strength of the actual interest and indicated willingness. Many patients who accepted the voucher reported to be physically active already. This may explain in part the low response rate. The rate of declared physical activity was above what had been expected [20] although a direct comparison is limited by the cut off for physical activity used in our study (“at least 60 min/week” and not 150 min/week as recommended to have an impact on disease recurrence [21]). This may also be reflected by a median body mass index of 24.5 kg/m2 what is lower than reported in other studies conducted in the field of exercise interventions in Western patients with early breast cancer [20, 22]. This possibly reflects a rather healthy life style in many Swiss patients, at least those presenting in our centre. This view is supported by a fairly high life expectancy in Swiss women (84.6 years at birth) and our findings that 87% of all participants reported to pay special attention to eating habits, a rate which is above reported rates in other Western countries such as the United States [23]. Furthermore, a strong predictor for reporting healthy eating was physical activity. Consistent with other data, we did not find a correlation of physical activity or attention to eating habits with participants’ vital signs, body composition, smoking habits or breast cancer characteristics (data not shown) [24]. These findings suggest that activities are rather determined by what is believed to be beneficial by certain patient groups than by the actual risk for recurrence arising from tumour stage and biology.

Nearly half of the participants reported engaging in one or the other field of CAM. Higher education, physical activity and younger age were the strongest predictors of CAM. This rate is similar to that reported in the literature [25, 26]. Though most CAM activities reported in our survey can be considered safe, the high rate of complementary therapies suggests that asking patients specifically about the use of such approaches is probably reasonable to ensure safety, especially when combined with conventional therapies. In the case of CAM, there was a remarkable association of the use and willingness to present on another occasion for special counselling, possibly reflecting the strongest health-belief of the fields studied here. It remains uncertain whether such interest may lead to active participation in institutional programs.

Interestingly, nearly all patients indicated to have changed their life after breast cancer diagnosis. Most reported positive effects like finding it easier to look after themselves or to have reduced stress.

The strengths of our study include the prospective design, the use of prospectively defined research questions and hypotheses allowing for robust sample size calculation, the completeness of data and information on non-compliance minimizing selection bias. The studied cohort also underwent external validation by comparison with data obtained from the cancer registry.

Limitations of this questionnaire-based survey include the possibility of answers intended to please (in contrast to entirely anonymous questioning or objective measures) and of inaccurate answers e.g. with self-reported activities where only the options none, once per week or more than once per week were offered. The validity of a 30 minute cut-off can also be questioned especially as 150 minutes of moderate intensity, physical activity is considered the level needed to be associated with a lower recurrence risk [21, 27]. Furthermore in some cases the boundary of what is to be considered CAM seems arbitrary (e.g. intake of vitamins or teas) and may not have been interpreted in the same way by all patients.

Conclusion

A high proportion of breast cancer survivors engage in activities that are believed to have positive effects. Though data supporting this view are largely lacking for CAM with respect to cancer-specific outcomes, implementation of supporting programs are increasingly requested by patient-groups. The content and setting of such programs remain to be elucidated and their impact further evaluated.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all patients for participation in this study and the nursing staff for their great help in the conduct of this study.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Breast Centre
(2)
Statistics Department, Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK)

References

  1. Gelber RD, Goldhirsch A, Hurny C, Bernhard J, Simes RJ: Quality of life in clinical trials of adjuvant therapies. International breast cancer study group (formerly ludwig group). J Nat Cancer Institute Monographs. 1992, 11 (11): 127-135. http://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/pubmed/?term=1385719,Google Scholar
  2. Winningham ML: Walking program for people with cancer. Getting started. Cancer nursing. 1991, 14 (5): 270-276.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Jones LW, Demark-Wahnefried W: Diet, exercise, and complementary therapies after primary treatment for cancer. lancet oncol. 2006, 7 (12): 1017-1026. 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70976-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ballard-Barbash R, Friedenreich CM, Courneya KS, Siddiqi SM, McTiernan A, Alfano CM: Physical activity, biomarkers, and disease outcomes in cancer survivors: a systematic review. J Nat Cancer Institute. 2012, 104 (11): 815-840. 10.1093/jnci/djs207.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Pierce JP, Stefanick ML, Flatt SW, Natarajan L, Sternfeld B, Madlensky L, Al-Delaimy WK, Thomson CA, Kealey S, Hajek R: Greater survival after breast cancer in physically active women with high vegetable-fruit intake regardless of obesity. J Clin Oncol. 2007, 25 (17): 2345-2351. 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.6819.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Blackburn GL, Wang KA: Dietary fat reduction and breast cancer outcome: results from the Women’s intervention nutrition study (WINS). Am J Clin Nutr. 2007, 86 (3): s878-s881.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chlebowski RT, Blackburn GL, Thomson CA, Nixon DW, Shapiro A, Hoy MK, Goodman MT, Giuliano AE, Karanja N, McAndrew P: Dietary fat reduction and breast cancer outcome: interim efficacy results from the Women’s intervention nutrition study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006, 98 (24): 1767-1776. 10.1093/jnci/djj494.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Pierce JP, Natarajan L, Caan BJ, Parker BA, Greenberg ER, Flatt SW, Rock CL, Kealey S, Al-Delaimy WK, Bardwell WA: Influence of a diet very high in vegetables, fruit, and fiber and low in fat on prognosis following treatment for breast cancer: the Women’s healthy eating and living (WHEL) randomized trial. JAMA. 2007, 298 (3): 289-298. 10.1001/jama.298.3.289.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Nahleh Z, Tabbara IA: Complementary and alternative medicine in breast cancer patients. Palliat Support Care. 2003, 1 (3): 267-273.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Fasching PA, Thiel F, Nicolaisen-Murmann K, Rauh C, Engel J, Lux MP, Beckmann MW, Bani MR: Association of complementary methods with quality of life and life satisfaction in patients with gynecologic and breast malignancies. Support Care Cancer. 2007, 15 (11): 1277-1284. 10.1007/s00520-007-0231-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Nagel G, Hoyer H, Katenkamp D: Use of complementary and alternative medicine by patients with breast cancer: observations from a health-care survey. Support Care Cancer. 2004, 12 (11): 789-796. 10.1007/s00520-004-0675-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dobos GJ, Voiss P, Schwidde I, Choi KE, Paul A, Kirschbaum B, Saha FJ, Kuemmel S: Integrative oncology for breast cancer patients: introduction of an expert-based model. BMC cancer. 2012, 12 (1): 539-10.1186/1471-2407-12-539.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Ernst E, Schmidt K, Baum M: Complementary/Alternative therapies for the treatment of breast cancer. A systematic review of randomized clinical trials and a critique of current terminology. Breast J. 2006, 12 (6): 526-530. 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2006.00340.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Helyer LK, Chin S, Chui BK, Fitzgerald B, Verma S, Rakovitch E, Dranitsaris G, Clemons M: The use of complementary and alternative medicines among patients with locally advanced breast cancer–a descriptive study. BMC Cancer. 2006, 6: 39-10.1186/1471-2407-6-39.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Witek-Janusek L, Albuquerque K, Chroniak KR, Chroniak C, Durazo-Arvizu R, Mathews HL: Effect of mindfulness based stress reduction on immune function, quality of life and coping in women newly diagnosed with early stage breast cancer. Brain Behav Immun. 2008, 22 (6): 969-981. 10.1016/j.bbi.2008.01.012.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Tremblay A, Sheeran L, Aranda SK: Psychoeducational interventions to alleviate hot flashes: a systematic review. Menopause. 2008, 15 (1): 193-202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Deng G, Vickers A, Yeung S, D’Andrea GM, Xiao H, Heerdt AS, Sugarman S, Troso-Sandoval T, Seidman AD, Hudis CA: Randomized, controlled trial of acupuncture for the treatment of hot flashes in breast cancer patients. J clin oncol off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2007, 25 (35): 5584-5590. 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.0774.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Walker EM, Rodriguez AI, Kohn B, Ball RM, Pegg J, Pocock JR, Nunez R, Peterson E, Jakary S, Levine RA: Acupuncture versus venlafaxine for the management of vasomotor symptoms in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J clin oncol off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2010, 28 (4): 634-640. 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.5150.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Allan JL, Johnston M, Campbell N: Why do people fail to turn good intentions into action? The role of executive control processes in the translation of healthy eating intentions into action in young Scottish adults. BMC Publ Health. 2008, 8: 123-10.1186/1471-2458-8-123.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Irwin ML, McTiernan A, Bernstein L, Gilliland FD, Baumgartner R, Baumgartner K, Ballard-Barbash R: Physical activity levels among breast cancer survivors. Med sci sports exercise. 2004, 36 (9): 1484-1491.Google Scholar
  21. Physical activity guidelines advisory committee. Physical activity guidelines advisory committee report, 2008. 2008, Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Sevices, http://www.health.gov/paguidelines/committeereport.aspx,
  22. Friedenreich CM, Woolcott CG, McTiernan A, Ballard-Barbash R, Brant RF, Stanczyk FZ, Terry T, Boyd NF, Yaffe MJ, Irwin ML: Alberta physical activity and breast cancer prevention trial: sex hormone changes in a year-long exercise intervention among postmenopausal women. J clin oncol off j Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2010, 28 (9): 1458-1466. 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.9557.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Thomson CA, Flatt SW, Rock CL, Ritenbaugh C, Newman V, Pierce JP: Increased fruit, vegetable and fiber intake and lower fat intake reported among women previously treated for invasive breast cancer. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002, 102 (6): 801-808. 10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90180-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Chapman GE, Beagan B: Women’s perspectives on nutrition, health, and breast cancer. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2003, 35 (3): 135-141. 10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60197-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. DiGianni LM, Garber JE, Winer EP: Complementary and alternative medicine use among women with breast cancer. J clin oncol off j Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2002, 20 (18 Suppl): 34S-38S.Google Scholar
  26. Pedersen CG, Christensen S, Jensen AB, Zachariae R: Prevalence, socio-demographic and clinical predictors of post-diagnostic utilisation of different types of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in a nationwide cohort of Danish women treated for primary breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2009, 45 (18): 3172-3181. 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.09.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Beasley JM, Kwan ML, Chen WY, Weltzien EK, Kroenke CH, Lu W, Nechuta SJ, Cadmus-Bertram L, Patterson RE, Sternfeld B: Meeting the physical activity guidelines and survival after breast cancer: findings from the after breast cancer pooling project. Breast cancer res treat. 2012, 131 (2): 637-643. 10.1007/s10549-011-1770-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/13/153/prepub

Copyright

© Templeton et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.